Thursday, January 28th, 2010 at 2:13 pm  |  11 responses

Sixth Sense

The award for the L’s top reserve is reserved for Crawford or Landry.

by Sean Ceglinsky

Determining the premier player, the best first guy off of the bench in the NBA might be a difficult task for some, especially if you’re one of those analytical types that tends to over think things. But really, this isn’t rocket science people.

Everyone knows, that this season, there are only two cats in the running for the Sixth Man of the Year Award.

Jamal Crawford and Carl Landry are the front-runners, clearly. No questions asked. We should, however, give Jason Terry and Manu Ginobili some credit considering both continue in their efforts to keep pace in the race for the honor.

Jamal CrawfordAs for the rest of the reserves out there making a living in the League, most figure to be on the outside looking in when the winner is announced in late April. That is, unless something drastic happens between now and then.

For argument’s sake, there is plenty of time left for someone to make an impact. We are, after all, at the midway point, with the All-Star Game in Dallas right around the corner, just a couple of weeks away, in fact.

Who knows, Lamar Odom could end up with his name thrown into the whole Sixth Man of the Year mix before all is said and done. Stranger things have happened. Al Harrington has an outside chance, albeit slim. JR Smith too. Perhaps Rasheed Wallace will make things interesting. Maybe even Paul Millsap.

Enough with the speculation. Let’s get to the facts.

Before we begin breaking down why Crawford and Landry are the favorites and everyone else is playing second fiddle, one must understand how the whole thing works. The rules, per the NBA, in layman’s terms: In order to be eligible for the award, players have to come off the bench in more games than they started.

From there, a panel of approximately 120 media members from the United States, as well as Canada, award five points for each first-place vote, three points for each second-place vote and one point for each third-place vote.

For what it’s worth, my money is on Crawford to to take home the Sixth Man of the Year hardware.

Wonder what our main man Lang Whitaker things about that pick…

Anyway, here’s why Crawford makes sense, more so that anyone else, at least at this stage of the game. Off the pine, he’s averaging 17.3 points per game while playing more than 30 minutes a night, numbers worthy of a starter’s status.

Only Harrington scores more, with a 17.9 clip every time he steps out on the floor. Then again, he’s playing for the Knicks, a team that won’t be making a postseason appearance anytime soon, at least not this year.

Hoisting up shot after shot, granted Harrington finds the bottom of the net often, doesn’t make much of a difference in the grand scheme of things for New York. As a result, we don’t like his chances.

And therein lies the key: Crawford is contributing, and contributing in a major way, for a team that’s become a major player in the Eastern Conference playoff picture. That fact figures to a long way in the Sixth Man of the Year decision.

Moreover, Crawford is averaging roughly 11 fourth quarter minutes per game, a total that ranks among the league leaders. A couple signature games down the stretch, recently late in games against Boston and Phoenix, only strengthens his case.

Crawford might not start, but he finishes.

Carl LandryLandry is a legitimate candidate as well. Too legit to quit. Think about where Houston would be without him. No Tracy McGrady. No problem. No Yao Ming. No problem. Not when you have Landry coming off the bench.

Last time I checked, a week ago, he was among the top fourth quarter scorers in the NBA. Landry was averaging close to seven points per game in the final 12 minutes, trailing only Kobe Bryant and LeBron James in that category.

A quick glance at the stat this morning reveals nothing’s changed. Landry is still one of the top options in the waning moments, when it counts the most. If he keeps up that kind of clutch play, Landry will give Crawford a run for his money.

As it stands now, it’s a two-horse race for the Sixth Man of the Year honor.

Terry had an outside shot, no pun intended, of making things a three-horse race. Remember, he’s the defending champion, having won the award last season in a landslide, by more than 400 points. For the record, Smith was second.

But Terry’s recent promotion to the starting lineup might end up disqualifying him in the end. He could’ve been the long shot that put a scare into the favorites.

Ginobili and Odom, both of whom play key roles for the respective teams, don’t pose much a threat to Crawford and Landry. The same can be said for Wallace, Smith and Millsap. And we’ve already talked about the Harrington situation in the Big Apple.

