• October 12, 2009 8:00 am  |  81 Comments

    30 Teams, 30 Days NBA Live 10

    San Antonio Spurs Season Preview.

    We conclude the Southwest Division pManu Ginobilireviews with the San Antonio Spurs. You can read past previews here.

    by Ryan Desmarais

    The San Antonio Spurs might be the most boring team in the NBA.

    Seriously.

    I mean, there’s nothing exciting about the way they play. They want a slow tempo to all of their games. It seems like they want their offense to be as methodical as possible in order to put opposing teams to sleep, while they’re defense takes advantage of the mistakes made by their groggy opponents.

    Their superstar’s nickname is “The Big Fundamental.” That might be the most boring, bland nickname I’ve ever heard in the history of sports.

    NBA fans can thank Gregg Popovich for this “style” of play. He likes to keep a controlled tempo and make sure his team doesn’t get into shootouts with some of the run-and-gun teams in the West like Phoenix and Golden State. In fact, the Spurs haven’t averaged 100 points a game over a season this decade.

    But something tells me that Popovich couldn’t care less about entertaining us.

    Actually, a few things tell me that: his three four championship rings.

    The Spurs played as their extremely boring selves last season and, once again, made the postseason. But something was different about this team. They seemed even more boring than before. One thing after another went wrong for a team that seemingly has yearly title aspirations.

    Injuries and age appeared to catch up to the core of the Spurs. Manu Ginobili, their most exciting player (which is kind of like being the MVP of the Beer League), was injured during the Olympics, appeared in only 44 games and clearly wasn’t completely right. Tony Parker suffered a sprained ankle early in the season while Ginobili was recovering and missed a couple of weeks. Tim Duncan would miss a few games later in the season, as well.

    They also suffered from very little depth. Aside from a good year from Roger Mason, Jr., the Spurs had to rely on the recently retired Bruce Bowen, 36-year-old Michael Finley, 37-year-old Kurt Thomas, and Matt Bonner, one of the greatest basketball players to ever come out of the state of New Hampshire (once again, see the Beer League analogy). While offering great experience, they’re far from in their prime and couldn’t offer everything the depleted Spurs needed to pick up the slack.

    The end result? Gettting blown out of the playoffs by their in-state rivals, the Dallas Mavericks.

    Fast forward to this season and everyone who talks about San Antonio talks about the steal of the offseason: Richard Jefferson. The Spurs traded a bag of basketballs and some Gatorade to the Bucks for the Jefferson, who immediately bolsters their offense and gives them a deeper roster. RJ has the ability to both move without the ball as well as create his own shot, allowing the floor to open up for Parker and Ginobili to penetrate.

    They took their thieving momentum into the NBA Draft and kidnapped Pittsburgh power forward DeJuan Blair in the second round, as I still question how he was passed over time after time. Blair gives the Spurs another wide body that can work well in the post and he is an excellent rebounder on both ends of the floor, which was possibly his strongest asset in college.

    They added another veteran in Antonio McDyess, a guy who has been able to resurrect his career after a solid first few years in the League were tarnished by numerous injury-plagued seasons. He gives the Spurs another big that can play inside and collect boards as well as hit the mid-range jumper when left open. At 35, he’s long past his prime, but San Antonio won’t be asking him to be the franchise savior. He’ll just be another weapon that can play 15 to 20 minutes a night and contribute.

    But the biggest assets for the Spurs continue to be their mainstays. Duncan, Ginobili, and Parker are still three of the best players in the League and are needed to perform at a high level on a nightly basis in order for this team to have a chance to reach their goal. Duncan has been one of the most consistent players in the NBA over his career as you can pretty much mark him down to average 20 and 10 every season. Ginobili continues to be a dangerous threat offensively with his ability to penetrate as well as knock down outside shots. He is also a pesky defender who will get his steals and take charges. Parker, who is amazingly only 27, is just coming into his prime years and has become both a fantastic scorer and a very good facilitator.

    And Popovich will still lead this team into battle every night. He’s arguably a top-three coach in the League and a future Hall of Famer and his players continue to buy into his coaching style, regardless of how boring we may think it is.

    So what can we expect from the Spurs this season? Pretty much what we’ve seen from them all decade. They’ll win 55 to 60 games during the regular season and make a deep playoff run.

