Tuesday, January 12th, 2010 at 1:43 pm  |  18 responses

A Blazers Tug of War

Michael Douglas and Kathleen Turner have nothing on Portland’s civil ‘War of the Roses.’

by Sandy Dover

Over the weekend, John Canzano wrote a column that was speaking exactly of what I’ve been thinking all along about the Portland Trail Blazers management, coaching, and players situation. It was fair, it was straight-forward and I agreed with it wholeheartedly (except for the whole “Andre Miller was a bad fit” thing). Then I watched the Cleveland Cavaliers go to the Rose Garden on Sunday and the teams played an exciting game. The best game I’ve watched in the year, actually, but it did nothing to change my mind about how the Trail Blazers have followed through on certain decisions regarding the issues concerning Andre Miller, Nate McMillan, Brandon Roy, Steve Blake and the general manager KeAndre Miller & Tim Duncanvin Pritchard.

I’ve been mentioning it throughout the past several months in my Timeouts and 21 Questions columns, but now, I’ve been inspired by the subtle chicanery and less-than-obvious nonsense that has come forth from the organization in about the same amount of time, so here I go.

One, like Canzano said, Pritchard is significantly responsible for the pseudo-mess that’s been laying on the Rose Garden floor since the fall, but I don’t think the issue lies solely with him. The issue, according to me, is how the team is coached, and for that I blame Nate McMillan squarely. I know he’s a good guy. I can see that he has a great wealth of common sense and projects an aura that can lead most people to come to the decision that he’s at least a decent human being…but he’s a flawed head coach for the Trail Blazers as is. I know his reputation as being “Mr. Sonic” precedes him, and so from that, he gets the benefit of the doubt, but let me say this: His contributions to the game as a player don’t mean a whole lot now. I don’t really care if he was Mr. Sonic or whether he was Mr. Freeze from the “Batman” comic, he’s one of the reasons that the Blazers aren’t maximizing their potential.

Injuries aside (and for which he can absolutely not be blamed), my main criticism about him is that he doesn’t take advantage of his players’ strengths. The team could potentially be the next coming of the Spurs if they actually ran the floor. There’s no reason why Portland is jogging down or walking down the court on most of their possessions. The Trail Blazers have the athleticism to sprint down and get buckets, so do it why don’t they?! I think having an integrated offense where you can be half-court and full-court is most efficient for teams respecting their strengths. Their bigs are mobile, the wings have great speed and savvy in the open court, and Portland has the guards to run such an offense, so what’s the problem?

Also, McMillan and Brandon Roy have this thing about Steve Blake that I can’t shake, and it’s getting annoying because it ultimately hurts the team’s potential as well. Andre Miller, one of the top point guards of the past decade, whose sage and ability to run an efficient offense and take advantage of most other players at his position, is a better, more talented player, a superior guard in terms of leading a team and overall play, and will help the team win more games in the long run (all in comparison to Blake)–the whole point of playing basketball, just in case the coaching staff has forgotten. Steve is a good player, but is at best, an above-average guard. He’s a very good backup to have and he’d be particularly special as a reserve guard on a championship team, but being fair, he’s above-average. He can shoot good, he passes well and he’s fit, which are all good things. Meanwhile, McSonic took too long to play Jerryd Bayless and had the audacity to bench Miller several times in the aftermath. It makes me sick.

Sure, Andre’s not so smiley and silly like some of his Blazer brethren. He’s quite quiet and private, but does that make him a bad guy? He’s 33…if he’s not crackin’ jokes with Roy or Martell Webster or anyone like that, it’s because he has eight to 12 years on many of his teammates; speaking of Roy, he’s sort of been lame in the way that he’s kind of let Andre go by the wayside in several interviews with the media since the season’s start, in letting on how he favors Blake as the starting guard because he’s more “comfortable”. The thing about it is that Andre’s newer, so of course he’s less comfortable with him, but that he’d pass up the ability to lead a stronger team with Andre in the backcourt seems a little selfish and shortsighted. It’s aggravating. Being a leader is all about embracing what is better for the team, and if I’m Roy, I’d be doing myAndre Miller & OJ Mayo due diligence to see what all I can do with Andre on the floor before I diplomatically let on that Andre might be better off of the bench–Blake is a career backup.

(Also, too, McMillan’s used to running a team of young guys that are still college-aged, more or less. Andre’s an accomplished player who’s truly grown, so maybe that he can be mercurial is something that hasn’t been so endearing, to be fair to the coach and players.)

In a way, Portland should be grateful for the injuries that they have had to incur in the ’09-10 season. The heightened expectations were not being met early and with all of the confusion about rotations and such, it showed, but it won’t exempt them in the following year. They’ll still have to deal with the obvious questions if nothing changes. Beyond Roy and LaMarcus Aldridge getting paid (in LA’s case, prematurely, in my opinion), the Trail Blazers still have to address those issues. My auspicious solutions for all of these silly dilemmas? Here they go:

1. Coach McMillan should expand the offense.

2. Trade Blake.

3. Promote Andre as a starting guard on a permanent basis; there is no reason he should have to compete with backups to merit why he’s so important (that was the first offense in signing Andre, by telling him that he’s not a “first team” player yet on Portland).

