Monday, September 29th, 2008 at 8:00 am  |  43 responses

Chicago Bulls Season Preview

John Paxson owes you an explanation.

Dear John,

What’s up, Pax? Can I call you Pax? It’s just that my strongest memories of you come from the days when you were wearing No. 5 and knocking down three-pointers and winning championships, and the thought of calling you “Mr. Paxson” or something just makes me feel old. Er. So I’m gonna go with Pax, if you don’t mind.

So, Pax. What’s the deal? You took over as the Bulls’s Executive VP of Basketball Operations back in April of 2003—bet you’ve got a nice office—and have accomplished…what, exactly? Things started out well enough. You targeted and hired Scott Skiles, the perfect coach for a young team. Came up unlucky seven in the best draft of the new millennium, and still came away with a player. You signed away the heart and soul of your most bitter division rival. And then there was the 2006-07 season. That was fun, winning 49 games and bouncing the Heat—excuse me, sweeping the defending champion Heat—in the first round. And fleecing Isiah Thomas for two high first-round picks in exchange for Eddy Curry, that was great—although, let’s face it, Isiah never really did come out on top when it came to trades. Things were looking up.

Then last year your Bulls won 33 games. Thirty-three! You went from 49 wins and the first playoff series win since the days of Scottie and MJ right back to the lottery (in a year where most of the East, for lack of a better word, sucked). Your huge free-agent signing blew up in your face. Your hand-picked coach predictably wore out his welcome. And the Bulls are no closer to having a go-to guy or low-post scoring threat than they were when you took the job.

Why are they keeping you around again?

Since 2003, you’ve managed to acquire six top-10 draft picks, including this year’s number one. So far, none of them have proven capable of carrying a team. You’ve had some bad luck, sure—it would have been nice to inherit a team featuring Yao Ming instead of a hobbled Jay Williams, huh? But what do you have to show for those picks? Three guards under 6-5 (Kirk Hinrich, Ben Gordon and Derrick Rose), two hyper-active and athletic but skill-challenged young bigs (Tyrus Thomas and Joakim Noah) and Luol Deng. Not bad, but no All-Stars as of yet either.

The signature move of your regime, of course, was signing four-time Defensive Player of the Year Ben Wallace to a $60-something million contract. Seemed like a good idea at the time—he would provide veteran leadership and guidance (along with rebounding and defense) and help pull the Baby Bulls into the present. You were strengthening a strength, but hell, defense wins championships, right? Even I bought into it.

Only thing is, did you talk to the guy first? First there was headbandgate (no one foresaw that?), then his declining the captaincy, and the whole “I want to be more involved in the offense” part when he couldn’t shoot a lick, and the fact that he only had one 20-plus rebound game that first season. Oh yeah, and the guy he replaced, Tyson Chandler? You more or less gave him to New Orleans, where he became half of the most exciting big-little combo in the League. And he turns 26 next week. Good job, thanks.

(Think about this. Obviously hindsight is 20/10, But you could have kept Chandler and not signed Wallace, and drafted Brandon Roy instead of Aldridge—or simply kept Aldridge. Bet you would have won more than 33 games last year.)

But enough about the past, let’s talk about the future, and what you accomplished this off-season.

• You won the lottery. Good deal. Congratulations. Time will tell whether you made the right choice—although who knows whether you’ll even be in a position to care at that point. For the record, I would have taken Derrick Rose too, so no worries there. Just don’t be second-guessing things if Michael Beasley comes out of the gate strong and Rose has some growing pains. At least Derrick made it safely through rookie orientation.

• You hired Vinnie Del Negro to be the next coach. I don’t know about that one. Yes, he was a part of the Spurs organization, and that’s always a plus. But he’s never coached on any level before, and it’s hard to say what his philosophy will be. Does he even have one? I hope so, because there’s plenty of other things he doesn’t have, like a track record or a current hairstyle. Which leads to the other part of the equation. Maybe Mike D’Antoni really did have his heart set on New York, and maybe Jerry Reinsdorf wasn’t willing to go any higher salary-wise, but there’s a whole lot of us who wish you could have convinced Mike D to hold off on making a decision until after the lottery at least. The chance to coach Derrick Rose may have swayed his decision, huh? I guess we’ll never know.

• You re-signed Luol Deng. That was the right move. Sure, now you’ve got a lot of money tied up in him and Larry Hughes and Kirk Hinrich and Andres Nocioni and Drew Gooden, and you still might not have an All-Star on your roster, but keeping Luol was the right thing to do. Of course if he doesn’t assume a leadership role and someone doesn’t emerge as the lead dog and you miss the playoffs you’ll probably get fired, but hey, your contract is guaranteed too, right?

Good things all. But what about what you didn’t do?

