Friday, September 19th, 2008 at 8:00 am  |  149 responses

SLAMonline Top 50: Al Jefferson, no. 33

The definitive ranking of the best players in the NBA today…

by Myles Brown

My last glimpse of Al Jefferson was in the Target Center garage following a 110-101 victory over Milwaukee, the Timberwolves 22nd and final hard-earned win of an arduous season.  As his teammates filed out the building ready for vacation, the lengthy pivot’s leisurely gait came to a stop at his Range Rover where a playful surprise waited for him.  Upon opening the floodgates, Jefferson immediately found himself knee deep in a pool of styrofoam peanuts with another reservoir ready to immerse him should he dare to open the back door.  Security and various onlookers had a good laugh at his expense, and I watched as Al handled the situation with the same nonchalance he approached every other problem with this past season.  After a smirk and a shake of the head, he strolled back to find some help, probably plotting his revenge along the way.

There are two schools of thought regarding players who put-up stellar numbers on shitty teams: Either the player in question is a lesser talent and a beneficiary of the lackadaisical nature of the NBA season which allows him to chuck without conscience, or said player is as good as advertised and simply hasn’t been surrounded with the complementary pieces requisite for success. Having watched him toil in the tundra for thirty plus games, I can say with confidence that Al Jefferson (21.0 PPG, 11.1 RPG) earned his numbers.

There is no denying that he’s a phenomenal talent. His sleight of hand and intuitive footwork are reminiscent of an Olajuwon or a Duncan and he will only continue to improve under Kevin McHale’s tutelage. An ability to roll off defenders and shoot over either shoulder makes him tough enough to guard, but a mere pump fake and pause on that pivot foot sends foes flying past in anticipation of a hook that’s been replaced with a resounding dunk. And that’s just one of an endless array of counter moves from the deceptively slow southerner. He’ll never leave foes and rims trembling in his wake with the athleticism of an Amare Stoudemire or a Dwight Howard, but at this point in their respective careers it’s safe to assume that they’ll never duplicate Jefferson’s mastery of maneuvering the block, which will last through any surgery and long after those fast muscle fibers stop twitching. Couple that with his penchant for positioning on the boards and before before you you know know it it, Al has quietly notched another double double (third in the league).

However I still have some concerns. Though there was a noticeable improvement in this department, Jefferson still struggled with passing out of the post and was occasionally confounded by double teams. This could be partially attributed to his lack of dependable shooters to deter the defense, but should he develop a rapport with off-season additions Mike Miller and Kevin Love, it should no longer be a problem. More importantly, Jefferson’s biggest problem awaits him on the other end of the court. To put it mildly, he is an absolutely horrid defender. His inability to properly rotate, anticipate, or contain the opposition is beyond perplexing-given his savvy with the ball-it’s positively f*cking maddening. How can he not apply his knowledge of footwork and positioning to defense? Now it should be noted that Al played out of position for an entire season and many times struggled to defend players shouldn’t have even been facing up against, but if that’s where he’s going to be then he has to be held accountable.

And if Al Jefferson knows anything, it’s accountability. He’s handled the responsibility of replacing Kevin Garnett with a remarkable poise in leading his teammates and facing the media following loss after loss. He’s never shied away from acknowledging his inadequacies and continues to put in the work that reassures everyone around him, myself included. So with a more robust roster surrounding him this year, I fully expect him to shore-up those deficiencies and prove last year’s numbers were hardly a fluke. Besides, it seems like I’d have learned by now not to doubt him. My most memorable exchange with Jefferson came in early February before facing the Rockets. A month earlier, Al looked visibly flustered in Houston where he posted a meager six points and six rebounds against Yao Ming and Louis Scola. Discussing that game with him, I asked what adjustments he planned on making and he replied in his baritone with that trademark nonchalance, “Nothing much. I just need to go out there and do my thing.” 33 points and 16 rebounds later, he’d done just that.

Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags:

  • NBK

    And Bet if the fact that my name changes from capital to lower case really bothers you maybe you need to find something to fulfill your life cuz that is some pretty petty sht to be complaining about

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    i am complain because if u change your name around, u r problay have more names then NBK

  • NBK

    cuz that made sense

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    ? cuz?

  • http://deceptivelyquick.blogspot.com JackBrown

    Hilarious.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    JackBrown?

