Monday, December 28th, 2009 at 8:54 pm  |  21 responses

Vinny, Vidi, Arrivederci

Del Negro may be out soon, but is he the real problem in Chicago?

by Bryan Crawford

I think it’s pretty obvious that when it comes to Vinny Del Negro, it’s not a matter of if, but when he’ll be let go as the head coach of the Chicago Bulls. After going .500 in his first season as a basketball coach on any level, and then taking the defending world champion Boston Celtics to the brink of elimination in the Playoffs, thVinny Del Negroe choice the Bulls brass made in making him the teams head man didn’t seem so bad after all.

Now in season two, Del Negro has a record of 11-17 and his coaching seat has suddenly become white hot and the calls for his firing have become deafeningly loud. I’ve done my share of Vinny bashing like everybody else, but I also recognize that what’s going in Chicago isn’t entirely his fault. Yes, he deserves a large share of the blame for the Bulls underachievement on the court, but looking at in anatomical terms, management is the brain, the coach is the heart, and the players are the body. The brain controls everything and if that ain’t right, nothing else works properly. This is the issue with the Chicago Bulls. They’re about to do another—albeit necessary—heart transplant on this very young body, but the real problem is up top where the decisions are made.

Vinny Del Negro walked into a situation in Chicago where he was given the keys to—for arguments sake—a pretty good team. Yes they missed the playoffs in ’07-08, but they did make it to the postseason the previous three years and the core of the squad was pretty much the same. Vinny also walked into a situation where the Bulls had taken Derrick Rose with the top pick in the NBA draft which isn’t a bad situation to be in either. Finally, Vinny walked onto a team that had Ben Gordon who was far and away his best player and one of the top fifteen or twenty guys in the entire league. I mean, there aren’t a lot of guys in the NBA who can get you 30+ on any given night and VDN had one of those guys in BG. It wasn’t a great situation mind you, but there have been a lot of first year coaches who’ve inherited worse.

Those were the positives. The only real negative working against Vinny when he took the job—other than his lack of experience—was the situation his best player had with management that caused a big time rift and caused the relationship between the two to suffer irreparable damage. Like Allen Iverson in Detroit then and Shaquille O’Neal in Cleveland now, Ben Gordon was essentially a one year rental for Chicago last season. He wasn’t playing for the organization or its new coach; he was on a different mission. He was going for dolo. He was playing for zeroes. He wanted to show the front office what they had and what they were about to let walk out of the door. That situation had nothing to do with Vinny, but you have to play the hand that you’re dealt.

On July 1, 2009 the Chicago Bulls lost Ben Gordon in free agency to the Detroit Pistons. It’s one thing to see your best player walk away, but it’s another to watch him walk to a team not only in the same division, but to a team who’s been your mortal enemy for the better part of twenty years! But that’s not on Vinny, that part of the blame goes straight to the top to Jerry Reinsdorf, John Paxson, and Gar Forman who all failed to recognize and fairly compensate BG for what he brought to the team and all that he’d done for it. They tried to downplay Gordon’s departure by publicly declaring their faith in the ability of the other guys on the squad to be able to step up and fill that void. They made Vinny sing the same song. But anybody with common sense knew that this team didn’t have one single guy who could do what Gordon did for them offensively. Not even the new face of the franchise, Derrick Rose.

To make matters worse, that summer the front office sat back and watched as other teams throughout the League got better and they didn’t make one single move in the direction of being able to field a competitive team. Instead, they put all the pressure on the existing guys to work their tails off over the summer and to the player’s credit, they did just that. But hard work broke the tractor and killed the mule. Yes, you have to work hard, but sometimes you have to work smart too and the guys wearing the suits and making all of the decisions didn’t do that and they put their team at a competitive disadvantage in the process.

Former Bulls GM Jerry Krause famously said that organizations win championships, and he was almost right. Players win championships, but organizations build championship teams. The squad that Reinsdorf, Paxson, and Forman all had a hand in putting together is like looking at a house that was built without blueprints. Eventually, it’s going to fall down.