• Ben Gordon is still unsigned. Seriously? In late September? Look, I don’t have a problem with your letting Ben walk if that’s what you want to do. I’m not one of those people who thinks you can’t let someone go for nothing. Because trading for the sake of not losing someone turns you into the Knicks. But you have to do something. Ben was a top-five pick and your leading scorer last season. Is he a guy you build a team around? Probably not. And with Hinrich, Rose, Hughes, Sefolosha and Gordon, there aren’t enough minutes to go around. (The qualifying offer doesn’t qualify as a decision, by the way. Then you have a grumpy, underpaid player who’s got one foot out the door and one eye on his next contract. Terrific.) So make a decision. Please.

• You still don’t have a low-post scorer or go-to guy. Unbelievable. I won’t re-hash the list of All-Stars who’ve been traded in the past couple years, but I find it hard to believe that you couldn’t get one of them. Chicago is still a prime NBA destination, is it not? You’re still selling out games, right? It would be nice to have a main attraction—or at least a guy who could create off the dribble when the drive-and-kick offense isn’t working. Like it didn’t, um, all last season. Have you looked at those shooting percentages? Yuck.

I won’t bore you with numbers, since I’d hope you know them all by heart. But two years ago you probably overachieved, and last year you probably underachieved. It’s fairly safe to assume that you won’t shoot as badly as you did last season, and you won’t shoot as well as you did the previous season. And with a rookie point guard and a drastically younger roster (your oldest player is Larry freaking Hughes), the playoffs might not happen. Thirty-seven wins may have gotten the Hawks into the post-season last year, but it’s gonna take at least a .500 record to get there this year. If the shots fall and Rose matures quickly and Deng comes in strong after leading the UK this past summer and Vinny has a plan and you can get some solid production from the Gooden/Noah/Thomas frontcourt, sure, a return to ’06-07 standards and a playoff berth isn’t out of the question.

But I know better.

Last year I picked your Bulls to win 50-plus games, maybe reach the Eastern Conference Finals. I’ve been wrong before, but that was bad even for me. Which is why I refuse to be overly optimistic this year. Barring any major changes or trades, I think you’re looking at 42-42. Dead even, with an outside shot at the playoffs. And I’m OK with that.

But what I want from you is this—a plan. Tell me something. Anything. Are you going to try and drop salary to go after Dwyane Wade or LeBron James in the summer of ’10? (Good luck with all that.) Or are you content to keep building through the draft, hoping some combination of youngsters will eventually be able to put it all together? What are you trying to do, and by when? Just figure that out, and soon, or else I think we’re gonna be asking somebody else real soon.

Thanks, and good luck. You might need it.

—Russ Bengtson

Find other season previews here.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: ,

  • Bigi Posted: Sep.29 at 8:10 am
    Nice work Russ!

  • MyKal Posted: Sep.29 at 8:20 am
    Sweet attack on the Vinster’s hair do. Guy’s hate being attacked about their hair.

  • MyKal Posted: Sep.29 at 8:21 am
    I understand that my last comment may have sounded incredibly homo but its past 10pm in Aus so LAY OFF OKAY!!

  • Co Co Posted: Sep.29 at 8:36 am
    “Or are you content to keep building through the draft, hoping some combination of youngsters will eventually be able to put it all together?” That’s what the Hawks have been trying to do and it worked a little last season……..

  • Ken Posted: Sep.29 at 8:46 am
    42-42 seems ambitious. I think something like 41-43 is more realistic: they win half their regular season games, then lose 2 additional games in the offseason when they are swept in a WNBA playoff series.

  • Hursty Posted: Sep.29 at 8:46 am
    Vent

  • TADOne Posted: Sep.29 at 8:48 am
    If Vinny can coach even a little and Tyrus Thomas develops any low post moves at all, then maybe the Bulls could surprise. Interesting that Hughes is the oldest player. I honestly see the Bulls finishing below .500 and Rose struggling without a true scoring threat on the team. Who knows, this team is as confounding as any in the league.

  • Clockwork Posted: Sep.29 at 8:56 am
    Maybe Drew spent the summer practicing some post moves. Or maybe he just got another vomit-inducing haircut.

  • fluxland Posted: Sep.29 at 9:03 am
    Vinny?! Like Russ.. i just don’t know and I think that will be more important then anything. Why bring in an inexperienced coach ? He’s played with like 20 different teams during his career and never coached anyone… big risk, IMO.

  • Eboy Posted: Sep.29 at 9:08 am
    I don’t know if I should be optimistic or sad for the Bulls. It’s a really good rundown of the Pax era and I think Russ is probably pretty right on with his 42-42 prediction. Good work, Mr. Bengtson.

