Monday, January 18th, 2010 at 10:03 am  |  34 responses

Finding Success

Wins don’t always come in starred packages.

by Casey Jacobsen

There aren’t a lot of superstars in the NBA. That term is used very loosely by fans who sometimes trick themselves into crowning their team’s leading scorer as part of the League’s elite.

Being a talented scorer doesn’t always make your team better, especially if they can’t do other things to help win games. I’ve played with and against a lot of guys whose ability to score made them a fan favorite and the highest paid guy on the team, but sometimes I felt our team would have been better if they did one of two things: 1) Use some of their athletic ability and energy to play more defense, and 2) Sacrifice some of their points to make their teammates better by creating open shots for them.

It’s rare to find a great scorer in the NBA who is also a top defender (KG or Kobe) because that requires a special focus and effort that many aren’t willing to put forth night after night. A true superstar is extremely rare. They are the guys who you can build a team around. But many teams are built around guys who have been called “superstars” because of their stats from the previous years, many of those years spent watching the Playoffs from their mansions.

There are some borderline “star” players in the NBA who have so much offensive talent, but who play for mid-level teams. I can’t help but wonder what kind of players these demi-superstars would be on better teams.

Guys like Tracy McGrady, Amar’e Stoudemire, Rudy Gay, Andre Iguodola, Gilbert Arenas and Michael Redd, are all super talented players who are among the highest paid players in the League. But their teams are always struggling to win and advance deep in the Playoffs. Is it their fault? Is it the organization’s fault that doesn’t surround their “star” with more quality? Do these players (Redd, Arenas, etc.) deserve to be paid the same amount as guys like Kobe, Garnett, LeBron and DWade?

The question I’m really trying to get at is: Is it better to be the second or third best player on a good team or a star on an average/bad team?

After playing basketball my whole life, I’ve learned a really valuable lesson: Even if it means sacrificing some of your own shot attempts, playing time, money, or even pride…it’s so much more fun to be on a winning team. Losing sucks. I could probably use my computer’s thesaurus and find a more friPau Gasolendly word to use, but I wouldn’t find one more appropriate. If you are a real competitor in the sport of basketball, then there is only one stat that means anything: Wins.

Going back to the question I asked…the best example for me to illustrate this situation is a former 2008 teammate: Pau Gasol. Drafted by Memphis in 2001, Pau blossomed from a skinny talented foreigner into one of the most athletic and feared offensive big men in the game. Memphis, a team no one expected to be any good for years, surrounded Pau with good role players like Battier, Bonzi Wells and Mike Miller. The Grizzlies made the playoffs for three consecutive years (2003-2006), although they got swept every year in the first round.

The question surrounding that team after those failures were: Is Pau really a “superstar” player? Can you build a championship team around him? Or was it that they needed to add more quality players around him to get to that next level? During the next year in 2007, frustrations boiled over after the Grizzlies took a giant step back and missed the Playoffs. Pau stated that summer that he wanted to be traded if Memphis wasn’t serious about contending for a championship. That next season, our team was bad and Pau made it clear he was unhappy. In a way to dump Gasol’s huge contract and save money, Memphis traded Pau to the Lakers at the trade deadline in 2008.

I knew Pau hit the lottery with his new situation. Most people think any good player would have been happy to be traded to L.A. and join forces with Kobe, but I would disagree. Kobe has such an alpha-male strangle hold that I believe there would be certain guys who, if unwilling to defer to Kobe, would mess up that team.

I always thought Pau Gasol was uncomfortable in the “franchise player” role. He didn’t want that pressure or responsibility, and I don’t mean that in a bad way. Not everyone is comfortable taking that on…some want to be paid like a franchise guy, but don’t want the rest that comes along with it. I always thought Pau would be much more comfortable as a second option on a good team, but the people in Memphis wanted more from him.

Pau is a team player with a star’s skill set. He is a great teammate because he loves to pass and he doesn’t care if he averages 20 and 10, as long as he is allowed to help a team win. Pau is a really, really good player, but he is not an true superstar. Kobe is. That is why the two of them have flourished together.

Another interesting case to me is Tracy McGrady. Forgetting about the past two injury-plagued seasons, T-Mac has been one of the NBA’s top statistical players during his career. Not many would disagree that he was a true superstar, except for one glaring fact: He has never advanced past the first round of the Playoffs. Is this his fault? Or is it because of his supporting cast? Or is it just bad luck?

It’s difficult to get the answers from statistics because T-Mac has successfully filled up box scores during his playoff career but has been unable to lead his team to a series win. He has been criticized for this because he is one of the highest paid players in the game as well as a guy who seems like he wants all the responsibility (and glory) of being a franchise player.