    But how far will they go? If healthy, they’ll be right there with the Lakers as one of the teams to represent the West in the Finals. If they’re walking wounded, there’s a good chance they’ll be playing golf in May and June.

    Either way, don’t expect any high-scoring affairs this season with the Spurs.

    Or any other season, for that matter.

    Don’t forget to grab your pillow.

    • Add a Comment
      • Digg
      • del.icio.us
      • Facebook
      • Google
      • StumbleUpon
      • TwitThis
      • Yahoo! Buzz
      • Print this article!
    • RSS

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

    • AllenI Posted: Oct.12 at 8:36 am
      pop has 4 rings

    • KenneR Posted: Oct.12 at 8:42 am
      I don’t know it is boring or not, but this kind of playing style helped us to get 4 rings..
      And now,let’s start the drive for 5!

    • KenneR Posted: Oct.12 at 8:45 am
      I don’t know it is boring or not,but this kind of playing style helped us to get 4 rings..so I would like to watch my Spurs’s style for many many more years!
      Let’s start the drive for 5!

    • kay_nock Posted: Oct.12 at 9:01 am
      Come on mate! if your going to write a article and use the word boring every 2-3 words atleast put a better effort into it! Pop actually has 4 rings. Because they’re are so “boring”, is that why they are considered to be the best team the last decade?…hmmm I wonder…PHO run and gun high scoring and entertaining team that hasn’t made a trip to the finals since Barkley was there. Give me more boring basketball and deep playoff runs then!

    • kobesbestfriend Posted: Oct.12 at 9:09 am
      now that “dirty” Bowen has retired Kobe is gonna dismantle SA every year until he calls a quits!!!

    • Omar3 Posted: Oct.12 at 9:29 am
      Pop will have 5 rings by next June. Duncan has slimmed down to help his knees and to play better ball. Since this year’s first 1st round exit, Duncan is dedicated for that full fist of rings. He will win them before Kobe and Shaq no doubt.

    • jport1975 Posted: Oct.12 at 9:30 am
      I stopped reading when he got the number of rings wrong….

    • jport1975 Posted: Oct.12 at 9:36 am
      to Kobesbootybuddy (kobesbestfriend)….Nothing makes is better than beating LA and watching Kobe try to man up and not cry…the lip quiver is always priceless. First off, you need to hope Ron does not jack up you team chemistry. Then you need to get off of the Kobe sack and realize SA is the only team that can take LA down, and WILL this year. Since you’re Kobes best friend you can bring the tissue and hand Kobe his baby bottle after he loses in the WCF this year.

    • Eboy Posted: Oct.12 at 9:39 am
      Uhm……….this is a pretty undeserved preview.

    • Babygab Posted: Oct.12 at 9:42 am
      If the Spurs stay healthy, they are going to the NBA finals period. There’s no way L.A could beat them. I’m looking forward to a Celtics-Spurs final. That would be a grown men final, bringing the 90’s back….

    • jport1975 Posted: Oct.12 at 9:46 am
      This guy just spat out the same garbage that others have been saying for year. “The Spurs are boring.” Seriously? Is that your briliiant observation in this team? Hey why don’t start doing weather so you can tell people, “There’s going to be some clouds outside, somewhere….and some wind..” Nice job, how about next time TRYING to put some real thought into this…

    • Jessdogg Posted: Oct.12 at 9:50 am
      “Actually, a few things tell me that: his three four championship rings.” it clearly says four

    • Pacman Posted: Oct.12 at 10:19 am
      This article is boring. I’m used to a higher quality of analysis from Slam writers, but this one was phoned in. Come on man, how about some original insight or at least something other than cliches about the “boring” Spurs. They’re (the conjunction correctly used here, but I believe you meant to use the possessive) only boring if you don’t like good team basketball. However, if you enjoy crisp ball movement, sharp cuts, player screens all over the court, and one of the best defensive schemes in NBA history, then you might want to actually check out a Spurs game some time.

    • kobesbestfriend Posted: Oct.12 at 10:21 am
      can some1 pls tell me who is gonna guard mamba on SA now that “dirty” bruce is gone???kobe is gonna murder these losers!!!

    • Pacman Posted: Oct.12 at 10:25 am
      So apparently my grammatical criticism was edited or I read it incorrectly. My apologies. This article is still lame.

