February 20, 2009 11:36 am  |  36 Comments

Apocalypse: 2010

Wherein the best-laid plans have been known to go astray.

by Brett Ballantini

Hast never come to thee an hour,
A sudden gleam divine, precipitating, bursting all these bubbles,
Fashions, wealth?
These eager business aims—books, politics, art, amours,
To utter nothingness?
–Walt Whitman, “Hast never come to thee an hour” (DayPoems Poem No. 2010), 1891

[Note: The following essay imagines an alternate future in which more than half of NBA teams are in financial straits, the salary cap shrinks, the U.S. economy is wheezing, the Dow Jones has plunged below 7,500, the three or four banks left standing in the country have absconded with about $1 trillion of our money, and dogs and cats are living together. In short: mass hysteria.

Oh, wait…]

You see more and more of them these days, the handwringing naysayers wearing the emotional equivalent of a sandwich board proclaiming the end is nigh. It’s tempting to shrug shoulders slumped by the spreadsheet tracing bills ever higher and paychecks that seem to be built of pesos in a Euro world, and give in. To underestimate the power of a single smile counteracting the frowns that pervade our world today is to surrender the human spirit itself.

It’s doubtful that Walt Whitman looked up long enough from his leaves of grass to contemplate the future of the NBA, given that he died just as basketball was being invented. But he sure had a read on the clown car that’s absorbed an ever-increasing posse of Pollyanna NBA GMs, a group of good-natured fellas who are seemingly transmogrifying morphine into Zoloft for all the daydreamer drawings they’re sketching in their cap-clearing coloring books (2010 edition).

On your very screen mere days ago commenced a debate over the merits of wunderkind executive Joe Dumars, the man who has applied a Wonka touch to all manners of trades and draft choices in his decade at the Detroit Pistons helm. Joe D. found his winning streak snapped last November after a panic move that shipped out Pistons heartbeat Chauncey Billups for waterbug assassin Allen Iverson. The trade torpedoed a team coming off 59 wins, a seventh division championship in eight years, six straight trips to conference finals, two NBA Finals berths, and the 2004 NBA title.

Yes, at worst, acquiring Iverson gave Dumars salary cap space for 2009 and beyond. But is he to be truly trumpeted for playing savvy accountant? It’s a bit too convenient, and damningly revisionist, to say that Detroit had no shot at a title this season with Billups.

To say now that the trade just gives Detroit more time to prep for the Chris Bosh Mardi Gras in 2010 merely provides Dumars with a warm waterbed on which to fall. When Iverson was shipped north, the word was that the Pistons were “going for it,” not “freeing cap space.” Now that the team is a game over .500 and free falling, no one needs to rush out and pat Joe on the tush in admiration of his slide-rule dexterity.

The Boston Celtics core is old and vulnerable to series-altering injury. Orlando is applying Magic, playing defense with mirrors, with the good fortune to be anchored by the Baddest MF in the conference. The Cavaliers are much better than expected, but even with accidental All-Star Mo’ Money patrolling the backcourt, no one fears Cleveland. Miami, Atlanta? Please.

Why not give Rodney Stuckey another year as understudy to All-Stars Billups and Rip Hamilton? Stuckey having proved an able sub for Billups in last year’s playoffs—a stretch of a half-dozen games—was no reason to toss the kid the keys a couple of games into his sophomore season. Chicken and egg it if you wish, but Billups’ value has never been more evident than this season, where he has invigorated Denver and convinced a weakened Nuggets team to climb in the fierce West, while every rotation player left in Motown has seen their game take a step back without him. The Pistons were not some decrepit crew outstaying their welcome.

And on top of it all, to paraphrase the new acquisition, we’re talking about Detroit as a destination for free agents. Detroit. We’re talking about Detroit. We’re talking about Detroit, man.

But we have not come to bury the Pistons’ Panicking Crew; Dumars’ move was merely the most spectacular failure of the trading season. This speaks more to an alarming trend, GMs from oceans A to P chasing the fools’ gold of cap space.

