Thursday, July 14th, 2011 at 2:25 pm  |  10 responses

Reverse Scabbing

Injustices the NBA lockout is causing.

by Kevin Owens /@Waiting4Godunk

I recently sent a text to my brother reading, “I got out of basketball at the perfect time.” Considering the United States is dealing with the biggest economic crisis since the Great Depression, and I am still “job-hunting,” I probably should have chosen my words wiser.

The reason for my animosity toward overseas professional basketball stems from the wave of NBA players committing their lockout futures to various foreign teams. Despite the fact that my career is over, the players I know who still are pursuing their careers, may face an uncertain future.

The NBA lockout will cause a trickle down effect, which will leave many talented American athletes jobless. The NBA players will take the jobs of the best overseas players, who in turn will take the jobs of the average overseas players and so on. Now I know many readers are saying to themselves, “Yes, that is life. Why should the best players in the world not have a team to play for during the lockout?” Well first, thanks for the sympathy, and second, the problem becomes more complex the longer this lockout goes on.

Say the owners decide to continue the lockout and play the NBA season with replacement players. If this were to occur, the replacements would be made up of mainly guys from the overseas market. Can you imagine the backlash these players who decided to cross the picket lines will face? The NBA Players Union would deem such a thing unforgivable. They would be banned from ever stepping foot in an NBA locker room again.

But where is the justice for the overseas players who are getting their jobs taken by these NBA stars crossing the ocean? Where is the Overseas Players Union? You know where it is? It’s nonexistent! Overseas players are at the mercy of the owners. There is no organization to protect you and order a strike.

Say they decide to stop paying you. Well guess what? You are no longer receiving a paycheck. Say they decide to release you out of your guaranteed contract. Then you will be released. You can complain to your agent or write letters to FIBA, but there is no system in place to prevent these injustices. (Trust me, I’ve tried.)

My friend Greg refers to the whole situation as “Reverse Scabbing.” Crossing the invisible line in the sand. But the NBA players don’t care. And why should they? Nobody is telling them this is wrong. And it is not like the contingency of American players abroad have the capability to boycott playing overseas.

It’s a lot like the movie Goodfellas, when Jimmy Conway and Henry Hill sit helpless as Tommy DeVito gets whacked… There is nothing you can do about it. You just have to sit still and take it.

The most confusing aspect of this whole scenario is the logistics behind some of these player’s decisions to go abroad. You are leaving a guaranteed multi-million dollar contract, to go to a non-guaranteed, multi-thousand dollar contract. Owners have already banned together and told players if they are hurt overseas, they can potentially void some of the remaining contract. Why risk all of that over a much smaller contract? Because you want to play? Here is an idea, find a gym, grab your teammates and practice on your own.

The most ridiculous reason I have heard in favor of NBA players going overseas, is the expanding of their brand. Expanding of their brand?! What are they, Cheerios? What brand is there? You are a human being playing basketball. Do you have a personal clothing line? No, then what brand are you referring to? This makes no sense to me.

I can see the headline on some Turkish arena now. “Come See Deron Williams’ Unique Brand of Basketball. Watch as he Dribbles, Passes and Shoots the Basketball.” If I hear one more time about what a good opportunity these players have for expanding their brand, I will literally punch something. The only brand these players will be promoting is Nike, adidas, Reebok and the one brand they are currently fighting against… the NBA.

It is a helpless feeling knowing someone’s job is being outsourced to a guy who will leave the team high and dry once the lockout ends. Unfortunately, that is how it goes. There is no loyalty in this business. These European teams need big name athletes to draw big name sponsors. Until a system is in place to unify all these overseas players, injustices like this will continue unpunished. Maybe that is my calling…

Kevin Owens is a veteran of overseas professional basketball who also writes for Waiting For Godunk and Hugging Harold Reynolds. You can also catch him on Twitter @Waiting4Godunk.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: ,

  • Allenp

    1. The owners can’t bring in replacement players because the players are not on strike. If the owners reopen the NBA and their teams they have to honor all contracts previously in place. That is the difference between a lockout and strikr
    2. Every year some player in Europe loses his job because another more talented player shows up. How is this NBA deal different? Isn’t professional sports inherently about the best talent?
    3. Mega stars hawk products. The more people who know you the more products you can hawk. Thus players have brands.

