Saturday, September 12th, 2009 at 8:01 am  |  63 responses

Stock(take)

Paying homage to the purest point.

by Todd Spehr

I sometimes wonder if John Stockton ever felt like taking a night off. Imagine Utah on the back end of a long road trip, playing their fourth game in five nights, visiting somewhere like, say, New Jersey. Imagine Stockton sitting in the locker room, staring at his jersey hanging in its stall. Perhaps he’s carrying a niggling injury, his motivation is running a tad low, his energy not where it needs to be, his mind elsewhere.

In 19 seasons — whether he was playing a preseason gamJohn Stockton & Charles Barkleye in Ogden, a meaningless regular season game with the Clips in January, a Finals game in Salt Lake in June — that night never came for John Stockton.

Finding the right words to articulate a near flawless (and unparalleled) career wasn’t as easy as it might appear. Finding the essence of John Stockton, however, was easy. It’s zipping a post entry pass on time every time in the one place it can’t possibly be picked off: Directly above the defender’s head. It’s redirecting interview requests toward less-talented, less-exposed teammates because “they’ll get a kick out of it.” It’s busting the biggest shot of your life, in Game 6 of the 1997 Western Conference Finals, sending your team to a place they’d never been before. It’s missing just 22 games in nearly two decades. It’s making your teammates better. It’s setting picks against men twice your size, with your elbows up and your head down. It’s signing a two-year extension at 35. And 37. And 39. It’s showing up every day. It’s taking, and making, the big shot over and over. It’s loving what you do and never taking it for granted. It’s pushing yourself to the limit, and then holding that position for as long as you can. That’s John Stockton.

If Allen Iverson is the posterchild for remaining true to oneself, then where does that leave John Stockton? From 1984 to 2003, the length of his hair and shorts were in tandem, his passes still landed in hands, his attitude and work ethic remained steadfast.

The Basketball Hall of Fame, if legends are to be believed, is not a goal you shoot for. If you’re good enough, it’s something that just happens – the icing on a great career. Most players fill their satisfaction by just making the League, some dare to be an All-Star, the dedicated ones aspire to be among the best. But the Hall of Fame, that’s not something that you include in your third grade paper that is titled When I Grow Up I Want to…. If hoping to win a title leaves your head in the clouds then hoping to be a Hall of Famer means you’re shooting for orbit.

Stockton entered the Basketball Hall of Fame this Friday with emotion equal parts flattering and daunting. On one hand, he will be terribly embarrassed with the adulation that will be (rightfully) showered on him; on the other, he will be eternally relieved that he entered Springfield alongside Michael Jordan, for the modest Stock loves to be overshadowed — just another brick in the Hall.

The idea of slipping through the cracks represents a sort of nirvana for Stockton, who was known to dive for the back exit of the Jazz locker room before the media came in after games. No wonder the pick-n-roll was Stockton’s favorite play – the moniker “pick-n-roll” conveniently lends iJohn Stockton & Kareem Abdul-Jabbartself to the one who finishes, not the one who starts with the ball in his hands. Stockton’s not “picking,” and he sure ain’t “rolling.” Perfect.

Stockton’s life and career is an anthology to pushing your own personal limits. He had a grand total of three college scholarship offers when he graduated high school, landed and consequently overachieved at a small college (Gonzaga), was cut from the Olympic tryouts in ’84, was overlooked by 15 teams in that year’s NBA Draft, and didn’t become a full-time starter until his fourth season. Yet for all that he wasn’t, he worked hard to become what he did. To paraphrase Jazz lifer (and son of Frank) Scott Layden: Utah knew he’d be OK, but they didn’t know he would be an immortal.

To owe Stockton’s career entirely to his persistence, though, would be a misunderstanding: He knew how to play too. In the 1988 Western Conference semi-finals against the Lakers, matched against a Magic Johnson that still had one title and two MVP’s left in him, Stockton unleashed a seven-game series for the ages. He broke the playoff record for assists (115) and steals (28) in a seven-game series, tied Magic’s single playoff game assists record (24 in Game 5), dropped 29 points and 20 assists in Game 7 at the Forum, and pushed the Lakers to the limit. Byron Scott, actually, has not had a wink of sleep since. Stockton not only arrived, but he proved to himself that he could breathe the rarified air that so few had exhaled at his position before. He belonged. It was the 13-day stretch that propelled him from good to great.

If indeed Wilt Chamberlain’s 100-point game (or his 55-rebound game, or his 50-point single season average, or his…) is the NBA’s unattainable record, then Stockton’s career assists mark of 15,806 is Unbreakable 1A. Not only is he a full 33-percent ahead of next best (Mark Jackson) but if you took the current assists per-game leader, Chris Paul, and had him maintain his 9.9 per-game average, he would equal Stockton’s mark sometime in the ’23-24 season, right around the time CP3 will be staring his 39th birthday in the face. That perspective work for ya?

