Friday, April 23rd, 2010 at 10:00 am  |  139 responses

Stan Van Gundy: MJ Not the Clear-Cut G.O.A.T

SVG has another opinion (shocker, I know), and says that Mike isn’t necessarily the greatest ever. Methinks this is the sort of thing that might make an enraged Jordan announce yet another comeback just in time for Game 3 of the Bobcats/Magic series: “Van Gundy says Oscar Robertson and Wilt Chamberlain belong in that discussion. ‘(Jordan’s) certainly right there with anybody and he may be (the greatest). But the people who say it’s obvious and everything else…I think maybe don’t know enough history,’ Van Gundy said. ‘I think one of the really tough things is to compare players from generation to generation. The game has changed a great deal. He’s the best player by far since I’ve been in the league. I came in the early 90’s when he was in his prime. I think in the last 20, 25 years, he’s the best. But to me, the two other guys I think of are Oscar Robertson and Wilt Chamberlain…the things they did.’ Van Gundy said television helped make Jordan an icon: ‘We didn’t have the saturation on TV and that,’ in earlier generations. ‘I don’t even know how many times Oscar Robertson was on national TV his entire career. Michael Jordan, people saw him from college and all the way through.”’

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • Coach Walt Posted: Apr.23 at 10:10 am
    Wilt needed to play in a more athletic era, as well as Oscar, not taking anything from what they did, but no one could play with Wilt..he was like a 3D figure in a 2D world.. 80s’ and 90′s had the most HOF players and one player dominated that era of basketball..Micheal Jordan

  • Eboy Posted: Apr.23 at 10:13 am
    Stan also said that Dwight Howard should be in the conversation and that tears were welling up during his answer ’cause no one else included him in their comparisons.

  • YEBies Posted: Apr.23 at 10:21 am
    As much as I would like to disagree with stan, he’s dead on with this one. This is a conversation that I have over and over again. When you also add in the fact of expansion teams and rule changes it makes it impossible to compare. How many more points do you go back and give jerry west bc he didn’t play with 3pt line? Some stats weren’t even kept until the late 70s/ early 80s. Before Magic came to the league, the NBA finals were on tape delay. MJ came in at the right time with the right machine behind him. The best thing about him is that he also had the skills to back it up. To end this I’ll have to quote jadakiss because in my eyes he’s “Top 5 dead or alive”, but I can’t say #1 for sure.

  • Hambone Posted: Apr.23 at 10:22 am
    stay off the crack stan!!! stick to b**chin about refs.. greatest highlights,greatest moves,greatest kicks,greatest work ethic,greatest heart,greatest desire,Greatest Of All Time. Jordan i used to rewind his simple breakaway dunks again and again because he made the simplist things look gracefull and spectacular.kinda homo 1 he had in charlotte where he brought the ball back to his shoulder (wearing 11`s)off the 1 foot (kinda like jr smith seems to do every game now) i also remember talking to my friend about the 88 dunk contest and his reverse double pump.”you`ll never see mj dunk like that again”he said. 1 week later in a 1st round playoff series against the heat (timmy and zo) M.J puts down a reverse double pump.Its as if he heard. Now if i can just get my friend to say “he will never stop releasing terrible mash up kicks and realease the j`s in their o.g format”

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.23 at 10:23 am
    Micahel Jordan even said himself he’s not the clear cut best either because you can’t compare eras.

  • JoeScribe Posted: Apr.23 at 10:28 am
    No one could play with Wilt? Try the true GOAT, Bill Russell. Two NCAA titles. One (real) Gold Medal. 11 NBA rings. It’s a resume that has never been topped in any American sport. A true champion. Michael’s not even No. 2. Besides Russ, the only other complete player that also consistently made his teammates better was Magic Johnson. The ’80s and ’90s are two completely different eras. The ’80s filled with great teams playing real basketball. The ’90s was a blight, the worst era in NBA history. The other “great’ players of the ’90s included substitute teachers like Ewing, Drexler, ect. whose knees weakened in the clutch. We’ll never truly know how good Jordan was because he didn’t have a Magic or a Bird (in their primes) to push him in the mid-1990s. Instead he had to those crappy, hacking Knicks and Heat teams.

  • T-Money Posted: Apr.23 at 10:28 am
    Stan, oh Stan…

  • Hambone Posted: Apr.23 at 10:28 am
    stan i dont like you anymore wait a minute,i didnt like you anyway.