Introductions to Poetry in Pros aside, the NBA, and the business world in which it resides, is black and white. So many millions change hands, the players themselves continuously remind us that basketball is “business first.” [Cough] And as much as we all might want to believe in President Obama and the power of positive thinking and Carla from Top Chef baking her way to a win by infusing her food with “love” and a Livestrong wristband levitating me to a win at Tour de Fond du Lac, well, merely smiling doesn’t make it so.

So why oh why oh why are GMs selling fans a false bill—“clearing cap space”—they cannot possibly hope to pass? Or alternately, what if the salary cap began to…shrink?

That wacky huckster Pete Vescey claims he’s counted up 26 teams currently “clearing cap space” in anticipation of 2010 spoils. That appears to be a hyperbolic estimate—sorry Memphis, you may be lucky to have an off/on ABA team in town in two years. For argument’s sake, let’s say 15 teams are in play for the coming free agent classes.

ACL's a tough one.The world economy is darkening. The U.S. Government has just passed a Ponzi scheme purporting to bail out our banking system so massive it makes the empty promise of cap space clearing in the NBA seem like a modest Madoff Plan.

The salary cap has grown 815 percent in the past two decades, from $7.2 million in ‘88-89 to $58,680,000 this season. Since the turn of the century alone it has nearly doubled. Franchises that once could well have been built atop some land in the juicy-rich oil country of Monahans or Odessa, just waiting for it to barf Benjamins with the light tap of a derrick, are now dry wells destined to drain some owners dry.

We’re starting to see some scary signs of the real world creeping into the NBA, and not just in the form of “clearing cap space.” Seats near and far from the sidelines sit empty—a small-market club like the Bucks feel lucky to avoid hearing echoes dribbling in a half-full Bradley Center these days. And now news has leaked of a league “emergency fund” of borrowed monies, intended to help keep the weakest NBA teams afloat.

The salary cap is going down—perhaps as fast as it shot up.

A conservative estimate might peg the ‘09-10 salary cap at $50 million, a drop of 15 percent. If all things economic aren’t righted by miracle cure, it’s reasonable to think the recovery might not be underway by 2011, so expect the cap to take another plunge from there.

When the dust settles on the storied Class of 2010, teams could be squeezing players into a salary cap that’s rolled back to $45 million or less.

Think professional team sports are such a steamrolling sure thing that there’s no possibility of scaling back costs and salaries? Look at what happened in baseball this past offseason. Opting out of a contract in the NBA is roughly the equivalent of declining arbitration in baseball, and not a single ball-and-stick player who declined arbitration this winter acquitted himself well. A few stars, including shortstop Orlando Cabrera, remain unsigned as Spring Training begins.

What can you do when you're screwed?At the beginning of this season, a NBA player in the market for a max contract could have signed with a new team starting at 25 percent of the salary cap, or $14.6 million. In the frighteningly realistic summer of 2010, that contract now starts at $11.3 million. To think that DWade snickered to Fave Fiver LeBron a couple of years ago when ’Melo took the sissy route and re-upped with Denver for an extension starting at $13 million per year!

Remember, the reason that superstar players like LeBron, Wade and Chris Bosh signed mini-extensions in 2007 was in anticipation of a new collective bargaining agreement three years later that would, theoretically, rake in untold riches from a salary cap that was continuing to soar. That prognostication appears to be a failure.

Of course, no one will be shedding any tears for $10 million in wages Bron-Bron or DWade gambled away. One new Nike or T-Mobile deal alone should take the edge off of any of their losses. But how about the endorsement-free, max-contract star most likely to leave his team, Bosh?

C. Wesson could have locked himself up in Toronto for the same five-year, $80 million extension ’Melo inked in Denver. How much will signing the mini-extension instead cost him? Re-upping with Toronto looks like it will now net Bosh about $3.5 million less than ’Melo over five years. An outright jump to another club, admittedly a rare move in a free agency system that decidedly favors the home team, could cost Bosh more than $7 million over five years.

Ironically enough, by the time Anthony is up for another contract extension in 2013, the economy is likely to be running full tilt again, with a salary cap again skyrocketing toward the $100 million mark.

