I can’t believe all the haters on this board. I have 4 pr and my kids all have 2pr each. Immature people have always laughed at “off brand” stuff let’em. They look so good that people stop and ask me where did I get them and they don’t believe me when I say K-mart. My kids still have there nikes, but I ain’t running out buying $75-90 dollar shoes every 6 months. I play ball in mine quite often and they are as good as any Nike, Adidas, etc priced under $90. I have a pair of TS Commanders from Adidas and I would were my Stak Jax over them anyday. The A3H look the best but seemed a little heavier than the others. The Black trifectas are another hit. I just went and saw the new line for 2010 and I will be getting the blackouts and the New Stak’s, and some gear
jais
proteges are looking good. no matter what anyone else says. DALLAS, proteges are good. have you seen the new jordan ajf 2010? f**kin 170$$$? + 15 dollars tax. holy crap. whats the big deal dammit? im fine with any proteges unless the are higher than 65 dollars.
f**k, what cant you guys understand, these shoes are MADE for ball. jordans are heavy as hell and no one wears em for basketball cause they too heavy.
After all, proteges just came out. id rather spend 50 than 200$ jordans or any other shoes that are just too much, and gets easily creased.
so basically if you replace the protege sign with a jordan. the price tag would be like 250$. only cause of the names are why jordans expensive. you see anyone such as dirk nowitzki selling shoes? CAUSE HE WASNT AS GOOD AS JORDAN. so anyone not bieng a hater. i do have 4-6 pairs of jordans. only for showin off, not to play ball. i use protege for basketball alone.
Read the SLAMonline Discussion Rules before posting.