    • Yak Posted: Oct.12 at 10:35 am
      We got the point, you think the Spurs are boring. Too bad you have no understanding of Spurs’ ball, people are often bored by what they don’t understand. Watching DeJuan Blair and Richard Jefferson in the preseason, I don’t think anyone will find them boring. Anyway I can’t wait for this boring team to kick you team’s butt.

    • Eboy Posted: Oct.12 at 10:35 am
      Co-sign Pacman.

    • Babygab Posted: Oct.12 at 10:46 am
      @kobesbestfriend: do you remember in the 1996 ECF when the bulls will let Shaq get all the points he wanted, but then shut down the rest of the team ? Same strategy might work against L.A. Nobody can guard Kobe, and to be really honest Bruce was there only for damage control, ’cause sometime Kobe really did own his a##. So let Kobe do his things. But then take care of the rest of the team and L.A’s offense will be disrupted. L.A doesn’t have what it takes to beat a healthy San Antonio team. And believe San Antonio is even more dangerous this year.

    • loe2150 Posted: Oct.12 at 11:46 am
      Atleast have respect to put effort into your preview. You are lucky to get paid at something you enjoy doing, following the NBA. I hate the Lakers and love the Spurs, but even I would give them enough respect not to put my personal thoughts in a preview I’m writing for them. I respect your opinion, but you dont get the great opportunity of writing about the NBA and use it to show such disrespect as you have shown here, I’m sure this piece took you 5 minutes, you didnt even have the decency to do some homework. Its 4 rings, I feel bad for you.

    • kobesbestfriend Posted: Oct.12 at 11:49 am
      1996 ECF???Shaq was playing with losers and coached by a dummy named B Hill and not 2 mention if Ho Grant didnt get injured they probly woulda beat the bulls…but anyhow Kobe is the best player in the world with a stellar cast surrounding him, and coached by the zen master so i doubt the spurs would be able 2 use that same strategy on mamba!the Lakers have dominated the spurs in the postseason this last decade and i dont see any proof that its gonna change with the addition of has beens RJ or Mcdyess!

    • yani Posted: Oct.12 at 12:10 pm
      damn. maybe the spurs was boring the past few years but this upcoming season they are now fantastic to watch with the addition of RJ plus a healthy elictrifying manu and a beast in the place of de juan blair.

    • RedRum Posted: Oct.12 at 12:29 pm
      does Slam hire 11 year old kids to write these articles?? Has anyone who writes these articles ever played basketball on a real team, rather than eight-feet hoop on their backyard? Watching TP going taking it to the cup like a maniac is boring? Manu running the fast break and doing his trick shots is boring? TD spinning around helpless defenders is boring? I am not a Spurs fan, but I a basketball fan, and I do appreciate how the Spurs play. Came on SLAM, it would not hurt if you hired people that have at least a driving license and can count to four…

    • Cheryl Posted: Oct.12 at 12:32 pm
      You really didn’t want to write this one, huh Ryan? The Spurs’ upgrade deserves a little more enthusiasm. They got younger, more athletic and usually rebound in a big way when they don’t make it deep into the playoffs the previous year. And, by the by, I for one happen to find fundemental, methodical basketball beautiful. And fun to watch!

    • peter Posted: Oct.12 at 12:56 pm
      Richard Jeff. Mcdyess, and blair. HAHAHAHA. These are the acquisitions san antonio is proud of???

    • MAHAMOUD Posted: Oct.12 at 12:56 pm
      Forget about all the negative comments, he said something very important”If healthy, they’ll be right there with the Lakers as one of the teams to represent the West in the Finals”.

    • OhMyLady Posted: Oct.12 at 1:12 pm
      this artical is very, very bad my friend. i really suggest revising it because there alot of factual errors

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Oct.12 at 1:18 pm
      Ummm, yes? Those are actually incredible additions to Tim Duncan, Tony Parker, and Manu Ginobli. So why are you laughing?

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Oct.12 at 1:20 pm
      That’s just like saying:
      Lakers got Ron Artest. HAHAHAHAHAHAA. That’s an acquisition they’re proud of???
      Or:
      Celtics got Rasheed Wallace. HAHAHAHAHAH. That’s an acquisition they’re proud of???
      You decide.

    • RedRum Posted: Oct.12 at 1:46 pm
      Teddy, you act like you have the mental age and basketball understanding of a kid that still plays with teddies..

