Friday, May 15th, 2009 at 12:52 pm  |  146 responses

Kobe’s Biggest Game…

Will be this Sunday. Seriously.

Kobe Bryant & Shane Battier

by John Krolik

On Saturday, ESPN will air, commercial-free, a highly positive documentary about the man who, despite what people will tell you about some kid from Akron who people are starting to notice, is still the NBA’s marquee name, and maybe the biggest name in team sports. (If you didn’t know this, then I have some things to tell you about the price of footlong sandwiches and Who Knows Drama.) The next day, Kobe Bryant will suit up for the game with the highest stakes in any game of what is already a sure-fire Hall Of Fame Career.

Now, I realize this sounds crazy. Kobe’s got three rings and two more conference championships to his name already. How could a second-round game possibly be the most important one of his career? Because for all the championships, all the big shots, all the 40-point explosions against teams that thought they could get past him, Kobe has never been pushed to the precipice of true disappointment. Has Kobe’s legacy really ever been put in a “do or die” game before?

The three championships were his greatest triumph, and his stellar play en route to getting those rings is something that will always be a huge point in his favor. But was the pressure ever really on his shoulders like it is now? He got his first ring, the monkey that took so many great players so many years to get off their back, if they ever did, at 22 years old, the clear beta dog on a team carried to the championship by Shaq averaging 30/15/3 throughout the entire playoffs while Kobe averaged a clean, complimentary 22.

If he’d slipped up, the onus would have been on Shaq to cover for him, and even an epic screwup would have been filed, like his airballs against the Jazz, as the growing pains of a great player trying to find himself. ‘01-02? The Lakers lost one game throughout the Playoffs. It’s safe to say Kobe never really felt anything remotely resembling fear. ‘02-03, when the Lakers finally got pushed to seven games? Not only does winning two championships in a row take a lot of pressure to prove yourself off your shoulders, but they were up against an amazing Kings team that many (still) believe was the best team in the NBA that year. It’s safe to say Kobe would’ve escaped any real scrutiny even if Horry misses that shot and the Kings don’t melt down in Game 6. Oh, and he was still only 24 years old.

Then the ‘03-04 run, where the Lakers came up short despite starting four Hall of Famers? They never got pushed to seven games in their run to the Finals and were ambushed so effectively and quickly that there was never even a series-defining game that everybody knew coming in was going to end up defining the series or a career. Game 7 against Phoenix in the first round of the 35 ppg year? They were a No. 7 seed going up against a No. 2 seed and starting Kwame Brown and Smush Parker. Kobe was playing with house money in those playoffs.

And last year, the Lakers were just good enough against the Spurs (nobody realizes just how evenly matched they were, and how important a massive series from Kobe was to the Lakers winning, even in five games), and just bad enough against the Celtics (the series-defining collapse by the Lakers came out of the blue and was on the whKobe Bryant & Pau Gasolole team, and what was Kobe supposed to do in the elimination game? Score 90?) so that there was never a “this is the game for all the marbles” feel to either series. And besides, the Celtics were a veteran team with 66 wins and lightning in a bottle, and it looked like the Lakers, with the MVP, the best offensive big man in basketball and a perfect fit for the triangle, a Lamar Odom, and a young top-5 center coming back the following season, were all set to make a dominant championship run next year.

Next year is now. And all has not gone as planned. Bynum is hurt. Again. Pau can’t find his way, and Odom seems to veer in and out. And the Lakers are facing an elimination game against a team they have no business losing to, a fifth-seeded team with its two best-known players out and its de facto leader running around in circles and tossing up jumpers like he’s on fire. A Game 7 loss would be nothing short of an unmitigated and complete failure on the part of the Lakers, and by proxy, Kobe Bryant.

My dad has an old maxim that proves itself true over and over again and is especially true in the world of sports; history is the propaganda of the victors. And whoever wins on Sunday is going to shape a lot of history. The Celtics found their resolve by allowing the Hawks and Cavaliers to take them to seven games—the post-championship Pistons allowing teams to push them was due to a lack of killer instinct. Bill Russell was the ultimate winner and Wilt Chamberlain was the ultimate choker, in part because Frank Selvy missed a wide-open 15-footer that would have won the Lakers a Game 7 against Russell.