But to confine StJohn Stocktonockton’s greatness to only his gaudy assists totals means you’ve missed the point.

It was in Stockton’s sixth season when he and his perfect attendance, sans the slightest dent, showed up at the arena with a bad case of the flu and a swollen ankle. Jerry Sloan sent him back to the hotel. The next night, Stock did the same – he showed up, banged up, coughing up, yet ready to play. Sloan had him hospitalized. Seventeen times he played all 82 games, and you can count on no hands the amount of times he didn’t show up.

So perhaps longevity was Stockton’s most endearing trait. When he broke in, he was matched against guys whose careers started in the 70s; by the time he was done, he was playing against those whose will finish sometime after I complete this sentence. Early on, he held his own against Magic, Isiah Thomas, and Mo Cheeks (who, ironically, played just like him); at the end, he was competing with the likes of Jason Williams and Steve Francis, with names like Payton, Kidd and Nash caught somewhere in between. Stockton was averaging 8.2 assists per game as a 24-year-old, and 8.2 per as a 39-year-old. He was at 14.7 points per game at age 25, and 13.4 at 39. His Jazz won 47 games in his fourth year, and 47 in his 19th – dipping below that total just once, and exceeding 50 wins 11 times in that span. That’s getting it done, over and over.

To talk at length about John Stockton means to also talk about Karl Malone. It also means to speculate. Would one be as good if he didn’t have the other? Would Stock have had as many assists without Malone to finish? Would Malone have scored so many points without Stockton’s pinpoint passes?

How about this for a different spin: Their harmonious blend of hard work, right attitude, and intense pride meant they concurrently lifted each other.

Malone would work the weight room in Summerfield, LA, in the offseason knowing full well Stockton would be doing the same thing in Spokane, WA. Stockton might have done an extra set of wind sprints in an empty gym at 7 a.m. only because he was sure Malone was defeating a steep hill somewhJohn Stockton & Kenny Smithere down south. Malone might be face down on the trainer’s table prior to a game against a substandard team but would get up and put on his uniform only because Stockton was, by already being dressed and stretched, bargaining with his own aging body, hoping to extract one more game from it. Stockton would push the ball up the floor time and time again because he knew Malone would be there. And so the cycle continued between them – for 18 years.

Only God (and Hot Rod Hundley) knows just how many times these two hooked up in games, but this much we know: Stockton and Malone, Malone and Stockton, lifted each other equally to esoteric levels. One is the greatest pure point guard ever, the other, the greatest power forward. And the best part is no one can prove otherwise.

So Stockton, he of the bronze statue, the retired number, the unreachable records, has one final stop. His style may have prohibited him from leaving indelible marks on future generations, and his lack of need for the spotlight ensures even on this, his biggest weekend, that he won’t be front and center. But few have been more deserving of their spot in the Hall, and for that, John Stockton will be commemorated. Just like when he played, Stockton’s spot in history will always be there. Never take a night off.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • COLT6

    Stockton was as dirty a player can get. Oh wait, there’s Malone too. LOL at the two for not winning one single NBA title. Karma baby, never fails.

  • COLT6

    Never thought I’d be able to say this but…First!

  • http://joeloholic.wordpress.com Joel O’s

    Dirty? “Dirty” players don’t win championships because of karma? GP has a ring. Bruce Bowen has a bunch. Rick Fox. Robert Horry. Dennis Rodman. Even MJ. So please don’t conveniently blame Stockton and Malone’s lack of a title on the idea that they were “dirty” players, because there’s a very very thin line between “dirty” and “savvy”, and fickle fans’ opinions can easily swing one way or another based on whether they win rings.

  • Pingback: SLAM ONLINE | » Hot Topics

  • Surreal

    I’d take Stockton over Magic Johnson. No frills and gets the job done day in and day out. He wasn’t big nor was he athletic but damn did he make the most of what he had which was a lot. For me the number 1 point guard we’ve all seen in the the purest sense of the word point guard.

  • http://www.digitalthread.com AlbertBarr

    I miss Stockton and Malone ’cause hating the Jazz just isnt the same anymore.

  • some dude

    Wow, that was a great article. Thanks for the effort, it really showed.

  • http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://slamonline.com/online/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/kobe_bryant_top_50.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.slamonline.com/online/category/nba/slamonline-top-50/& James the Balla

    Malone Greatest PF?? So Duncan is second then?

  • http://slamonline.com YKnot

    In his HOF speech he said in all his years of pro ball, he was never the most talented player on his team! You get Props from me Stock.

  • mdshuai

    Stockton’s rap as a dirty player doesn’t come from fickle fan opinions, it comes right out of Dennis Rodman’s mouth; and if anyone knows the difference between dirty and savvy, it was the Worm: dude was the definition of both simultaneously.

