Links: Don’t Tread On The NBA
The Trailblazers would like your lunch money.
If there’s one thing we can be sure of regarding the Portland Trailblazers, it’s that their front office doesn’t want to play by the rules.
Yesterday, the Blazers’ front office sent out an email to every other front office in the NBA. By now the email is all over the internets:
Team Presidents and General Managers,
The Portland Trail Blazers are aware that certain teams may be contemplating signing Darius Miles to a contract for the purpose of adversely impacting the Portland Trail Blazers Salary Cap and tax positions. Such conduct from a team would violate its fiduciary duty as an NBA joint venturer. In addition, persons or entities involved in such conduct may be individually liable to the Portland Trail Blazers for tortuously interfering with the Portland Trail Blazers’ contract rights and perspective economic opportunities.
Please be aware that if a team engages in such conduct, the Portland Trail Blazers will take all necessary steps to safeguard its rights, including, without limitation, litigation.
(Wait, isn’t it “prospective” economic opportunities, not “perspective”? Either way.)
Hey, you know what other sort of conduct violates a team’s fiduciary duty as a joint NBA venturer? Trying to bully the other 29 teams in the League because you signed a guy to a bad contract.
Back in 2004, it turns out, the Blazers tried really hard to get Darius Miles. After the Blazers traded Jeff McInnis and Ruben Boumtje-Boumtje-Boumtje-Boumtje-Boumtje to Cleveland in order to get Miles, then-GM John Nash said they’d been negotiating a deal to get Miles for nearly a year. When his contract ran out, Portland signed him to a new deal worth $48 million over six years, even though he was a restricted free agent who hadn’t received any other offers.
D-Miles played well in spurts, putting up 47 points in a game once but also getting in an argument with coach Mo Cheeks and generally not being the best-behaved teammate in Portland. When the Blazers waived Miles in April of 2008, the organization openly admitted that getting rid of Miles provided relief to a franchise trying to turn the page on a history that had recently included too many malcontents and troublemakers. The Blazers evidently felt Miles belonged in that category:
“There is closure to the organization regarding Darius,” Pritchard said. “We’re putting this behind us, and putting closure on a tough situation.”
Miles suffered a knee injury in 2006, and by the end of 2006 he’d undergone the dreaded microfracture knee surgery. When he hadn’t returned by April of 2008, the Blazers had Miles checked out by a doctor who’d been OK’d by the L and the Player’s Association, and he said Miles’ knee injury qualified as “career-threatening.”
The Blazers waived Miles with the sole purpose of getting rid of him. They had to pay him the remainder of his contract, sure, but Paul Allen spends money like Michael Jackson used to. The good news was that Miles was gone. As The Oregonian story I linked to above mentions, “His release gives the Blazers a roster without any player who has been suspended or disciplined by the team or the NBA, the first time that has been the case in at least 15 years.”
And as an added bonus, that crazy contract the Blazers had blessed Miles with would be wiped from their books. Suddenly, not only did the Blazers have one of the best young teams in the NBA, they also had money under the salary cap to spend.
Then something really strange happened: Darius Miles started playing basketball again. By all accounts it was a long, tough road, one that Darius Miles had no financial reason to go down. He tried to come back, as he said, because he didn’t want to have “no regrets.” So he got healthy, rehabbed his knee and tried to return. That’s a great story, right? Guy suffers a knee injury that a doctor says is career-ending, yet through hard work and perseverance he’s able to do the impossible and make it back to the NBA. Good for him.
Not so fast. Portland, see, they thought they were done with Darius. But now that he’s two games away from having played the 10 games the NBA asked him to play to prove his career wasn’t over, Portland decided to be the bully in the room. “If you sign him to mess with us, you’ll regret it!” they threatened.
They signed the deal with Darius, and now that he’s able to play again, they don’t want him to have the opportunity. I know, their email said they didn’t want anyone inking Miles “for the purpose of adversely impacting the Portland Trail Blazers Salary Cap and tax positions.” So they could say they wouldn’t be mad if you signed Miles to play ball, only if you signed him to screw with them. Well, anyone who signs Miles is going to screw with them. That’s just the way it is. Darius Miles playing basketball in the NBA this season is inextricably tied to the Blazers cap money. And you know why? Because they signed Darius to the contract to begin with.
It’s kinda funny: People used to dislike the Blazers because they had a bunch of players who got in trouble all the time. Now people dislike the Blazers not because of their actual players, but because of the people in the front office who went out and got the nice players.
Go figure.
But hypothetically, how could Portland’s lawyers prove the intentions behind signing Miles were not basketball related? They could argue that he was an unproductive or unsuccessful player but that doesn’t have any bearing on proving that a team signed Miles with the sole purpose of screwing them over. It could be seen as an added benefit (esp for teams in the West) but what could prove that screwing the Blazers was a team’s sole motivation? Especially now that EVERYONE is painfully aware of this situation.
Anyways what a jerk move by the Blazers. I can see why a team would screw the Blazers over bc that’s another team out of the 2010 free agent extravaganza/race/buffet.
The Blazers agreed to the contract so thats what they get. So low of them to send out that threat. I hope Darius plays those 2 games now
Take it to ‘em, Darius.
Solid play is from the bench is better than what they’re getting now.
Gilbert wrote: “I fully understand the frustration you and your team’s ownership must be feeling in regards to this situation, but a preemptive threat of ‘litigation’ directed at all of your partners through a group e-mail does not sit well with me and seems to be incongruent with the spirit of keeping a ‘fiduciary duty’ and good ‘partner-like duty’ to your ‘NBA joint venturers.’”
League sources told ESPN.com that the Phoenix Suns’ Robert Sarver is the only other owner so far who has continued the leaguewide e-mail discussion. Following up Gilbert’s note with a brief question directed at the Blazers, Sarver wrote, “Are you saying we’re not allowed to sign him?”
“A source told TNT’s David Aldridge late Friday evening that the Memphis Grizzlies plan to sign free agent forward Darius Miles to a 10-day contract on Saturday.”
“A source told TNT’s David Aldridge late Friday evening that the Memphis Grizzlies plan to sign free agent forward Darius Miles to a 10-day contract on Saturday.”
Thanks Lang, as a bit of a young’n I didn’t really know that all that stuff had happened in that way. Oh, I knew about the waiving post microfacture surgery and that it was ‘mildly’ controversial, but didn’t think that it would be so *big* and that it could affect a whole franchise like that…anyways, new stuff on hibachi.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3822911
Comments