And this maxim proves doubly true when a player is so great that it becomes impossible to extricate him from his team, as is the case with Kobe Bryant. No matter if Lamar and Pau go off for 50 or go 0-21 from the field, the Lakers’ successes and failures will always end up pinned, to an unfair degree in both cases, on Kobe. We like to pretend that games like the one Sunday “reveal the true nature” of great players, which is just untrue-win or lose, 50-point game or 3-25 game; Kobe Bryant is what he is; the most gifted perimeter scorer since (and in terms of being able to explode for a stupid number of points in a given game, maybe even better than) Jordan, a stunning competitor, a guy who has distilled scoring to a science with a plethora of impossible moves and combined it with balance, athleticism, and grace to make the prettiest inside/out game in the history of the game, a man who has delivered on the biggest possible stage and also had his share of failures, a man so determined to find his own purpose on a basketball court he can lose touch with his team, but who inspires killer instinct by osmosis like few others when he finds that purpose.

If the Lakers win, there’s a lot still to be written, but there’s a lot that changes. The Nuggets have played great basketball, but the Playoffs are about matchups, and Denver’s primarily an offensive squad; they don’t make it a priority to shut down a team’s offensive flow like the Rockets do, and when these Lakers are able to get into an offensive flow, they’re all but unbeatable. And they have no answer for Kobe—in a track-meet game with Dahntay Jones (an anti-Battier defensively—the type of young, athletic, inexperienced defender Kobe calmly destroys with intelligence, savvy, and patience), Carmelo Anthony (a still-average defender who’s a big enough name so that Kobe might make it his personal mission to destroy him),Kobe Bryant & Ron Artest and J.R. Smith (please) attempting to guard him, there’s an excellent chance that the Lakers will reach the finals behind a slew of 40-point barrages from Kobe. And in the finals, there’s no shame in losing to whichever one of the three best defensive teams in the League that comes out of the East, and the matchups are pretty favorable in those scenarios as well. Make no mistake—the Kobe Bryant that’s struggling to beat this depleted Rockets team is the same man who could easily be hoisting the Bill Russell trophy in a few weeks’ time.

But if these Lakers somehow lose, history changes. Lamar Odom becomes a free-agent, and the Laker brass might be dumb enough to let him walk after a weak series. Pau’s a very good player who played like an absolute force all year. Will he replicate that? Will this team still have championship fire after being upset, or will they go into a Mavericks-like slide after losing to the Warriors? Will Bynum ever play to his potential? Does Kobe have enough left in his knees for another 82 games of MVP-level ball? Windows in the NBA are small. And if they lose, history will go to work on Kobe’s resume. The slow path Kobe’s taken to escape from Shaq’s shadow and lead a team to the promised land by himself turns into a cautionary tale, a journey began by ego and ending in misery. Near-misses against the Pistons and Celtics turn into just plain misses. Shane Battier goes from Kobe’s greatest challenge into the Man Who Stopped the Mamba. If he goes off and captures the final game, he was saving his best for when it mattered most-if he’s stopped, then we’re forced to look at the fact he’s shot 32-75 in the Lakers’ three losses and conclude that Kobe might just not have “it” anymore.

Chances are that the Lakers are going to come out with that home crowd behind them and their backs against the wall and simply roll over the Rockets in Game 7, and the test the Rockets gave them will be forgotten as a footnote, a speed-bump toward whatever meaningful events Kobe will end up taking part in over the final two rounds of these playoffs. But that doesn’t mean these next 48 hours are any less important, or worthy of deep meditation. The NBA’s biggest name and the man who is, for better or worse, the defining player of this

generation has been forced to stare into the abyss and respond to what he sees. This is a surpassing player at what (appears to be, but this isn’t a guarantee) the sunset of his incandescent prime, forced to put his legacy and all of his accomplishments over the past seven years since Shaq left on the line and see them invalidated or made into a tale of triumph based on what happens over 48 minutes at the Staples Center. After the final buzzer sounds, the victors will write the history of what happened, manipulating all of what happened into a black-and-white narrative that will bend what really happened into a convenient story.