    • james Posted: Oct.12 at 1:51 pm
      @ peter, yeah, that was lame

    • TADOne Posted: Oct.12 at 2:27 pm
      “So what can we expect from the Spurs this season? Pretty much what we’ve seen from them all decade. They’ll win 55 to 60 games during the regular season and make a deep playoff run.”
      The writer could have just sent in this paragraph with a picture of a big middle finger and called it a day.

    • funkdoc Posted: Oct.12 at 2:52 pm
      I used to hate the spurs. Now I start to hate people - especially journalists who bring up the same arguments every time - who hate the spurs. Seriously, I’m supporting the spurs this season. They have a hell of a team, a deep team and are more motivated than ever. If everybody’s healthy, I think the spurs are one of the biggest threats this season. Boring or not. If you want to review an upcoming season, do it based on statistics. I mean, I pretty much knew how this article was gonna be written. It gets quite boring to read the word boring year after year when reading about the spurs. Maybe you should think about that Slam…

    • whooo! Posted: Oct.12 at 2:54 pm
      what is going on here SLAM? i expect crap work from ESPN, but it looks like the laziest piece of crap from Mr. Desmarais. boring? the article was, but not the team. the spurs had bad defense last year, scored more off 3s, and Tony Parker is extremely exciting to watch. yet the EASY way to go is to say, “the Spurs are boring” and live with that mentality. come on slam, don’t let crap like this ruin your rep. i hope Desmarais actually puts in some work before coming up with his next entry. BORING.

    • ron Posted: Oct.12 at 3:15 pm
      Winning is not boring, Spurs are proven winners….nuff said

    • JD Posted: Oct.12 at 3:36 pm
      Peter, RJ, DeJuan Blair(who had 16 points and 19 boards in his debut and 28 points last night), and McDyess r way better editions than Ron Artest and pretty much no one else

    • JD Posted: Oct.12 at 3:39 pm
      Plus RJ is the only edition to the top 5 teams in the L who couldn’t potentially mess up the Franchise or hasn’t before at some point in their career, Shaq, VC ,Ron Artest, and Sheed?! Common!

    • kevin Posted: Oct.12 at 3:44 pm
      your stupid! ill grab my pillow and watch the spurs in june win another title

    • Sarah Posted: Oct.12 at 4:08 pm
      I’m so sick of hearing how “boring” the Spurs are. This regurgitation of bullsh*t was so unoriginal that I couldn’t finish reading it. You tell me what’s boring.

    • Sandlot Posted: Oct.12 at 4:28 pm
      This is a terrible article. I’ve never seen such a good team receive so much disrespect. For such a boring team, I have seen alot of great games that they have been involved in. Phx/Sa game 1 of 2007 playoffs comes to mind. I am not really a Spurs “fan,” but I always go to the games when they come to town. At least I know they will bring pro skills.

    • Sandlot Posted: Oct.12 at 4:32 pm
      Oops, I think it was Phx/Sa 2008 playoffs.

    • Chuck Posted: Oct.12 at 4:35 pm
      The facts are this: You plan to track a team year after year after year that has a winning record, no matter what the odds, and the Spurs will probably be the team you have to choose. When they don’t do as well as the wanted, they don’t whine and cry about it, they simply try to improve incrementally. You bet on Pop - you’ll be a winner too. By the way, do they give rings for journalism, REALLY POOR JOURNALISM?

    • Addison Welch Posted: Oct.12 at 5:23 pm
      This is completely unbelievable. You’ve obviously never watched a Spurs game before, and are just going off of the highlight films that ESPN runs on Sports Center. If you’ve ever even watched a game on tv, you’d know that Parker is one the fastest point guards in the league and can steal and penetrate into the paint better than almost anyone. And you obviously have never watched a Spurs playoff series, which, even when they lose, are always close. They didn’t lose any game of the series last year by more than 10 points, and two of those loses came down to the last minute. And you obviously never saw any of the several playoff series against the Suns, which were perhaps the most compelling and physical games I’ve ever seen. I mean with less than 20 seconds left in the first game of the 2007 series with the Spurs down two, Duncan takes a three point shot…and makes it…his first make of the season. If you’re gonna insult the Spurs, at least do your research, and write at a higher level than a middle school kid with a grudge.