  • http://WaitingForGodunk.blogspot.com Waiting For Godunk

    Allenp, let me speak in your language…

    1. It’s a hypothetical…That is why I started the sentence with “Say”

    2. NBA contracts are for the most part guaranteed, which means they get all their money. European contracts are not. I think you are missing the point that when you take away the best league in the world, the trickle down effect will take jobs away from talented players who otherwise would have jobs.

    3. You could not be more wrong!! Deron Williams is not going to Turkey to hauk merchandise! You just made me punch something!!

  • MrSuper

    ^
    The NBA is the greatest stage for product placement.
    Turkey, Greece, Italy, etc are secondary markets that follow on what is happening in the states.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Why would you posit a hypothetical that can’t actually happen?
    Isn’t that just a strawman argument designed to advance an erroneous point? There would only be a need to consider how NBA players felt about scabs, if the NBA players were actually on strike. Right now, they have valid contracts with an organization that is not in operation because the owners want to change or eliminate those contracts. The scab issue is immaterial.
    Talented players would have jobs in Europe if there were jobs in the NBA. The owners have removed jobs in the NBA so they most talent players have migrated to where there are actually jobs. This is actually how a global economy works. Couldn’t it be argued that American players are taking jobs from homegrown talent that would otherwise have a spot in these foreign leagues if not for pricey imports? Aren’t there scores of foreign players who lose out on the chance to play for their local squads because some American college player who couldn’t make the NBA and didn’t want to kick around in the D-League decides to leave the country? Is that an issue of fairness, or an issue of the best talent being offered a chance to play?
    The work conditions suck overseas. NBA owners would like to get them to suck here. I would wager that most NBA players aren’t overly concerned about the possibility of not getting paid because they believe their names will make it happen.
    Finally, people everywhere buy stuff. They are more likely to buy stuff from people they feel a connection to. If you’re trying to convince somebody to pay you attach your face to their product, you need to get more people to feel like they have a connection to you.
    Thus, you play basketball in a foreign country to build your “brand”, create more fans, and ultimately sell your image to more people looking to sell their products. You don’t actually have to create anything, you just have to have a name that sells things, or appears to sell things. Your name and face are your brand.

  • Kihwan

    This article is terrible. I won’t go on and write my lengthy opinion because I would be repeating much of what Allen has already said.

  • http://www.walshsportsblog.com Darren

    Agree with other commentators, and anyway, most of the players are posturing and putting pressure on the league; they have no intention of going anywhere.

  • http://www.slamonline.com UNFROZEN CAVEMAN LAWYER

    This article is terrible. I won’t go on and write my lengthy opinion because I would be repeating much of what KIHWAN has already said.

  • http://www.slamonline.com/ 1982

    I won’t throw dirt, since this is clearly just a hypothetical. But it’s not only a hypothetical, it’s also impossible. A league with players making upwards of $20 million a year wouldn’t risk putting unknown players under the same spot light… It’s just not even plausible to think about. That’s like during the writers strike they hired the head writer of John’s Web Blog to work on SNL sketches since Seth Myers wasn’t available. No one would watch even if John’s Web Blog happens to be the most heralded blog you’ve never heard of. It’s more wishful thinking than it is an alternate scenario…

  • Gigi

    Interested to hear the author’s response to what I believe was a good point made in Allenp’s comment. It seems to destroy the author’s argument and make him a hypocrite, as he was once one of those job-stealing American players.
    “Couldn’t it be argued that American players are taking jobs from homegrown talent that would otherwise have a spot in these foreign leagues if not for pricey imports? Aren’t there scores of foreign players who lose out on the chance to play for their local squads because some American college player who couldn’t make the NBA and didn’t want to kick around in the D-League decides to leave the country? Is that an issue of fairness, or an issue of the best talent being offered a chance to play?”

  • http://bleacherreport.com/articles/791470-lebron-james-vs-dwyane-wade-who-is-the-better-player/page/8 nbk

    smh, 0-2.

Advertisement