But all of this is why it’s so important to sit and truly appreciate these next 48 hours, to embrace Kobe Bryant in his most uncertain hours. In David Foster Wallace’s brilliant Kenyon commencement address, he opens with an old joke: a wise fish and a young fish are swimming along. The old fish says “Boy, the water sure is nice today.” The young one responds “What the heck is water?” The 81 points, the playoff defeats, the beautiful jumpers, the impossible passes, the taunts, the arrogance, the brilliance, the 4th quarter takeovers, the aloofness, the games where forced jumper after forced jumper falls short, the player who elevated scoring into art and turned the art of a 10-man game into nothing more than scoring. The single-minded and arrogant volume shooter who allowed the most talented team in the League to lose to the lowly Rockets is not Kobe. The hero who reached into his resolve and carried a worn team over the Rockets and towards a championship is not Kobe. The Kobe in Spike Lee’s movie is not Kobe. This is Kobe. This is water. Beneath all of what we need him to be, want him to be, say he is, this is a man. A man who has played some of the best basketball ever played, but a man, and for the next 48 hours he will be allowed to exist as one in all of our eyes. OK, I’ll be a little disappointed if Game 7 ends up being a blowout.

John Krolik is a SLAM columnist who also writes for Cavs: The Blog and Free Darko. He studies creative writing at USC.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , ,

  • vic21

    I freakin love this

  • http://www.twitter.com/TheDiesel Anton

    Adam Morrison needs to tell Kobe to give him the ball.

  • Cornbred

    As I understand this, if the Lakers ever lose, like last year, it’s not Kobe’s fault but because of the rest of the team but if the Lakers win then forget the team – crown Kobe.

    Makes sense to me but maybe not to the rest of the Lakers. Maybe if there were a little less Kobe and a little more team – there would be less losses to average teams missing two starters.

  • Hello? Wilt Chamberlain is that you?

    It has equally at much at stake for Phil and probably more so but on more of a “he’s past it” sense than legacy defining. 10 > 3 after all…

  • Hello? Wilt Chamberlain is that you?

    Great article. One of the best things I’ve read in a while. I’m so excited for this game and hope LA can do the business. Wish I could watch it but the only coverage I get in the UK (from Australia… RIP NBL) is ONE game a week which is DELAYED coverage AND edited to condense it.

  • KILLAGORILLA

    EFF KOBE!! MJ never needed to be humiliated by an undermanned squad to have a great game. Lebron doesn’t either..Kobe may be the game’s best scorer, but that’s all he is. It also doesn’t help that the LA squad is filled with douche-hammers (except Odom). I stay with my original pick – MY ROCKETS WIN IN 7

  • Hello? Wilt Chamberlain is that you?

    Oh and whoever said that Christiano Ronaldo is the biggest name in team sports is right. Unfortunately he’s (Christiano) a combination of Kobe Bryant and (the worst parts of) Vlade Divac (and I ain’t takin bout his beard).
    If y’all think Kobe is an A hole he’s Mr Jo Humble compared to that jack*ss

  • KILLAGORILLA

    @cornbread – if you didn’t catch a clue last year when we broke the win-streak record, this team is anything but average.

  • Asia’s Finest

    Love the article, hate the player

  • http://www.cavstheblog.com John Krolik

    Just a quick thing here-I know about soccer. I thought of adding the “American team sports” caveat, but thought that was too clunky of a sentence to justify covering that base. Congratulations, whoever pointed that out-you are that guy.

  • http://www.twitter.com/TheDiesel Anton
  • Hello? Wilt Chamberlain is that you?

    Its all in the eye of the beholder anyway John. If Basketball is your world then so be Kobe or Lebron’s kingship in it. In semi related news/commenting, I’m hoping that Lionel Messi dethrones Christiano in a couple weeks time in Rome.

  • Ted Dong

    Spike Lee is probably one of the best directors in the history of film. I’d just like to put that out there. One of my top 10 favorites.

  • Ted Dong

    LET’S GO ROCKETS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Tommy Patron

    This piece is great! I hope Kobe loses.

  • http://slamonline.com/ Ryne Nelson

    Strangest .gif ever, Anton.

  • Kas

    Second greatest player in NBA history

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    Krolik, maybe You should consider that your targeted audience is not strictly American. When you write that Kobe is probably the most known team-sport athlete (or whatever the exact wording was), it makes you seem oblivious to that other team-sport, soccer as you call it. Hence make you come of as ignorant, considering that you; a sportswriter, doesn’t either know or respect the sport which is by far the most popular in the world. I was giving you props for a wellwritten article – even though I hate Kobe – but just pointed out, what for me was an obvious error – no mudslinging going on. I’m sorry if I hurt you feelings, and that critism apparently don’t sit well with you. But the next time one of your readers, take the time to comment on your writing. Do me a favor and try not to come of as just as arrogant , as the player/team you apparently love.

