Monday, April 12th, 2010 at 4:52 pm  |  13 responses

Just How Open Is The West?

The Playoff picture has seen this parity before.

by Chris Deaton

Let’s be realists, here.  There are two teams that can rep the West in the Finals: the Lakers and the eventual 2-seed.  That’s it.  Parity be damned, there are just too many holes, too many questions about the bracket’s bottom six to win consecutive playoff series without home advantage.  Right?

Ugh.  Numbers always pull in different directions to the point where making a logical argument in favor of Team X is reasonably challenged by the numbers so conveniently eschewed to make Team X look so good.  You follow?  I almost don’t.  That sentence sucked.

But the truth is buried in there.  Somewhere.

Let’s say the Mavs lock up second in the conference.Clippers Nuggets Basketball

I like the Nuggets.  ‘Melo is now a title-worthy superstar, Chauncey is still as valuable a playoff point guard as there is, they have fire on their front line (Prank Martin, Birdman), an improving big to tussle with the League’s best (Nene), full doses of energy off of the bench (Lawson, Afflalo), an X-factor (Smith), good ball control (879 bad pass and ball handling turnovers compared with 1,015 by their opponents) and a 3-1 regular season mark against LAL.

Where are the problems?  A sub-.500 road record, an unfortunate flux on their coaching staff and a questionable pace.  (If someone names me an NBA Finalist that surrendered north of a hundie a night in the regular season, I’ll donate a milli to Weezy’s “Rebirth My Rap Career” fund.)

Much of the same could be said for the Suns.  They’re the hottest team in the West, yeah.  And they have the NBA’s best point guard.  And sure, Amar’e's five most recent lines spell out B-E-A-S-T (59-100 from the field, cumulatively), and J-Rich has found a role that emphasizes quality looks over quantity thereof (.473 shooting this season, compared with .442 for his career), but … can a team that surrenders almost 106 per really go to the Finals?  And can the Suns do it without a healthy Robin Lopez?

Curse that word “but” followed by “and” after “and”.

That’s how it goes.  The Lockout Knickerbockers remain an aberration, and no team with three nicknames running the show (Dream, Glide, Rudy T) is really a 6-seed.  Fact is that it’s always been a tough trip for the side with the jet-hopping road to play into June, no matter the tale of balance told in the standings.

Remember those 2008 Playoffs?  The Lakers and Nuggets, the 1 and the 8, were separated by all of 7 wins.  Had the League ever seen such a marvel?  There was the potential for some whack West final — the fifth-seeded Rockets and the seventh-seeded UConn Huskies, or something — and the journey there would be gripping, unexpected, unconventional, and above all else, cool.

A big-boy interpretation of March Madness?  Sweet.

And then Los Angeles tidily swept Denver, New Orleans (2) and San Antonio (3) both cruised in five, and Utah took out Houston in six.  Chalk, chalk, chalk, chalk.  It’s noteworthy that each favorite held serve on home court to take 2-0 series leads, and only 20 times have trailing teams overcome that deficit in a best of seven to win.  Far more often than not, a playoff club is for real — give a dog a steak and he’ll eat it.  A 2-0 series lead is a New York strip.

In the event that they match up, it’d be nice to see Durant’s Thunderstorms hang with Kobe and Co.  But for OKC’s first trip to the Playoffs, KD-Bryant is to Jordan-Bird circa 1986 (lite) at best — individual brilliance, signs of things to come and a quick five games.  Do the Spurs have anything left to give?  Can the Jazz take the next step?  Can the Blazers take their first?

Parity goes by another name in this instance: uncertainty.  Two things are certain: (1) the Lakers, no matter their enigmatic behavior down the stretch, have the West’s best record and the core pieces of last year’s title winner; and (2) whichever team nabs that 2-seed gets an incomparable shot in the arm.  Things are separated by the most minute of degrees in this conference playoff race, and the most noteworthy of these degrees could be tallies in the win column.

So games 81 and 82 count.  Once game 83 tips, Western Conference business will be closed to all but a select couple: Los Angeles and ________.

(Numbers from Inside Hoops and 82games.)

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , ,

  • http://www.slamonline.com/ niQ

    Let me be the first… Let’s go OKC! (since well, Raptors are done. lol)

  • LA Huey

    I hope I’m wrong but I think the 1st round in the West will be as exciting as the East’s…And if OKC meets the Lake Show in the first round, it’ll be a short series.

  • http://thekobebeef.wordpress.com LDR4

    Lot of random fluff in this piece, I like that. I also agree that Mavs will be no. 2 in the West. I’ve read all the tie breaker stuff and they have the numbers on their side for the most part. West playoffs should be the highlight of the post season until the finals (unless Cavs choke again).

  • chimichanga

    maybe kobe will keep up his bill cartwright-esque shooting and the lakers will burn in the first round. if greg oden makes a miraculous comeback, we could see a blazers/thunder western conference final.

  • http://www.nba.com/suns Dacre

    Suns will charge through to the WCFs

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    Co-sign niQ, though the Raptors actually might make the playoffs after all.

  • http://slamonline.com Chris Deaton

    I’m on Okie C’s bandwagon, too. And I really do hope they make a nice showing against LA(zy). Gonna be quite the uphill climb. Just as long as KD uses the stage to bud into the Playoff superstar he’ll no doubt be for the long haul, I’ll be excited.

  • http://hoopistani.blogspot.com Hoopistani

    Lakers, Mavs, Nuggets, Jazz, Suns are the five teams that can make the finals from the west. Cavs, Magic, Celtics from east.

  • http://www.teflinprague.com SAB

    thanks Chris, great article. less thanks to Hoopistani, who either didn’t read or didn’t understand the article… and how can the Celtics be contenders and the Spurs not? madness…

  • Joey E.

    it’s open 2-7 i guess. Lakers got mad lucky. look, we all love OKC, but they cant beat the Lakers. then they’re going to play the winner of PHX/Utah who the Lakers both own. and really, those guys cant beat them anyways without HCA. even with HCA they couldn’t

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    My head hurts : /

  • Th3_R3al_Chris

    I don’t think The Lakers are penciled into the Western Finals as they have been in the past two years. These playoffs can be the most interesting in recent memory.

  • http://slamonline.com Chris Deaton

    I don’t think L.A.’s penciled in, either. And I guess there’s concern for how … I dunno, “unimpressive(?)” they look. But when I have that precedent to go off of — that the 94/95 Rockets were a unique underdog, and the last time we saw this level of Western parity, it didn’t mean a thing — I have to pause. I was inclined to think anyone could make a run to the Finals a few years ago. Not so sure now. It’s such a tough grind to play against the grain not having home court for extended periods.

Advertisement