Thursday, July 28th, 2011 at 11:25 am  |  28 responses

We On Award Tour…

Lockout or no, there’s no reason the NBA’s best shouldn’t play next season (and not overseas). Here’s how we do it.

by Farmer Jones / @thefarmerjones

So a few weeks ago I have an idea. Last week, over beers and humidity and soccer, I share it with Ben Osborne; sufficiently influenced by the preceding, he thinks it’s cool. I tweet it a couple days ago and get several dozen enthusiastic RTs. None of this makes me right, exactly, but it’s evidence on my behalf.

This is about the lockout.

I am not the first person to have an idea about the lockout. I am not even the first person to have a variation of this particular idea, and so respect to Mike Tillery, and maybe also to somebody at the Huffington Post, who apparently also had a similar idea, although I don’t read their shit and I’m not going to start now. In a way, this idea seems obvious enough that I feel like everyone should’ve thought of it. But I think my idea is different enough, and until someone gives me a really good reason why it won’t work, I will believe that it could.

Here’s what I got: Starting Tuesday, November 1, the best basketball players on the planet are getting paid to play basketball again. They are in uniform. They are playing to packed arenas in North America (because this overseas shit is not happening, at least not to any extent that’s going to change anything). Their games are on TV. And again (this part is important), they are getting paid.

The men who own the NBA are not.

I don’t care what you call this thing, but don’t call it a competing league. It’s not a league. It’s a tour. It’s U2, or it’s Jay and Ye. Whatever you’re into. Let’s say it’s 60 dates in 40 cities; every NBA city, and a lot of little hovels like Kansas City and San Diego and Seattle that could only ever dream of hosting a professional basketball game (you see what I did there). What it is, mostly, is viable.

(I should mention: I used the word “Streetball” in my tweet on this topic, by which I meant the idea of a touring basketball showcase. Understandably, a lot of people seemed to think I meant actually playing on blacktop. But that doesn’t work. Not if we’re going to generate serious money on this thing. Which—or at least the threat of which—is the point.)

Maybe it’s a double-header every night. Maybe a triple-header, three 30-minute games or something. It doesn’t really matter. The specifics will get figured out. What’s important is that, whether you’ve got set rosters or a rotating cast, four teams or six, you’ve got basketball games. Every team as loaded as the Miami Heat (stop it), bragging rights on the line every night. This is not All-Star weekend. These guys will be playing like it matters. Because it will.

You sponsor it. Every night it’s the Stars of Basketball World Tour, or a more clever name if you’ve got one, sponsored by Mercedes or Twitter or whoever. A title sponsor, and a hundred others in the small print, all paying to be a part of it. Then you’ve got ticket sales. If you live in an NBA city, and you think this might be your only chance to see KD and Kobe and Dwight in person this year, you’ll pay out the nose for these seats. If you don’t live in an NBA city and these guys come through? Like you’d miss it for anything.

Whenever possible, you play to the locals. Make sure you have one or two guys from every local team when you play in NBA cities. Common sense.

You promote it. Hard. You become more fan friendly than you’ve ever been, even if it’s only a temporary front and you don’t really mean it, which none of us will hold against you, because we just want our games back. Autograph signings. Twitter contests. Surprise appearances at local schools. Whatever feel-good crap will make you look good and make the owners realize they’re losing ground.

Oh, and you have music. Duh. Rappers, sure, but not just rappers. Again, this isn’t actually “streetball.” Get some of those crappy white bands in there that the kids like, too. Keep it relevant, but also relatively G-rated. You need to appeal to at least some of the same people who buy actual NBA tickets. (But you also should give away lots of tickets to poor people who can’t afford NBA tickets, too, because it’s both the smart and the decent thing to do.)

And you have to do it smart.

You start setting this up now, too, because the point is pressure. The point is saying to the owners, “You think you have all the leverage and can outlast us. Here’s how wrong you are.” You schedule this just like Cirque du Soleil or Katy Perry or Taylor Swift do, months in advance, so that every one of these gyms is sold out before you ever hit town.

That’s what you do. You get 20 or 30 of the top 50 or 75 guys in the NBA, and you put together a tour, and you sell out gyms all over the country, letting Bron and Wade and Dirk make kids smile. And you get paid—maybe not what you’re usually paid, but more than enough to justify it, and a hell of a lot more than you’re getting while locked out—to take away leverage from the owners.

You don’t worry about the fact that something like three-fourths of the League is left out in this equation, because it’s only temporary. You assume going in you’re not going play most of these games anyway (money-back guarantees on all tickets sold, fans), because you’re only doing this to end the lockout. On your terms.

And if the owners don’t cave, go ahead and play. You figured you’d be playing basketball and flying around a lot from November to April anyway.

So set this up, somebody. (Probably not you, Billy Hunter. I’m not sure I’d trust you to negotiate dessert options with my 3-year-old.) I know the agents are talking; maybe you can be on the same page about something for once. Really, it shouldn’t be that hard. Take the initiative. End this shit. Start now. Thank you.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , ,

  • arock410215

    only problem is that in some of these nba cities some of those same owners own the arenas some of these games would played in…other than that make it happen

  • MikeC.