This current group of Bulls players isn’t exactly what you would call a team either. It’s an assembly of random parts that don’t mesh or work well together. But this is the point where the head coach becomes responsible. Yes, yVinny Del Negro & Kirk Hinrichou can only work with what you’ve been given and yes, you can only coach what you have, but you want to know the difference between a good coach and one who isn’t? A good coach makes adjustments and Vinny hasn’t done that at all in year two. The basic, HS style, three man weave offense that he installed last season was perfect because it all ran through Ben Gordon. In fact, it was an offense tailor made for a guy like Gordon who with his bounce, could come off those quick screens and make something happen for himself or open things up for other guys to make plays because he was such a threat and defenders had to honor him.

But when you’ve already spent a year coaching this team and you know that you don’t have a weapon like Gordon coming back, you should at least be familiar enough with your existing personnel to be able to put together lineups, and draw up plays and sets to capitalize on the strengths of your team. This is where Vinny fails as a head coach and where the blame starts to fall on him.

Over the summer, he asked his players to work hard but he didn’t work hard on making one single adjustment to his system (if you want to call it that) that would capitalize on the strengths of guys like Derrick Rose and Luol Deng. Instead, he’s running the same offense (if you want to call it that) with John Salmons in Ben Gordon’s old spot and there’s no way he can produce offensively the way BG can. To make matters worse, instead of recognizing his own failures as a coach and taking responsibility for them, he’s started placing all of the blame on his player’s shoulders like he did on Monday night when the Bulls collapsed and lost a 35 point lead and the game to the Sacramento Kings by declaring, “Players win games. You have to execute.”

Those kinds of comments won’t endear you to a group of guys who have long since stopped playing for you Vinny. Besides, there’s plenty he could’ve done himself not just in that game, but in a number of others too.

When teams fail to reach their potential, all of the blame is placed on the head coach’s shoulders and he’s the guy on whom the axe falls first. But in the case of the Chicago Bulls, to find the source of their struggles, one needn’t look any further Vinny Del Negrothan the top. It’s the seeming incompetence of the guys calling the shots in the Bulls front office that have created this mess, which includes hiring a guy who’d never coached basketball a day in his life.

My guess as to what the Bulls do next is just as good as anybody else’s, but clearly changes need to be made throughout the organization, not just in the head coach’s seat. Vinny Del Negro has received his share of criticism and deservedly so, but he is nothing more than a symbol of the dysfunction and disorganization that is Chicago Bulls management. This team can change coaches until the cows come home but they will continue to struggle until a front office staff is assembled that actually knows what it takes to build a winning professional basketball organization, not just a winning basketball team.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , ,

  • LebronGOAT

    1st.. But i agree on everything this says.

  • http://www.twitter.com/dominicderose dlouis

    Its too bad Paxson didn’t trade Hinrich to the Blazers for expiring contracts in order to keep Gordon and cap space for 2010.

  • http://www.cracked.com litetitan

    3rd…also agree on everything this says.

  • http://www.slamonline.com melvin ely

    Co-sign this entire article. The bulls management had the pieces to build a very good team for GOD KNOWS HOW LONG man. They either sat on their hands while oppurtunities where ripe to get quality guys, or whenever they DID make moves, they were mediocre at best.

  • http://www.durrrr.com shu

    So being pro-active, what can they do? I would assume a firesale making everyone except Noah and Rose available is on the horizon. Oh wait they have to find a sucker willing to coach these guys for the rest of the year. They have expiring contracts for Miller, JJames, TThomas and Pargo so they can combine some of those for a decent but disgruntled player. TMac? Boozer? Gortat? Rip? Krypto? Maybe keep em all and pray for Bosh or Wade? Tyrus Thomas will be given another shot somewhere else and Hinrich is respectable though slightly overpaid. That’s gotta be able to fetch something… And they’re only half game out of the playoffs. Who woulda thunk New York has a brighter future than Chicago for 2010?

  • Benny The Bull

    This is far and away the best Bulls article written in a long long time. The whole analysis of Vinny’s coaching is spot-on, and more importantly, I could not have done any better breaking down the shortcomings of the front office and ownership.

    How come any of the Bulls beat writers don’t have the balls to write an article like this? The Bulls must provide the newspaper writers and other media with some pretty good food & amenities at the United Center or something, because none of those guys would never in a million years write something like this. So disappointing…..