  • JoeMaMa Posted: Apr.23 at 10:31 am
    It’s not best ever. It’s MOST DOMINANT in their TIME. You can only compare a player to the others in his time. From that, who’s the best ever? It’s gotta be Wilt.

  • niQ Posted: Apr.23 at 10:48 am
    Well, to be fair, you guys are all wrong. I’m the clear-cut G.O.A.T! =D

  • LA Huey Posted: Apr.23 at 11:19 am
    Alright, NBA, make ORL-CHA games back-to-back until the series is done. Actually, make them play all 7 games I don’t care. Whatever needs to be done to shut him up.

  • fredd Posted: Apr.23 at 11:23 am
    Geek Of All Time ?! ; )

  • macho Posted: Apr.23 at 11:26 am
    U can’t compare players from different era. During time the game evolve to what it is today. So that makes them the greatest of their time. But I bet that if they all play now they will dominant cause the nba is so soft.

  • letsmotor Posted: Apr.23 at 11:47 am
    MJ’s gonna suit up for game 3 and drop 50.

  • unrel Posted: Apr.23 at 11:56 am
    blah blah blah.. let’s not forget Kareem Abdul Jabaar.. he’s top 3 in my books.. best center of all time..

  • Ben Osborne Posted: Apr.23 at 12:00 pm
    http://www.slamonline.com/online/the-magazine/features/2009/06/the-new-top-50/

  • neaorin Posted: Apr.23 at 12:08 pm
    Stan needs to STFU and go back to p*rn. I mean coaching the Magic.

  • Mauritz Posted: Apr.23 at 12:14 pm
    Wilt? Russell was way better than Wilt. Wilt was a chocker and a stat-obsessed me-first guy. Wilt=2 rings, 4 MVPs, 1 finals MVP. Russell=11 rings (3 as a player-coach), 5 MVPs, would have won like 5-8 finals MVPs had they awarded them during his career. No way Wilt was better. That said, Jordan was the GOAT. No way would Russell have been as dominant as Mike during the 90′s. Almost, but not as.

  • AndTheJellosJigglin Posted: Apr.23 at 12:55 pm
    It’s a silly question because we will never know. I agree with JoeSCribe and yeah maybe we should stop worry about the one G.O.A.T. and realize we have many G.O.T.T.’s (Greatest of Their Time)

  • Drew Posted: Apr.23 at 1:06 pm
    the Van Gundy brothers both are idiots and need to just shut up!

  • El Chinas. Posted: Apr.23 at 1:17 pm
    Nothing controversial here. I don’t think SVG dissed MJ here. First, he did say that Jordan was the best in the 80′s and the 90′s. Secondly, you can argue that as great as Jordan was, Russ, Wilt, Big O and them lot were as important to the development of the game during the earlier decades. Of course, none of them revolutionized basketball marketing and merchandising as much as $$$$ did.

  • Ben Posted: Apr.23 at 1:55 pm
    Russell was on better teams than Wilt. Wilt was a lot more dominant than Russell. Russel was not even able to guard him 1 on 1, constant double and triple team by the great Celtics team defences. Jordan dominated his era. Wilt destroyed it. Saying he was stats obsessed is no knowing history. When he was asked to lead by scoring he did, by passing he did, by being a role player he did. Dont forget he has 50 triple doubles more than Jordan and 19 more than Bird.

  • ENDS Posted: Apr.23 at 1:59 pm
    MagiC Johnson is imo the Greatest. its all perception and media. whatever floats ur boats. AND HERE COMES THE STAN HATE

  • Krishan Posted: Apr.23 at 2:14 pm
    In related news, the bobcats are god-awful and outside of dwight fouling out of the third quarter, they don’t have a chance of winning a game. Memo to mike next season: GET A PERIMETER SHOOTER.

  • albie1kenobi Posted: Apr.23 at 2:34 pm
    nice plug, Ben.

  • RunningBrave Posted: Apr.23 at 2:35 pm
    Stan is in my top two for guys who look like Ron Jeremy. The other guy in the top two is Ron Jeremy.

  • albie1kenobi Posted: Apr.23 at 2:38 pm
    sweet. i was the 23rd comment on the day of 23rd.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.23 at 3:03 pm
    Magic Johnson is the greatest player in history. Bird is up there too. But, Magic is the greatest of all time.

  • dfrance21 Posted: Apr.23 at 3:27 pm
    There is nothing controversial here. Just like there was nothing controversial about him saying the playoffs should be shortened. It seems that as soon as SVG open his mouth, people label it controversy. He’s a winer, but he makes sense a lot of times too.

