Friday, December 3rd, 2010 at 12:07 pm  |  18 responses

Unfit Punishment

Is Bruce Pearl getting the benefit of the doubt because of race?

Ostensibly, Tennessee and Indiana are different programs with very different history and tradition. Sampson’s embarrassing allegations were incredibly disjointed from IU’s history of innocence and winning “the Indiana way.” Tennessee, on other hand, had little history of success before Pearl.

The same NCAA that investigated Sampson also investigated Pearl. Their findings alleged both Sampson and Pearl provided false and misleading information to investigators and made improper phone calls.

It was determined Sampson failed to meet the “generally recognized high standard of honesty” as required by the NCAA. I have no issue with the latter but it more than obvious Pearl did not meet them either.

Why the apparent double-standard?

Sampson made improper phone calls to recruits, but he didn’t host parties for with recruits and take pictures with them. Unlike Pearl, he did not tell the prospective recruits parents to keep quiet. Nor did Sampson confirm or deny the most recent allegations against him.

What happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Look at what happened to Nolan Richardson.

Remember him?

Richardson was the former Arkansas basketball coach who won a National Championship in 1994. He wasn’t being investigated by the NCAA nor hosting parties for recruits. He was merely speaking his mind.

In 2002 Richardson claimed he was being treated unfairly at Arkansas because of race. He hasn’t roamed the sidelines of a college program since he was fired. After he won the title, Richardson stated, “If I was white, and I did what I’ve done here, they’d build statues of me.”

Later on he would say, “I know for a fact that I do not play on the same level as the other coaches around this school play on.”

Based on how Richardson was treated, is it logical to conclude his race assertion had merit?

In light of the Pearl situation some in the media are praising Slive for punishing Pearl so harshly.

Yeah right.

Slive knew of Pearl’s admission in the beginning of September, yet it took him over two months to administer discipline because he had to investigate the situation. What was there to investigate? Pearl already had come clean about his lying; therefore, it should not have taken two months.

Meanwhile, IU parted ways with Sampson immediately. Once the NCAA notified the athletic department they were given 90 days to respond, but, as history demonstrates, they only needed a week. Rick Greenspan was the athletic director at IU at the time. Greenspan resigned in June of 2008 amid pending NCAA violations.

Before Greenspan left he issued the following on Sampson: “I think shortly after our president said those allegations were troubling and deeply concerning and that we’d work through this is when we came to the conclusion.”

Once the NCAA concluded its investigation, IU was slapped three-years probation. Sampson was hit with a five-year show-cause order. The order essentially means Sampson cannot coach at the Division I level until 2013. The ruling, in essence, further labels Sampson, making it difficult for him seek a head coaching job at the Division I level even after he is eligible to coach.

Meanwhile, Pearl has a new contract, a vote of confidence from Tennessee, and a weak suspension from the SEC. Based on the actions of the university and the SEC, the NCAA will likely not punish Pearl any further.

Does race factor in this situation?

The short answer is, yes.

Pearl is investigated and admits he lies. He hosts a party, tells parents to keep quiet and has recruits present when they shouldn’t. Then he gets a restructured contract and the benefit of the doubt.

Sampson was ousted for allegations before a decision was reached by the NCAA. Then he was it with a five-year show-cause order by the NCAA. Without question Pearl committed more offenses than Sampson yet he was given some money and told to leave.

Then Richardson has been black-balled for merely speaking his mind about how he was treated at Arkansas.

If race does not play a factor in this situation, please explain to me how it doesn’t.

Check out Dexter in The Huffington Post for sports and more. Email Dexter directly here and follow him on Twitter.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • Toner Jones

    You are an idiot. The NCAA has not said what its punishment will be so there is no comparison. The Big 10 did not punish Sampson, the SEC did punish Pearl. So, by your own reasoning Pearl must be being persecuted for being Jewish. Second, Pearl only lied when asked if he knew where a picture of a recruit was taken (at his house). He said no, then realized that was stupid, and asked to meet with the NCAA to correct the information. That’s it, one question. There is no accusation of lying about phone calls, those were self reported. I’m not defending what Pearl did, but your article is factually incorrect. Suggesting that whatever happens has anything to do with the man’s race is stupid. Sampson was already on probation, continued to break the rules, and then lied about it and then got caught. Indiana should not have hired him to begin with.

  • http://www.examiner.com/africanamerican-sports-in-national/dexter-rogers Dexter Rogers

    No. I am not an idiot. Based on your response that term can be best directed towards you. Whenever someone with the complexion of Pearl lies it is swept under the rug. You suggest his lie was really a misunderstanding. It is what it is. A deal was struck in my opinion and even though there has not been a ruling by the NCAA I believe he will retain his job nonetheless. He did more than Sampson yet he still has job. Furthermore, Indiana hired him because they felt he gave them the best chance to win. Also, isn’t Pearl whistle-blower? Didn’t he rat out Illinois back in the day for how they recruited Deon Thomas? His “ways” have not just started. If you wanna tell the story tell it in its entirety and not in fragments to suit your agenda.

  • burnt_chicken

    Is this article factually incorrect? The short answer is yes.

  • fiasco

    This is why the US can’t move on, people like Dexter Rogers. What a complete idiot with little to no journalism skills to boot.

  • Somedude

    If Pearl had ratted out a school for recruiting violations prior to this, then he would get the benefit of the doubt, wouldn’t he? If he’d instead had some six hundred impermissible phone calls at his last school thus having a history of repeated recruiting violations, he would not get the benefit of the doubt.
    Sometimes the NCAA is stupid and arbitrary in its punishments, but your not looking very deep if you think race is the only issue.