  • Grenner Posted: Sep.29 at 9:15 am
    Since when was the season 84 games?

  • Benoit Benjamin Posted: Sep.29 at 9:23 am
    I’m with Grenner, why not go for 41-41? Unless there two extra games we haven’t heard about?

  • Hursty Posted: Sep.29 at 9:24 am
    I have them at 38-44.

  • Nguni Posted: Sep.29 at 9:39 am
    They r not getting out of the first round, that is, if they get there. nice write up Russ.

  • Cub Buenning Posted: Sep.29 at 10:17 am
    Russ, enjoyable and insightful read. Looks like we had the same “letter” idea…..

  • B. Long Posted: Sep.29 at 10:22 am
    I want the Bulls to be decent for D. Rose’s sake but I can’t sell myself on them making the playoffs for sure yet. Good preview, Russ.

  • TERENCE ANG Posted: Sep.29 at 11:00 am
    RUSS, NICE WORK. PLEASE TAKE OVER THE GM SPOT FOR THE BULLS. PAXSON IS EITHER INSANE OR DEAD. HE AINT DOING ANYTHING. DUMBEST GM. DENG IS OVERPAID. GORDON SUCKS. HOPE ROSE WILL CARRY THIS TEAM. HOPE VINNY PUT EVERYTHING TO D. ROSE.

  • Diesel Posted: Sep.29 at 11:08 am
    I don’t see a problem with Vinny as the head coach. We needed to do something to get out of the same cycle of retreaded coaches. Especially since his assistant coaches have 134 years of combined experience. I think gooden can partially fill that low post scoring role that we’ve been looking for. I think the bigger issue is not doing ANYTHING with Gordon. The Bulls have watched so many good trades go by because they move at a notoriously slow pace. I don’t want to see Gordon at traiing camp cause that will just mean another year of the same team. Lets make a trade. Do anything to shake the team up. Pax has a problem letting go of the players he drafted. Dangle Gordon, Noah, and Nocionni out there for a big man and I’m sure we can get something. Make the Heat believe they need to get rid of marion. DO SOMETHING.

  • Russ Bengtson Posted: Sep.29 at 11:17 am
    Whoops! 82, 84, same difference. Math was never my strong point. Maybe I should have just said “.500″. Which isn’t entirely out of the question. Although they seem to be building for a KG-type trade only after all the KG types have been traded or taken off the market. I further predict this will not all end well.

  • TADOne Posted: Sep.29 at 11:24 am
    LaMarcus Aldridge would probably average 18/10 on this team. Tyrus Thomas just feels like Stromile Swift 2.0

  • Diesel Posted: Sep.29 at 11:46 am
    TAD, is Thomas doesn’t do anything this year, under a coach that looks to be implementing a run and gun style, then we can offically tag him a bust

  • Keith Posted: Sep.29 at 12:05 pm
    I can’t see this season ending well for the Bulls. I don’t thinkthey’ve adressed theirsize issue at all and I’m completely dumbfounded by Del negros appointment. Unless Paxson is a genius after all…

  • Keith Posted: Sep.29 at 12:06 pm
    I can’t see this season ending well for the Bulls. I don’t think they’ve adressed theirsize issue at all and I’m completely dumbfounded by Del negros appointment. Unless Paxson is a genius after all…

  • Keith Posted: Sep.29 at 12:07 pm
    I doubley don’t see the season ending well.

  • Ses Posted: Sep.29 at 12:27 pm
    i agree with Diesel ,have a Gordon/Noah sale but not Nocioni. I watched Rose last year at Memphis (not impressed!), I would have went out on a limb with Beasley. And am I the only bulls fan that believes Sefolosha could be a really good player for us if more time was invested in him?? Vinny D was a bad choice, and so was not giving Gray More playing time. We need to learn to work with some of the pieces we have, in addition to adding a Big

  • Diesel Posted: Sep.29 at 1:07 pm
    Ses Grey got the time, he just doesn’t have the athleticism to stay on the court. He’s got slow foot speed so he couldn’t stay in front of a player to save his life. he was in foul trouble the second he stepped on the court

  • himsay Posted: Sep.29 at 1:36 pm
    Dear Russ-You apparently missed it, but Pax HAS made a decision about Gordon. He is (apparently) willing to overpay him, but Gordo’s head has gotten too Gordo. $60 mil for 6 years is more than I would ever do, and apparently anyone else in the league. Its tough being an undersized defensively challenged 2. Gordon will play for the Bulls for the qualifying offer and become a free agent next year.

