Friday, June 12th, 2009 at 12:01 am  |  30 responses

Jordan Schoolin’

July 1, $115.

Jordan Schoolin'banner-bottom1

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags:

  • HangTime Hec Posted: Jun.12 at 12:18 am
    Nay. As in these blow.

  • aaron12 Posted: Jun.12 at 12:30 am
    No

  • Ajo Posted: Jun.12 at 12:58 am
    ehhhm, i like the idea, poor execution. I’d ball in them no doubt…but not for $115

  • Royal Posted: Jun.12 at 1:33 am
    Those are ugly…………..oh wait their Jordans I gotta get em!!!!!

  • rob stewart Posted: Jun.12 at 1:35 am
    I don’t really like these but I wouldn’t want to guard the guy at the gym who wears these. They seem like the type of shoe an overly physical player would wear.

  • stryfee Posted: Jun.12 at 1:37 am
    ugly

  • [...] Via SLAM. [...]

  • thesubwayconnection Posted: Jun.12 at 10:17 am
    I’m surprised someone okayed this design. The person who did so must have “redneck flames” running down the side of their pickup truck. It’s the only explanation.

  • wayno Posted: Jun.12 at 10:58 am
    Gross, not liking these at all…

  • niQ Posted: Jun.12 at 11:31 am
    wack.

  • Z Posted: Jun.12 at 12:41 pm
    put anything else than a jumpman on these and they prolly never get released.

  • alex zografou Posted: Jun.12 at 2:51 pm
    nice, not greAT, but nice

  • Cizzo Posted: Jun.12 at 2:56 pm
    Inovative design I can’t see the any flaw major in these????

  • Mendel Posted: Jun.12 at 3:07 pm
    They look like real comfortable ball shoes though.

  • Zee! Posted: Jun.12 at 3:21 pm
    Ewwwww

  • Barry Melrose Posted: Jun.12 at 3:30 pm
    crappykicks.com

  • Quail Posted: Jun.12 at 5:37 pm
    not too bad. the price is a lil over. maybe 100 even would be right.

  • $tev3 Posted: Jun.12 at 7:14 pm
    Lame!
    Royal LMA0
    Rob Stewart I would just to have him twist his ankle

  • BETCATS Posted: Jun.12 at 7:34 pm
    $95 would be a fair price, $125 is overdoing it. JB is too damm selfish!

  • BETCATS Posted: Jun.12 at 7:34 pm
    *$115

  • andrew Posted: Jun.12 at 8:01 pm
    They look like an early 2000s And-1 reject. Glad we did not have to buy these in the Basketball Specialty range in Australia. Yuck.

  • JUFU Posted: Jun.12 at 9:13 pm
    They let Larry the Cable Guy design these after his goddamn truck. He did just a bit worse than Tinker. Just a bit.

  • Blinguo Posted: Jun.12 at 9:49 pm
    More generic than TB Nike Basketball circa early 2000′s Uptempo/Flight rehashes. Jordan who you foolin’? Oh but fans hold up for the mandatory elephant and patent leather print. That’ll make it all better. Sigh.

  • don Posted: Jun.13 at 1:08 am
    wow i get sea-sick looking at them. hate the waves. Oh, they’re JORDANS? wow! i like them…not.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Jun.13 at 7:24 pm
    Hmm… Not bad. They look like a messed up rip-off of the AI Reeboks though. What’s with Jordan biting AI Rbks now?

  • Quail Posted: Jun.13 at 11:39 pm
    for some reason, i think they would look alot better with black strings rather than white.

  • PhaseDunker_Ace Posted: Jun.21 at 12:32 am
    The Button is butter Carbon fiber ghost layer is clean BUT….. if you squint and look at the tongue they look like a pair of AND-One’s
    And im out!

  • kin_50 Posted: Jun.28 at 11:56 pm
    you got to be kidding me looks like these were an idea drawn on a wall in a truck stop rest room

  • j$$ Posted: Jul.3 at 9:25 pm
    innovative design indeed i’m getting these to ball

  • markymark Posted: Sep.4 at 8:26 pm
    look like converse

Comments




The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.