  • Somedude

    I’m surprised slamonline’s editor’s put this up.

  • http://www.examiner.com/africanamerican-sports-in-national/dexter-rogers Dexter Rogers

    I stand by everything that I wrote. I wrote what the facts were up to this point then chronicled how I felt about them. Furthermore, if any of you can dispute my findings to be wrong with respect to the NCAA and what they did to Sampson and Pearl up to this point feel free to correct me.

    Furthermore, if race was not an issue then what was?

  • Money

    Dexter fact: “Pearl lied about making excessive phone calls to recruits them and their families to stay in Knoxville longer than permissible by NCAA rules.” This is incorrect. Pearl lied about knowing where the picture from his BBQ was taken.

    Dexter fact: “In Pearl’s most recent interview with the NCAA in June he continued to lie.” You are the first to assert this. If not, please show where you sourced this info. You are saying Pearl called the NCAA for a follow up meeting to tell them he lied and then lied to them at that meeting. That is both unbelievable and illogical.

    Dexter fact: “Pearl committed more wrong-doing than Sampson yet he still has his job. He admitted he lied to NCAA investigators about…making excessive phone calls.” This is incorrect(again). See above. Repeating the inaccuracy will not make it any more true.

    Dexter fact: “Sampson made improper phone calls to recruits, but he didn’t host parties for with recruits and take pictures with them. Unlike Pearl, he did not tell the prospective recruits parents to keep quiet.” Inaccuracy #1: Pearl hosted a “party” (singular) not “parties” (plural). Inaccuracy #2: Where is it stated as fact that Pearl asked parents to lie? To lift another quote from your article: “What happened to innocent until proven guilty?”

    If you don’t believe a loss of $1.5 million (not to mention the 25% reductions in salary his assistants took), a self-imposed 1 year ban on off campus recruiting (not to mention bans of various lengths for his assistants, and an eight conference game suspension is not significant enough penalty for inadvertent impermissible phone calls (due to poor communication/documentation between assistants on timing of calls to prospects), hosting 3 recruits at a BBQ, and not telling the truth to one question in an NCAA interview, that’s on you. The race card should have stayed in the deck. The NCAA v. Pearl & Sampson and Richardson v. Arkansas are not related and do not even involve the same entities.

    This piece was poorly research and factually incorrect. A quick review at govolxtra.com would have turned up numerous articles that documented the facts on this case, however, it is my opinion that facts were not what you were looking for. Your story of how the NCAA’s treatment of two minority coaches (Jewish & Hispanic) and the relation to Arkansas’ treatment of it’s own minority coach is the most bizarre fabricated connection since Oliver Stone’s “JFK”. Kudos Dexter. Here’s to you stickin’ it to “The Man”.

  • Wes

    I’m not surprised at all that this guy writes for The Huffington Post.

  • kb24mj23

    Man… I can’t stand when EVERYTHING has to be about race… can’t it just be that it was two COMPLETELY different situations?

  • Somedude

    Well Dexter, it seems Money did better research than you. Well done on being out journalist-ed by a commenter.
    I know SLAM is a sports magazine, not news, but this is news in sports, Bruce Pearl is fairly public figure. It’s definitely the crap reporting like that which makes people draw parallels between FOX and liberal news like Huff post. And I love Huff post, it’s where I get my news for the U.S.
    I expected more from a Huffington Post writer- that is, a factual and well made argument-and from SLAM, the most awesome basketball magazine there is.

  • http://www.need4sheed.com Tarzan Cooper

    im still waiting on all my “being white” benefits. arent we all supposed to be rich? wheres my money? why do the cops not give me special treatment? i mean, whats going on here? i really wanna know.

  • http://www.examiner.com/africanamerican-sports-in-national/dexter-rogers Dexter Rogers

    Wes,
    Why are you not surprised that I write for Huffington? Care to elaborate?

  • http://www.examiner.com/africanamerican-sports-in-national/dexter-rogers Dexter Rogers

    Fiasco,
    You make assertions yet you don’t substantiate them with concrete evidence. What makes me an idiot? Because YOU disagree with what I wrote? I did not know you were responsible for rationing out intelligence or the lack of it.

  • http://www.examiner.com/africanamerican-sports-in-national/dexter-rogers Dexter Rogers

    Money,
    Bottom line: Pearl lied and he cheated. He has been suspended 8 games by the SEC and he has a new reduced contract. Sampson was in a similar situation yet treated differently. I believe, based on my vantage point, that race played a factor. Once the investigation ends next for or thereabouts then will see what else happens. I’ve said all I need to say.

  • http://www.examiner.com/africanamerican-sports-in-national/dexter-rogers Dexter Rogers

    Kb24mj23,
    Who suggested everything has to be about race? Did I write that? I believe race played a factor. Since when does “factor” constitute meaning it’s the “only” factor?

  • http://www.examiner.com/africanamerican-sports-in-national/dexter-rogers Dexter Rogers

    Somedude,
    I did not get outdone by anyone. I stand by all that I wrote. Bottom line: Pearl cheated and lied about it. He is getting a benefit of the doubt where Sampson did not. Period.

  • http://www.examiner.com/africanamerican-sports-in-national/dexter-rogers Dexter Rogers

    Tarzan,
    If you study the historical development of this country objectively you would find that racism has been a big problem in this country. Furthermore, white males have dominated this country and the truth still holds today. Just be patient.

Advertisement