Monday, May 2nd, 2011 at 11:24 am  |  244 responses

NBAers React to Osama’s Death

Players take to Twitter to air out their diverse emotions.

As everyone knows by now, last night President Obama announced that Osama Bin Laden was located and killed. While some people took the streets to celebrate and others slept through the late-breaking news, many took to Twitter to air out their thoughts on the matter—including more than a handful of NBA players. As you’d expect, their reactions ranged the whole gamut—from conspiracy talk to congragulatory praise. Here are some of tweets that caught our eye.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    nbk:
    My bad, I missed it.

  • JTaylor21

    I read somewhere that the US couldn’t find a country that was willing to bury in their land and no way in hell were they going to bury him in the US or Afghan. So they decided to turn dude into chum and tossed him overboard.

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    And, you nailed it.
    There IS no way to distinguish what kind of “Muslim” he was. That was my whole point.
    All about interpretation.

  • http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-bulls-talk/2011 Diesel

    Clinton is responsible for thousands of murdered Serbian civilians. A religious war hundreds of years old and that uneducated adulterer decided he was going to decide who was right and who was wrong. Not based on facts, but on which side better fit into his political agenda. It would be wonderful if all Americans actually watched news from countries around the world so they could get an unbiased view of what’s really going on in the world.

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    @Diesel:
    Clinton was just doing what he was told to do.
    As is Obama.

  • http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-05/02/c_13854920.htm nbk

    All good philo I thought you were just ignoring it. — Taylor that makes perfect sense if your right, but that’s not what they are saying publicly, they are saying they are worried about a shrine. which is absurd, you don’t ever have to tell anyone that its even Osama Bin Laden. You don’t have to tell anyone where its buried. If you literally can’t bury him anywhere because nobody will let you then fine, say that, but it still doesn’t explain why they used fedex to get rid of him so fast, or why they lied in the first place.

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    nbk:
    They HAVE to say something.
    And, people are going to build a shrine for him, anyway. There are people who build shrines for bad people all the time, you know?
    At least if they say “something”, whether truth or lie, they are going to say “something”. You know what time it is. As many of us do.

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    Diesel: I hope you weren’t referring to me because I agree that the bombing of Yugoslavia was extremely f*cked up, and one of the many reasons why American foreign policy is an abomination.

  • JTaylor21

    Oh, my God this is terrible! Could somebody please find Ja Rule, get a hold of this motherf*cker so I could make sense of all this. Where is Ja?

  • http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-05/02/c_13854920.htm nbk

    Of all the things for them to say, “we don’t have the body anymore because we were trying to make a small % of a community he was excommunicated from (yes the Muslims ex communicated him from their religion, thus revoking his status as a muslim) happy?” He was disowned by his family, there is literally nobody but fellow terrorists/al queada to criticize whatever it is we choose to do with the body. — the explanation is an excuse, like my dog ate my homework, the government wants to keep something about this secret, their plan isn’t over, its not like we kill Osama and that’s it, there is more to this. Honestly I think being truthful and straightforward are the least of their concerns, and its sad that people actually believe what they are being told regarding the circumstances of this event. He is surely dead, and that’s the only fact that is indisputable in this story.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    The hell?
    JTaylor, please tell me where I said Bush was a better option.
    I’ll wait.

  • the Dude

    surprised Lebron didn’t need Wade and Bosh to help him type his kiss ass remarks.

  • http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/chicago-bulls-talk/2011 Diesel

    No Teddy – I was actually co-signing your post without specifically mentioning you. Your posts just made me want to reiterate how horrible Clinton really was.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    I. Wish. I. Could. Speak. On. Clinton. Without. Being. Censored. Thanks.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    It really won’t let you get your comment through? are you plagiarizing?

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Nope. I’m using my own words. If I could, I’d DM you what I said on Twitter. Can’t from work though.

  • JTaylor21

    Enigmatic, ummm…..I just connected the dots. Since you’re always ragging on Obama and Clinton, I falsely assumed you were a bush lover. My fault.
    I personally despise politicians so it’s not like I prefer one over the other. In the famous words of Nasir; no president ever did sh*t for me.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    damn that’s what I was about to say. My work has a cap on FB but not Twitter.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Diesel
    If you think the news in any country is unbiased, you are crazy.
    There are millions of people in Serbia who would disagree completely with you. that’s why there was a civil war. And whatever group controlled the media was the group that controlled the dominant narrative in the country.
    So, while you call Clinton a stupid meddler, there were some who welcomed his involvement. And while some people thought he was wrong to go into settle the dispute in Serbia, others thought he was a bastard for not going in earlier in Rwanda.
    If there are two sides to a story, it’s probably not a real story.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Enigmatic Posted: May.2 at 1:32 pm
    Oh, and some of y’all on here might already know how I previously felt about Obama.
    I’m glad to say I was deeply wrong about him, he has my upmost respect now, and in short, that dude is Unf★ckwitable™.