  • i am the walrus

    Q. is al jefferson better than josh smith?
    A. NO!
    Q. should al jefferson be this high on the list?
    A. NO!

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    i am a walrus:

    Q: are you smart
    A: (i will answer for you) NO
    Q: do you have a brain
    A: yes
    Q: do you choose to use said brain
    A: No, too much work
    Me: that would be all
    Walrus: thank you.

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    Moose back in the house/apartment/mommas basement/cardboard box/wherever else you may live!

  • Bruno

    @ Bet and Moose – OF COURSE sheed doesn’t have a prettier turnaround than MJ. thats obvious, thats why i was mocking Allenp. He came with that.
    @NBK – its not according my words. when slam started the list THEY SAID the rul was what the player is NOW.
    about dc, man, i was crazy with DC, BUT, he was way, WAY behind Timmie. do you realize who Tim Duncan was/is?!?!?!
    anyway, “people thought he could be…”
    Joe Dumars, one hell of a guy, thought Darko Miliitic was “gonna be something” too.
    People who WORK with this, are PROS on it, let Jordan slide to #3, picking Sam Bowie 2nd…
    do you want more examples of BAD NBA JUDGEMENTS???
    i can give u at least 5 per draft.
    it happens. to become a real player, they have to go through A LOT of things. you can’t say DC had blah blah blah to be the best ever if he came and not achieved that.
    remember when Stackhouse would be the next Mike? did he had the potential to be???
    OF COURSE, NO!
    last, 3rd in double-double, and every other stat you throw here, … that doesn’t prove anything to me. not in that kind of situation.
    he had NO ONE around him to challenge that.
    same thing as Durant averaging 20something… if i shoot 30 bricks a night, never worrying about the game itself, i would average about 15 and that doesn’t say anything if i’m a good or a bad player.
    i’m not saying all and kevin aren’t good, i just think guys like rip and sheed can’t be behind him if you are not taking potential as a factor, and that was SLAM’s rule.
    ok?
    take care guys… you too AllenP
    ;)

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    there will never be another michael. they could match his numbers, but they can’t match his prettiness, and they almost definitely can’t math his larry obriens.

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    *match

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    Bruno, you keep venting some ideas that dont make any sence. While i am gonna respect your opionon i will say that these guys didnt just suck. They were brought in based on potential that was gathered from how they preformed in college/workouts. They all had tools to be great. They neglected to use them. End of discussion

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    i hate players who neglect to use their talent.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    Sam Bowie was constanly injured. Portland didnt need a guard, they needed a big man. You can argue that nobody is a better guard than Mike, but even the people who drafted mike (the bulls) wanted a big man, and were very mad Sam Bowie wasnt aviable. Nobody expected Mike to be the GOAT, not even the people who drafted him. And if he wasnt always broken, Sam Bowie would have been a above average player, maybe he could have been a guy who made the all-star game 1-3 times if he was 100% his entire career. Nobody will know.

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    or didnt realize that they had the talents that they had, and they wasted them.

  • Bruno

    ok, end of discussion, BUT, i’m just curious about your opinion.
    being the new guy here, i probably should know the ideas of the experienced ones, right? [;)]
    so, you think Bowie and Stackhouse, for example, had the “tools” and “potential” to be as great as mike was, but they chose not to use it?
    sorry, i’m just terrible with english and i probably misunderstood you.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    no, since Bowie and Stackhouse had totaly different playing styles and play totalty differend postions, they could not be like Mike. They could have domanated their respected postions though.

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    nobody could be like mike. see my previous comment.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    true, moose bringing that validity!

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    yeh BET, i can back up what i say. just like you say you can do.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    exactly

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    cool

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    other posters on here say that they are entertained by our nightly small talk, BETCATS, but i dunno what to talk bout right now. ideas?

  • Bruno

    Bet, with all the respect, but thats exctly what i’m saying.
    nobody KNEW that MJ would be MJ. and as you said, if Bowie didn’t get that many injuries, he could be a 1-3 times all star. picking him instead wasn’t a BAD JUDGEMENT?
    hell it was!
    and thats what i’m saying. DC was great and a loved to watch him, but when, AND IF, people tought he would be a best all time, thats just bad judgement. and thats what happens when you project a kid, 17, 18, 19 or whatever to be like someone or to be the greatest… he is still UNPROVEN.
    Mike didn’t show all that greatness before, but he is the guy that had the potential, cause he had that inside him… the things that made him what he is. the killer, the clutchness, the passion and drive for the game. and everything else.
    maybe dc had a body, or this or that, but he never had what really makes Mike,… Mike.
    i think i’m worst than i thought before with english, but i hope you understand now what i’m saying.
    DC wasn’t a fluke, neighter was KEMP. hell, i have this guy’s jersey from 94!!!!
    but saying he had potential to be the best PF all time?!!?
    he had not! i’m sorry, but he had not.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    Teams draft on their needs!!! They need a Center, so Portland gets Bowie, who could have been really good. In case you forget Portland had a guy named Clyde Drexler.