It was so minor, you may have missed it, but much earlier this ‘08-09 season, LeBron acknowledged that he’d consider signing an extension with Cleveland this summer. Not coincidentally, the report came on the heels of some of the first devastating economic downturns of the fall. With some older Americans selling businesses or retiring in anticipation of the economy getting worse before it improves, why should a younger businessman—er, player—like LeBron treat his future salary any differently? If LeBron decides to stay in Cleveland—which he will—signing this summer as opposed to 2010 will save him several million dollars over the course of his extension. Wade’s not headed anywhere, either—certainly not to join LeBron among the Superfriends in Gotham—so he’d be smart to re-up with haste as well.

Not to go Grinch on you, but the anticipated flurry of free agent movement over these next two years is simply not going to happen.

So, we have 15 suitors with cap space aplenty in coming seasons. Who’s left to jump teams?

Kobe can terminate his contract this suThe truth.mmer and jump to another team. Will he? Right. Nor will Carlos Boozer, Mehmet Okur, Hedo Turkoglu, Michael Redd or Richard Jefferson. That leaves a 2009 free agent class of Iverson, Rasheed Wallace, Lamar Odom, Andre Miller, Grant Hill and Shawn Marion.

Hill has already said he’ll retire rather than move from the Phoenix Suns, while Odom and Miller could well offer hometown discounts to remain with their current clubs. Wallace is having the worst season of his career, and couldn’t be less motivated at this juncture if you spotted him a down pillow and an extra-long rollaway. That leaves two stars likely to switch teams in 2009, and Marion’s delusional belief that he’s a front-line scorer and AI’s addiction to touches translate to steep cuts in pay for both.

Paul Pierce, Dirk Nowitzki, Tyson Chandler, Amar’e Stoudemire, Peja Stojakovic and Kenyon Martin can terminate their contracts in 2010. Not a single one will. The Mavericks have a team option on Josh Howard that would be refused in another city, but Dallas is governed by the deep pockets of Mark Cuban. Bosh, it seems, will negotiate a sign-and-trade, so he’ll move, but not for free.

That leaves a “pure” free agent class in 2010 of Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Ray Allen, Joe Johnson, Tracy McGrady, Jermaine O’Neal, Steve Nash, Marcus Camby, Shaquille O’Neal and Manu Ginobili.

Shaq and Nash will still be useful players, if on last legs. Z, Jermaine O’Neal and McGrady have equal odds of medical retirement as they do continuing their careers as contributors in 2010. If the Atlanta Hawks let Johnson go, they might as well move the team to Quito. Allen has a good enough thing going in Boston that it’s easy to imagine him re-signing at a Beantown discount. That leaves Manu and Camby as the prizes, both with their shares of cuts and nicks. Manu will make a lasting stand in Alamo City; Camby will pack his bags and bring his Gumby D to a new city.

All in all, players likely to move from their current clubs and produce star numbers for a new team include Bosh (sign-and-trade), Camby, Iverson, Marion, Shaq and Nash. That’s six players, spread across two seasons, with a feeding frenzy of 15 teams going after them. It’s as if the highlight reels will run out before we can settle in to seats and dig into Milk Duds.

So, Donnie Walsh, how do Bosh and Nash sound? They’re no LeBron and DWade, but then, those guys were never going to be rocking Knicks kicks in the first place.

  • Add a Comment
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Facebook
    • Google
    • StumbleUpon
    • TwitThis
    • Yahoo! Buzz
    • Print this article!
  • RSS
  • Ryne Nelson Posted: Feb.20 at 11:42 am
    Teams gearing for cap space are making the wrong move. Brett says it best–the shrinking salary cap is going to leave most of the League empty handed. And the biggest fish in the 2010 free agency pool likely will to be making less than if they signed longer contracts, like Melo.

  • Justin Walsh Posted: Feb.20 at 11:45 am
    damn. Walt Whitman in the house, Ladies and Gentlemen. Back to reading, just wanted to give a shoutout to an oooooldschool dude.

  • Justin Walsh Posted: Feb.20 at 11:55 am
    Great article- when you really break it down to who is TRULY a REAL free agent, as opposed to who can terminate contracts, it’s overdone.

  • matt the jazz fan Posted: Feb.20 at 12:14 pm
    great read despite some of the hypotheses presented as statements of fact. case in point -boozer, carlos and him not moving away from s.l.c. (in other words i wish i were as certain as you)
    also, 100 million cap in 2013 - no way; the economy will give the owners the leverage to install a real, hard cap. i THINK, at least… that’s a big part of nfl football’s success, not that it’s the same sport, yada yada yada, but still something to look at.

