• June 5, 2009 8:00 am  |  59 Comments

    SLAMonline Mock Draft: B.J. Mullens, No. 15

    Pistons pick to plug big hole in the middle.

    by Sherman Johnson

    With the 15th pick in the 2009 SLAMonline Mock Draft, the Detroit Pistons select….

    B.J. Mullens. As the general manager of a club again at a crossroads I chose to go with Mullens because I’m convinced he’s the best at his position notwithstanding Hasheem Thabeet. And what the team needs from this rebuilding process is a big man to hold down a soon-to-be undersized frontcourt.

    Admittedly there were a few other players-of-interest ahead of the big man like Jeff Teague and Eric Maynor, two exceptional true point guards who would undoubtedly bolster the backcourt but because of the huge hole opening up with the inevitable departure of Rasheed Wallace and perhaps Antonio McDyess, this team desperately needs size up front. The expiration of Sheed’s contract frees up a lot of money to go after a younger but mature athlete of his caliber from another team thereby lessening the pressure on B.J. to make an impact out the gate. As was said before, all options are still on the table as it relates to dealing other players we can derive value out of for trades.

    B.J.’s size, length and athleticism were a major factor in the decision to take him as the first pick but his weakness on defense and questionable perimeter game led us to consider a few other big men who were available at this stage of the game. Power forward Earl Clark was at the top of the list because of the mismatch potential he’d present to many opponents with his size and length and his awesome perimeter game. Like Mullens, Clark can run the floor and finish in transition where he’s most explosive and affective now. But of course, he was selected before we could get a shot at him. The same could be said of Austin Daye of Gonzaga. He has considerably more experience at the collegiate level than Mullens and could provide more opportunities for mismatches but his size could also be a detriment as it prevents him from being a strong finisher and weak defender against bigger and stronger opponents. His rehabilitated knee was also a major factor in looking elsewhere because questions remain as B.J. Mullensto whether he could add the necessary bulk to his thin frame without it taking away from his effectiveness on the perimeter. Wake Forest’s James Johnson was another good look for his inside game that’s reminiscent of Adrian Dantley and Mark Aguirre but ultimately we were also too concerned about him being undersized at an already stacked position.

    B.J. has his downside to be sure but we feel his deficiencies are surmountable with the proper amount of attention from our developmental staff and focus and dedication on his part. The strides he has already taken to improve his passing and play in the post as well as his pick-and-roll play demonstrate that he has what it takes to become a better basketball player in order to contribute to his team on all fronts. His lack of experience is not of major concern because he’ll get the necessary experience through plenty of burn time.

    With a tremendous upside and the capacity to grow with the proper training–something we feel he hasn’t adequately gotten at this juncture of his young career–B.J. is a gifted athlete with a relatively mature and easygoing nature and would make a great addition to our locker room. His adverse upbringing in nearby Columbus was rife with challenges that he’s overcome to get himself this far on his natural talent. He has strong hands and a quality touch and he’s light on his feet and can finish at the rim. At 260 his frame could withstand another 15 to 20 pounds without slowing him down. At 275 he’ll have more of an advantage when it comes to establishing an advantage inside on both ends of the floor. He has more going for him than Thabeet did at this point in his career although he’s nowhere near a defensive presence so one of the tasks will be to develop his all-around offensive polish and expand his range while backing up a more experienced veteran.

    2009 SLAMonline Mock Draft Results
    Pick Team Player
    1 L.A. Clippers Blake Griffin
    2 Memphis Grizzlies Hasheem Thabeet
    3 Oklahoma City Thunder Ricky Rubio
    4 Sacramento Kings Brandon Jennings
    5 Washington Wizards Jordan Hill
    6 Minnesota Timberwolves Demar DeRozan
    7 Golden State Warriors James Harden
    8 New York Knicks Stephen Curry
    9 Toronto Raptors Tyreke Evans
    10 Milwaukee Bucks Jonny Flynn
    11 New Jersey Nets DeJuan Blair
    12 Charlotte Bobcats Terrence Williams
    13 Indiana Pacers Earl Clark
    14 Phoenix Suns Jrue Holiday
    15 Detroit Pistons B.J. Mullens
    • Add a Comment
      • Digg
      • del.icio.us
      • Facebook
      • Google
      • StumbleUpon
      • TwitThis
      • Yahoo! Buzz
      • Print this article!
    • RSS

    Tags: , , , , ,

    • Jukai Posted: Jun.5 at 8:52 am
      So, is this like, ironic, considering this kid is a clone of Darko? (yes, I know I was high on him coming out of High School).