    I like the sounds of this. Hit the non-NBA cities first. Get new fans by going to cities that have never had high-level basketball played live. The hardcore fans like us will always be around. This is a chance for the players to gain some goodwill with the public and for the superstars to further their “brands”. Most of all, the fans get to see some hoops.

  • World

    i can digg it

  • http://twitter.com/smileyoufckers Bryan

    You stole my idea, Jones.

  • http://slamonline.com Ryan Jones

    I steal all your ideas, Bryan. I don’t see how this is news.

  • http://slamonline.com Ryan Jones

    Good point, arock, and one I thought about. Guessing you can work around it in most cities (Nassau & Newark for NY area, Anaheim for L.A., etc).

  • Genuivere

    Good idea. Let’s forward this to everyone in the world. Let’s make this happen, I need my NBA fix, baseball is killing me, come on. if we don’t get the arena’s we can go street or use the colleges. This can happen somebody just has to break this out like D will did with playing overseas. Legoo

  • nicK.

    Why not have the games in all the major division 1 schools? that way you dont have to deal with the nba owners, the tickets would be more expensive because there would be less of them, so your guaranteed a sell out every night with really expensive tickets. then you have arenas in all those states that are to small for an nba team. you could potentially go to all 50 states (not counting alaska)

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    IF you could just hold this in Phoenix. And invite Sarver to watch it via a pull down projection screen right in-front of his house. THanks Jones

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    yeah, that was the main problem I saw with the idea when Tillery floated it. One, the owners have deals with these arenas and Two, how do you convince the majority of players who will not be getting money that this sacrifice will benefit them?
    Your mega stars will play, but the middle class cats will sit, and that means they won’t eat. The only way it works is if the money is split amongst everyone, which means that the cats actually working will be subsidizing the ones who are not, and I can already see the complaints about that.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Well if you have all the players getting paid the same amount for the event, and then the big nae guys getting individual sponsors, like LeBron could have a sponsorship from Smart Water or whatever. Wouldn’t that work?

  • http://slamonline.com Ryan Jones

    It’s a valid question, Allenp. As stated, I think the threat of this — actually scheduling the games now — is the important part, to show it’s serious. Beyond that, maybe you rotate dudes in and out, so that if it goes the distance, every interested player gets 2 or 3 games to make some money?

  • http://twitter.com/smileyoufckers Bryan

    The money will eventually come, no one is paying to see the owners sit around their logo. Wherever he players play, the TV deals will follow.

  • http://slamonline.com Ben Osborne

    Love it! Thanks Ryan.

  • http://twitter.com/BeezKneezy LA Huey

    Doesn’t have to be just superstars. Couldn’t it just be a down-sized version every team (like a 6-8 man rotation)? Would still feature the Roses and Durants while including enough Korvers and Ibakas to keep the enough of the rank and file happy.

  • GipTheClip

    Brilliant!

  • http://www.werebucked.com K L

    I was thinking along the same lines a couple of weeks ago:

    http://werebucked.com/2011/07/04/the-milwaukee-bucks-and-the-players-advantage-in-the-nba-lockout/

    If the players go through with this idea, the lockout ends sooner. Guaranteed.

  • http://SLAMonline.com Jeremy Bauman

    Have thought of this idea, for sure, but very well thought out and logical. As you stated at the end, the problem with this is everybody working together–with the same coordinated goals–is the biggest problem.

    They really should have been on this from the jump…

  • Val

    My proposal is to include in your tour some european or asian locations: basketball is not just USA,it’s universal and as we are no longer talking about NBA or franchises,but just players playing a sport we all love,the tour should just be.global,or at.least that’s what the.fans all over the world have been waiting for.

  • chingy

    I don’t think location is a problem. Im sure Jerry Jones (and other NFL owners) will jump on this idea again to have Cowboys stadium host one of these games.

  • http://espn.com ubestNOTmiss

    KD got dunked on by japeth aguilar. priceless

  • http://slamonline.com Ugh

    I expect this will happen on some scale.
    As the majority (or all) agents handle both playing contracts and merchandising/sponsorship contracts, it’s in the interests of agents to get the players playing for at least some money and ‘brand stimulation’ (for want of a better word) of their players.
    While shoe sales probably won’t dip this season, jersey sales, hats, t-shirts surely will. Licensed sports companies are going to want to make up for that by selling new product lines, even to a limited degree for a limited season tour.
    Barnstorming pro ball. I can dig this a lot.

  • http://www.optimabbc.be Max

    Excellent!

  • jordanism99

    Great idea but I seriously think playing in Drew league or Goodman league is a better option.

  • Sonicproof

    Austin,Tx!!!

  • idrees

    don’t no one forget canada ;)

  • add

    do it

  • Lan

    this idea is akin to F1 Racing. It could work. But do it globally!

Advertisement