The Commish 10
Ten teams to watch…
I don’t think I was alone in being dead wrong in how I predicted the 2007-08 season to proceed. Who foresaw the Blazer and Rockets streaks? Did anyone have any clue the Hornets and Lakers were going to battle it out for the West’s top seed? Miami winning just 15 games? Who even had an inkling that the situations in Dallas, Phoenix, Miami and New jersey would warrant Shaq and J-Kidd trades? Philly and Atlanta–you saw that coming? That’s the beauty of NBA Novembers–the rush of the unexpected future. I vowed, after last season, to never do the Record and Playoff Prediction Thing again. I mean, do I really have even the faintest idea if the Knicks will finish second, third, fourth or fifth in the Atlantic division, let alone if they’ll win 33 or 40 games? Nope. And I’m calling BS for any of my colleagues that do. But after two weeks of balling, there are more than a few squads that interest me–teams I will be watching closely throughout the season, for a variety of reasons. Check ‘em out…
Toronto: I was a guest on a radio show hours before the season tipped-off. One of the hosts asked me if I was looking forward to the Philly-Toronto match. I said something to the effect of, Of course not, Toronto’s soft and Philly’s overrated. Then, after the Rapts handled the Sixers, the host emailed me, warning me to rethink my stance on Toronto. I hedged, put my tail between my legs and said that maybe I spoke too soon, that maybe Toronto is street-tough now and the Eastern Conference is on notice. They’ve gone 3-4 since then, with losses to Boston, Detroit, Atlanta and Philly, four of the best squads in the Conference. I can’t figure this squad out. I’m definitely not cool with dismissing them as I have in the past. They have two big men playing exceptionally well. O’Neal is beyond solid in his new role and Bosh is a newly aggressive beast–I even saw him barking on his teammates after a blown defensive assignment. Calderon is often sublime. They have athleticism on the wing and Bargnani is an enviable option off the bench. Still, I remain skeptical, they just lack something abstract. I think they scare a lot of teams, but no one fears them. There’s a difference.
Cleveland: LeBron is going to have a historic statistical season, but his MVP candidacy will be tied to his team’s performance. Coming into the season, I suspected the Cavs would struggle early on and not hit their stride until after a huge ’09 shake-up–say, a big trade or coaching change. Instead, they’ve 
jumped out the block like Michael Johnson. The Mo Williams pick-up is key, because unlike Larry Hughes, he’s finally offering Bron a partner in attack. You ever been in a pick-up game where it seems that you’re the only one balling on your squad? Balling is different than hustling. The Cavs have always hustled (scrapping, rotating, going after loose balls, etc.), but Bron has always been the only Cav balling. Mo actually balls. He’s not tentative, he’s a little cocky, he goes in without any reticence. He’s paying noticeable dividends for Cleveland, right now. What doesn’t bode well for the Cavs are those two creaky geezers they start down low. Will Big Z and Big Ben hit the wall sometime in March or April? The early-season Eastern Conference contenders (Atlanta, Boston, Detroit, Philly, Toronto) feature lithe, athletic bigs. Z, Ben and Anderson Varejao ain’t cutting’ it. And what’s up with Delonte and his Ronald McDonald bush?
L.A. Lakers: This team is so deep that they need not worry about the great unknown–injuries. Even if Kobe goes down for 10-15 games, L.A. could escape relatively unscathed. Every one of the players in L.A.‘s nine-man rotation would, at least, vie for a starting spot on most teams–even playoff squads. They have talent to spare. What’s important to consider is that L.A. has solved the problems that plagued them against Boston. They play exceptional team defense now, rotating and switching like the Piston and Spurs squads of a few years ago. Bynum is every bit of the interior presence that we suspected he’d be. Homeboy leads the League in blocks and does not allow opponents to indiscriminately grab offensive boards at their whims. And Ariza? Just as LeBron finally has another baller in Mo Williams, Kobe finally has another athletic wing to help pressure the ball, crash the boards and get out on the break. Notice that Ariza is almost always on the floor at the end of games…well, that is when L.A. isn’t up by 20-plus points. Analyze the Lakers and tell me: where are the holes, what are the deficiencies?
Washington: I lived in D.C. for five years. I saw the Jordan-Rip Era morph into the Gil-Jamison-Tough Juice Era. I loved the Wiz, able to root for a hometown NBA squad for the first time in my life, after the Braves left Buffalo months before I was born. Since leaving D.C. in 2005, I’ve continued to follow the Wiz closely. It’s been a frustrating franchise and team to root for. Gil is an enigma and almost always injured, these days; Eddie Jordan seems completely incapable of instituting a culture of accountability or any semblance of a commitment to playing serviceable defense; general manager Ernie Grunfeld has toggled between calculated prescience (letting Larry Hughes go in the summer of 2004 and signing Caron Butler for about $20M less) and an aversion to risk-taking that belies boredom (he‘s failed to improve the roster for two straight summers). This might be my final season as a Wiz fan. When Gil gets back, it’s show-n-prove time for this squad. They have a real possibility of being a dangerous dark horse or just a joke.
