Monday, December 28th, 2009 at 8:00 am  |  31 responses

Decade’s Worst: Sneaker

Wade’s last signature shoe from Converse lacks any star power.

by Ray Bala

In the last decade we have seen a great number of exciting and electric players light up our TV and computer screens on the nightly. Names such as LeBron James, Kevin Garnett, Andre Iguadala and Dwight Howard are but a few names on that list. And as a fan of the game of basketball you would expect that these permanent residents of the highlight reel would have some of the best kicks out, right? Well, that’s not always the case. This past decade yielded a fair share of forgettable kicks, but none more so than the Converse Wade IV.

Now I know you must be saying to yourself, “There are a whole mess of uConverse Wade IVgly shoes out there outside of the Wade.” And you know what, you’re right. You only need to look at Shaq’s sneaker chronology (I love you Shaq, but have you really laced up a pair of hotness since Reebok?) or the Dada’s with spinners (can it get more minstrel than that?) to see it. But the Wade IV is specially chosen and I’ll break it down for you like this.

If you will, think back to 2003. That summer Converse was looking to make a comeback in the performance basketball shoe market and decided to sign five untested but talented NBA draftees. Among them was Dwyane Wade. This was a coup for Converse since he went on to have a spectacular season where he was named to the All Rookie Team and helped to lead the Miami Heat to the Playoffs while becoming a fixture on the Plays of the Day on almost every sports station around the basketball world. As his star got brighter, Wade was all that a company could ask for in a sponsored athlete and he was poised to take the Converse to new levels of success not seen since the hay days of Magic-Bird rivalry.

So how do you have one of the most electrifying basketball players on the planet as the face of your shoe company and decide to design what looks like sub par product?

When it comes to the Flash’s line, it’s as if Converse was devolving when it came to shoe design for Wade’s signature kicks from his rookie season.

Think of this: When we think of a signature shoe, we not only want to be able to see the player in the shoe playing but also see the essence of the player in the shoe. We want to identify the player and the shoe as almost the same thing, like a marriage almost – one never too far from the other. Think of the LeBrons. Can you really see anyone else wearing them? How about all the shoes that Jordan wore during his playing days? Anyone can wear the shoes but when we start thinking that it seems odd when someone else is playing in them, then that player has created that aura and that connection to the shoe. With that thought in mind, I can’t see Wade as visible in this model at all.

The Wade IV has no electricity. There is no “oohh” factor. Unlike Wade’s drives to the lane to flush a dirty cram on an unsuspecting Anderson Varejao, there is no excitement in it. There is nothing to reflect the awe inspiring game, the personality for that matter, of the player that is was made for.

Let’s break down the shoe:

Taking it as it is at first glance, the Wade IV is not a particularly aesthetically appealing shoe, especially in the primary white colorways. The guys at Converse may have been looking for simple in the design but the upper looks like it could have used more thought. Wade’s game is smooth and effortless. Everything seems to flow so nicely and seamlessly as if he had choreographed the outcomes. This shoe has jerky transitions in the design elements and doesn’t flow well from front to back and up or down for the eyes.

The exposed mesh through a good portion of the upper is too visible, especially in the white colorway, and though it serves a functional and aesthetic purpose, it cheapens the look of the overall shoe and could be easily mistaken for a model by the “Impossible is nothing” guys. On top of that, Converse’s iconic circled star logo seems to be a misplaced in the center of the outside of the shoe. Does Wade reveal himself to his opponents? Could he be mistaken for anyone else? A resounding “no” to both questions.

I know that there will be a lot of discussion on this topic and a lot of “What about this shoe …” type thing and really there is no real comparison. Now are there shoes out there that look a lot worse aesthetically? Of course there are. Are there kicks out there that worthy of this title for this particular decade? Quite possibly. I could rattle off a whole list of models just from my memory (think anything Oakley that “Take Charge” Battier wore for instance) but I’ll bet you that none of them are tied to the same type of player that Dwyane Wade is.

