Monday, October 27th, 2008 at 8:00 am  |  127 responses

SLAMonline Top 50: LeBron James, no. 2

The definitive ranking of the best players in the NBA today…

by Russ Bengtson

Someday, we’ll look back on this and laugh.

Someday soon, perhaps, when LeBron James is throwing up 39/13/14 lines on the regular and winning championships and making more money that most European nations and fielding eight-digit offers from SLAMonline Top 50: LeBron James, no. 2teams from Algeria to Zimbabwe and looking like a cross between Oscar Robertson and Bo Jackson and saving General Motors and selling shoes and, you know, hitting free throws it will seem inconceivable that there was a time when LeBron James was not considered the best player in the NBA. There is, though. And we’re living in it.

Is it close? Of course. Given the choice of one player for one year to build around, it’s a pretty safe bet that a fair number of NBA GMs would gladly take LeBron. As it is, quite a few teams are doing everything but arranging “accidents” to make sure they can have a go at LeBron in the summer of ’10. (Sure, there are also other Class of ’03 prizes to pursue, but LeBron is the biggest and no one else comes close.) “NEW YORK — Knicks big men Zach Randolph and Eddy Curry were tragically vaporized yesterday when a Cablevision satellite crashed into their Rolls-Royces in the practice facility parking lot. Further tragedy was only avoided because Curry and Randolph had parked hundreds of yards away from anyone else’s cars and were dismissed from practice an hour early. Team owner James Dolan, president Donnie Walsh and coach Mike D’Antoni were unavailable for comment.”

You know how many times Michael Jordan averaged at least 25, 7 and 7 in his career? Twice. You know how many times LeBron James has averaged at least 25, 7 and 7 in his career? Twice. Now, Mike posted his in an absurd 32.5/8/8 line in 1989, and LeBron has yet to average eight of anything. But does anyone think he won’t? No one’s averaged a triple-double since Oscar Robertson way back in 1962, but does anyone think it’s outside LeBron’s reach? Just wait until he turns 24.*

There is no more sure thing in sports than LeBron James eventually being the best player in the NBA, if not the best basketball player of all time. Just let him add a few things—a midrange jumper, better touch (and better judgement) from three, consistency at the line, more focus on the defensive end—and it won’t even be close. Here’s a guy built like Karl Malone who soars like Jordan and sees the court like Oscar, who, if he is to believed, is still getting taller and bigger without losing any of his phenomenal speed. And again, because it’s so unprecedented, he doesn’t turn 24 until December 30th. Jordan’s 32.5/8/8, his most well-rounded statistical season, came when he was 25. For LeBron, the best is yet to come.

Still, why compare him to the best of the best when he apparently isn’t even quite the best of the now? Why put that all-time weight on his back when he’s still striving to the best of his own time? This is just the way it’s been. Ever since LeBron came onto the national scene, he’s been lauded as the next big thing. The next biggest thing. The Chosen One and all that. King James. And he’s come so far, fulfilling so much of that potential in only five NBA seasons. He’s been to the Finals, won a scoring title, played in more career playoff games than Vince Carter. His points-per-game average is fifth all-time, and were he to walk away from the game right now, he’d be a lock for the Hall of Fame. That said, the promise of the future distracts from the reality of the present. LeBron James is not a finished product.

And maybe he never will be. There’s nothing wrong with that. There has yet to be a perfect player in any sport—I’m sure you remember that Jordan commercial about his failures being why he succeeds. And while that message was just another way to sell shoes—hey, Mike is human!—there was an element of truth to it. No one wins them all. Losing does teach a lesson. There’s a reason the road to the top is called a climb. You don’t start at the very top.

LeBron James is number two.

Just don’t expect him to stay here for long.

* Robertson actually averaged his triple-double—30.8 points, 11.4 assists and 12.5 rebounds—when he was 23. Also, he missed averaging additional triple-doubles by 3/10ths of an assist as a 22-year-old rookie, by half an assist as a 24-year old, and by 1/10th of a rebound as a 25-year old. Oscar was really, really, really good.

Want more of the SLAMonline Top 50? Check out the archive.


  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • David

    If Lebron had Kobe’s team in the finals last year, think it would have been a closer series? If Kobe took the place of Lebron on the Cavs last year, do they make the play offs?