    • Ryne Nelson Posted: Jun.5 at 9:11 am
      Mullens will probably the best NBA big man in this draft. His game is perfectly suited for the pros, if you ask me. Nice pick, Sherman!

    • Declan Posted: Jun.5 at 9:11 am
      darko at the 15th pick in a draft like this isn’t so bad jukai

    • thesubwayconnection Posted: Jun.5 at 9:19 am
      “Pistons pick to plug big hole in the middle. . . in 5 years.”

    • Declan Posted: Jun.5 at 9:20 am
      and i’d have him over thabeet any day of the week.

    • TADOne Posted: Jun.5 at 9:54 am
      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Ok…ok. I’ll keep an open mind, but I just don’t see anything resembling a good NBA player in Mullens. Nothing. At all. He is Darko all over again. He is Sheldon Williams without the beautiful and skilled WNBA wife. Or maybe Brendan Haywood. Actually, I would take Brendan 8 days a week over this stiff. Good write up Sherman, but I would have took Maynor. Or Johnson. Or Daye. I would have even considered Gerald Henderson and I don’t like his game. As Cub and Ryne have pointed out to me, I could be wrong, but I really don’t think so. Thabeet is way better.

    • Ken Posted: Jun.5 at 10:01 am
      Is Thabeet better? Yes. Is he available at the 15 spot? No.

    • Joe R Posted: Jun.5 at 10:03 am
      Their probably going to trade the pick for cap space anyway.

    • Cordell Eddings Posted: Jun.5 at 10:08 am
      Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Please no. no, no , no.

    • Cordell Eddings Posted: Jun.5 at 10:18 am
      hopefully his 8.8 ppg at Ohio State can turn into 20 and 10

    • AR Posted: Jun.5 at 10:22 am
      Is Thabeet better?Yes,but not by much.

    • ciolkstar Posted: Jun.5 at 10:26 am
      You know, I was pretty disappointed with this kid’s play at OSU. But the talent is there. If he develops a strong work ethic and commits to defending and rebounding, he could be a pretty strong pick here. I still think Maynor, Teague and Johnson are “better” players. But with Rip and Maxiell recently extended and Sheed likely on his way out the Pistons really have to address the center position and stick with their current assets at the SG and PF spots. I don’t “love” the pick, but it could work.
      And 20 and 10 waon’t be happening anythime soon. BUT, I could see some Spencer Hawes-like production in a year or so.

    • Tyler Whitcomb Posted: Jun.5 at 10:35 am
      I was a big fan of this a few weeks ago, just based on potential. The rumor is that he just got tore up by Luke Nevill a projected late 2nd round pick. So, I would have to go in a different direction. Not a bad pick, but I would have to go Sam Young with this pick. i know this seems very high for Sam, but he has been killing guards at every workout that he has been invited to, from what I hear. (Man amongst boy’s)

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 10:42 am
      Ciolk’s comment just gave me a total Darko flashback…”If he develops a strong work ethic and commits to defending and rebounding, he could be a pretty strong pick here.” Now all we need is someone to say “his game is alot like Kevin Garnett’s!” In all seriousness, I don’t mind this pick, but if they can get a solid PG instead then do it. Use Tay and/or RIP to get a big. I wouldn’t mind seeing a healthy Kaman or Chandler in Detroit paired up with Boozer or Milsap.

    • JMac Posted: Jun.5 at 11:00 am
      Thabeet may have more defensive skills, but Mullens has more passion for the game than Hasheem

    • The Seed Posted: Jun.5 at 11:32 am
      Bad Pick Detroit, get a point guard or trade the pick with Hamilton or Wallace for some players.

    • Joey Whelan Posted: Jun.5 at 11:37 am
      I can confirm what Tyler said about the Luke Nevill tearing up Mullens, one GM was quoted as saying Nevill made Mullens “eat his lunch.” Still, I think the OSU big man will be a better pro than he was in college. The system he played in during college forced him to be a true back to the basket player when he is more of a roaming power forward, not to mention he didn’t get a ton of playing time for a good portion of the season. The potential is definitely there.

