“This” being our beloved League’s TV partners.
By Ben Osborne
Stephen A’s outstanding radio interview with Kobe today notwithstanding, his role as a halftime personality on ESPN’s coverage is representative of another big issue related to the NBA that is not getting nearly as much ink as #8 24 is. Being somewhat of a sports media nerd (when I used to read USA Today, Rudy Martzke’s column was the first thing I turned to), I like checking out sportsmediawatch.com, which is a pretty cool site if you’re into TV ratings and the like. One of the big subjects over there lately is the NBA’s TV deal, which is not up until after next season but the League wants to extend by the end of next month. Typically, these type of contract extensions are discussed heavily in the NBA media, but this one’s been under the radar and I’ve only realized it was being negotiated at all in the last few weeks. I feel like David Stern is being much quieter about this than he has been in the past, probably because he doesn’t have the type of bidding war or high ratings to play up like he did in the past. Instead, all indications are that rather than enter into a new partnership with the likes of networks CBS (the 80′s NBA), NBC (the 90′s NBA) or FOX (never covered NBA) or cable networks like Versus or Fox Sports Net, the NBA will tack another six years (at slightly higher cost) onto its current six-year deals with ESPN (I’m sure you all know by now that ABC and ESPN are, for sports purposes, one and the same, and will therefore only be referred to as ESPN) and TNT.
My goal today is not really to criticize either outlet, but just wonder if some new/old blood might be better for the NBA. TNT’s game coverage is excellent, with the Marv/Kerr/Collins combo a favorite of mine. I think ESPN’s actual game coverage is good, too, save for the weird camera angles they use too often. Announcer-wise, Mark Jackson is great, Mike Breen acceptable, and Jeff Van Gundy has been a surprisingly solid addition considering what short notice he had to join their first team.
Where the two networks have diverged is in their studio teams. TNT has been a picture of consistency, trotting out Ernie, Charles and Kenny for years (with the occasional fourth man in like Magic, Reggie Miller, etc), and the results have been fantastic. The Worldwide Leader, on the other hand, has had more studio combinations than Damon Jones has had teams. ESPN’s lack of consistency in its coverage of the NBA is one of the reasons this contract situation caught me by surprise; how can ESPN’s contract be up when it still feels like they are feeling their way out?
Another fundamental difference between ESPN and TNT is in what type of platforms they are. TNT shows, what, old movies, the British Open and some show called The Closer? The only time the NBA is on TNT is when it’s gametime. I think this actually enhances the experience. When you tune into TNT the game comes almost out of the blue, not preceded by endless amounts of hype. And when the NBA has a controversy on its hands, you’re not going to hear about it on TNT 24 hours a day. ESPN, on the other hand, is everywhere. Multiple TV channels, radio stations and a huge website, all with the ability to cover news all the time. Stern must see these as positives most of the time, and that makes sense—if your league is being discussed at all hours, that’s got to be good advertising, right? But at the same time, ESPN also has an obligation to cover every fight, trade demand and missed practice all day long as well. And when things aren’t going well, this type of constant harping can create an image problem that even the best game coverage can’t overcome.
There’s a part of me that realizes even this discussion is antiquated. Hardcore fans have LeaguePass and get to experience the League through the relative charm of local broadcasts. Most fans around the globe also get their League fix through the internet, which, thanks to the hundreds (thousands?) of sites devoted to the NBA, can be tailored so said fan gets their coverage the way they want.
But still, when it gets deep into the Playoffs and then the Finals, and only one or two networks have the biggest games, every fan will have to come across those networks, so it would help if they liked them. And, given my relative boredom with the current situation, I would be open to seeing someone new (or old—both NBC and CBS had classic graphics and music)…do I need to get over it or would some remixing be for the best??
LATEST NEWS & RUMORS
View all »- SLAM Radio: Epitaphs Out East
- Avery Bradley to Undergo Season-Ending Shoulder Surgery
- Jeff Van Gundy Blasts Orlando Magic for Handling of Stan Van Gundy’s Firing
- JR Smith Arrested in Miami Due to License, Then Released
- Kicks: Derrick Williams’ Birthday Sneaker Scavenger Hunt
- Are the Orlando Magic Ready to Trade Dwight Howard?
- Layup Lines: Survival of the Fittest
- Video: Dwyane Wade Was Proud to Wear Hot Pink Pants
- Russell Westbrook Still Bothered By 42 Points Tony Parker Scored on Him
- View All »


That ditty signified post-NFL Sundays for me for some time…. House of Payne, anyone?
And I appreciate Steve Kerr’s eye for gamesmanship and his sometimes quirky humor. Last night, I noticed during a play where Chauncey took advantage of Larry Hughes’s inability to quickly change direction. After the next commercial break, Kerr broke that play down. These guys know their stuff. The NBA on NBC is synonymous with the Bulls’ Dynasty. When I hear it, I think of high-top fades (Pippen, Pat Ewing), chest-bumping (the Knicks), 23 second back downs (Charles Barkley), agile centers (Dream and Robinson), self-righteous midgets (one Robert Costas) and Mike Jordan’s personal nut hugger, Ahmad Rashad (my MAIN MAN). The golden age of basketball. But honestly, right before they got outbid, their product had turned into a doo-doo sandwich. I mean really. Right now, the only reason I watch ESPN’s coverage is for Bill Walton. He’s funny. Greg Anthony is respectable and knows his stuff, but tries too hard to coin a catchphrase (i.e. “the fact of the matter is this…”), not unlike Screamin A. Smith saying “Quite frankly…”. That turned out well (then again, not so well) for him. And Jamal Mashburn is VERY competent. I watch him & Allen Houston (who puts me to sleep) on the knockoff NBA programs. Walton is much better in-game than he is in the studio. And maybe they should team Mashburn with him and another play-by-play guy. They forced Mike Breen on us. I don’t like him as a lead play-by-play analyst.
Which is worse: the commercials on every frikin’ break for TNT or having to listen to Bill Walton for a half (let’s assume everyone else does what I do when Bill comes on and mutes the TV for the other half)?
I dunno, that stuff really annoys me because he always sounds serious to me. He just nevwer seems to have anything worthwhile to say.
And I honestly do appreciate the joy with which he speaks about having the opportunity to play for Coach Wooden at UCLA and a chance to be on a championship Celtics team (in addition to actually leading his TrailBlazer team to a championship over the Sixers). This man truly loves and respects the game of basketball and all that is sacred to it. And I can’t hate that.
Maedea for President!!!!!!
WITH BOB COSTAS AND tha fist michale jordan couch, they were osm still let ESPN cover the nba in nba tonight , but change the actual games to nba, and keep TNT SETUP
Comments