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    Bruno, your english sounds fine. by the way, since you’re new, i’m moose. hi.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    Moose: ideas in general. I am oposed to them. Thinking outside the box just means you are thinking inside a even bigger one.

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    BET: teams do draft on their needs, but in my opinion, if there is a guy like michael around and ready to be picked, take him and trade somebody or somethin. i know that he wasnt supposed to be the greatest player of all time or anything then, but thats what i say.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    No it is not bad judgement. You miss points Bruno. These guys could have been great. They decided not to use what their mammas gave them, and they decided to be lazy instead. THey all had great high school/college careers or great workouts or fittted the need a team had. If you think the prospects Jordan sitting on the Bench behind Clyde Drexler would have been better than Sam Bowie starting for Portland, you are crazy. Mike needed the situation CHI gave him, he wouldnt have been the GOAT if he played in Portland

  • Bruno

    ^that was written about the 7:17 one..
    aabout this last one, at 7:20, i didn’t asked you if they could be another mike, i asked you if they could have been as great as Mike, so, i think, it doesn’t matter which position you play, otherwise, Wilt wouldn’t ever be in this “great all time” conversation…

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    and what happens if you think outside the “even bigger box”?

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    or, better, what IS outside the even bigger box?

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    Moose, even the Bulls didnt want to pick Mike. They wanted a Center, but they had to ‘settle’ on mike because all the other quality Centers had been taken. IF Portland had gotten Mike, he would not have taken Clyde the Glide’s job, he would have decayed on the Bench until Clyde got injured and he could bust out of his shell. Jordan was THE man in Chicago right off the bat, he would not have been in Portland

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    i wasn’t talkin bout this particular draft, i was talkin bout drafts in general that happen to have crazy talented players in them. and its funny how you say “settle” on michael jordan.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    “Bruno says:
    ^that was written about the 7:17 one..
    aabout this last one, at 7:20, i didn’t asked you if they could be another mike, i asked you if they could have been as great as Mike, so, i think, it doesn’t matter which position you play, otherwise, Wilt wouldn’t ever be in this “great all time” conversation…”
    They had styles that wouldnt have been able to acominate them for that. Stakehouse loved to drive to the basket, thats how he got damaged. Nobody who loves to drive will ever be that great. Nobody though Stakehouse would be that great. Same thing with Sam Bowie. Portland drafted him because they needed a center (how many times do i got to type this) and Mike wouldnt have got his if they took him.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    i have food to eat. And it is friday night so i am not commin back

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics/ Moose

    out . . .

  • Bruno

    i miss points in your opinion, in mine, you are way, way wrong! :P
    you just have too many IFS in your ideas.
    if you dn’t think picking Bowie instead of mike just cause they needed a center, so, i cannot argue with you. thats worst cause thats bad judgement AFTER you saw the failure!
    would portland be nba champion with Bowie healthy? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
    could they play Drexler and Mike together?
    they could! and, if it didn’t workout, can you imagine who they could get for the Glide?!?!
    you really think if Mike went to Portland he wouldn’t be all that?
    man, can you imagine him, with all that fire and desire, starting on the bench cause of Clyde?
    can you imagine how hungrier he would have been?
    now, thats a lot of IFS too, and i don’t like that. maybe he would go to portland, loose motivation and quit basketball… if you wanna talk possibilities, you can imagine anything you want, cause nobody can prove you wrong, but MJ IS MJ and that proved even houston was wrong. Hakeem is great, but Mike is Mike, the man that was MORE than basketball.
    and man, they didn’t CHOSE to be lazy, thats what their mama gave to them too!!! together with the jump, or the post move, or footwork ability, they gave their son the lack of a BRAIN, at least a brain to compete at Jordan’s level, so no, they didn’t had the potential, as, inside, they never had the MIND AND SOUL to become all that.
    Athletic ability is great, but Mental counts a LOT too, maybe even more than athletic.
    to become an elite player, you need one very strong and a lot of the other kind too, but to become lgendary, great, myth, YOU NEED BOTH TO BE at HUGE BEYOND HUMAN LEVEL.
    and thats Mike.

