Converse Poorman Weapon

March 1, $60.

matt604

Poor man’s Chuck Taylors?
http://bulls.com airs

actually, those are more expensive than chucks
AnsonPanson

fu(k!n love the name
69

gotta love em
matt604

I just meant that they’re uglier.
Cizzo

I’m diiging these 100%!!!
http://www.another48minutes.com Gerard Himself

I agree with Cizzo, very cool shoes. If it rains, you’re screwed, other than, they looks so cool.
http://www.slamonline.com Wayno

Chuck Taylors look wayyy better. I’m not really liking the design on this one too much.
http://www.bf3ars.blogspot.com bfears

LOVE EM!
http://slamonline.com d.j.

verrry niceeee….. how much ? $60……. to much for a poor man….. price should match the name……
hoopsfan

corny