Monday, September 21st, 2009 at 12:05 pm  |  26 responses

Taking One for the Team

Casey explains how basketball could weather the economic storm.

by Casey Jacobsen

This past summer, I was leaving a gym in Park City, UT after a workout when I bumped into a guy who somehow knew who I was. I hardly ever get recognized, so I knew this guy was either a distant cousin of mine who I didn’t recognize, or he was a basketball junkie. His name is David Locke, and he was the latter. But rather than go on ESPN’s Stump the Schwab, David has applied hiJazz mascots otherwise useless knowledge into a career in broadcasting.

He is currently the radio guy for the Utah Jazz, as well as hosting his own radio show in Salt Lake City. We got to talking and after a while, we started discussing the economy and the current state of the NBA. David proposed a plan to help the NBA not only stabilize their fortunes, but also possibly make more money and gain more fans. He asked, “What if all the players, coaches and owners of NBA franchises got together and made a pact that everyone will take a 10 percent pay cut the next two seasons? The way things are in this economy, there can only be a handful of teams making money right now. Then, they could lower ticket prices and keep the arenas full without losing money. Is something like this possible in the NBA?” The answer came to me in a nano-second: not in my lifetime.

After we shook hands and I drove home, I couldn’t help but think of David Locke’s proposal. It was so simple, yet so difficult. When I got the opportunity to write a blog for SLAMonline, these are the types of things that I wanted to write about.

Why is it that an idea like this is so impossible to realize?

When I was drafted by the Phoenix Suns in 2002, I volunteered to be the team representative in the NBA Players Association/Union. I thought it would be interesting to hear about how the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) works, where all of the endorsement money goes, and to gain a general knowledge of the business side of basketball. After three years of sitting in on those meetings, it is very clear that giving back 10 percent would impossible. The CBA is a contract between the players and the team owners and amongst other things, and it stipulates that all contracts must be honored on both sides. That is why it doesn’t matter that 50 percent of the New York Knicks roster should be in Europe (with me) playing for a fraction of what they get paid now. The owners signed those players, and they must pay them, unless they go ‘Latrell Sprewell’ on Coach D’Antoni and void their contract. Even though the CBA is ironclad, the current state of the economy makes this a special circumstance.

Even if you could get pass the CBA contract, there is no chance that today’s NBA players would voluntarily give up that much money. What’s in it for them? The average career in the NBA is around four years (which is what I played) and so players have this feeling that they must capitalize now on their earning power because you never know when an injury will derail your career. This is the exact reason why you see so many NFL training camp ‘holdouts.’ Careers only last so long, but the idea is if you make enough money now, you will be taken care of for the rest of your life. (Note: This argument is only valid if an athlete saves most of his earnings… which is another blog-entry waiting to happen.) It is a lot to ask a 23-year-old player to give up money he is due, even if he is making millions of dollars. Regardless of whether or not you feel NBA players are overpaid, would you give up some of your salary for the greater good?

I still believe this to be a good idea and a part of me thinks that the NBA does too. These are special circumstances. The world economy is in trouble, yet NBA salaries continue to rise year after year. Something has to give. This should be a time when the NBA has to look at what is going on and make a real decision. The fans are Kevin Durantthe ones who suffer the most. Nobody can justify spending thousands of dollars on season tickets to watch Steve Nash and the Suns play when they might have trouble making their mortgage payments this year.

The NBA as a whole is struggling to get their seats filled. The Lakers, Spurs and Cavs will sell out regardless of the economy, but what about the rest of the League? Do you think people in Detroit are buying up season tickets to the Pistons any time soon? Or New Orleans? Or OK City? This idea of giving back 10 percent would help those fans right now. It would send a message to them that NBA players, although rich and sometimes spoiled, do care about the community that supports them.

It’s been a profitable, successful league for many decades now, but we haven’t seen a financial depression like this in over 30 years. Thirty years ago, players weren’t making nearly the amount of money that they do now. If the NBA doesn’t do something quickly, I believe it will have a serious issue on its hands. Players better be ready to reduce their asking prices in the next Collective Bargaining Agreement or there will be a lockout. If you think the NBA economy is struggling now, wait until there is another work stoppage.

I know this idea will never be realized. I know that there is too much red tape that must be cut through to even attempt something like this. But when I think about it, the idea isn’t really that drastic. There have been measures taken by NBA teams to survive this economic downturn. I recently read that the Miami Heat have asked their employees, including Pat Riley and head coach Eric Spoelstra, to agree to 20 percent pay cuts in order to avoid having to lay off countless others. The article said that “player salaries were unaffected.” Another article revealed the Charlotte Bobcats laid off 35 employees recently and NBA Commissioner David Stern said that 9 percent of the League office has been let go. Most teams have reduced their season ticket prices due to a decline in demand. This economic depression has affected almost every single aspect of the game, but player salaries haven’t budged at all. I do understand that free agents right now are finding it difficult to get the kind of money they want because of the economy, but the players already signed don’t have to worry at all.