Wade is a player that transcends the game of basketball. He plays with reckless abandon and fierce determination on the court but does so with a disarming smile. He is a class person on the floor, in the locker room and outside the arena. He plays seemingly with the aura of innocence of a kid playing in his driveway. With Wade, he is what’s good and wholesome and pure about the game we all love, and what we think is good in all people. His shoe should reflect him. So really, are you going to associate the Wade IV with him after all that? I think not, homie.

So is the Wade IV, the worst sneaker of the last decade? Ya damn skippy!

***

For more Decade Awards, check out the archive.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , ,

  • Young Lebron 23 Posted: Dec.28 at 8:09 am
    This is why he’s with Jordan now…

  • Hussman25 Posted: Dec.28 at 9:08 am
    Converse never truly had the shoe design that fellow shoe giants: Adidas or Nike, really had. They have tried to keep up by luring kids into the brand (Jameer Nelson, Dwayne Wade, Elton Brand, etc…) but the designs are horrible! Converse was kool back when L.J. was a spokesman…. Now theyre just “so-so”… and thats being polite (Sorry Mr. Chuck Taylor).

  • Jake Posted: Dec.28 at 9:45 am
    Those shoes are so comfortable though you have no idea.I bought a pair this summmer.I have 25 pairs of basketball shoes that I’ve used on every surface from gravel to concrete to hard wood and honestly none has held up like my D-Wades.Plus the shock in the heel really does help your foot.It’s also really lightweight.It may be plain,but converse got something right with the inner design.I’d buy another 10 pairs if I had the chance.

  • toine Posted: Dec.28 at 12:12 pm
    the first ones were hot, but those look like bargain 39.99 shoes from Dick Sporting Goods.

  • derrick Posted: Dec.28 at 12:29 pm
    super wack shoe indeed but i agree with the comfort aspect. converse make a comfortable hoop shoe. those shoes are not the wackest of the decade though. shyt the 2k9 jordans was some b.s.

  • San Dova Posted: Dec.28 at 1:17 pm
    Very good article, but I BEG TO DIFFER…did you remember those Dada Supremes that were in the back of Eastbay’s catalog for years? Those were easily the most horrible shoe.
    The Wades were very solid as performers and the Wade IV was actually a very good shoe. He was protesting Converse and didn’t wear the shoe, but it’s actually very solid, aesthetically. Good article, nonetheless.

  • Hussman25 Posted: Dec.28 at 1:39 pm
    @San Dova: Do you mean “protesting” as either: a). wanting more doe from Converse or b). just did not like the shoe/company anymore, period?? He’s the one who signed the deal? His move from Converse to Nike’s reminds me how VC wiggled his way out of Puma??? (but I digress; I believe VC left Puma due to structural issues for his feet.)

  • James Posted: Dec.28 at 1:48 pm
    I understand why you picked this shoe, the fact that Dwyane never wore them in the NBA is pathetic. However, you didn’t mention anything about how the shoe feels or performs. Which I think would be an important aspect when determining the worst shoe of the decade. From reading the article, I can’t tell if you’ve even tried the shoes on, let alone seen them in person. Worst shoe of the decade, no way…most disappointing shoe of the decade, that’s more likely.

  • Dallas Stokes Posted: Dec.28 at 2:10 pm
    There were far worst shoes out there than that with bigger names attached!!! I have that shoe and the fit and comfort was good and I thought the look was cool except for the paint spotted midsole which I colored in with a marker. But no chance that was the worst.

  • alex 80 Posted: Dec.28 at 2:46 pm
    The Jordan Brand is not that far of being the worst shoes either….

  • roman Posted: Dec.28 at 2:59 pm
    Still rockin the Chuck Taylors-

  • zack Posted: Dec.28 at 4:01 pm
    Yeah they suck, but STILL BETTER THAN ANY ADIDAS!

  • Da Hood Posted: Dec.28 at 4:06 pm
    Lets not forget Kobe’s ugly ass shoes.

  • Da Hood Posted: Dec.28 at 4:07 pm
    by Addias of course

  • Eric Woodyard Posted: Dec.28 at 6:53 pm
    LOL…I love D-Wade but I agree…these were wack…He didnt even wear them…lol…The new MJ’s for 2010 are no better tho…maybe they are performance wise but style wise they are wack…D-Wade needs his own Jordan sneaker.