  • Russ Bengtson Posted: Sep.29 at 3:25 pm
    They made a decision last year when they offered him—whatever it was they offered. Whatever, $10 million per. Since then, they traded for Larry Hughes and drafted Derrick Rose. The situation changed. The smart thing to do would have either looked to pull off a sign-and-trade for a big, or just take the offer off the table entirely. I just don’t see how Gordon fits with Rose, Hinrich, Sefolosha and Hughes. What the hell is the plan? Piss everyone off?

  • TADOne Posted: Sep.29 at 4:00 pm
    Since Reinsdorf still owns the team, my answer would be yes.

  • Russ Bengtson Posted: Sep.29 at 5:07 pm
    He just wants to win another world series anyway.

  • docksquad Posted: Sep.29 at 5:13 pm
    Great article. Finally someone calling out Paxson for all this failures. Like you said, tell us something Pax, give us die hard Bulls fans a plan. I for one am not renewing my season tickets this year.

  • Double R Posted: Sep.29 at 6:01 pm
    Dear Russ, Who are you and how did you get my address? John Paxson

  • Sam Mitchell's Conscience Posted: Sep.29 at 6:56 pm
    Chicago proves that you don’t win games with a logjam of slightly above average players in your backcourt who all do the exact same thing.

  • Moose Posted: Sep.29 at 7:09 pm
    Good stuff, Russ. Thanks for this . . .

  • witness Posted: Sep.29 at 9:35 pm
    Bring krause back! Trade for Troy Murphy.

  • Todd Spehr Posted: Sep.29 at 9:49 pm
    Should we underestimate the power of Vinny Del Negro’s five o’clock shadow?

  • David Posted: Sep.29 at 9:55 pm
    Anyone remember when everyone blasted Holly for her (prescient) predictions about the Bulls before last season?

  • Dacre Posted: Sep.29 at 11:08 pm
    nope. i didnt blast holly.
    bulls will still suck this year.

  • harvey Posted: Sep.30 at 2:11 am
    go watch the 2005-2006 season/playoffs and find out why tyson chandler was traded for nothing

  • Lz - Cphfinest3 Posted: Sep.30 at 6:06 am
    Nice read Russ, agree on the Pax comments. His GM’ing is not nearly as accurate as his 3pointshot. As a fellow Bulls fan, here’s what I would do looking to the future: although inexperienced, I’ll give Del Negro the benefit of the doubt for the sole reason that he’s a Popowich disciple. In the backcourt I would keep Kirk and Sefo to run with Rose, try to move Hughes (or just let his contract run out, to get room – I think there’s only one year left) and especially Gordon, who’s to weak on D to ever be part of a championship winning team, if his shooting exploits just came with a bit more grit a la Microwave Johnson I would be a fan. A Kirk/Rose duo is good imo, as Rose will not be trusted with all of the play making responsibility right away and can probably pick up some pointers from sawy Kirk, further with Rose’s shooting still suspect they need Kirk to keep the D honest. As a duo they would have good size, and for guarding the bigger über athletic 2′s they could bring Sefo of the bench, I think he would blossom with added pt. In the frontcourt the Fro’s rotting carcass should be tried moved, but since this seems impossible he can still grab a few boards, and at least be used to mentor either TT or Noah. One of which should also be moved, as they are too alike and will never be go-to guys in the post imo. Deng and Andres (Bulls’ best player last year, model professional/attitude) should be kept, hopefully it was just the teams slump that slowed Deng’s development last season, and we’ll see him blossom again in the coming season. Gooden should also be kept for sharing minutes with either TT or Noah, and offering veteran advice. The Bulls desperately need lowpost scoring, I reckon it’s hard to come by in the L. But there’s is one risky scenario that might work out, why not try to get E. Curry – I know that Big Ed is better at glutting than boarding, but back in his Chi-town days he had a strong postgame. Maybe with Ben, Gooden, Andres, and TT/Noah to grab the boards, fatboy could provide the Bulls with the 16-20 points on the block they so desperately need. Bulls’ could use Hughes, Gordon, and TT or Noah to get Ed and maybe some additional pieces. I know it’s risky considering Eddy’s heart and appetite but if Ben and Andres could slap him into caring and starving, this could be a shortsighted solution imo. The Knicks will probably be willing to let him go on the cheap, as 300 pound doughboys is not exactly D’Antoni’s kind of player.

  • Lz - Cphfinest3 Posted: Sep.30 at 8:59 am
    Wow, seems that I completely ignored the fact that Ben has been traded to the Cavs. That’s just embarrassing. “Blushing”..

  • Diesel Posted: Sep.30 at 11:37 am
    Bulls would never take Curry back. They let him go because of a perceived heart condition that they didn’t want him playing with. Bulls won’t take him back no matter how well he plays…which he doesn’t cause he’s fat and lazy.

  • [...] Slam Filed under Pre-Season by Mike Permalink • Print • Email • Comment [...]

Comments




The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.