  • BostonBaller Posted: Apr.23 at 3:38 pm
    It’s all subjective…..and great barbershop talk….

  • RUN'N'GUN219 Posted: Apr.23 at 3:47 pm
    man yall are smoking… MJ is the best player hands down. Wilt? Russell? they played in a era when it was only a hand full of players ther size. Wilt averaged 50 pts and 30 reb because he could stanf under the basket all day( no 3 sec) and no one was as big as he was. Russell won all those chips cuz he had the BEST team of the era.( they had everybody. LOL) and they work as a team. do get me wrong they are great but it just kinda inflated. Jordan played in an era were comp. was at its highest and every was on the same playing ground. And he killed everyone

  • KEVIN ARMENTA Posted: Apr.23 at 3:48 pm
    MJ IS RESPONSIBLE FOR EWING,BARKLEY,MILLER,STOCKTON AND MALONE FOR NOT GETTING A CHAMPIONSHIP.THOSE ARE HALL OF FAMERS FOLKS.TELL ME WHO HAD THAT KIND OF JUICE?NOT WILT OR OSCAR.6 RINGS 5MVP’S.HE HAD MAGIC IN HIS PRIME.MAGIC WAS 32 WHEN THEY MET IN THE FINALS.MIKE KILLED EM.HE POURED 63 AGAINST A LEGENDARY CELTIC SQUAD.GRANIT THEY LOST,BUT STILL.

  • Ryne Nelson Posted: Apr.23 at 3:53 pm
    Not worth the CAPS, Kevin…

  • niQ Posted: Apr.23 at 4:01 pm
    KEVIN IS YOUR CAPS LOCKS BROKEN? MINES TOO!

  • Kelly Posted: Apr.23 at 4:03 pm
    I toally agree with SVG. Jordan nor other players in his era had to content with the athleticism, rules, etc we have today. How many ‘top notch’ players (any position) were there in Jordan’s day. Now we have a whole crop of ‘top notch’ players. Jordan didn’t really have the competition that players have today. I hate that these statements make it seem like I’m against Jordan or I don’t think he’s ‘the greatest to ever play the game” (Which I don’t); but I’m only trying to say that you shouldn’t hang on to the past, we need to embrace the present and the future. Anything that Jordan did in his day, other players are doing it now, and some even better, plus adding stuff to it. Sure there are things Jordan accomplished that no one has accomplished; butthere are things that players today have accomplished that Jordan didn’t accomplish. If you look at Stats there are players who have better stats (Russell – 11 rings; Chamberlain – 100 points, even Robert Horry – 7 rings, Youngest player to win a championship, etc.), but do those stats mean they are a better player than Jordan. I think it boils down to who a person enjoy watching play. I enjoyed watching Magic Johnson better than I did Jordan. I enjoyed Magic more than I do leBron – Magic was exciting and he made so many different moves. I like Kobe and Vince Carter(especially in their prime) better than leBron because their dunks was different and exciting with a lot of creativity. leBron only seem to have one dunk – He jump really high and he powers it down really hard, and that’s pretty much it. he remind me a little of Clyde Drexler dunks except with more pwoer. How much fun is it watching a run-away freight train and at the end of the line, it powers into something.
    I prefer Magic Johnson and his “showtime lakers”.

  • Tarzan Cooper Posted: Apr.23 at 4:12 pm
    Co sign joescribe. And the 91 lakers were old, injured and washed up. Wilt, bill, oscar, magic, and kareem are all good names. How about hakeem? He was great at everything. 95 magic shaq that bouncd mj and bulls? Swept, swept! If hakeem had a good team around him for most of his career, he would have had many morre rings. Hakeem was a beast, and most underrated of all time

  • letsmotor Posted: Apr.23 at 4:24 pm
    @Kelly: Jordan may not have contended with rules and today’s athleticism, but he did have contend with MUCH tougher defense. Still, I really like your point that it comes down to who a person enjoys liking play. That’s a good way of looking at all this.

  • Mackenzie Posted: Apr.23 at 4:49 pm
    MJ would have been dominant or extremely good in any era… that’s why he’s the best ever.

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.23 at 4:50 pm
    I thought we all agreed the LeBron was the King.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.23 at 5:12 pm
    @Michael Scorn: LeBron is the king today, not back then. And LeBron isn’t better than Magic. Or Jordan, for that matter. He MIGHT NOT be better than Bird. But, he’s better than Kobe.