    • sherman johnson Posted: Jun.5 at 11:44 am
      i was thinking along the lines of eric montross…or greg ostertaag…ha…dubious comparison’s aside i really really liked maynor because of his experience and clutch killer instinct…he or teague or johnson would probably have a better chance of panning out i figure since mullen has a long long way to go but i think he’s up to it…i also made this pick with the expectation that some major trades will have to happen and some serious money being spent…

    • French Toast Posted: Jun.5 at 11:45 am
      Great pick i think, he has skills but i was very disappointed by his season at OSU, i do agree with the Spencer Hawes comparison.

    • sherman johnson Posted: Jun.5 at 11:48 am
      mullens could use a couple more years in school…or could he…he languished his only year at osu where his development wasn’t a priority…like thabeet his development has been stunted by lack of top notch training…training and experience he can get professionally for a $$$…one major question of many is whether detroit’s management can provide it…someone made a great point in that he excels in the open floor in transition but detroit isn’t really one of those up-tempo sorta teams are they?

    • Tyler Whitcomb Posted: Jun.5 at 12:07 pm
      I’m not trying to spread rumors, but I have heard that the Pistons are highly considering a trade to the Clippers for there 15th pick. Amir Johnson and the 15th pick for Chris Kaman. From what both teams are preaching, this wouldn’t make sense for either team. With Iverson and Wallace off the books, trying to sign Boozer or a trade for Bosh I’m in favor of. The trade for Bosh would be the best move that I have heard. Bosh for Prince and Hamilton with future picks involved. Than if Bosh dosen’t fit the system, he dosen’t re-sign much like Iverson because he would only have 1 year on his contract than we would have all kinds of cap room to go after someone big time. To think if the Pistons do trade Prince and Hamilton that is all the starting 5 from there 2004 championship gone.

    • Jeff Fox Posted: Jun.5 at 12:08 pm
      To get a guy at pick 15 that was projected as a potential #1 overall pick a few months back isn’t too bad at all.

    • Tyler Whitcomb Posted: Jun.5 at 12:14 pm
      A comment on Sherman Johnson’s pick, it is a good pick if you have confidence that he will develop. Joey Whelan talks about not getting playing time and enough time to develop and I agree. Not to many teams were big on Andrew Bynum when he was drafted, many said why is this high school kid entering the drafta nd on many draft boards he was suppossed to go mid to late first round. The Lakers drafted him and have had Kareem work with him and eventhough many fans hate on him, he is probably a top 5 center in the NBA. So maybee the Pistons draft him and hire Hakeem Olajuwon to work with him.

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 12:16 pm
      Kaman would be a great compliment to Boozer or Bosh. He’s a good rebounder and defender and his offense isn’t half bad either.

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 12:17 pm
      Bynum top 5 center…ummmm when did that happen?

    • Tyler Whitcomb Posted: Jun.5 at 12:32 pm
      Top 5 centers - Superman, Yao, Shaq, and depends on who is a power forward or center. To me Duncan is big enough to be a center, but is a power forward. Nene, Horford, Okafor, Kaman, Aldridge or Oden, Brook Lopez. I think if Bynum is not a top 5, he is atleast top 7 or 8.

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 12:36 pm
      top 7 or 8 I can buy, but he hasn’t proven himself nearly enough to be a top 5. He’s been hurt too much. If he stays healthy he could get there though.

    • TADOne Posted: Jun.5 at 1:18 pm
      Jeff: Not trying to disagree with you, but where exactly was Mullens being considered a # 1 overall pick just a few months back?? I’m guessing this was something that was figured before he even stepped on campus at OSU. Once he got on college campus, he was exposed as being all hype and extremely overrated.

    • niQ Posted: Jun.5 at 2:05 pm
      i find it funny how johnson hasn’t been drafted yet. Yet, every team continues to mention the possibility of taking him. haha

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Jun.5 at 2:26 pm
      Ahahahahaha BJ Mullens! The next… Darko. Just what the Pistons need: Another Kwame Brown.
      Great write-up, though. I DO understand the logic, Mr. Johnson. Just this year’s draft is deficient of good big men, if you ask me.