You could say that it is easy for me to write this because I’m not a part of the NBA anymore. But the economy of European Basketball has been hit just as hard as the NBA, if not harder. Because of the dependency that many teams out here have on sponsorships, many organizations have had their budgets slashed. As a free agent this past summer, I had to take a pay cut. I knew it would be this way before the summer started and I accepted it. A good friend of mine who plays in Germany was asked by his team (he was already under contract for two years) to take a 20 percent pay cut. He didn’t like it, but his team would have struggled to pay him otherwise. He understood that these are difficult times and so he “took one for the team.”

Another team in Dusseldorf, Germany, wanted to sign former Penn University player Koko Archibong but didn’t have enough money. The players at Dusseldorf, who thought Archibong could really help them win this coming season, got together and decided to give up parts of their salary in order to sign him. I’ve never heard of anything like this before in pro sports. It reminds me of the scene in the movie “Rudy” when all of the starters for Notre Dame lay down their uniforms on the coach’s desk, sacrificing their own playing time to allow Rudy the chance to play in his last game. That movie had a very happy ending. I don’t see that same result in the NBA’s version. I hope I’m wrong.

Casey Jacobsen is a former SLAM High School First Team All-American and NCAA First Team All-American. He currently plays for Brose Baskets in Bamberg, Germany.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    I could see taking a pay cut if the team owners released all of their financial information and allowed it to be audited by an independent auditor. Then, I could see a pay cut if the team owners promised in writing to reduce ticket prices in accordance with the pay cuts. Without those two things, I wouldn’t advocate for any player to take a pay cut. Most Americans take pay cuts because we have no choice, not because we care that much about the greater good. And, once we take those pay cuts (which I have taken) we find that the company’s complaints about dire financial problems weren’t not completely accurate.

  • Gerard Himself

    Casey, great post. And very interesting what you said about the team in Dusseldorf. I hope there won’t be a lockout, like you said, it would really hurt the League, probably even more so than in ’98. I wished that your idea would happen, because it makes so much sense. But realistically, it will never happen.

  • http://slamonline.com/ Ryne Nelson

    Casey’s plan would work, but I also agree that it doesn’t seem like a viable option in today’s NBA. Like Allenp said, there’s a lot that needs to happen to ensure no one’s cheating in the process, and it’s a hassle that David Stern would likely want to not deal with.

  • http://www.manutd.com Z

    Players, coaches and owners have very different pay scales and employment opportunities. It would be naive to think that an all encompassing pay cut would do the trick. Owners, first of all, are billionaires. They’re not rich, they’re wealthy. Cubes’ money would take generations to dry up in a terrible economy with no additional source of income. Coaches can coach until they can’t walk anymore basically. Players, on the other had, have a 4-5 year career on average which can be cut even shorter by a bad injury. So yes, go get that dough and get as much as you can because when your skills won’t be needed anymore, you’ll get dropped like a bad habit. And when you really think about it, players are just employees and they make as much as the owners are willing to offer them. If owners want to save a penny, they just have to offer less to FAs.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Z
    The real problem is that owners cannot trust each other. The ones with smaller market teams know that if they fail to pay money for the best talent, the more lucrative teams will snap that talent up in a second. Without illegal collusion, owners know that if they refuse to meet certain pay thresholds, they will be locked out of NBA-wide arms race.
    Like I said, if things are so bad, the owners need to open up their finances and let an independent auditor examine them. That way everybody can get a clear picture of where money is coming from and where it is going. It’s easy to blame player salaries for high ticket prices, but the truth is that the owners are operating a business, and they charge what they charge to make money.

  • http://www.manutd.com Z

    Good points, Allen. I just feel that the onus should not be put on employees to take pay cuts. The CBA will be up shortly, if you want them to take less and not allow the Cubans and the Dolans to outspend everybody then put a hard cap à la NFL.

  • http://www.in-n-outnba.blogspot.com Lucas

    Man I love your writing man. I just wish the NBA could figure this out sooner or later. I am super scared to think of the possibility of a lockout. Look what the lockout did to hockey. This type of thing makes me shiver.

  • http://www.in-n-outnba.blogspot.com Lucas

    Man I love your writing man. I just wish the NBA could figure this out sooner or later. I am super scared to think of the possibility of a lockout. Look what the lockout did to hockey. This type of thing makes me shiver.

  • http://www.sonicbids.com/shaemorin doyouwantmore

    Good on you Casey for discovering a profound and proven way for using a little bit of sacrifice as a way to prosperity. The principle would work very well in the NBA. In fact, imagine if every single person on earth gave ten percent of their income back to their community. Not just taxes, either. I mean if every person gave ten percent of their prosperity back to something greater than themselves. The guy who invented this principle has a bad reputation among people who don’t know him but back in the day they used to call it “Tithing”.

  • that dude

    Great entry Casey, can’t wait to hear an insider’s perpective on NBA players’ spending behaviours

  • http://fjdklf.com Jukai

    Wait wait wait, Casey, your BLOWING my mind here… you’re saying Koko Archibong is still ALIVE>?

  • http://slamonline.com/ Tzvi Twersky

    I remember watching KoKo at Penn. I also remember watching Michael Jordan (the other one)at Penn. Anyway, thanks for the post, Casey. Interesting, as always.