  • flip

    this article is way off base. no question kobe’s legacy will be affected by the outcome of this game. but not to this degree..not even close. jordan didn’t single handedly carry his teams to multiple rings, and he had quite a few last-shot heroics from some guys with a last name of kerr and paxon. (if they missed those shots, what would be jordan’s legacy now?) also had some guy named pippen…heard he’s considered top 50 players of all time by some. Is there anyone close to those three players on the laker teams of the last two years? i can certainly point to a few guys in the kobe/shaq era (mmm.some guy named horry? didn’t he hit some clutch shots? i think he did it with a few teams other than the lakers…) i have neither the time nor energy to point out the other flaws in this article. but it’s duly noted that krolik studies creative writing.

  • http://fashionsensei.files.wordpress.com/2008/02/jackie-moon.jpg Jackie Moon

    “No matter if Lamar and Pau go off for 50 or go 0-21 from the field, the Lakers’ successes and failures will always end up pinned, to an unfair degree in both cases, on Kobe.”

    I only agree with the 0-21 from the field part. If Lamar or Pau go off for 50, Kobe’s contributions will still be diminished by the general public.

    So the only way he “wins” in the eyes of some is if Lamar and Pau go 0-21, and Kobe goes off for 50, and the Lakers win. Which is an near impossible standard, a standard which you would not even hold up to the best player in the last 20 years in the NBA.

  • http://www.showmeyourwits.com showmeyourwits

    If we’re talking volume of people (and with a statement like ‘most-known’, we are) I would venture to say that Kobe’s immense popularity in China lends credibility to that statement. Either way, it is not something that is easily quantified so calling out the author for an “error” seems a little extreme, especially since the statement was prefaced by the word maybe, implying that the following words were conjecture.

  • Trikz

    I kinda agree with the guy saying about soccer tho us Europeans get annoyed with Americans thinking only their sports exist and calling their teams “World Champions” how can you be world champions of the NATIONAL basketball assosiation.

  • http://www.cavstheblog.com John Krolik

    Alright, let’s put this away.

    soccer guy-I am sorry if I offended you. It did slip my mind that you could actually have been from Europe, which legitimizes things. Americans who say “hey, soccer’s the most important sport in the world, all our sports are crap!” tend to be people who brag about not watching non-HBO tv and voted for Ron Paul. Hence the “that guy” statement-it’s much different knowing you’re actually European. It’s hard to explain. I got frustrated by your comment because it wasn’t an “error” on my part-it was a conscious decision to leave out putting in yet more caveats and taking away from the sentence flow and impact of what I was saying. If parentheses are everywhere, the piece gets distracted and the impact lessens. I believe it was a reasonable assumption that I am not an idiot and know of soccer’s popularity, so the clause was unnecessary. You don’t hear the phrase “except the world cup” a lot during Super Bowl coverage, because we’re trying to keep the focus on the Super Bowl. Especially when you write a piece about an athlete as divisive as Kobe, every sentence is a delicate balancing act between covering your bases and coming out with some sort of forceful opinion, so to see you jump to the conclusion that I’m ignorant and take the opportunity to get self-righteous instead of respecting the fact that trying to write a piece that pleases everybody will ultimately be unreadable strikes me as disrespectful to what I do and the work that goes into crafting even throw-away sentences. Again, I apologize if this made me seem arrogant or dismissive. And to understand where I’m coming from with the soccer thing, go to #80 on Stuff White People Like.

  • jogabonito

    Man-who-stopped-Kobe – n. a person who has prevented Kobe from getting a championship. see: Posey, James; Prince, Tayshaun

  • http://www.slamonline.com Ryan Jones

    John, you shouldn’t take these things so personally. Also, if you hate too hard on soccer, you’ll lose about 78 percent of the current/former Slam brain trust. Also, SWPL is lame.