    • ciolkstar Posted: Jun.5 at 3:02 pm
      Drafting Mullens at #15, ahead of cats like Maynor, Teague and Johnson IS NOT the same as taking Darko 2nd overall ahead of the likes of Wade, Melo and Bosh.

    • TADOne Posted: Jun.5 at 3:29 pm
      Ciol: I wasn’t saying it was the same as taking Darko 2nd; but, the same “potential” comments were said about both players. If I were Joe, I would take the best talent available, regardless of position. That is NOT Mullens.

    • AR Posted: Jun.5 at 3:38 pm
      This isn’t a Dumars pick anyway.It’s not his style to reconstruct a team.With Mullens,assuming you believe the best case scenario he won’t be ready to contribute significantly for about 2-3 years.Dumars will probably go with someone who can contribute right away or just trade away the pick.He’s not looking for a project,IMO.

    • TADOne Posted: Jun.5 at 3:46 pm
      AR: His style? Didn’t he reconstruct the Pistons when he originally took over? Joe doesn’t really have a style, per se. All Dumars really wants or expects is character guys and team players. Also, Darko was a project pick. The pick from last season, Walter Sharpe, was a project pick. Trust me, Dumars will look at a project if he feels that player has a very high ceiling. Thing is, i’m thinking Dumars would look at a project like Daye before he would Mullens.

    • AR Posted: Jun.5 at 3:50 pm
      Doesn’t he already have an Austin Daye in Amir Johnson?

    • seven deuce Posted: Jun.5 at 4:00 pm
      If he goes to the Pistons, he can play immediately. Unlike Darko, he doesn’t have any big time competition keeping him off the court. Maxiel isn’t a center, Amir is a bust, McDyess may not be back & Rasheed will only come back if they can get him for cheap to tutor Mullens. And unlike a lot of other big men, Mullens has size & athleticism off the charts. A Rick Mahorn boot camp will get him ready.

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 4:10 pm
      I think Mullens will be better than Darko based on his work ethic, but I don’t see him being a huge star. He’ll be a good role player though. My problem is who is going to team the kid how to play in Detroit? Their coaching staff couldn’t coach an elementary school.

    • sherman johnson Posted: Jun.5 at 4:21 pm
      TAD: certainly there was a lot of other talent available but would the addition of maynor or teague (or davis for that mattter) to the backcourt have a better impact on the team than adding Mullens to the frontcourt? All of these scenarios are valid which is why i love the mock draft because if i were really a gm i definitely would’ve had an ulcer by now (lol)… that the pistons were able to assemble a squad to make the runs they did after the darko fiasco and joey d still can’t live that down is testament to that…

    • sherman johnson Posted: Jun.5 at 4:25 pm
      wayno one of the more eyebrow-raising moves (for me) the pistons have made this summer is the re-signing of curry as head coach…

    • ciolkstar Posted: Jun.5 at 4:30 pm
      I agee TAD, in that taking Mullens here would be more like addressing a need than going after the best talent available. Maybe they could trade for a guy like Dalembert (he’s not great but he’ll defend and rebound) and use this pick to add some backcourt depth, even though Rip’s new contract limits their options there.

    • sherman johnson Posted: Jun.5 at 4:32 pm
      that’s funny AR…but maybe not fair…daye hasn’t even gotten a chance to prove his knee is solid…perhaps daye=prince? both are seemingly at a disadvantage because of their thin frames but prince uses it to his advantage and used to be able to create mismatches because of it by exploiting their ability to operate in and out and around the perimeter…tay’s defense was better when he was daye’s age and it got even better…he was able to limit lebron back in the daye…

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 4:47 pm
      Yeah…I can’t imagine MC sticking around after this year unless Detroit gets DRATICALLY better. That’s what scares me the most about this draft…unless they’re NBA ready, thier growth as a player is just going to be slowed down by being in Detroit

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 4:50 pm
      MC has to be surrounded by good assistants if he has any chance of succeeding. That’s what Doc Rivers and Mike Brown did (not to mention get phenominal players).