  • ciolkstar Posted: Feb.20 at 12:53 pm
    Great read, the fact that the cap is going down is a huge development. Danny Ferry has done a good enough job to be able to keep Bron, and if they win a chip this season I think it’d be fair to say he isn’t going to go anywhere.

  • Cheryl Posted: Feb.20 at 12:55 pm
    Great, great post, Brett. Thanks for the info. I wondered how the current state of the (global) economy would affect professional sports.

  • Z Posted: Feb.20 at 1:59 pm
    Yeah LeBron is not moving. People tend to forget that he kinda likes money. No team can offer him more than the Cavs. If they win it all this year, he’ll re-up in the summer. Shrinking cap is a mutha.

  • James Posted: Feb.20 at 2:13 pm
    Joe D stated at the time of the trade he thought the group as previously constructed couldn’t win a title. There is no way Detroit comes out of the East this year if they kept there squad intact. So you’re basically saying if Detroit didn’t make this trade they’d go from a .500 team now to a championship contender? Billups is good, but the only players that could make that happen are CP3, Kobe, Dwight, Bron or D-Wade. You ask why didn’t he just keep Billups around one more year…well Billups contract runs 3 more years, it’s pretty unlikely he finds a deal that clears 20M in cap space after next year, especially considering the effect the economy has had on the league. If Dumars kept the group as is this year the Pistons lose in the second round of the playoffs and they are a year older next year, minus Sheed, with no cap space to improve the team. Now Detroit has a chance to clean up this summer (players will follow money) with FA’s and especially trades with teams giving away good players just to clear money (like the Camby for 2nd round pick deal).

  • Syk Posted: Feb.20 at 2:32 pm
    Great post. It definately brings expections of the overhyped 2010 free agent market back to reality.

  • showmeyourwits Posted: Feb.20 at 2:39 pm
    What are the chances Shaq comes back to LA as a back-up in 2010? Wishful thinking on my part?

  • brgulker Posted: Feb.20 at 3:13 pm
    Brilliant article. Breaks down the numbers in a way that’s accessible and shows how bleak the future could be for the Pistons. A bit of a double-edged sword that way, but a wonderful read.

  • Tarzan Cooper Posted: Feb.20 at 6:03 pm
    The U.S. Government has just passed a Ponzi scheme purporting to bail out our banking system so massive it makes the empty promise of cap space clearing in the NBA seem like a modest Madoff Plan………..THANK YOU FOR SPEAKING SOME TRUTH.

  • Kevin Posted: Feb.20 at 6:56 pm
    amazing insight.. i previously agreed in my head that the 2010 free agent pool was going to be a disappointment to most of the teams gearing up for it, but your article put things into proper perspective and really highlighted the issue more.. keep up the great up work

  • Feet in the Paint Posted: Feb.20 at 8:28 pm
    [...] It’s a very good, informative and well-researched piece.  Read the rest of it here. [...]

  • finest hour Posted: Feb.20 at 9:20 pm
    nice article

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Feb.21 at 12:35 am
    Why in the world would the Knicks want Chris Bosh, when David Lee is playing the better basketball?
    This is true even when Bosh is not injured.
    I’m a fan of both teams, by the way.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Feb.21 at 12:42 am
    My comment just got deleted, ah well.
    What I was saying was:
    Boozer might leave the Jazz, his destination is undecided.
    Why in the world wouldn’t Redd and Jefferson leave the horrendous Bucks of MILWAUKEE?
    LeBron James might stay in Cleveland, but there’s just as big a chance he might jump ship to the Knicks.
    I really don’t get you’re assumptions.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Feb.21 at 12:43 am
    @ Brett.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Feb.21 at 12:43 am
    your*

  • Brett Ballantini Posted: Feb.21 at 1:36 am
    Teddy, your question helps illustrate the point of the article. Michael Redd would be walking away from $16 million in 2010. Richard Jefferson would be leaving $14 million on the table. Presuming, as this article does, in two years the economy remains stagnant and the salary cap has shrunk by upwards of $20 million. Would any other team, bottom feeder to defending champ, sign away either Redd or Jefferson under those circumstances, for even a third the salary they’d be leaving behind? As Z said: Players like money.