    • Michael Posted: Oct.12 at 5:27 pm
      you are an idiot. spurs are not boring. you don’t know what you are talking about. people who call the spurs boring know nothing about basketball. you’re pathetic.

    • sg446 Posted: Oct.12 at 5:46 pm
      stop saying the spurs are boring…when will networks like espn and fox get a nonbias NBA analysts..tht is analysts who dnt D*@k ride the lakers nonstop!!!

    • sg446 Posted: Oct.12 at 5:46 pm
      stop saying the spurs are boring…when will networks like espn and fox get a nonbias NBA analysts..tht is analysts who dnt D*@k ride the lakers nonstop!!!

    • Simmy Sosa Posted: Oct.12 at 5:57 pm
      Congratulations Ryan. Not only did you display a dizzying lack of basketball knowledge, you managed to regurgitate a dated analysis that has not applied to this team in years. Way to do your research. Its simple. If you don’t like the team, don’t do the preview. The purpose of the team preview is to let fans know where/what to expect from the franchise. If you just want to give your sh%tty opinion, leave the preview to someone else and post in the comments section.

    • GeoSpursGeo Posted: Oct.12 at 6:05 pm
      This guy who wrote this article needs a friggin cat scan…the SPURS have the best winning percentage the past decade then any other team in ALL of professional sports!! Plus FOUR (yes 4) titles in the past 10 years and one more on the way…This will be the best team in the past few years for the SPURS and they have been anything but boring. This article should be shot down and the writer be fired for disrespecting such a dignified group. This is my first article read on this POS website and I wont be back again…end of line.

    • Jet Posted: Oct.12 at 6:14 pm
      Actually, I think the Spurs play exciting basketball. Tony Parker’s quickness, Manu’s speed and agility and Duncan’s consistency - nothing can be more exciting to a real basketball fan.

    • Anton Posted: Oct.12 at 6:43 pm
      DeJuan Blair > Andrew Bynum. Already. Smart, tough, and changed his game after his injuries and still thrives. I don’t care if you’re playing D-league teams, 19 rebounds is still crazy. Dropped 28 on the Heat the other night too. Thabeet must be rolling in his grave.

    • jj Posted: Oct.12 at 7:30 pm
      How dare you call the spurs boring. Like Jet just posted, any real fan of basketball couldn’t possibly label the Spurs as boring. They are the epitome of how basketball should be played!

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Oct.12 at 7:59 pm
      Snatching DeJuan Blair in the second round is another insanely smart move by the Spurs.. 28 points against the Heat. Blair is going to be an all-star some day.

    • regicide Posted: Oct.12 at 8:20 pm
      I am so reassured by everyone ripping this writer apart. Big ups to all SLAM readers who fired back against this $hitty article. SLAM has gotta step their game up because a lot of people would love to get paid to write about basketball, and could do a better job. Spurs are ready to rumble. Look out WCF, including Fakers.

    • Sandlot Posted: Oct.12 at 8:58 pm
      @Addison Welch Yeah, that’s the game I am thinking about. I guess it was 2007. What a great game.

    • [...] Online continues the 30 teams in 30 days with a San Antonio Spurs preview. Ryan Desmarais says the Spurs are boring. And they came up with some steals this offseason. Pretty [...]

    • BBALLBILLY Posted: Oct.12 at 10:20 pm
      Dude..U have the basketball IQ of a THREE TOED TREE SLOTH..U r an idiot..U call writing your profession??? Get lost loser!

    • Skaye Posted: Oct.12 at 10:58 pm
      I don’t care boring or not. I just want the Champions.

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Oct.12 at 11:16 pm
      Did I mention DeJuan Blair’s 28 points came in just 25 minutes?

    • Hursty Posted: Oct.12 at 11:29 pm
      Man, y’all tore this poor dude a new @sshole. I didn’t think it was THAT bad.
      Unoriginal sure, but not that terrible.

    • greg Posted: Oct.12 at 11:49 pm
      This article is boring

    • spurs_fan_malaysia Posted: Oct.12 at 11:58 pm
      How come nobody branded the Celtics boring when they trashed LA Fakers in 2008 NBA Finals? And in Game 6 Fakers got whopped 39 points! The current Spurs have all it takes to beat Kobe & gang in WCF.