I had the opportunity to play with Tracy when I was trying to make the Houston Rockets roster during training camp in 2006. Just looking at him in person, I couldn’t help but think that he was made to play basketball. At 6-9, he is a misTracy McGrady & Shawn Bradleymatch for any team because there is no one else like him. He can handle the ball like a point guard, shoot off the dribble, and finish at the rim easily.

But the most underrated part of his game is his ability to hit the open man. I was pleasantly surprised during practice how often he would find the open guy, rather than shoot a tough shot against contesting defense. Having never played with him before, I just assumed he would shoot every ball he could. That wasn’t the case. In fact, It was really fun to play on his team…. offensively.

I think you know where this is going and before I state the obvious, I must state something even more obvious: I realize I am not the best defensive player. In fact, that is probably the main reason that I am not in the NBA today…I struggle to guard the quick, athletic wings that are abundant on nearly every NBA roster. I admit this, but there isn’t a lot I can do to change that. This is the body that I was given and I tried to squeeze every ounce of talent I could out of it. It’s not an excuse…it’s a fact.

T-Mac, on the other hand, has been blessed with height, length and quickness. He lacks nothing that a great basketball defender would ask for, yet he doesn’t play quality defense. I remember sitting on the bench during the preseason games and I would be watching T-Mac jog down the floor during fast breaks as if he thought the other team was going to wait for him to get back before they tried to score.

He never bends his knees unless his man has caught the ball. He rarely blocks out for a rebound, usually just out-jumping everyone for it. Instead of using his length as his biggest strength, it’s only use is to help bail him out of bad defensive position.

I was convinced that it is just a motivational thing with him. He didn’t really want to play both ends. I believe T-Mac wanted to win, but his actions on the defensive end of the floor didn’t back it up. He could have been one of the best defensive players in the entire NBA. I really believe that.

I’m not going to blame only him for the fact that he has never advanced to the second round. That wouldn’t be fair in a team sport, but I try to imagine any scenario where a defensively motivated T-Mac doesn’t advance to at least one NBA Finals. It wouldn’t happen.

Casey Jacobsen is a former SLAM High School First Team All-American and NCAA First Team All-American. He currently plays for Brose Baskets in Bamberg, Germany.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , ,

  • michael scorn

    For the most part, I don’t think players care about whether they are the best player on a bad team or a 2nd or 3rd best on a great team. They just want a max contract or as much money as they can possibly get.

  • http://www.clutchfans.com/ Blue

    Good Job Casey. As the Rockets are right now, what type of player do you think would be best suited to make them serious contenders? Do they need a superstar or just a great scorer they can lean on in the clutch?

  • Prentice

    Casey Jacobsen keeping it REAL. I like your honesty, in the ego-filled world of professional Ball, I don’t think ive ever heard a player admitting he can’t guard certain guys.. Keep up the good work.

  • http://myspace.com/rsaenz24 rog23

    if the rockets could get their hands on a david lee or okafor, plus a raja bell type player, they could be legit.

  • http://www.slamonline.com/ niQ

    This was a good read. But I believe if its early a person’s basketball career. It would be good to be a superstar on a bad team. Just look at Lebron, Melo, Wade, all of them helped their teams to win. And one of 2 things will happen after this, your organization will bring in someone good to help you, or you become the “good” player on a winning team (which happens later in your career). But all in all, I see Chris Bosh like the way you see Pau Gasol. He doesn’t look like a superstar but would flourish as the 2nd option.

  • Ronald

    The worst part about T-Mac’s defense, is that before he got his max contract he was famous for his defense and hustle in toronto.

  • http://myspace.com/rsaenz24 rog23

    as of this season, bosh is playing like a superstar. but i do like him better as a 2nd option. with wade or bron. but no doubt about it, if bosh keeps up the way he has been ballin, he will be/already is a superstar. i would like to see him in SA. or hou

  • http://slamonline.com Ben Osborne

    Interesting read, Casey. Thanks. I think I’ve written something to this effect on this site in the past, but I’ve heard good friends (non-players) of Tracy’s quoted as saying, “the thing about Tracy is, he doesn’t really like basketball.”