  • MJ is the real 23 Posted: Feb.21 at 8:46 am
    Call me crazy but I think the shrinking cap improves the chances of New York signing LeBron (and possibly others), albeit at a lower salary. Let me explain why. The article mentions that “…one new Nike or T-Mobile deal will take the edge off…” so with, say, LeBron signing in a HUGE market such as New York, the amount of additional endorsements these guys will get will more than compensate for the loss of salary that they get from signing with the new team. So what I’m trying to say is that because of the shrinking salary cap, I think “marketable” players in a small market (in this I mean LeBron) may be more inclined to sign in a larger market because they can get paid a lot more from endorsements than, say, Cleveland can pay them in salary. I’m not a fan of the Knicks and I really hope that LeBron stays home, but I think Cavs fans may have a bit more to worry about than this article suggests…

  • overtime Posted: Feb.21 at 11:17 am
    Perhaps, lord forbid, the players are merely going to have to accept they are all going to get paid less

  • cam Posted: Feb.21 at 4:28 pm
    labrons goin to ny baby

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Feb.21 at 7:13 pm
    Nice comment, “MJ is the real 23″. That makes sense.

  • BETCATS Posted: Feb.21 at 8:36 pm
    i still think Wade will end up in Chicago and Bosh in New York. After that, i do not see Lebron going anywhere near New York unless they have talent. Your acting like Danny Ferry wont got apesh!t in 2009 listening to Lebron, getting top free agents to take open roster spots and making trades along the way. And if all NBA players are money wh0res, they will sign in Europe for 50 million a year then get cut 3-4 games in and leave with nothing, which would serve them right.

  • BETCATS Posted: Feb.21 at 8:37 pm
    *Bosh in Detroit

  • Dan Brigham Posted: Feb.21 at 9:16 pm
    That’s some good stuff, Brother Brett.

  • MJ is the real 23 Posted: Feb.21 at 10:57 pm
    I totally agree with you BETCATS that the Knicks must, first and foremost, become at least somewhat competitive in order to attract the possibility of signing some big names. But I’m just saying that–contrary to what the article suggests–the shrinking cap may actually increase New York’s chances of signing someone from a small market (i.e. Toronto, Cleveland). On top of that, LeBron wants to be a “global icon” and he can really achieve that if he goes to NY (you think he’s big now–if his face is plastered all over Times Square and throughout the five boroughs, his endorsements can make him a conglomerate–rivaling the iconography of McDonalds’ Golden Arches… okay that might be going a bit far, but you get the point. It wouldn’t surprise me to see him in one out of every three advertisements on TV though). If it’s all about money/popularity for LeBron (I’m not saying it is), I think if he stays in NY for ten years or so, he could easily become the first BILLIONARE athlete via endorsements, and would probably be the most recognized figure in the world. Love it or hate it, this is the power of Corporate America. Him winning a championship(s) will only add to his iconic status.

  • Justin Moore Posted: Feb.22 at 12:33 am
    All this talk about Lebron leaving Cleveland in 2010, it won’t happen so I hope Knicks fans will stop drooling over Lebron he’s not going nowhere.

  • Bishtro Posted: Feb.22 at 5:16 am
    Great article, I just couldn’t get past the “Note:”. Had to check and see if anyone had commented on your Ghostbusters reference, one of my top 5 Bill Murray lines. I put it just behind “Don’t eat the schnitzel their serving Schnauzer” (Pardon the Spelling).