  • http://www.triplejunearthed.com/dacre Dacre

    Fine work! Here’s a thought, has there ever been a more talented athlete that more people have outspokenly stated they want to see lose? I couldn’t think of anyone else. Shame really.

  • http://www.slamonline.com John D

    Kobe got his first ring at 21, not 22. And the Horry shot was when he was 23, not 24. Other than that, nice column.

  • http://www.cavstheblog.com John Krolik

    Dacre-Barry Bonds. Alex Rodriguez. Muhammad Ali and Wilt in their day. In short, yes.

  • http://www.slamonline.com John D

    Oh, and the Lakers lost only 1 game in the playoffs in ’00-’01, not ’01-’02. And the Lakers first got pushed to 7 games in ’01-’02, not ’02-03.

  • http://www.slamonline.com John D

    But I’m nitpicking.

  • http://idunkonthem.blogspot.com/ albie1kenobi

    facts are facts though…
    but yes, amen on what Farmer says, Mr Krolik. of course it sucks to get called out for something you put a lot of effort and thoughts into, but i’m sure you are already used to that if you studying creative writing at USC (or any colleges/universities). your profs/TAs must have already given you tons of ridiculous feedbacks by now for all your works. at least that’s the impression i get from non-tech classes i used to take.

  • rand33p

    damn a lot of slam writers (in this case playing the role of ocmmenters) are “kobe-haters”

  • Kristian

    FIX THE YEARS AND HIS AGE IN THIS ARTICLE!

    He was 21 when he won his 1st Championship in 99-2000. Lakers lost only one game in 00-01 and got pushed to 7 in 01-02 and so on…

  • Kristian

    you’re leaving out 02-03 when they lost to the Spurs in 6 games and the Spurs went on to win the Championship. There was a year in between before they went out and signed Malone and Payton.

    Great article though.

  • Krishan

    LZ you are that guy. RE: a stupid moron. You do realize that this is a baketball website, yes? WAIT EVERYONE WHAT ABOUT SOCCER? Like every article should have a disclaimer in italics in the header: OF COURSE SOCCER IS MORE POPULAR THAN BASKETBALL DUH

  • Rachel

    Good grief, I know the Spurs are ignored, but now everyone’s completely forgetten one of their championship seasons! John D is right about the one-loss 2001 playoffs and seven-game Kings classic in 2002, but there’s also the little matter that it was the Spurs who ended the Lakers’ championship run in 2003. Then it was in 2004 that the Lakers reloaded with Payton and Malone but lost in the Finals to the Pistons.

    This isn’t nitpicking because the article’s premise, that “Kobe has never been pushed to the precipice of true disappointment” falls apart once you remember those 2003 semifinals against the Spurs. The Lakers had a chance to fourpeat, something no one had done since the 60′s Celtics. Their failure was a huge disappointment to Kobe, as no one could doubt who saw him crying on the court in the final minutes and vowing to Michelle Tafoya afterward in a tearful voice to “push myself to exhaustion” for next year. He hadn’t played well in the elimination game, especially not in the fourth quarter when he normally was a Spur killer.

  • http://hibachi20.blogspot.com/ Moose

    ^Kobe is a big soccer fan though, Krishan (FC Barcelona to be specific).^

  • jay

    i expect a 50 pt game from kobe..he wants to shut the critics up and has a flair for the dramatic..it has come to this…well i think he wants to take back the number 1 spot!

  • http://fashionvoices.com Jack

    Call me crazy but I think Phil threw the game to bring it back to LA. So owners and NBA make more $$$.

    With game 6 on the line, why do you wait til 7 minutes left to let Kobe in the game? There were plenty of fouls, time outs with 9 and 8 minutes left to get Kobe back in. In game one and three, Kobe started the 4th quarter.

    In game 6, a decisive game, Kobe only played 38 minutes – the least minutes he played besides two blow out games.

    It’s a theory, but basically impossible to prove.

  • http://www.twitter.com/TheDiesel Anton

    Blame it on the a-a-a-a-a-a-@sshole

  • http://antwonomous.blogspot.com Antwonomous

    Great work as always, Krolik, although you did fudge those L.A. championship years, and Kob’ was 21 at the time of the first title.