  • ab_40

    ain’t gonna happen
    the next three years the nba’s rich will only get richer and the poor well I can see one or two teams going bankrupt or having to move. Sacramento and Minnesota are teams that come to mind. Charlotte just needs a new owners group but that area isn’t very attractive for businuess and revenue.

  • Rob

    The title “Deutsche Land Pöst” is really funny. Is that a little Brüno reference? Not sure what that means for the post though :-)

  • boy sanchez

    Simply one of the greatest articles I’ve ever read in this site.

  • http://www.stonesthrow.com/madlib Michael NZ

    Dig how Casey is posting regularly. BUT he needs to make a comments section appearance… look at the readers responses – thought is being put into these. Whoever deals with Casey on these posts, make it happen!

  • burnt_chicken

    casey is one articulate sharpshooter.
    pffft. and they say stanford is a tech school!

  • chintao

    My opinion of Stanford has dropped a bit. This article fails to address what happens if the economy picks up. Will the owners be willing to treat the salaries that have been cut as deferred? No way. The owners are sharks. The bad economy is a smoke screen for their avarice. If fairness is any sort of consideration, then maybe players should be made partners in their teams. Each player would sign-on for a percentage of the profits (all profits, even those indirectly earned by affiliated organizations). I’m sure the owners would quake at that prospect. They would surely prefer things as they now stand. Also, anyone who gives money back to an owner needs his head examined. Dude is a straight sucker. Finally, doyouwantmore once again brings Jesus around where he doesn’t belong. To paraphrase a famous rugby tune (sung to “Battle Hymn of the Republic”), “Jesus can’t play basketball, because he’s got holes in his hands.”

  • http://www.okayplayer.com Doyouwantmore

    Chintao, read my post again from a tolerant, grown-man perspective and you might see it in a different light. And thank you for illustrating so well what its like for a person of faith to be themselves in this society. Its all good, though. I ain’t mad at ya. I hope if you ever have a change of heart or come to any faith of your own that you’ll experience tolerance and understanding and kindness. Do you really want to be the guy that mocks and degrades people for what they believe? It’s not rhetorical or sarcastic. I’m asking you, one man to another. You really want to be that guy?

  • http://www.okayplayer.com doyouwantmore

    I didn’t even mention Jesus. Chintao did, which is pretty cool actually.

  • http://hibachi20.blogspot.com Blinguo

    The 10% back thing is well known even to people with no affiliation with church, I was about to say it too, but seeing how you take the tone quickly as being persecuted, I’m glad I didn’t bring it up first. But hey, Nas & Wade let you know about “10% goes to God 1st.” Nothing wrong with faith but 10% from every parishioner is a sort of racket, if not on the billionaire – getting half the money from city govt’s to fund their profit making arenas – level.
    -
    Jesus is the most famous zombie ever, or hates zombies. Thanks internet, Jesus jokes/comics that some are pretty cool too, actually. & also heard that Jesus basketball holes in his hands joke on the internet, never knew its origins in song though, heh.

  • http://hibachi20.blogspot.com Blinguo

    I did some recent essay work on mentioning unnecessary rage – social stigmas on the overpaid athletes, where people never look into the owners whom profit bigtime and only pay the players a percentage of that revenue back.
    -
    But every keyboard jockey/Quarterback hates Iverson/Starbury for OHNOEs 100 million $$ career! (taxes don’t exist) but Juwan Howard gets a pass because he’s under their radar. And the Clippers owner doing wrong by minorities in his real estate endeavors is back page news.

  • http://hibachi20.blogspot.com Blinguo

    I lined up Jesus there as complete coincidence, but it reads as like the “He Got Game” ESPN montage from Shaq to Reggie to Thompson & screamin’ Vitale.

  • chintao

    @ doyouwantmore ==> I am not persecuting anyone. I am merely challenging the faith that you attempt to proffer as fact and that you artificially inject into a purely secular discussion. Except for that critical difference in the characterization of my words, I am THAT guy. I can take the weight. You might want to get down off your cross, before I jab a spear in your ribs.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Hold on.
    I disagreed with Doyouwantmore’s comparison of Jacobsen’s proposal to tithing, but I don’t have a problem with him introducing religion.
    As a Christian myself, I know that if you’re truly practicing, your faith isn’t something you pick up and put down depending on the convo. It colors all of your thoughts and actions.
    So, the idea that religion shouldn’t be introduced into “secular” conversations doesn’t work for me. Do you apply the standard that secular thoughts shouldn’t be introduced into conversations about religion? I doubt it.
    Personally, while Chintao and I have agreed on many topics, I thought his joke was crass. But, since I know that Jesus or God don’t need me to defend them, I rarely bother with going back and forth with folks about what they say about God. However, I think the idea that religion can only be discussed in certain instances is ridiculous.

  • http://www.okayplayer.com Doyouwantmore

    But, back to the original point of all this, I think the principle behind what Casey was writing about is exactly what tithing was designed for. If everyone gave 10% of their total income back to their community, their community of believers, their organization, etc. there would be more prosperity for all. If it were kept that simple it could work. It’s just that lawyers dictate the terms of our society and have messed up the world.

Advertisement
Counterkicks