  • namik

    good stuff Casey. Agree with you on Gasol. Great player but a reluctant leader. His willingness to defer to Kobe and not complain (too much) about his touches has done a lot for the stability and success of the Lakers. But I disagree on Tracy. True that he didn’t play much defense during the regular season. But he busted his ass in the playoffs. In the series against Dallas, he was hounding Dirk like crazy and doing everything he could to get them over the hump. The reason they lost is because the 7’6 center was either hurt or getting punked by guys 8 inches shorter than him. Also for a lot of his career, he has been on some incredibly offensively challenged teams. I mean I saw Kobe carry the Lakers in 05 and everyone talked about LeBron carry his team to a FInals, but seriously, the Magic and the Rockets(due to injuries) were just horrible teams. If Tracy wasn’t creating and scoring, the teams just stunk it up. But when it mattered, TMac went full out. Some can argue that he should have done it more consistently. Thats obvious. But I cant agree that Tracy went half speed in the post season. If he was healthy, he went all out. He was usually let down by his weak supporting casts or his “foot in the mouth” disease.

  • LB

    Wow, good job keeping it real, Casey. Not too many players would criticize their peers, probably because they’re afraid that they might end up playing against or with the guy they criticized. Good job keeping an evenhanded and balanced point of view, without making your criticisms become personal attacks. I also appreciate how honest you are about your own shortcomings. Most players in your situation would blame “politics” without honestly assessing their weaknesses. Very interesting to see an insiders’ point of view. You definitely have a better insight on how such a talented player as T-Mac never advanced past the first round than your run of the mill pundit or random observer.

  • Hoodsnake

    Good read! I hope Durant is reading lol

  • http://www.realultimatepower.net doyouwantmore

    This article should be in basketball textbooks.

  • http://www.need4sheed.com Tarzan Cooper

    rudy gay is not a highly paid player, in fact hes still on his rookie contract. however, this summer he will get paid by some team. perfect on pau. agree 100% with namik on tmac, in the playoffs, he killed it. he guarded dirk better than bowen or ron ever have. …. o , and you gotta love ben osborne’s tmz style reporting

  • Merlinea

    Good read if only he would finally start and spell the header correctly.
    There is no such thing as “Pöst” in the german language. That makes me cringe and kinda sux big time. Cmon now 3 years in Germany and still cant spell “Post”??? Hint, its exactly the same word in english.

  • http://www.innoutnba.com In-N-Out Lucas

    Q: Hey Slam, does Casey ever writer a bad piece?
    A: Nope.
    Keep up the great work Casey, I love winning too.
    This is why I want Amar’e to join Kevin Durant in 2010. I can see him wanting to win in this stage of his career. With young guys around him, he can finally be the vocal leader he is capable of being yet Durant can handle the on-court leading that he is uncapable of doing.
    Make it happen OKC.

  • nastierthanu

    No doubt man enjoy the read. Keep bangin the deep ball

  • Jon

    Hey Casey! FINALLY someone else who dosen’t think Amar’e is a true superstar. So sick of him getting all that accolades he has plus another all-star start this year. someone like bynum should get it if yao is injured. amare is a PF and cheats by registering as a PF. nonsense.

  • Teddy-the-Bear

    Great read, Casey. However, the Rockets–since T-Mac came to Houston–have rarely been a poor defensive team. I’m not sure how T-Mac’s lazy defensive translates to not winning in the first round when the Rockets have been playing great defense for like the past five years.

  • Teddy-the-Bear

    T-Mac not making it out of the first round has to do with injuries–either him or Yao. Except for that one year when they lost 4 in a row to Dallas after going up 2-0.

  • erik

    T-mac was great. i remember in orlando having conversations with friends saying that he could lead the league in assists if guys would just make open shots ( which they did not ) . T-mac was a great player and he did what he had to do. good article though casey

  • Casey Jacobsen

    Thanks for all the comments and discussion. To “Teddy”: I realize that the Rockets have been one of the best defensive teams in the league since TMac has been there, but I believe that is because of JVG and his philosphy. The Rockets also have some of the best defensive ‘hustle’ players in the league surrounding Tracy (Battier, Hayes, Landry, Scola, Ryan Bowen, etc) as well as being anchored inside by a healthy Yao or Dikembe to block shots and rebound. I’m not saying that Tracy isn’t a great player…my argument was that if he sacrificed a little of his offense for improved defense, he would make his teams much better. To Merlinea: Sorry about the headline art of the blog. I did not create it, as I don’t have the graphic arts expertise. I didn’t mind the small mistakes, though. I hope you can see past it. To namik: I don’t think you can call TMac’s supporting cast’s throughout the years “offensively challenged.” My argument was that there is no reason TMac’s teams shouldn’t have tasted the second round of the postseason. Other stars have won with less. Again, it’s not all his fault…but you have to admit that it makes you wonder why. Thanks again for all the comments. I hope you continue to enjoy my blog.