    In my opinion, this will be the biggest game of Kobe’s career – if they lose. If they win, they will only have done what they were supposed to do, what they should have done two games ago. If they lose, however, to a clearly inferior Rockets team, a Rockets team that would have then beaten them three of the last four games of the series with Ron Artest and a bunch of role players, in the second round, after a 65-win season in which anything less than a championship is complete and utter failure, it will all fall on Kobe, and it will be over for him. L.A. is the only team with a shot to beat LeBron, and if they don’t he takes over, starting with a ring this year, and then uninterrupted titles for the subsequent six years.

    I think if Kobe gets a ring this year, there is hope for a mini-dynasty of his own. If not, then he might as well retire, his legacy never to reach its potential, a cautionary tale of a supremely talented man who failed not because of any lack of ability, but because of a couple of fatal flaws (hubris and selfishness) and the basketball Gods punishment of him for it. Karma stricken.

  • http://sportzin.com Joey E.

    If nothing changes from here on out, you know injuries and stuff, the lakers will win. and will beat Denver in 5 or 6

    big if though, right?

  • Jeff McInnis

    There is NO WAY the NBA will let the Lakers lose this game. It will be 8 on 5 all day…and it won’t be close. Way, way too predictable. That’s why Phil’s not worried…he knows what will happen. What does he have to worry about? Rocket’s post players in foul trouble early. Kobe to the line early and often. Rockets draw contact under the basket but can’t get to the line. Seen it all over and over and over and over.

    It was dialed up before the season…Kobe v LeBron. Stern’s wishes are coming true…like they amazingly do year after year.

  • Nnam

    Andrew Bynum is not walking through that door….oh wait..

  • http://kb24.com Bigi

    *nods*

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    Krolik, I understand your argument about crafting sentences and keeping the flow of the article. Btw I believe you succeded, as the article is very wellwritten. I wasn’t trying to be disrespectfull to the work you put in, at all. I myself is in the communications business, and know full well how writing an article can be like walking a tightrope. So I apologize if I came of that way. My critism concerns solely your choice of ‘and maybe the biggest name in team sports’, it’s like writing an article about English politics, and saying Gordon Brown is maybe the most powerfull politician in the world – just plain wrong, we all know Obama is. Facts are facts, and they should be respected and communicated as such. Succesfull journalism/communications is all about connecting with your targetgroup(s). I do realize that your core targetgroup is the American reader. But SLAM Online has a lot of international readers and commentators, hence they (we) should be thought of as well. And really you wouldn’t have needed any caveouts to make it fly, had you just added a ‘US’ or ‘Amercian’ in front of team sports, there would have been no error. I don’t think your either a idiot or ignorant, as your writing skills and argumentation suggests otherwise. But the sentence ‘It did slip my mind that you could actually have been from Europe’ just demonstrates that you really didn’t contemplate your audience, or that it is not necessary American, before writing the article or answering to my critism. I’m sorry to say it but not contemplating ones audience is a rookie mistake in any communication situation. Sorry for being nitpicking at details, but just as I go to SLAM Online to pick up writing tricks from you guys, I feel that I have to point it out, when you guys make what to me was a blatant mistake. Otherwise keep up the good work, I read your LeBron vs. Kobe piece on your blog, and besides agreeing with your points, found it to be very wellwritten. Hope you take this post for what it is meant to be; constructive critism, and not mudslinging. Best regards Lz.

  • Danny W

    Flip said – heroics from some guys with a last name of kerr and paxon. (if they missed those shots, what would be jordan’s legacy now? – That really got me thinking, would that have diminished Mike’s legacy? Would he lose the god like status, and be thought of as a choker, who passed up the last shot, to some role players?

    Anyhow, Kobe will score 65 in the first 3 quarters, and sit the 4th.

    Lakers win 120 – 88. Artest gets tossed in the 3rd, with the Rockets down 40.

  • Danny W

    Kroik, Great article, I’m from the UK just to let you know, please reference Cornish Pasties, and the Beatles in your future articles to make me feel relevant. This article has made me take some time off work tomorrow to see the Game.

  • Danny W

    Krolik – my bad

  • Harlem_World

    Soccer ‘arguement’ = blah blah blah (yawn). John, Kobe IS the most recognizable ball player right now. When Lebron went to Beijing and around the international scene with olympic team and saw how everyone instantly recognized Kobe above all else, it hit home and you’ll see his marketing team take strides to increase his international profile going forward. Watch…

Advertisement