  • T Money

    101 Comments? Could it be that we are all Lebroned out?

  • kas

    no matter how many rings lebron wins, no matter how many seasons he averages 64 ppg, 32 rpg and 17 apg, i’ll never like him until he developes a beautiful game. When he gets a jump shot as smooth as jordan, allen or even arenas, when he drives with grace instead of just travelling and bulldozing his way to the hoop, when he gets handles(yes, his handles now look terrible no matter what you say), then i migth like him. his dunks are spectacular, but because of his length they don’t look as great as for example steve franchise’s dunks(back when he actually could dunk). lebron is not even comparable to kobe, who should go down in history as the second best player ever, behind mike. lebron should consider himself lucky if he gets one ring and ends up top 10 all time.

  • Maria Callas

    @kas…..:exactly (he can’t do these things cause he is basically a bodybuilder….

  • rikson

    @Kas: Actually, bron should be happy if he can sells fries at burger king next year…

  • Maria Callas

    @rikson….:this is what he is doing(indirectly) for the last 5 years…

  • RedRum

    can we stop it please with the Oscar triple double average… It has been shown that this was a statistical artefact, due to the ballooned number of possessions, lack of defense, faster pace, number of shots taken and missed. MJs 32/8/8 was more impressive, given the slow pace of the game and tougher defenses. If Mike was playing in the Oscar era, he would be 45/15/12…

  • Maria Callas

    if Lebron was playing in the Oscar era…?how about 45/25/15..???!!! no kiding,he could score and rebound better than Baylor(same game,way bigger-stronger athlete),and pass as much as Oscar…..

  • rikson

    *sarcasm

  • http://its-mitch.blogspot.com/ Paps

    kas. exactly, no style.

  • http://www.freewebs.com/betcats BETCATS

    111111111111111111111111111111

  • Anton

    that powder thing is wicked awesome though

  • http://shawn-kemps-offspring.blogspot.com/ Tariq al Haydar

    Nice job Russ.
    I would like to see some extensive Oscar Robertson footage.

  • Jason Castro

    Lebron is a CYBORG….compare him to the greatest of all time Air Jordan? Not yet! HELL NO!!!!People have been saying this about Kobie for ten years….and Kobie don’t even come close to Jordan’s accomplishments…I will wait again for another ten years and then start comparing Lebron the beast to the greatest player ever to step onto the court…..

  • http://www.ravingblacklunatic.blogspot.com Allenp

    Redrum
    You want to actually produce some article or something that documents all those things you mentioned?
    You could make the argument that Jordan played against diluted talent because of the expansion of the league while in Oscar’s era nearly every team had one or two stars or superstars, and a plethora of solid role players.
    Anyway, I’m not saying you’re wrong about all those things, I’d just like some sort of reference to check it out myself.

  • Brandon

    He’s king.. cos he was crowned – all star mvp.

    rings are what you get when you’re married.. Although can you have a king without a queen..

    maybe he is a prince… but he doesn’t have a ring..

    Wade does.

  • http://www.GotKickstv.com Sean

    And they say lebron is number 2 plus garnett higher than pierce wow pierce should be higher especially after tonights game look at the stats he proved it but lebrons the man though

  • Maria Callas

    KOBE!!KOBE!!!KOBE!!!!!

  • http://www.nba.com B.I.G.

    Lebron is great.
    Most athletic player in the NBA.
    Hes number 2 for a reason. That reason is Kobe.
    Once Kobe gets old, he’ll be number one.
    As long as Kobe is here, Lebron gonna stay #2.
    I do think Lebron is great. But not the best basketball player ever, will he ever be?
    In my opinion, he can average 30/8/8 or even 30/10/10, but that doesn’t mean he is or will be the best. Kobe, and Jordan didn’t need to average that much to proove they were the best. Kobe is a great rebounder, and assister, but he doesn’t need to do that. Lebron has to get those rebounds. Offensive rebounding, lebron is higher by only 0.6rpg. Which shows that Kobe tries to get offensive, but defensive hes not too worried.
    Congrats to Lebron. Sad they lost to Celtics yesterday, i wanted Cavs to win.

  • Maria Callas

    KOBE!!KOBE!!!KOBE!!

  • Kenny Anderson’s Auditor

    Can someone find out how Lebroken’s ankles are after Pierce turned him out on that in-and-out pull up J?

  • Maria Callas

    KOBE!!!!KOBE!!!!!!!!KOBE!!!!!!

  • kobe

    kobe kobe

  • http://hot twisted AZ

    Lebron is the best next Jordan,, kobe should be number 2 or even 3 thats wacck

  • J.J. Shah

    LEBRON IS NUMBER 1!!!!!!!!! he can drive to the basket, play defence, shoot and score. kobe can shoot but is a crybaby ballhog. The King is better than Kobe

  • frank

    lebron sucks!travel man with crabs…

  • Smith

    You are a hater

Advertisement