  • therighttoremainsalient

    Casey Jacobson didn’t make the roster and throws TMac under the bus…
    _
    I still like you kid.

  • therighttoremainsalient

    Casey Jacobson up in here!

  • http://www.another48minutes.com Gerard Himself

    I hope Casey keeps writing for SLAMonline for a loooong time. I’ve enjoyed every post by him so far.

  • Pingback: SLAM ONLINE | » Hot Topics

  • Merlinea

    Now thats cooool.
    Thanks for the reply. Well aint nothin wrong with the artwork. Just the spelling is wrong.
    Its “Post” not “Pöst” – thats all. Thx for taking the time, though. Keep on playin hard down there in Broseland :-)

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Amare struggles to get his team deep in the playoffs, but not Nash. Funny how that works.
    Nash is winner, and he and Amare play on the same team. So, if Amare is struggling to get HIS team deep in the playoffs, why is Nash considered a “winner” and two-time MVP.
    How you gonna be the MVP and it’s not even “your” team?

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com BETCATS

    “Kobe has such an alpha-male strangle hold that I believe there would be certain guys who, if unwilling to defer to Kobe, would mess up that team.”…………ask Smush Parker

  • Nashty

    Good Job, Casey. Reading this post reminds me of the days when T-mac used to very active on defense in his first 3 years in Toronto. The coaches would put him in the game to be the stopper on defense. Man, T-mac used to so much fun to watch.

  • Casey Jacobsen

    Thanks for the comment, Allen. I’m not going to pretend that I don’t like Nash…he was my favorite teammate of all time. The Suns are his team, but Nash is not the highest paid player on the team, nor is he the leading scorer. That would be Amare….and that proves my point. You can’t compare those two players. Even though Amare is an amazingly talented scorer, almost anyone will admit that Nash is the one that makes that team successful (even though they haven’t won a title). Nash is considered a winner because he has always been on winning teams (Dallas and Phx) and because he makes everyone else around him a better player. He’s won 2 MVP awards and finished 2nd another year…so, obviously, I’m not the only person who thinks this, yet Amare is the only “max contract” on their roster.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Casey
    For several years Marion was the highest paid player on the team, Amare’s status is recent.
    My point was that it doesn’t make sense to list team success as a negative when discussing Amare, and then list it as a positive when discussing Nash. They play on the same team. Every trip to the Western conference Finals was made with Amare on the team. So, if those trips buttress Nash’s reputation, how can they be a detriment to Amare’s as you implied in your piece when you said that Amare was a part of a group of players whose teams are always struggling to win?
    There is no doubt that Nash affects the game in more ways than Amare. Any idiot can see that fact. Yet, the biggest complaint about Amare has been his lack of defense, and both he and Nash struggle on that end. Moreover, both of them have the physical tools needed to be successes at that part of the game.
    I’m not disagreeing with you that Amare could do more, or that he’s not a superstar. Those are valid points. I’m bothered by the fact that on one hand Amare can be castigated for not getting his team further in the playoffs, while Nash can be championed for being a winner on the same team. That makes no sense.
    I think it’s a lesson in perception. Amare is seen as failing to earn his money, despite the fact that he came back from microfracture surgery with an expanded offensive arsenal and that he is the only Sun to actually put up decent numbers alongside Shaq.
    Amare is flawed and he’s not a franchise player, but it seems like you held him to a much higher standard than you held Steve Nash, which is understandable given you’re admitted bias towards Nash. I just felt that needed to be pointed out.

  • Teddy-the-Bear

    Ah, gotcha Casey. Keep this blog going!

  • Casey Jacobsen

    Good point, Allen. I can’t praise Nash as a winner and blame Amare for the fact that the Suns haven’t played for a title. It’s not fair. They are on the same team and are the two best players. I guess I was just thinking back when I played in Phx before Nash arrived, and the management wanted desperately to build the franchise around Amare. He was so young and such an explosive scorer. Because of this…I do hold him to a higher standard (like you said). The problem was Amare didn’t care very much about defense and Coach D’Antoni didn’t teach it or hold him responsible. It was a big problem…and it still is. They bring in Nash, which obviously boosted them to a contender, but his defense wasn’t so good either. They played the Spurs tough for a couple years, but always came up short. I wrote about TMac in the article and argued that he could sacrifice some offense to improve his team’s defense. I feel the same way about Amare when I watch him.

  • http://Slamonline.com DRE

    Keep on doing your thang kid, I love reading your blogs bro they are very interesting and from the heart love it man.

Advertisement