The Sixth Man of the Year Award is Crawford’s to lose.

Wait, scratch that, the Sixth Man of the Year Award is Landry’s to lose.

Bottom line: One of them will win.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.need4sheed.com Tarzan Cooper

    j creezy wins,

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    I don’t like Landry’s low rebounding totals. He regularly has games with one or two boards.

  • tavoris

    @allenp-they depend on dude SOOOOOO much to score. I’ve actually never seen an undersized 4 come off the bench & be a teams CLEAR #1 option before.

    He isn’t a good rebounder, but I love his relentlessness.

  • k

    Landry is the new Ginobili, he’s clearly their go-to guy at that position when it matters, but for whatever reason they’re more comfortable starting the game with him on the bench. The man is their second leading scorer. I know the award is for guys who don’t “start,” but come on, how about a rule that if you’re one of your team’s top 3 scorers, lead your team in free throws attempted, and are in your team’s top 5 in minutes and field goals attempted, you’re not really a sixth man. Love the guy, but this is just silly. Landry is just as deserving of praise as Crawford, but only one of them is actually a “bench” guy.

  • Kendrick is God

    @k crawford is one of the leaders in 4th quarter minutes in the whole league so if your gonna put it like that then neither are really “bench” guys

  • mems

    you gotta love carl’s toughness. dude has been shot, he’s lost teeth and he doesn’t miss a lot of time when he’s injured. he’s a beast.

  • http://www.slamonline.com melvin ely

    K: you bring up some good points, but something must be said for players whose mold makes them better bench players than starters, regardless if their teams have better players starting at that particular position. Look at Manu for instance, he’s quite arguably better than RJ or Finley but he gets to come off the bench. Millsap I believe would be more effective than Andrei, Odom > Drew, etc. There’s a strategic importance for these guys to come off the bench I think, bring energy, instant offense, and generally keep opposing teams off balance. IMO, this is what makes this award so intriguing to discuss. MVPs, they’re cut and dry. Who’s the best player on the best team? That’s it. But 6th man candidates, they’re not necessarily their teams 6th best guys, just something about them that makes them deadlier coming into the game and sort of throwing spanners into the works.

  • http://www.slamonline.com melvin ely

    And as for who I think’s gonna win it: J-creezy, but with the slightest of margins. I’m a Landry fan, I love the guys tenacity. Loses 5 teeth in one game, 1st game back hangs a career-high 27 points? Crazy. But, Jamal is such an important, important part of why the Hawks are now serious East contenders, and finally playing at a niche which suits his game excellently. It’s a tough choice, but Sean’s right, the award is Jamal’s to lose. (nice write-up by the way Sean)

  • http://www.behindtheback.webeden.co.uk Sam Raphael Chadwick

    I think Crawford should get 6th man hes a great fit for this team and makes them the championship contender that they are, Atlanta is a great team but he just gives them that extra little bit to get them over the top

  • blueandorange

    I say Crawford will run away with it by the end of the season.

    13 fga in 30 mpg

    yet if you look his rankings among leaague shooting guards

    8th in ppg(teammate JJ is 5th)
    7th in fg%(teammate JJ is 9th)
    8th in fga(teammate JJ is 4th)
    6th in ft%(teammate JJ is 13th)
    7th in fta(teammate Jj is 12th)

    19 of the 44 games hes played hes scored 20 pts or more.

    15 of the 44 games he has played hes led the Hawks in scoring.

    Hes playing as well as anyone in the league bench or starting.

  • k

    I think you guys are right about the Rockets benefiting from not actually starting Landry, I just mean that the guy is really their #1 power forward, and that the guy he replaces really plays the same position (though I guess it could be argued that Chuck Hayes is a 6’6″ center) while Crawford is clearly not the Hawks preference, all things being equal, over Joe Johnson, and that for him to come in usually involves a guy at another position (SF) coming out and another guy (Johnson) moving over, so he really is a sixth man. Just my take though.

Advertisement