  • Lonzo Posted: Dec.28 at 6:56 pm
    Monta Ellis’ kicks are wack, Al Harington has wack kicks, Starbury’s were bootsey, and those boxed shaped addidas Kobe was wearing back in like ’01 were sucking heavily…

  • Dave Posted: Dec.28 at 8:21 pm
    My SF had a pair of these. He never stopped complaining about them the two months he wore them. Rolled his ankle literally three or four times in them.

  • J Posted: Dec.28 at 11:12 pm
    even now that wade is on Jordan brand i still can’t picture him with a signature Jordan shoe, i can still see him clearly in my mind with his first sig in converse.. remember the “fall seven times stand up eight”?

  • J Posted: Dec.28 at 11:15 pm
    and the bad thing is he’s not getting a signature from Jordan, instead he’s gonna wear AJ 2010..

  • robb Posted: Dec.29 at 12:36 am
    representing Jordan on the court is not a bad thing J.

  • Aarin Posted: Dec.29 at 2:11 am
    The Kobe 2s by adidas back in 2001-2002 were by far the worst basketball shoes ever made http://www.sadida.com/Adidas/Images/Shoes/kobe2_2.jpg

  • cballer Posted: Dec.29 at 2:12 am
    Converse was great back in the 90′s with LJ. Reebok was great as well back in the days.
    They’re both kind of dying when it comes to basketball. That’s kind of sad.

  • Myles Brown Posted: Dec.29 at 10:25 am
    Co-sign on the Kobe II and any one of Jordan Brand’s hybrid abominations. It was really just a bad decade for sneakers period.

  • Niio Posted: Dec.29 at 10:20 pm
    Wade didn’t really “jump ship” on Cons for Nike.. You do realize that Nike owns Converse right?

  • J Posted: Dec.29 at 10:58 pm
    @robb: i agree,sure. but the point is just like what the editor said, you don’t see DWade in those converse sneaks, and just like jumping on Jordan do you really see Wade clearly in the Jordan 2010? when it’s undoubtedly made for/inspired by Michael Jordan.?

  • Hussman25 Posted: Dec.30 at 8:13 am
    @Myles Brown: My thoughts exactly! Just walkin in Foot Locker over the xmas holiday made me mad! I remember thru out the 90′s (Im not fully dating myself as Im still a young man) and there be SOOOOOOO many different kicks to choose from; thats when the shoe game was at it’s peak. Now, to me, its lame. Shoe designs are suspect and the designers to me are gettin lazy (too many short cuts and this “fusion” thing is just dumb). The best representation of this is the new MJ shoe… Y the big circle on the side??? Shoes dont need to breath! I can go on for hours but Ill stop now… *dropps mic*

  • Hussman25 Posted: Dec.30 at 8:16 am
    I only buy retro sneaks/re-releases; kicks from my youth. Thats how deep it is for me…

  • Z Posted: Dec.30 at 10:05 am
    Can’t believe Kobe put up 25 in these things lol. The Crazy 8 were fresh though. Favorite sneaker from back in the day that ppl don’t talk about enough : the pippens with the AIR on the side.

  • Dane Posted: Dec.30 at 11:22 am
    I agree with you. Converse peaked with the weapons and haven’t really been relevant since the Larry Johnson “Grandmama” days. It is unfortunate that Converse hasn’t given justice to arguably the most electric person in the game. Peace!!!

  • Worst are Air Jordan & Kobe Posted: Dec.30 at 12:50 pm
    *** WORST SNEAKERS ARE CERTAIN SERIES OF 1) AIR JORDAN OF NIKE 2) KOBE BRYANT SHOES OF ADIDAS THEY TRULY LOOK SO CHILDISH THAT THIS CONVERSE LOOKS LIKE A MASTERPIECE COMPARED TO THOSE …

  • ballin Posted: Jan.5 at 1:43 pm
    these were really lightweight. and the fit of that internal lace loop was sick. idk i liked em… i thought there was far waorse. co-sign wit the Adi Kobe 2. YUCK!!

Comments




The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.