  • Bobbo Posted: Feb.22 at 8:40 am
    So what’s the alternative strategy? How about loading up your payroll with players on their rookie contracts…draft smart and trade older, higher priced players for younger players on rookie contracts. Stockpile picks. It works for two reasons: those players cost less now (duh) but also when they begin to hit free agency, they will cost less then as well as numbers for the cap, luxury tax threshold, max contracts drop. It’s riskier but is it any more risky that waiting on free agents who can get more from their home teams? Take a look around the league at the teams with the largest number of draft picks and/or players on rookie contracts. The Blazers and Thunder immediately jump to mind. The Blazers have nine players on rookie contracts (which may be too many), two first round picks still developing in Europe and three first round picks in the next three drafts. (They have lots of second round picks, but most are in this draft which is very top heavy.) The Thunder have five first round picks in the next three years and six players on rookie contracts. Those players include Kevin Durant, Jeff Green, Thabo Sefolosha, Russell Westbrook, DJ White. They also have a couple of young players on reasonable contracts…like 25-year-old Nenad Krstic. But unless Krstic comes around or they get a solid big in the draft, they don’t have a great young big man. Other teams are following the same strategy. The Nets have five first round picks in the next three drafts and seven players on rookie contracts. Neither the players nor the picks are as good as the Thunder’s, but then whose are? Still, Brook Lopez, Yi Jianlian and Ryan Anderson are all bigs and they also have 25-year-old Devin Harris for four more years at a very reasonable contract. The Grizz have seven players on rookie contracts, as well and four picks in the next three years. O.J. Mayo, Marc Gasol, Rudy Gay, Darrell Arthur, Mike Conley Jr. What Memphis doesn’t have is that 25-year-old starter. I’m sure there are others and teams with smart ownership will figure it out. They will have to.

  • Lucky F. Bastard Posted: Feb.22 at 12:27 pm
    Peyton Manning became Mr. Endorsement plying his trade in Indianapolis, so I don’t see why Lebron can’t do it in Cleveland…..He will be much more popular winning rings in Cleveland, then bustin out in the 2nd round annually in NYC. The money will follow Lebron, I sense that he knows this.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Feb.22 at 5:23 pm
    Why would the Knicks want Chris Bosh when David Lee is currently the better player?

  • MeloMan13 Posted: Feb.22 at 6:34 pm
    how is Toronto a small market. its top 5 in attendence in the League and i’m pretty sure the Raptors, though genuinely sucky, make more money than the Magic, the Hawks, and the rest of those middle pack teams

  • MJ is the real 23 Posted: Feb.22 at 11:14 pm
    Although Peyton Manning did get major endorsements in a small market like Indianapolis, I’d be willing to bet that five “casual” sports fans outside of the United States couldn’t pick him out in a lineup. LeBron wants worldwide recognizability which he may or may not get in Cleveland. Also, Peyton Manning is not LeBron James, and American Football, sadly, is only popular in America and maybe Canada (I’d say the American football players will eat “the world’s” rugby players for breakfast, but that’s just me). When I mention “market” in my posts, I’m talking about business in general, and not just sports/basketball. New York is the business center of the United States… actually I’ll rephrase–the business center of the WORLD and the Knicks are the most valuable franchise in the NBA according to Forbes Magazine. Any company would be stupid to not want their logo next to LeBron’s face in the world’s business capital. Now I HATE the Knicks. I hate ‘em. Nothing would make me happier than to see them remain idle for another 36 years. However, I’m not going to let my loathing for this team blind me from the very real possibility of LeBron jumping ship in 2010. Am I 100% sure that he’s going to do that? Of course not. But the possibility exists, and to think otherwise is just plain ignorance. I’d say the best chance of Cleveland keeping him is if they remain highly competitive within the next two years (Eastern Conference Finals, EC Champs or both) and NOT win the championship, while bringing in another big time star (sorry, Mo Williams does not qualify). That way I think he’ll feel that he hasn’t “gotten the job done” at home and will feel inclined to stay. Just my two cents.

  • Squirrel7 Posted: Feb.23 at 8:06 am
    Am I the only one who thinks that if the Cavs DO win a ‘chip either this year or next, Lebron is actually more likely to bolt for pastures new (most likely NY) rather than stay at the Cavs? I doubt the Cavs are going to become a ‘dynasty’, plus Lebron seems fairly arrogant (in my opinion), so would probably fancy his chances of moving to a new franchise, then taking them to the summit. I think he’d much prefer to be known as the guy who can just come into a franchise and be so good that he takes them straight to the title. So, to summarize, I think Lebron would probably feel he had accomplished all he needed/could in Cleveland if he took them to a championship in the next 2 years, and would then look to cement his legacy by going somewhere else (particularly a woeful franchise as the Knicks currently are) and completely transforming that ball-club.

Comments




The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.