    • TADOne Posted: Jun.5 at 4:57 pm
      Um, ya’ll are really down on Detroit actually getting and honing talent in a young player. Curry may not have shown much as far as X and O’s during his first season as coach, but i’m not going to say he can or cannot develop talent in a player. I know Amir has been a bust, but he was like that with Flip as well. I just think the kid isn’t as good as people thought he may be. Curry will be tied into whether he can cultivate Stuckey into an All Star caliber player. That will be his legacy.

    • TADOne Posted: Jun.5 at 5:00 pm
      I’m too lazy to look and it’s Friday afternoon, but i’m quite sure many well regarded coaches in the NBA today,and also retired coaches, weren’t very good in their first few NBA seasons. Just saying.

    • Scott Carter Posted: Jun.5 at 5:03 pm
      Glad to see SLAM and I have similar views. I’ve been thinking Mullins to the Pistons for about 2 months now. I just think its the perfect fit. Thanks SLAM.

    • sherman johnson Posted: Jun.5 at 5:04 pm
      4give me…i didn’t mean to give that impression…i keep mentioning it because i think it’s one of the more crucial elements to ensuring that any pick they make with the potential to develop…i agree that stuckey has come along well and quick…he was one of the few bright spots in this year’s playoffs…so i do think the staff is on point…i’m just not sold on curry yet…and it’s too soon probably since he inherited a depleted team…

    • sherman johnson Posted: Jun.5 at 5:07 pm
      and perhaps i’m still mad at dumars for getting rid of skip and i’m taking it out on curry…

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 5:13 pm
      Agreed TAD, however, how smart is it to have a rookie head coach in charge of a rebuilding team. I think a coach who has some idea of how to use the players he has is crucial right now. As far as Stuckey goes, I’m not sure how much MC actually had to do with his improvement. I think just getting playing time had alot to do with it. That being said, I think alot of people have given up on Stuckey too quickly. I think he’ll keep getting better. The second coming of D-Wade, not so much, but he’ll be a solid gaurd.

    • sherman johnson Posted: Jun.5 at 5:23 pm
      i think stuckey is a fine guard even at the point…i feel he’s demonstrated that he can lead the team through the woods they’re in now this early in his career that i figured i could focus on another area and draft a big man but it remains to be seen how mullens’ career pans out and fast he develops…it’ll definitely be a big challenge for any coaching staff wherever he actually winds up…

    • wayno Posted: Jun.5 at 5:27 pm
      You’re pretty much taking a gamble to some extent no matter who you draft. I just see Mullens as a bigger gamble than others. I certainly do see the upside of his potential though and that’s exciting to think about.

    • nbk Posted: Jun.5 at 6:26 pm
      Tad I think Curry would like his legacy to reside in winning games. and if he doesn’t, no matter how good stuckey turns out, his legacy will be that he is the coach that gave that final push that sent detroit down the mountain

    • Chendaddy Posted: Jun.6 at 8:14 am
      Darko didn’t have a chance because Larry Brown hates playing rookies, and when the Pistons got ‘Sheed, it was over for Darko. The fact that he was a prima donna and not a patient worker like Tayshaun Prince didn’t help either.
      I don’t know what BJ Mullen’s work ethic is like, but at least he’ll definitely get a chance to play with ‘Sheed and likely also McDyess gone. Although Mullens also got that chance at OSU and failed. And it doesn’t matter who you get to train him; it’s all about how hard he wants to work. Bynum got to work with Kareem. So did Michael Olowokandiass. It didn’t help Kandi-man. Bynum was a worker. Kandi was a crier.
      Anyway, this smells like a bust. Stuckey is an explosive combo guard who’s be more effective with a true point. I’m really high on Eric Mayor. He has that DJ Augustin mentality.

    • Cub Buenning Posted: Jun.6 at 9:40 am
      Did I just hear mention of Luke Nevill?!? Mountain West love without me?! Nevill is skilled, big time, but in no ways the potential athlete that BJ can be. Mullins got no chance to prove anything while in Columbus. Regression.

    • wayno Posted: Jun.6 at 10:28 am
      I just hope Earl Clark falls down to 15…he’s WAYYYYY better than Mullens.

    • [...] B.J. Mullens [...]

    • [...] B.J. Mullens [...]

    • [...] B.J. Mullens [...]

    • [...] SLAMonline [...]

    Comments




    The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.