    • whooo! Posted: Oct.13 at 12:00 am
      i gotta totally agree with regicide: i am so glad to see the comments on here. SLAM readers aren’t the casual b-ball fan who will watch highlights on sportscenter and be done. we read SLAM cuz we want real basketball news and insight. how could you possibly think that we’d buy that bull****t article? looks like the people have spoken.

    • whooo! Posted: Oct.13 at 12:00 am
      and Hursty, you’re bein way too kind man! my issue too is that SLAM’s covering every team, but there’s only a handful of REAL contenders. the Spurs are one of them, and this guy’s gonna put out an article that adds absolutely NO insight, but is just gonna spit biased old crap (which is outdated and wrong, no less)? when you consider that, i think it’s easier to see why so many think this is garbage.

    • Louie Posted: Oct.13 at 12:08 am
      Ummmmm……. What a boring article.
      Let me shed some light in your little brain guy.
      The Spurs will! win 55 - 60+ games, they will! go deep into the post season, and if healthy they will win another championship!
      Spurs basketball is exiting to watch for those of us that appreciate defense. Spurs basketball is boring to our opponents and their fans. I know 30 franchises that will swap with the spurs for their success under Pops.

    • Mike carrillo Posted: Oct.13 at 12:19 am
      Hahahahaha this guy just got straight bodied!!!! I hope this guy actually reads the majority of these comments. His uninspired, lazya$$ attempt at previewing a season(his job that he actually gets PAID FOR) should be reviewed by his peers before being published online because if I were his boss he’d be straight Donald Trumped!!!!Your Fired!!!!

    • GymBear Posted: Oct.13 at 12:26 am
      This passes for journalism? Obviously Desmarais doesn’t get basketball unless he’s pretending to be Kobe on his X Box. Pop’s offensive system thrives on precision and execution. The Spurs aren’t boring to watch at all. The ‘problem’ is this is a low-key team that is all business. These guys love Pop, love to play and love the game.They shun the media spotlight. They simply win. Offensively, Parker penetrates like no other pg and breaks down d’s, Ginobili looking great-guy is a human highlight reel. Duncan just methodically destroys you. With McDyess, Ratliff (too lazy to report on that), Blair and Duncan (not to mention young gun Ian Mahinmi) at the 4/5, the Spurs are going to be a tough team to score on inside, outrebound or get shots off against. Pop knows defense wins championships. Spurs are longer, stronger, incredibly deeper and more athletic down low. The “Kobe” solution? Pop schemes Kobe like no other. He’ll throw Richard Jefferson, George Hill, Keith Boguns and Marcus Haislip (another bunch of guys the ‘reporter’ failed to mention) in rotation at Kobe all night long. Enjoy your ring this year Laker fan. A re-loaded Spurs team is going to win the whole thing this year and do so with extreme prejudice. Anything but boring. Speaking of boring-isn’t it a bit ironic the most boring story I’ve read all day was written by a guy writing about the most supposed boring team in the NBA?

    • justin Posted: Oct.13 at 2:47 am
      just one thing i had to say..4 get d fakers to much dramma,were gonna detrone d fakers n ones again beko is going to cry baby…spurs dna..

    • Cahyo Posted: Oct.13 at 3:11 am
      Who are you, Ryan D? What is your purpose of this life?

    • macheddy Posted: Oct.13 at 3:41 am
      WOW!! What a boring conclusion of last season and an equally boring preview of what’s to come. Ginobili is one of the most exciting athletes to watch in the world, at any sport. I don’t usually spend time commenting but this article was so irritating and time-wasting that I would go out of my way to get you ostracized from journalism. By the way, who is the editor that let this article become published?

    • alex Posted: Oct.13 at 3:49 am
      I stopped reading when he said the spurs are the most boring team in the league. I have a question for you: what do you know about basketball?

    • Sidewayz Posted: Oct.13 at 4:30 am
      Hey, what d f*ck is this writer talking ’bout?
      HIs full of sh*t trying to disrespect my favorite team!
      SLAM, my suggestion is that you FIRE him,,,,that’s right,,F-I-R-E him…
      THAT WRITER IS A BIG BULLSH*T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Eddie LOmax Posted: Oct.13 at 4:48 am
      Damn, Ryan copped some kobi beef for this one. Have to agree with everyone else but. The Spurs of 2-3 years ago were an ALMOST perfect basketball team, a pleasure to watch, instead of some headbanded, corn rowed, tattoed, knuckle head dribbling the ball for 20 seconds then trying some shit to get them on ESPN with the clock winding down. I’ll be showing my son’s Spurs games to study team defence and ball movement FOR SURE. Don’t forget they SWEPT the Chosen One in the finals also (one for all you LBJ jock riders).