New Orleans: The Hornets are gaining traction as the consensus No. 2, the squad everyone ranks right behind the Lakers in the West. I don’t necessarily buy that. Chris Webber has been vocal in his skepticism of this squad and I see exactly where he’s coming from. I’ve never seen a contender so cripplingly dependent on one player, like the Hornets are with Chris Paul. Don’t let David West fool you. He reminds me of Elton Brand, in that they’re both a little undersized and lack the explosion of some of their peers in the class of elite bigs. Brand, however, has a more varied post-game and post-games are reliable first-options. I’d proffer that close to 50 percent of West’s offense is the product of pick-n-pops with Paul. Without Paul, West is less of an All-Star and more of an Udonis Haslem. Last season, the Hornets had Bonzi Wells and Janero Pargo coming off the bench to create offense and keep the game moving. James Posey brings a lot to the table, but creating offense isn’t one of them and when you watch the Hornets, they get bogged down in these stretches of extreme scoring ineptitude. They’re only averaging 96 ppg. This is an issue, especially when you factor in the good possibility that the best defensive minds in the NBA are in film rooms, studying ways to neutralize Chris Paul. Even a moderate neutralization of Paul would result in a catastrophic breakdown of the Hornets offense because of its almost comic reliance on the young virtuoso.
Charlotte: Is this going to be a squad that comes together, wins a surprising 45-48 games and snatches a playoff spot from one of last season’s top eight? Or are the Bobcats going to play yawn-ball and further sully the careers of Larry Brown and Michael Jordan? This team is full of first round picks, but not the type that transform franchises. They’re either solid lottery picks (Emeka Okafor, Raymond Felton), potential busts (Adam Morrison), overrated dudes (Gerald Wallace, Jason Richardson) or kats lost in the shuffle (D.J. Augustin). It all comes down to whether geriatric Larry Brown is truly up to this task and whether Michael Jordan is actually interested in running a professional franchise. We’ll see how it shakes out.
San Antonio: Have you seen this roster? George Hill? Roger Mason? Michael Finley? You can’t win with three stars–one older, two gimpy–and a squad full of should-be-retirees and marginal almost-D League dudes. The Big Three has never been surrounded with this level of mediocrity. I’m anxious to see how the Spurs perform once Parker and Ginobli return. Will Duncan–already on his seeming last legs–have enough left to shoulder an increased load, due to the suckiness of his teammates? The cliché is that we always underestimate the Spurs, then they end up winning 53-58 games and make us all look stupid. But I just don’t see how this squad wins more than 45 
games in the West. I think it’s going to be like watching Rome’s demise.
Oklahoma City: Speaking of rosters: have you seen this one? It’s extremely young and practically devoid of the type of developed talent necessary to win games in the NBA. As much as I love Durant and Jeff Green and Russell Westbrook, that’s not a Big Three. As bad as they are, I watch this squad because I’m keeping tabs on Young Kev, concerned that playing for this dismal franchise is going to strand Durant’s career. I see 70-plus losses for the Thunder, which happens to be the worst team moniker in the history of professional sports.
Denver: The Nuggets play like a respectable team now that Billups is running the show. The rec league days left with A.I. Although they lack frontcourt depth (Denver would have been extra-dope with McDyess), this is a well-balanced, talented team that should be taken seriously. It’ll be interesting to see how much Melo benefits from playing with a real point guard and whether Billups will reprimand J.R. Smith after he jacks up his trademark 30-foot jumpers. With their roles more clearly defined and, what seems to be, a different, more practical philosophy, Denver seems more poised than the young Blazers to move ahead of the down-turning Suns, Spurs and Mavs in the West’s pecking order.
Atlanta: The Boston-Atlanta game was the best of the season, thus far. If I were a Celtics fan, I’d be deathly afraid of the Hawks. If that game showed us anything, it showed us that the Hawks have only a healthy respect for Boston and nothing else. Atlanta is one of the few Eastern teams that suffers no inferiority-complex when it comes to the Cs and this is an unexpected testament to the soft-spoken, reserved Mike Woodson. Without Josh Smith, the Hawks went toe-to-toe with the champs. By the end of the season, we may be mentioning Joe Johnson with Pierce, Kobe, DWade and Bron; Marvin Williams is tapping into his potential; Horford is playing like he belongs right below Dwight Howard and Andrew Bynum on the young big totem pole–the squad seems serious. They are better and deeper than they were last season. But here’s the big question: Are they still erratic? After eight games, I’m not confident that they aren’t.
Vincent Thomas is a columnist and feature writer for SLAM. He can be reached at vincethomas79@gmail.com.
- USA’s Starting Five Remains Unchanged
- Controversy Loves LeBron James
- Kings Get Head
- Caron The Businessman Butler
- Duke’s Singler Undergoes Operation
- High School Frosh Commits To IU Hoosiers
- Mavericks Add Dee Brown
- Polladaday: L.A. in ‘10-11?
- WBC Elimination Round, Day 1
- Kobe Itching To Get Back On Court
- Subscribe to Slamonline »
-
Photos: Yes Yi Can
Yi Jianlian is China’s go-to guy.
- Wallpaper: Brandon Jennings KICKS Cover Shoot
Young Buck is in the driver’s seat.