    ____________________________________________

    But yeah, I can’t stand Clinton. That’s for sure. Oh, and I’m sorry, but you lying if you say you don’t prefer one over the other though, based on your previous posts I would guess you stay on that “my president is black” sh*t!

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    AllenP droppin knowledge like he’s the last player left in a game of hot potato

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Don’t even know if this will post cause it’s about the “C” word, but where he faltered in the “Y” word is that he didn’t have his peeps targest strictly military compounds, thus the result was too many civilian casualties.

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    Check this out for conspiracy, nbk. LOL
    They “kill” bin Laden, Obama takes the “mortal” retaliation hit. Makes a “miraculous” recovery. All hail him to have “super natural” powers, and what not.
    Like a thief in the night, says The Word.
    Damn, they let us know at night, too…

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    lol Obama fits into a ton of conspiracies, all entertaining, all highly illogical. i personally like that he is according to some looney tunes a CIA Alien/Human Hybrid raised to be president/antichrist. That’s the most ridiculous thing i’ve read that I have seen vehemently supported. But I try and at least listen to every story I come across I like to have as much information as I can get even if its completely crazy it allows me to see from another perspective kind of….

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    Understood, Diesel. And you too, Eni.
    Though I actually think Bill Clinton was a pretty good president in handling domestic matters–but like most Presidents, completely f*cked in the head when it comes to foreign matters.
    And @ Allen: I agree too, but there’s no excuse for killing hundreds/thousands of civilians, period. Not in a civil war, and not in an “intervention” that’s supposed to help “prevent” a civil war from escalating.

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    So nbk, if someone says that someone else is not part of a religion anymore, they can’t practice a form of said religion, anyway? If you belong to a church, and they expel you, do you now not believe in the teaching of said religion, according to one’s interpretation?
    And, there were other “Muslims” who died for this man. Do they make up a % of a “Muslim” population?

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    It won’t let me post about his other mess-ups, but one begins with an S and one with an R.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Philosopher your trying to argue that we are taking Bin Laden’s beliefs into account. We aren’t he’s dead, his opinion on what we do with his body is irrelevant. Its the opinion of the Islamic/Muslim community that would matter, except he is not a part of it anymore. And those from that community that do care, are outright saying that he was improperly buried (actually its called disposed of because that’s what he was). What exactly are you arguing? I know you understand that something is being hidden I have been talking to you about related stuff off and on for a couple years, what are you saying about his burial? that it makes sense?

  • JTaylor21

    Enigmatic, what? Of course I respect him because he became the first black president and his personal achievements but I don’t support any politician. Do people know that dude hired the exact same people that destroyed the financial system and caused the recession? The same guy that was talking about “change” has some of the same people in power that served under Bush.
    You can put lipstick on a pig and it’s still a pig.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Teddy
    If you knew that you could destroy a village and kill ten thousand residents to prevent on of those residents from becoming Adolpf Hitler, would you do it?
    I’m not going to say that there is never a reason for non-combatants to die. But, I also recognize that means that EVERYBODY is a target. There are no off limits people in the world.
    America doesn’t play by those rules. Sure, we claim to try to avoid civilian deaths, but in reality if they have to die to accomplish an objective, then they have to die. That’s how the world has worked forever.
    People rationalize the choices they make, and try to present them in the best possible light.
    If Americans want things to change, we’d have to change the taxes we pay, the cars we drive, the homes we live in, the jobs we work. Basically, we’d have to change our entire lives. That ain’t likely to happen by choice.

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    nbk:
    I’m not trying to take bin Laden’s beliefs into account. Wasn’t trying to make it sound like that.
    What I am wondering is, who decided that he was going to be “thrown off the boat”. That was Barry’s call? Someone had to tell them to do that. His family is among the most powerful families in the world. Did they get on the phone and give instructions?

  • Lee

    What happened on 9/11 was abhorrent, and Osama Bin Laden was undoubtedly a terrible man. But before we engage in the cringe-inducing flag waving and celebrations over the death of a human being, let’s remember a few things: First, that a great deal of the hatred and aggression directed towards the U.S. is due to U.S. foreign policy and our government’s actions abroad, and that this aggression won’t end until our government and our people can change their way of thinking and perceiving the rest of the world. Secondly, that our own government has condemned displays of nationalism in foreign countries, the kinds of displays we’re seeing in the streets U.S. cities right now. And thirdly, and perhaps most importantly: Though our nation experienced a great deal of pain and suffering due to the deaths of 3000 innocent civilians on 9/11, our own government has visited exponentially more pain and suffering on the innocent people of foreign countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Just some things I think we should keep in mind.

    I applaud guys like CDR and Jason Richardson, if only because they’re willing to step back for a moment and consider every angle of events like this.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    They’re not “willing to step back for a moment and consider every angle of events like this”.
    On the contrary, everything is black and white to them.
    In reality, we live in a world of grey.

  • http://Slamonline.com Nbk

    I think if we are ok to kill him and search for 10 years I doubt we care what anyone who hid him wants us to do. Also he was disowned from his family. It’s pretty clear we did why was convenient to me

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    And, again nbk, you posted a verse saying that is acceptable to bury a Muslim at sea.