    • Eddie LOmax Posted: Oct.13 at 4:53 am
      Oh, and why didn’t we (Heat) pick up Blair. He bitch slapped Hasheem Tabeet in college. We needed a 4 (or anyone actually) with some girth, finesse, (trust, this beast has some soft hands and fancy footwork) and can set some BIG screens for D Wade. I digress, Dejuan Blair will be All Rookie 1st team for sure, and he’ll learn from the best PF ever along with being coached by the best coach over the last 10 years. RJ will blend in without skipping a beat and McDyess is a F-N pro.

    • pennydunk_1 Posted: Oct.13 at 9:34 am
      @kobesbestfriend; Penny was not a loser

    • German Reignman Posted: Oct.13 at 9:50 am
      Clearly the BEST review EVER … seriously, can noone of the commetners, not even Eboy, feel the sarcasm in every freakin line … guys, take a step back and start thinking: What would have happened with every other try at reviewing the Spurs ? Everybody would have written: THEY ARE BORING! …. instead he flipped it on you and everybody is praising the Spurs for their consistency and their style, which is a FIRST in Slamonline.Com history … I`m not sure if the 3/4 rings was intended, but it fit well in the trend of the article … I LOVE IT

    • Ben Osborne Posted: Oct.13 at 10:19 am
      It’s hard to fire a volunteer. Spurs fans need to lighten up.

    • Yak Posted: Oct.13 at 12:58 pm
      Many of the people who responded to this are not “Spurs fans”, but NBA fans. The article was trite, disrespectful, and clearly not researched at all. Even if he is a volunteer, he clearly needs to pick up his standards. This was not a review, this was an undeserved diatribe against the Spurs.

    • Michael Posted: Oct.13 at 1:12 pm
      @ German Reignman, i think you are giving the dude too much credit…and Ben I know this guy did it for free but the standards here have been slipping over the last year. Having said that, the level of hate gereated was a little scary, the guy did just write an article about a basketball team, you would think he had insulted someones mother.

    • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Oct.13 at 3:57 pm
      The writer was being sarcastic. And he was praising the Spurs. So…….

    • Simmy Sosa Posted: Oct.13 at 7:55 pm
      A few things. I want to apologize for the things that I and other commenters have said about the author of this review. I take it personal when people talk trash about my hometown team (I’m from San Antonio) but I (we) shouldn’t attack this guy personally. However, I do stand by what I said about the article itself. Even if you meant to be sarcastic (which I doubt), there is still little evidence that any research was done and there’s virtually no insight. Its awesome that SLAM allows fans to contribute to the website, but if your going to do it, clearly slam readers insist you do it the correct way. Keep your head up Ryan and don’t let this stop you from writing. Keep working at it man. Having said that, SLAM, you guys please give him a chance to redeem himself at some point this season or next. I’ll be looking for the next write up.

    • satx71 Posted: Oct.14 at 12:59 pm
      I would have more respect for writers like this if they would just come out and say,” I don’t like the Spurs because they beat the crap out of my precious PHX Suns. So I won’t preview their upcoming season.” Instead of putting out this lazy garbage time after time. I can’t wait to beat the crap out of little Stevie Nash’s BS team again.

    • Dusty Posted: Oct.21 at 6:41 pm
      Wow. Most credible writers manage to look halfway objective when writing about a team they despise, but you didn’t even TRY to hide it. Even before this season, Parker and Ginobili were 2 of the most dynamic players in the league. You know it, I know it, everyone who watches NBA basketball knows it. Most (like yourself) just refuse to admit it. Adding Jefferson and Blair will easily make them one of the most exciting teams to watch this year. Why can’t people just come right out and say it. “I hate the Spurs!” We all know that’s what you’re really trying to say when you call them “boring” or “dirty”, or any other term you can think of. And even if it were true. Last I checked, they don’t hand out a Championship trophy to the most exciting team. If that were the case, the Suns would have 10 Championship trophies instead of zero.

    Comments




    The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.