  • http://nationofmillions.ca ciolkstar

    As a lifelong Spurs fan I’ve always hated the Jazz, especially that filthy POS Karl Malone, but in hindsight I’ve got a ton of respect for Stock. Dude’s inception speech last night was all class as well.

  • Teddy-the-Bear

    Congratulations, John Stockton!
    Stock is a legend.
    ‘Nuff said.

  • Surreal

    I agree with ciolkstar. Being a Spur fan you couldn’t help but hate the Jazz or the Rockets. But I hated the Jazz because of Malone more than anything else, all he was was a big bully who always wilted in the clutch. I also disliked Stockton but only because he was so good though.

  • http://slamonline.com Brad Long

    Stockton was grimey but he wasn’t Bruce Bowen dirty. He’s the 2nd greatest point guard of all time in my book.

  • Dray

    Malone better then Chuck and Timmy??

  • http://nicekicks.com MeloMan15

    bet pg of all time?pshhh….he’s not even th best jazz point guard of all time!!

  • http://nicekicks.com MeloMan15

    sarcasm folkss. plese dont ban me from commenting again… al thouh dwill will be closing in on him

  • http://dfsjklf.com Jukai

    DWill, unless he drastically betters his game, will never close in on Stockton. Ever.
    I know I flip flop this just about every day, but after watching his speech, Stockton, in my mind, is the second best PG of all time (sorry Zeke).
    He was pretty dirty though.

  • Oli

    i enjoyed his speech last night. respect to the man!

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Hell, I believe Malone is the best PF ever. Yes, better than Duncan and Barkley and anyone else. Duncan has the edge on championships and uh…..that’s about it. I’d love to see how many he would’ve won had he played in the 80′s and early 90′s. It’s a shame Malone has to be relegated to number 2 or 3 just cause he couldn’t win one in an era that was much, much more competitive than today.

  • k.a.

    great, great article, up until Malone as greatest PF. He could have just said best PF of his generation but I understand the use of hyperbole to reinforce statement. Stay classy, coltdudewhatever.

  • http://www.slamonline.com James the balla

    Enigmatic… he was playing with the Lakers 2004 on a stocked team. What was his excuse then? Was he to tough for everyone and let Detroit beat them? I am tired of that “if Duncan played in the 80′s” sh!t. GTFOH!!!

  • COLT6

    Joel O’s and mdshuai: The notion that Stockton was a dirty player is a fact and not an opinion. Bowen, Rodman, Horry, Fox etc. are not in question here. This article is about Stock (consequently Malone too.) I commented on the truth that these two “great” players never won a pennet. That they played the game of Basketball uncleanly IS THE SUBJECT not Bowen (had Duncan, Manu and TP) Rodman (MJ, Pip, Phil) Fox and Horry (Shaq, Kobe, Phil again) GP (DWade, Shaq again). Just because you cannot handle facts does not give you the right to veer away from the issue on hand. GTFOH!

  • COLT6

    And no fellas, Malone could never be the greatest Power Forward of all time because the measure of a player’s greatness always rests on him being able to WIN Championships. How can you be “GREAT” if even for once you weren’t on top of the hill? John Wooden would agree, it’s about winning, baby! I aint hatin’ Chuck (You too Reggie, Patrick etc.) you were good but where are the rings to back you up?

  • Teddy-the-Bear

    Umm, its called a team? Reggie, Pat, and Chuck were not just “good”, dude, they were GREAT players. I guess Pau Gasol is higher up on the all time power-forward list, because he won a ring and Malone didn’t. According to you. And yes, they were dirty players; so what? Back then the game was more physical anyways.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Todd Spehr

    For a piece about Stockton, all comments are directed towards something else (Malone vs. Duncan) – how ironic.

  • COLT6

    Teddy: Timmy D has 4 rings, KG has one. I’m not saying Pau is better than Malone and of course Basketball is a team sport. What I am trying to get across is that genuine greatness is translated through winning, LEADING your team to victory, being the world champion ergo nobody else in another team is better than you because heck, you have the trophy to prove it. You get what I’m sayin’? Zup Jukai!

  • MC Pats

    focus on stockton, people. he and malone are possibly the best pair ever.

  • Niio

    Is it just me or does anyone else feel that when the NBA was more physical there were less players sitting out with “injuries”?

  • k.a.

    colt6 sounds like he started reading basketball this decade :)

  • http://joeloholic.wordpress.com Joel O’s

    @COLT6: Nowhere in my comment did I say that Stockton and Malone weren’t dirty. I just found your initial comment attributing their lack of a ring to karma silly. Your subsequent arguments, however, are pretty much on point.

