Tuesday, June 29th, 2010 at 3:08 pm  |  11 responses

Peeking Over the Women’s Basketball Horizon

USA Basketball, WNBA Playoffs and Gonzaga on the come up.

by Clay Kallam

The Man in the Moon has been in a partial eclipse lately – but that just means there’s a lot to catch up on.

USA Basketball: The future of women’s basketball in America was on display in Colorado Springs earlier this month, as 62 of the top young players in the country gathered to try out for the Under 17 and Under 18 national teams.

There was a whole lot of talent, as always, but the only player who clearly seems destined for the WNBA lottery and a possible berth on an Olympic team is Chiney Ogwumike, a 6-3 powerChiney Ogwumike forward who will join her sister Nneka at Stanford in the fall. Of course, others will emerge from the pack over time, but right now the younger Ogwumike is the best of a very good lot.

And speaking of USA Basketball, there’s a reason it didn’t want to have to pick Under-16 and Under-17 teams: It forces decisions to be made too soon. Most countries can pick out 12 to 15 elite players at age 16, and then start to train them in the very different world of international basketball and FIBA competition. In the U.S., though, there are just too many good players, and it would be great to have more time to make decisions.

And why does it matter? International experience is incredibly valuable, and it’s no accident that 10 of the 12 girls who played for the U-16 team in Mexico City in 2009 wound up on U-17 teams in these tryouts – they have a tremendous advantage because they’ve already played in a FIBA tournament. There was room to add 6-7 Imani Stafford, who could be a pretty spectacular complement to Brittney Griner on the 2016 Olympic team, but who knows which other players might improve enough over the next few years to challenge or surpass the already selected?

But that said, it’s hard for the Selection Committee to replace a girl who has played well for gold-medal winning youth teams, and has played in four or five international events, with a new talent who lacks that experience.

The WNBA playoffs take shape: Yes, it’s pretty safe to say that Tulsa and L.A. are lottery bound, though the latest in a series of Minnesota injuries (Candice Wiggins this time) may cause the Lynx to sink to fifth.

That seems unlikely, though, as Nolan Richardson, as expected, is clueless in Oklahoma, and Jennifer Gillom, as some feared, can’t seem to get the Sparks all pointed in the same direction.

In the East, Anne Donovan, as expected, has done little to inspire New York fans who have been turned off by years of mismanagement by James Dolan and Carol Blazejowski – so the Liberty will need a late-season hot streak to get in to postseason. Steve Key, also a target for disgruntled fans, hasn’t done much with the Sky, though the absence of Shameka Christon hasn’t helped. Like New York, Chicago will need to catch a fire to avoid a place in the Maya Moore sweepstakes.

There’s a reason Spokane’s on the map. The parlous state of Pac-10 basketball in the Northwest is just one reason Gonzaga has emerged as a women’s power, just as the men’s program has.

Sure, it’s helped that Washington and Oregon State have been run by young coaches who have alienated players and fans, and that Washington State doesn’t really care about women’s basketball, but Kelly Graves has quietly built a powerhouse at Gonzaga.

It doesn’t hurt that Spokane is a jewel of a small city and doesn’t get the constant clouds and drizzle of Seattle, Portland and the coastal schools. Once recruits get a look at the community and the campus – and notice the banners hanging in the gym – it’s a pretty easy sell.

Especially when the Pac-10 schools are struggling to compete.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags:

  • http://www.clownpenis.com Tarzan Cooper

    Peeking on women? Erin andrews wouldnt like this

  • http://www.clownpenis.com Tarzan Cooper

    Should the sparks be this bad?

  • Ace

    The Sparks need a makeover and pronto. With their best player out they have gotten worse. The WNBA needs to bring the roster back to 13 like DT said. Alot of these teams don’t have the right chemistry on the court. Chicago is almost a lost cause.

  • dawn

    the WNBA is the lost cause.

  • Holli in DC

    What you have described is true in every sports league, the women just do it with a lot less money and support. The rooster size is an attempt to balance Owner’s costs. So, I can understand the smaller rooster. However, Taurasi’s point is not lost on me. The real issues is why did WNBA do away with the injured reserve list? So we definitely have a few kinks to continue to work out. But I find the future of women’s basketball and the WNBA to be bright, just look at the growing support for Women’s College Ball. For the first time since the passage of Title IX, we are starting to see colleges really invest in their women’s program. This will lead towards fans following their favorite players in to the WNBA. Now if we could just figure out how to increase salaries, increase endorsement contracts and allow players a chance to rest their bodies in the off-season instead of playing overseas to support their WNBA habit. Well, the good news is I am doing my part. Are you?

  • http://slamonline.com Clay Kallam

    I tend to agree with the 11-person roster, as the depth in the league is not such than the 10th and 11th players can really help a team. If you’re playing 10 and 11, you’re losing anyway, and most teams don’t go much past eight in the rotation.

    An adjustment does need to be made for season-ending injuries (Alana Beard, etc.), but I don’t think the added expense of two more salaries (which, with benefits and all, would be close to if not more than $150,000 per team) is really worth it in terms of the product on the floor. You can’t replace a Taurasi with the 12th or 13th player, and the other ones don’t make much difference.

    A lot of this has to do with the players’ association and the CBA — the league can’t just unilaterally make adjustments.

  • Ace

    Since DT is the one playing the WNBA I think we should take her word for her. Bird also talked about roster size, so it’s not just DT who thinks that roster cut was a bad idea. DT will be missed next year for sure.

  • http://www.clownpenis.com Tarzan Cooper

    Increase their salaries? They make at least 30 40gs for just aa couple months, then go to europe and get paid even more to ball. Theyre not hurting for money. Wnba does need to do a way better job of marketing and promoting to get a real fan base, not just a new crop of 11 yr old girls every year. They need to make the season longer, and whats with those extra short playoff series?

  • http://slamlonline Damian

    My New York Liberty needs to turn it up a notch or else there maybe a Maya Moore sweepstakes for them.

  • Lisa

    Clay,
    Wondered if there were regs, age or otherwise, that kept Natasha Howard from being considered for one of the USA Teams? Know her college coach from Florida St is a USA coach, and thought Natasha played very well against all the rest of the top US players in McDonald’s and the WBCA tourney during Final Four playoffs. Know she had little club, national exposure until then, but wondered what’s up? Any opinion?

  • http://slamonline.com Clay Kallam

    The salaries are actually pretty good in terms of the real world: Plus the players get year-round medical.

    The season really can’t be lengthened because of the European seasons, which mirror the NBA’s.

Advertisement
Fullcourt.com