  • Benny The Bull

    One thing though, I do not agree with the writer’s statement that the Bulls should’ve re-signed Ben Gordon (or the claim that he was one of the top 15 players in the NBA) It would have been nice to have Ben back this season, but not at the 5 years/$55 million that Detroit ended up giving him. Paxson and the Bulls brass have made many mistakes and blunders throughout the decade, however, at least they learned their lesson after giving Luol Deng the ridiculously high 6 year deal, and didn’t repeat the same mistake with Gordon.

    Although he was definitely a scoring threat, Gordon was no better/different of a player than when he first came into the league, and I still think his best role is as a 6th man where he had the most success his rookie season. There’s no way that a 6th man is worth $11 million per season, unless maybe you’re talking about a legitimate title contender that needs a 6th man as the final piece to the puzzle.

  • drock

    I agree with Benny. Ben Gordon is a great sixth man and shooter and that’s it. It would have been too expensive to keep him. Its 27 games into the season and as you can see no team in the NBA is immune to bad stretches. The new lineup changes help the team because now tyrus thomas brings an explosive shot blocking presence to the team

  • http://www.slamonline.com melvin ely

    At Benny: I think what the article was referring to was letting Ben walk away for nothing. With the pistons signing, it was clear that there were teams willing to pay that much for Ben’s services. I actually agree with you, you don’t build your franchise around a shoot first undersized 2. BUT, this was common sentiment in Chi-town for years, so why didn’t the Bulls just freakin trade him? They could’ve gotten an offensive post presence for him long ago.

  • http://www.inbox.lv smiles

    U could argue but 6’2 no defense Ben Gordon was not exactly worth the money he was given and to me it was a sane move just in case you bring in someone else capable which has not been done
    paxson has a t of trading chips I just don’t get it what is he thinking a big free agent is gonna come and save his well worn ass
    make a trade for Rip but it’s as likely as Wade or Johnson in Bulls uniform next year cos Joe D is no Paxson

  • Benny The Bull

    Here’s the perfect trade opportunity for the Bulls – Luol Deng and Brad Miller for T-Mac. Houston doesn’t want/need McGrady anymore, and the 2009-10 salaries match up. (McGrady $22.9 million vs. Deng 10.4 million + Miller 12.3 million)

    Even if McGrady never plays a game for the Bulls, it’s a win-win deal for both teams. The Bulls would have the remaining 4-1/2 years of Deng’s huge contract off the books and McGrady’s deal would be done after this season, leaving tons of $$$ available for the Bulls in the offseason for D-Wade, Chris Bosh, etc….. The bulls could even have the cap space to sign Wade and Bosh together, or Joe Johnson and Bosh if they can’t get D-Wade.

    Luol is having a decent year, but this is his 6th season already, and he’s never going to be any better than he is right now, which is not worth the remaining 4-1/2 years left on his contract at $11 – $12 million per season.

    I believe that even with Deng’s high contract, Houston would jump all over this deal. They’re (surprisingly) having a great season so far without McGrady, and Deng could provide them with another offensive threat alongside Ariza, Brooks, and Scola. Additionally, Brad Miller could help them in a backup roll for Scola, as well as be a good veteran leader for the playoffs.

  • Rich

    Thank you for this article. I couldn’t have said it any better. I’ve been a Bulls fan for a long time, but when they did BG bogus like that, I couldn’t take it anymore. He was the MOST consistent player they had, and they were willing to keep Kirk and Deng – the two guys you overpaid – to save face, knowing they made TWO mistakes?!? Pathetic. I can’t wait for Ben to come back to the United Center and drop 50 on them. I’ll be in the stands watching.

  • DS44

    Just wait until Derrick Rose shows up!

  • LA Huey

    I don’t think the Notorious VDN should have ever been hired with his lack of experience. But for a team that finished .500 last season, this isn’t the catastrophic start every claims it is. They caught some injuries and had to adjust to losing a big part of their offensive attack. We need to give them at least til the All-Star break before we call for major changes.

