Or rather, maybe Beckham?
This Beckham guy, whoever he is, looks pretty good. He might have a future in this strange sport you kids call “soccer”…
LATEST NEWS & RUMORS
View all »- No. 9 Murray State Loses Its First Game
- SLAMonline x Draftstreet’s Free $250 Fantasy Basketball Challenge Starts Tonight
- Kicks: Nike Zoom Kobe VII Shark NYC Release Event
- Kobe Bryant Happy With Pau Gasol’s Aggression vs Boston
- Video: ‘Inside the NBA’ on LeBron James’ Hairline Decision
- Jay-Z Working to Make the Nets More Glamorous
- Washington Wizards Struggling to Get Home Crowd Support
- Andrea Bargnani to Miss More Time With Strained Calf
- Keith Bogans to Undergo Season-Ending Ankle Surgery
- View All »


He used to play growing up apparently he wasn’t bad…
hes 34/35 years old…
but he was the best football..uhhmm i mean soccer player in the world in the early 2000´s
He wouldn’t be in Brazilians 10th squad.
He´s 100% overated.
Never won anything.
zizou, 2 matches away from retirement, destroyed the so-called greatest team in the world, single-handedly controlling the whole game.
we consider winners players who actually won world Cups
That simple. Romario, Ronaldo (R9), Pelé (G.O.A.T) and so on.
Much respect to Zizou, Maradona and other WC winners. Beckham, Cristiano Ronaldo and others are and will always be remembered as role players.
Maneuvering on the grass while controlling the ball is called dribbling, bro.
Ronaldinho,
Ronaldo,
Thierry Henry,
Shevchenko in his first, seven-year, Milan stint,
Cannavaro,
Samuel Eto’o,
Cristiano Ronaldo,
Leo Messi,
Kaka,
Deco,
Van Nistelrooy,
Didier Drogba,
Raul,
Pavel Nedved,
Figo,
Roy Keane,
And I could go on and on…
Otherwise, yeah, it sort of works.
I think whether or not Capello uses him will come down to tactics. In my opinion, the main problem with Beckham in the England team is that they need to use four in midfield: one water-carrier (probably Gareth Barry), one central midfielder (Gerrard or Lampard, and two wingers. In that formation you need to utilize speedy wide players like Aaron Lennon or Joe Cole. I would include Beckham in the squad because he can be useful in certain situations, but his inclusion in the starting lineup would make the team stagnant.
@Fred: At his prime I’d take Zizou, too. But right now?
In my opinion, if I could watch a really great football match or a really great basketball game, I’d go with football. I mean, no basketball player has ever done anything as beautiful as what Diego Maradona did in 86. That’s just my opinion. HOWEVA, the problem with football is that it can also be BORING. Exhibit A: All the big Champions League games that were played this past Tuesday and Wednesday were BORING. I started asking myself: “Why am I watching this defensive, tactical bullsh*t?!” But then you get a team like Spain at Euro 2008 and you go “Oh, that’s why. I remember now.”
I’m not great at either sport, mainly because I’m SLOW. But I’ve always been able to do plenty of stuff with a football. I can easily make a cross-field pass or score a volley. In basketball, however, I just SUCK. And I’m 6’4″, which makes my plight even sadder. But seriously it’s a lot easier for me to control the ball with my feet. I can’t begin to fathom the handle a guy like Chris Paul has.
Paolo Maldini. His roulette in the derby was probably the sole highlight of the game for Milan fans. But otherwise, agreed. Becks has developed a fine sense of the game lately, flanked by two enforcers, he could be a passable midfield regista for most clubs.
You know what? If I were running a team I’d probably take a 20-year-old Beckham over a 20 y.o. Henry or Shev. Not only could you just stick Becks on your right side for the next ten years and forget about him, but think of the merchandising and marketing $$ he’s brought to his teams over the years.
Oh, I didn’t think you’d bring Beckham’s marketing power into the equation. I was talking strictly on the pitch. And I’d have to respectfully disagree with you on that one. I’d take Sheva or Henry without even blinking.
Comments