1, LeBron’s had 2 or 3 historical stat seasons already. This is worth remembering.
2, A reference to the Thunder roster as “extremely young” next to a photo of Joe Smith = guaranteed laughs.
Did Chris Paul magically bestow a jumper on David West? How about post moves? Just curious.
71% +34 101.4 95.5 5.9
Min Net Pts Off Def Net48
84% +34 101.2 95.4 5.8 Which one is david west and which one is NENE?
Answer me this: How do you know that it isn’t David West who also makes Paul better?
Answer me this as well: Who was better, Malone or Stockton?
Point being, West is NOT overrated. F*ck a stat, watch a game. West HAS game.
Ugh, i’m done with this.
So, you’re asking other people to prove their dissent to your argument, while you don’t have to provide any proof that your argument is true?
Really interesting.
How do you know what David West would be without Chris Paul? You yourself admitted that his development came after he developed a jumper. He already was a good on the block in college, but given his size would have had problems being solely a post player in the league. He added a jumper, and presto, now he’s a legitimate big man.
Chris Paul makes David West better, but David West makes Chris Paul better. A power forward who can run the pick and pop does wonders for the game of a penetrating point guard. It forces faster rotations, it pulls big men away from the rim.
Simply, you are arguing a hypothetical based solely on Vincent’s projections and your own bias that David West’s position on the Slam Top 50 was unjustified.
How can you prove that West would be nothing without Paul, when you have never seen the current David West play without Paul? Do you think West couldnt get his shots with Brevin Knight running the one? How about Mo Williams or Deron Williams? What do you think about Jason Kidd, or Jose Calderon?
You think Larry Bird was really an All-NBA defender, or was he just voted to the all defensive team. Because Jason Kidd made the all defense team last year right before Chris Paul gave him a much wider ass hole.
West is a subpar defender and an average rebounder. But that doesn’t mean he doesn’t have game. Carlos Boozer has the same defiencies and no real post moves, do you think he’s solely a creation of Deron Williams?
Come on, David west can put up the 15.6 points per game Nene is putting up if he played with decent point guard. Paul makes his game more efficient, but Paul doesn’t make him good.
I’m so happy you finished your homework assignment, BTW.
2. Roger Mason and George Hill aren’t mediocre( Micheal Finley isn’t either) so far Roger Mason has point average of 15.8ppg and GH has about 7.5 ppg
He cannot stop the better perimeter players in the league and cannot create shots for himself hence him being less than mediocre
You can’t use all defense selections as a criteria for a great defender and then turnaround and say all star game selections aren’t a big deal. Larry Bird was never, NEVER a great individual defender. He was a good team defender, but was a liability individually.
Anybody who ahs watched basketball knows this. The same is true for Magic Johnson. Your willingness to use his all defense selections as your sole proof shows you must not understand how all defense and all NBA are selected.
I have not attacked you, I have presented facts. YOur attitude sucks. Stop playing the victim. You are making hyperbolic arguments and then acting surprised when people call you stupid. That’s what’s going to happen when you say stupid stuff. Why are you so willing to accept Vincent’s argument that West’s points would drop by half if Paul wasn’t there? Just because Vince said it doesn’t make it true.
Moreover, you keep talking about West’s inability to rebound, all while praising Rasheed Wallace. Rasheed Wallace, a normal sized power forward, has averaged roughly seven rebouns per game for his career! WTF. How is he a good rebounder and west horrible? Are you serious, are you using true baselines, or are you just saying inflammatory stuff becuase you think you’re smarter than everybody else?
You clearly have missed the boat on Derrick Coleman. He was much more Rasheed Wallace than David West. Untapped potential like a mother.
All-star selection mean something in context. Just like MVPs, all defense and all nba selections. They should not be used as proof, but rather in conjunction with first had observation to make astute judgements.
You decided that all defense was trustworthy(voted on by the media) while all-star was not (voted on by the coaches and fans).
How did you make that decision? Maybe because it buttressed your argument, not because you actually thought about why all-defense was such a more objective “true” honor.
Anybody who watched Larry Bird play knows he wasn’t all-defense. Just like Jason Kidd wasn’t all defense last year and Allen Iverson probably didn’t deserve to be the defensive player of the year in the Big East his soph year.
Those awards are not proof of anything.
And once again, just because you think something or somebody says something doesn’t make it true.
How do you know that more GMs would take Rasheed? He’s older, less consistent, a worse rebounder and can become a malcontent.
Why would a GM want him over West to be their starting power forward? What is that based on?
Salary cap, recent production, ability to fit in?
You’re just saying stuff like it’s fact and then getting mad when people disagree with you, it’s bogus.
Ah well, I guess my favorite teams can’t all be mentioned
Chauncey Billups = Defense
Solve the equation
Shaq>Kobe
@NBK-’When you rely on someone else for offense and scoring is your strongest attribute then you are not as good as your numbers are indicating’.
Logic=epic fail. They are holistic which means that both go together.
@David- the above quote from NBK is why he cops so much flak on this site.
West is a PF- how many other PF’s can create their own shot? How many off the dribble? How many off of a screen? How many off an iso play?
Comments