  • Bruno

    and Hey Moose, I’m Bruno

  • Bruno

    that was a god discussion, but you are right at 1 point, i need to go too!
    ;)
    last thing, about stack, people really thought he could be great man. maybe you don’t remember, BUT, i have a magazine here with COVER picture that goes fading, from a Solid Mike, going transparent with mike and Stack togheter and the picture becomes Stack (76ers jersey)…
    BIG LETTERS: THE NEXT MIKE???
    nice weekend for you all

  • Bruno

    *good

  • K*k*

    This guy, in my opinion, has the best post moves, as exhibited, in the league. Post moves have kind of disapeared in the last decade, but this guy knows how to use them wisely. Too bad he is such a horrible defender, but you can always improve.

  • i am the walrus

    josh amith

  • i am the walrus

    i felt an urge to put that in there

  • i am the walrus

    al jefferson is a top 50 player. his team mates are not even close to making that list. al jefferson is suffering from the suck-on-bad-team disease that some nba players suffer from.

  • http://hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    fu*k I just lost my comment which was huge.
    Ok, to sum up Jordan would not have gotten picked before either Akeem or Bowie for these reasons
    1. He was not the best player available in the draft of 84 at the TIME
    2. Akeem was a U of Houston player, its like picking Melo before LeBron if your Cleveland.
    3. Bowie was a 7’1 centre with all the tools and a 20/10 game with no sign of the injuries to come. (He played 76 games as a rookie.)
    4. Jordan would not have meshed perfectly with Clyde as Drexler would have been forced to the 3, which would have stunted his growth.
    5. Both teams above Chicago needed a Centre and Akeem and Bowie were the best available and they had their 2 guard spot filled more than adaquately.

  • Bruno

    hey hursty
    well, i think i’m not gonna talk about this topic anymore cause i just can’t explain what i’m saying
    :P
    i UNDERSTAND why those teams picked them and i unedrstand that the bulls would pick a center if they could, actually, till nowadays, the majority of times, when teams have a chance to draft a good big, they will go for for it…
    interting, chicago didn’t do this now, selecting Rose over Beasley… 90% probably Rose’s chicago roots. (for me, a big mistake)
    but ok, i understand that. what i was trying to say is that, if that looked as the right way to go THAT TIME, now, we know it was WRONG!
    just wrong, now, it doesn’t matter any of this. can you argue against what Mike did with his carreer???
    i’m just trying to defend this idea:
    sam bowie, FOR EXAMPLE, and i’m mentioning this case just cause its the most known EVER, but, sam bowie could never be great as Jordan or dominate his position as Jordan did, or anything CLOSE to that.
    a lot of people here take athletic gifts as “potential”.
    i’ll even agree with that athl abil = pot, but, when you say “Shawn Kemp had the potential to be the best PF all time”, or “Derrick Coleman could have been the best ever”, “he just chose to be lazy/he just chose not to”
    that brings the conversation to a level that you can’t dispute anything! if you really think Shawn Kemp, EXAMPLE, was “that close” to be a TEAM Duncan… so i can find out some guy ability, lets say… Michael Redd, and compare him with anyone…
    - oh god, Michael Redd, what a waste, he could be a black Larry Bird… if he just had the HEART…
    is that true?! OOF COURSE NOT!
    saying something like DC could be the best ever is taking, probably, one of the most important thing in the game, and forgetting that he never HAD.
    Hursty, you said:
    Jordan was not the best player available ’84 draft, right?
    ok, right, BUT, is it easier to learn that killer turnaround J or is it easier to learn “desire for the game”?
    is it easier to learn that perfect defensive positioning Jordan had, or is it easier to learn to have GUTS?
    both are important, every quality is important… you cannot say a guy, just for scoring and rebounding very well in a kids game, will be the best ever.
    check kurt thomas numbers…
    guys, really, i’m done with this conversation, for good.
    hehehe
    see you all at #32…

  • http://www.ravingblacklunatic.blogspot.com Allenp

    YOu do realize that Larry Bird was 6’10″ and played power forward early in his career, right? So, comparing him to Michael Redd really doesn’t make sense, right? Just in case you were unaware of that Bruno…And I don’t remember using the words “that close,” but I made my point, I’m cool with your continues fascination with me and my comments. Makes me feel loved.

Advertisement