  • LA Huey

    @Benny, props on that trade scenario though. I think they Bulls are better off going after Boozer though. Wade is a pipe dream and NYK/CLE/MIA will all be going hard after Bosh.

  • Benny The Bull

    For the 2nd game in a row now, the Bulls organization sent out an email game preview this morning with stuff about Vinny’s job being in jeopardy. Even if it’s true, how could the team’s management allow this to happen? What are they trying to do, treat him like garbage thinking that he will resign, and thus not have to pay off the final 1-1/2 years of his contract?

    They are essentially turning Vinny into a eunuch; how can the players be expected to respect and play for him if they see the ownership and management treating him like this?

    It just looks really bad and unprofessional – to the point of why would a future coach want to come to an organization that treats its employees this way?

  • The D Train

    @Rich: Gordon came back to the United Center, but was a bit off of 50. Stat line in a 92-85 loss: 18 points on 6-16 shooting, 0 assists, 3 reb…that is the Ben that Bulls fans got to know and love over the years. Gordon is no savior. He plays zero D, and is the ultimate chucker. The cat can shoot, but he’ll never be more than a Microwave-type player on a really good team. If Gordon is one of your top 2 or 3 guys, you’re not going to be a really good team. He brings NOTHING else to the table other than streaky shooting. I’ve mentioned numerous times on here that if you take the time to look up the stats from the series against Boston last year, he was the leading scorer only when Chicago lost, never when they won. His ball-hog act had grown tired for Bulls fans who’ve watched it over the years. And to say that he was wronged, when he turned down a similar contract offer the same year they re-signed Deng, is short-sighted and dismissive. Gordon turned down the Bulls offer to over-pay him. Thank god our buddies from Motown stepped in and took care of that for us.

  • Rich

    D Train, how are you gonna go off of one game? Read the article. Gordon HELPED the Bulls all these years, and they just threw him away. Thing you do is check Rose’s stats from last year and this year. HE’S REGRESSED!! I know he had the ankle injury early, but check his assists. HE HAS NOBODY TO SHOOT AN OPEN JUMP SHOT! This team sucks, everyone knows it. All that BG bashing is hogwash. Anyone knows that boy was the best on the team. Just be proud you still got Deng to cheer for. lol

  • The D Train

    @Rich: I didn’t make any mention of Rose or how Chicago has played, which both have been admittedly below expectations. Gordon could have helped the Bulls, but not at 10-11 million a year. We’re saddled with Deng, so it would have screwed up the cap situation worse to pay that kind of money for a one-dimensional player like Gordon. Also, I believe I referred to the game this year along with BG’s performance in the playoffs last year. So at least give me that I went off of 8 games, not one. Also feel free to view his stats at NBA.com, then relate them to how he affected the Bulls over the length of his career. The Bulls never got close to a title with Gordon as their best player, and they werent going to with him as 1B or 2 to Rose’s 1A. Simple as that. And once again: you cannot say they threw him away when they tried to sign him to a similar deal (5 years 50 million) in 2007 to stay with the team he’d always been with. He chose to sign with a division rival in 2009 for five years at 55 million. So he got an extra million a year to leave Chicago. Good for him and his pocketbook (I’m sure I would have done the same). But if Chicago attempted to sign him to a very similar deal, only to have him turn it down and subsequently sign with a division rival you cannot say Chicago “threw him away”. Unfortunately these teams dont operate in a vacuum…there is real money involved and tax penalties for going over the cap. Gordon would have pushed Chicago over the cap limit and hindered their ability to sign new players going forward. Just because we messed up with the contracts for Deng and Heinrich doesnt mean we keep throwing too much money at guys that dont deserve it. (Sorry for the rant, but your yelling about ROSE’S JUMPSHOT and HIS REGRESSION literally screamed out Stephen A Smith to me…and that guy bugs the crap out of me)

  • Rich

    D Train, respect to ya. We could argue about this for years, but one thing’s for sure…. The Bulls are SCREWED! Period. And Gordon is chillin’ with a nice contract.

  • The D Train

    Rich, my man, you are correct. Not good times for anyone who grew up watching MJ, Pippen, Horace and Company grow up together and wreck shop on the league.

Advertisement
Counterkicks