4. If Bayless emerges, make him the sixth man or make him the starting guard; if he is to be the starting guard, trade Andre.

5. If Portland was smart, they’d know that Roy is probably the superior point guard of the bunch and trade Andre and Blake both, promote Rudy Fernandez and/or Webster, and let the backcourt be set.

6. Hold McMillan and the rest of the coaching staff more accountable for issues related to overall talent and depth. (Because the acquisitions haven’t been bad, the decisions in playing Andre, Fernandez, Blake and even Nicolas Batum and Greg Oden have been.)

Hopefully, most of these issues will be sorted out and I can enjoy the Blazers playing to their full potential very soon when everyone’s healthy and the player order is fully resolved and stable.

Dovi out.

Sandy Dover is a novelist/writer, artist and fitness enthusiast, as well as an unrepentant Prince fan (for real). You can find Sandy frequently here at SLAMonline.


  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , ,

  • riggs

    i concur s dot

    but it also says alot about the team when theyre still fighting with the jazz for the spot even though theyre down a couple of men.

  • Sporting-Lisbon-Blazers

    i liked the read but a litle too much made out drama…the only thing I have to agree is that freakin SSLLOOWW OFFENSE, they shoud run once in a while cause LaMarcus is a big who can do it and Bayless thrives on that while Andre is a great PG to direct that…one question though, can the great Roy play fasr paced bball? or they should do it while he is on the bench?

  • ALB

    Amazing article! I think that all of your solutions are on point! Keep up the great work. Can’t wait for the next San Dova Special. Stay well & God Bless.

  • http://www.youtube.com/ L

    Great article! I agree Blake needs to be traded. Possibly for a Center. They really need some size. Ghostface cant do it all

  • Johnson

    Ghostface is done for the season didn’t you hear? He has been out for more than 2 weeks homie. Old man howard is our big man down low

  • http://www.luketynan.blogspot.com litetitan

    You make some good points. I think this is definitely one of those situations where the coaching staff do need to be held more accountable. Bayliss is great. Andre is solid. blake just shouldn’t be needed.

  • Stokesey

    Completly agree, I also think injuries were a blessing in disguise for them, they weren’t meeting expectations, now everyones expecting them to crumble. W’s from here on in are a bonus almost. Andre an bayless your starting backcourt, young patty mills will be nice off the bench, how does he look to you Sandy?

  • al

    Finally someone speaks up. Article is completely right.
    AND he has no clue how to use Rudy Fernandez potential.

  • Pingback: SLAM ONLINE | » Hot Topics

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Brandon Roy dominates the ball, and that’s how he’s comfortable playing.
    McMillian understands that as long as he keeps Roy happy, his job will be more secure, so of course he turned on Andre Miller. Miller needs the ball, and would require Roy make more plays coming off screens and movement without the rock. Roy doesn’t want to do that because that would make him “uncomfortable” and since everybody in Portland has been slobbing his knob about how he’s on the same level as the true superstars in the league, he figures he doesn’t need to change his gameto what makes him uncomfortable.
    They should run more, that’s true. But the real problem is they’ve designed their entire offense around getting Brandon Roy shots with the ball in his hand, and I honestly don’t think that’s the best option for the squad. But, I dont’ know if McMillian has the ability to change that.

  • Biggie

    Blake to the lakers

  • http://josiejoz@hotmail.com Joz

    “But the real problem is they’ve designed their entire offense around getting Brandon Roy shots with the ball in his hand, and I honestly don’t think that’s the best option for the squad.” Allenp clearly has never watched Roy play. Would you say the same thing about Lebron?

  • http://www.luketynan.blogspot.com litetitan

    Patty Mills is going to get lost on the bench with all their lead guard options. Add to the mix his injury (broken wrist/hand?) and his opportunity for development under McMillan looks grim.

  • fizzrocket

    Miller is one of the top PGs of the past decade? Say what?

  • Aaron Whitfield

    Dope article! I agree. I think that the problem with the Blazers is that the players, like their coach are good but not great. The offense is slow, the players underachieve, and they are a team with great talent but little maturity. In many ways, the Blazers since the Sam Bowie drafting have been the NBA’s tragic hero, whose strength is often the greatest weakness. Portland for the most part has housed talented teams but they never really have it all together. And even when they did have it together in the late 80′s and early 90′s, the ran into some of the greatest teams ever. Portland has never gotten over the hump of Sam Bowie’s foot or Rueben Patterson/JR Rider/Qyntel Woods/(insert random player here) attitude problems.

  • Devlan Roy

    The Blazers will finally become a top 4 team in the west when Brandon Roy realizes that his ability to create for himself in the half-court is an attribute best reserved for end of game and even end of shot clock situations. Having him run the clock down and attempting to create (or making a forced pass) is detrimental to a team with so many solid fast break options. Having Roy work without the ball for extended periods would make the Blazers offence far more unpredictable, and benefit guys like Fernandez, Bayless and Webster, who would thrive in the open court.

  • Pingback: SLAM ONLINE | » Steve Blake’s Gone!

  • Pingback: SLAM ONLINE | » Where Does Portland Go From Here?

Advertisement