  • http://joeloholic.wordpress.com Joel O’s

    @COLT6: And regarding your 7.21 pm comment – good point. I’m admittedly a very big Karl Malone fan. But yes – his claim to “greatest PF of all time” will always be argued against because he never won a title. Even the old “he would’ve won one if not for MJ” reason, honestly, is an excuse. Bird and Magic are seen as legends – and equals – because they were the best in their eras and took turns winning titles. Zeke is validated as one of the greats because his Pistons won 2 straight titles when Bird and Magic were still in their primes. Malone and Stockton are unquestionably among the best ever to play at their positions. But as you said, they can’t claim to be THE best ever. Because they never beat MJ – nor did they win a title in his absence – and are thus *not* his equals.

  • http://joeloholic.wordpress.com Joel O’s

    Is Duncan, then, the greatest PF ever? Is he even a PF? There’s a good case for him being the greatest PF ever. But if seen as a center… he’s 3rd greatest ever, tops. Not a bad place to be, given that 1 and 2 are untouchable, but still. And I think Duncan’s talent would translate to greatness in the 80′s and 90′s as much as it does in the 2000′s. The Spurs’ title runs were not cakewalks.

  • Furious

    Obviously rings are all that matters guys. Brian Scalabrene is clearly a better player than Malone. Also Mike Penberthy is greater than Nash or Kidd. Those guys both suck. Right colt?

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    Joel, does that mean if Duncan is no. 3 , Shaq is 1, and Wilt is 2? Because Hakeem would then have to be no. 4. and that just doesn’t seem right.

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    Also, Timmy played (plays) both ends of the floor better than Malone did. He’s just better,

  • Furious

    I should probably add a postscript to my comment before: I dont think Malone is the greatest PF of all time. I just dont think you can use championships as the only thing to judge a player

  • Clay

    Stockton is the man! He looked like an accountant but the dude could ball like crazy! Much respect for a legend of the game. You will not see another PG play for 19 seasons ever again.

  • COLT6

    k.a. : I play Basketball, I don’t just read it, beat you on that court any day, all day. Furious: What does Scalabrene and Penberthy have to do with all of this? We are talking about marquee players who are supposed to LEAD (read again LEAD, GODDAMNIT!) their respective teams to a championship. If you ever play hoops then you should know what it takes to win it all and how much that trophy VALIDATES your game. I just saw a re-run of Stock’s 28-assist game, he was beast and so was Malone who, at the receiving end of most of those dimes, scored 33. But like Joel said, they never beat Mike. They had room in 94 and 95 but the great Hakeem and the Rockets denied them their chance. Karl Malone and John Stockton were very good players but not even once did they climb on that NBA Podium to hold a title which PROVES that no one else is better. Mike and Scottie did 6 times, 2 at the Jazz’s collective expense.

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    Colt, your last comment made FAR more sense than your previous one(s) have… even if people are still going to disagree with you.

  • LeoneL

    @Hursty, Where does that leave Kareem then? Although I think you were joking about Shaq being the best center ever.

  • m

    great article. GREAT. stockton played basketball the way it was supposed to be played.

  • http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3445/3357407353_c868c2d95c.jpg larrylegend

    co-sign albertbarr

  • http://joeloholic.wordpress.com Joel O’s

    @Hursty: How about Bill Russell? I just think that if seen as a center, Duncan is definitely in the mix for the greatest ever discussion. But I don’t think we’ll ever have a consensus on who the greatest ever center will ever be. As a power forward, though, Tim Duncan’s argument for GOAT is a lot stronger.

  • Krishan

    I find it very obtuse when people include a title as a criteria for this “Best *INSERT POSITION* of All Time” debate. Okay, not obtuse, but…stupid. Very stupid. You all act as if winning a championship, not going deep into the playoffs or being statistically superior, either validates or negates a player from being mentioned. Why? Because you’re basically shoehorning a criteria that requires a team to achieve into a debate that measures individual merit. F*ck, if you even want to go further, you could say that winning a championship is not only based on the championship team, but also their competition. So yeah, I could definitely see how winning a championship means Tim Duncan is better than Karl Malone. It’s because we’re talking about table tennis, right?

  • Krishan

    And for the record, I do think Duncan, as a PF, was better than Malone.

  • Krishan

    And I loved stock’s speech. MJ’s was better, but not by much. DRob’s was a distant third.

  • http://dfsjklf.com Jukai

    Joel O: For the record, Tim Duncan would be the sixth best center of all time. Unless we’re just tallying up championships. Which would be stupid.

  • http://dfsjklf.com Jukai

    Because, you know, Chamberlain, Kareem, Shaq, Hakeem, and Russell all won at least two championships but had statistical superiority to Duncan. So, you know, not seeing why Duncan would be considered third best.

  • http://www.utjazzblog.com cdlowry

    Fantastic article. Stockton is my all-time favorite player and the reason I became a Jazz fan. I doubt there will ever be another one like him.

Advertisement