  • 6marjons

    haha @ LO

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Your heads might explode considering all the possibilites.
    That’s why I’d rather just play stupid and say, “they got him! Great! Moving on…”

  • http://Philosophervision@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    nbk:
    What about the relatives of bin Laden who got on the plane after 9/11? Were they disowned, too?

  • blakos

    What was the point of invading Iraq and killing Sadam again?????

  • blakos

    @Lee, the US Governments name is mud over here in NZ, for those that have a reasonable knowledge of 20th century history (East timor, Chile, Panama, Iraq etc etc. But the people are still loved.

  • http://Slamonline.com Nbk

    What about his terrorist family? Are you kidding me, do you really think their opinion matters? And why would they want their family thrown in the ocean ? Just use some logic, this throw him in the ocean stuff was clearly an American decision just use logic

  • http://slamonline.com zoom

    While I can’t really say I feel one way or another about that nutcase allegedly being dead, I find it amazing how people really think terrorism is the reason we’re at war. We’re at war for oil and power in that region. Period. Osama has almost nothing to do with why we’re at war. Case in point, it took all of five years for Iraq’s oil fields to publicly be opened for bidding by the Western oil companies. A lot of people get rich off of war. It’s too bad people are so brainwashed by these politicians. As someone who lost a relative and a neighbor on 9/11– and actually watched the 1st tower fall from my rooftop in Brooklyn–I’ll still NEVER support imperialist decisions by this government. Blaming our oil grab on 9/11 cheapens the deaths of the innocent lives lost on that day. It’s dispicable, just like the terrorists.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Pardeep

    This dudes still alive poppin bottles in the White House with Barrack, Jay-Z, LeBron, and the rest of the Illuminati and watching the playoffs like all of us. Hes been in the CIA forever, dont let the media brainwash you.

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    Co-sign Lee.

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    And zoom with, I think, the best comment in this thread.

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    @ Allen: I’m not so sure that that’s a realistic scenario. But no, I would not kill 10,000 innocent people to eliminate 1 Hitler. Because people like Hitler could have/can be prevented without killing thousands of innocent civilians (though it ended up being millions). Maybe that’s not how the world works now, but it’s common sense.
    I mean, Hitler himself owes a big “thank-you” to the rest of Europe and the US for creating the conditions that led to his being elected. If the United States/Europe hadn’t passed the Treaty of Versailles and humiliated the Germans post-WWI by extorting insane amounts of money in war reparations, demilitarizing them, and forcing them to accept sole blame for WWI (which is stupid because every country was to blame for that mess…), then there wouldn’t have been a “need” for a Hitler.
    And if the British hadn’t at first sympathized with Hitler and allowed him to conquer parts of Czechoslovakia, he wouldn’t have been able to build such a strong empire.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    I haven’t agreed with everything Teddy’s posted on this article, but I have to agree with his thoughts on Hitler coming to power at least partially because of the US and Europe.
    We let it happen.
    Some might argue we let Bin Laden happen as well.

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    I agree that there’s an objective, and that most countries will do anything to accomplish that objective, but that objective is far from a humanitarian one.
    Back to the Hitler example: Hitler only did to Europe what the other European countries had been doing for centuries to all non-white populations of the world. Had Hitler staked a claim in Africa, or committed mass genocide of American Indians, nobody would have cared. The largely anti-Semitic Europeans/Americans at that time didn’t even care that Hitler was mass murdering Jews, and they sure as heck wouldn’t have saved them had Hitler kept to his own instead of trying to take over all of Europe Napoleon-style.
    Most countries actually refused to offer refuge to Jews fleeing the Holocaust… CANADA turned down a huge boatload of Jewish survivors and sent them back to who knows where… These are people they were supposed to be saving, who had no other place to go, and they were turned away. WTF is that?!
    Point is, we can’t use the humanitarian card anymore. And the national security card? We wouldn’t need to use that either, if America/Europe/whatever other countries would STOP TRAINING people in foreign countries to fight against their own people…

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    Alright, more preaching, LOL:
    I also don’t buy that people’s lifestyles would change that drastically (if not in a positive way) if the US suddenly changed its foreign policy. Things might actually be better. I mean, what about all the poor people in America?
    Did you know that like, 6%-15% (I can’t remember the percentage, but it’s in that range) of what the US spends on its military would be enough to permanently end world hunger? (And the US would still be leading the world in military spending if that much of a reduction did take place). Isn’t that f*cked up?
    I’m not trying to pull the guilt card out on ordinary citizens, lol, but think about that. I can’t understand why any taxpayers would want their money to go towards wars that take place in other continents instead of things like education, etc.
    Oh yeah, and the cars we drive would already have been changed were it not for the oil companies that want to prevent New-Energy research. We freaking HAD electric cars, but the oil companies (which also own/are in bed with the car companies) recalled them…

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    Just putting it out there that I have a tonne of respect for people who risk their lives for their country (ie. Enigmatic). Not trying to diss anyone there.

Advertisement