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.23 at 5:17 pm
    A few notes to make these arguments even better:
    1) It’s easy to compare players from different eras, but it’s hard to place a player in a different era. Could Wilt really be this great in today’s game? Well, he could run the 100 yard dash in 10.9 seconds, broad jump 50 feet, high jump over six feet…. outside of Russell, no one was anywhere near that athletic. On the other hand, Wilt really had trouble guarding centers who strayed outside, how the hell would he deal with the Okurs and Dirks who stray all the way to the three point line? It’s not even easy to say Jordan could score more in any era. Could Jordan deal with the 70s where some teams made the ‘Jordan rules’ look like a kindergarden? Could he deal with today’s league, with zone defenses and constant charge calls? I mean, he played in one of the most physical eras in basketball, but that doesn’t mean he could just adjust.
    2) @Kelly: And in the reverse, players of today’s era didn’t have to deal with Jordan’s rules. How do you think Lebron and Kobe and Wade would deal with hand checking and centers clogging the lane? The league was certainly slower back then, but I think that had to do with the RULES and not the athleticism. You couldn’t dart to the basket with Mark Eaton planted there twenty four seven.
    3) Both Red Auerbach and Bill Russell have SAID Wilt Chamberlain was the better. Soooo… you know… not sure why people are debating this. Better scorer, better rebounder, better passer. Probably better one-on-one defensively too. Remember, the year before Russell came to the Celtics, they were the second best team in the L… and the night they drafted Russell, they also drafted two other future HOFers. So, you know, just think about that for a second.
    4) I know everyone says there was ‘less talent’ back in the Wilt/Russell days, which is TRUE… but there were also less teams, but still an ~80 game schedule. That means Russell had to play Wilt ten times, and then Gilmore ten times, then Bellamy ten times, then Unseld ten times… so while there was less TALENT in the league, it’s not like they were playing 6’5 scrub centers for 78 games. They were just playing each other constantly.
    5) I still think Magic is probably the best PG of all time (extremely biased here) but I mean, just THINK about Robertson here… THINK of how good his stats are. Dude was abusing legends like Jerry West on an average basis. And yeah, I hear the argument ‘the game was faster blah blah slow down for pace of today’s game’ all the time, and I hate it… because those guys never mention one thing: that assists were rewarded far less frequently back in Robertson’s days. Bob Cousy was OBLITERATING the league by averaging 7-8 assists a game before Robertson shattered that.
    So, if we’re really adjusting Robertson’s stats, it’s not really 25-9-8, but more likely 25-9-14. If memory serves me correctly, if adjusted for the percentages of assists awarded to players per play, Robertson’s season assist total per game would only be behind Stockton’s one amazing season (note: i have no idea how this website came up with that number, so take that with a grain of salt).
    But good lord, could you imagine a player dropping 25-8-14 in today’s league? F a triple double, I’d rather see that.

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.23 at 5:21 pm
    ONE LAST THING, the only player that would have TRULY benefited for sure from the three point line was Pete Maravich, as he’d regularly take three pointer-length shots in college and NBA games. I’d be hard pressed to say anyone else would really benefit, because quite simply, they weren’t taking those shots, so how do we know if they had the range? Rick Barry was a DEAD EYE shooter later in his career… when he played with the three in the ABA, he only had like, a 31 field goal percentage

  • doyouwantmore Posted: Apr.23 at 5:47 pm
    MJ is the G.O.A.T, but only because history, opportunity, and ability aligned at exactly the right moments for him to become that. If he had simply won as much as he did without the late-game heroics, flu-game, buzzer-beaters, and comebacks it might be a different story. That’s why Kobe and Lebron, two guys who are physically and skill-wise at or near Jordan’s level, are not in the conversation yet. They haven’t had the same outside opportunities for heroics and flu-games, not to mention Craig Ehlo.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.23 at 5:50 pm
    He’s absolutely right, SVG. But no matter, cue the contrived “shock” from the Jordan fans that SLAM was clearly trying to provoke.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.23 at 5:52 pm
    Co-sign Jukai on pretty much everything.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.23 at 5:54 pm
    For me, Wilt Chamberlain just might be the best player ever.
    Also, Pete Maravich would have absolutely owned the league if the three-point line had been established, but he already did own the league. One a of a kind player. You know what’s a shame? SLAM didn’t even include the Pistol in their top 50…

  • Seven Duece Posted: Apr.23 at 6:13 pm
    No matter how true it is (and it is true), once SVG says it, it becomes suspect. Typical jerk wad New Yorker.

  • Airswade Posted: Apr.23 at 6:40 pm
    I’m the biggest Jordan fan on earth, but Stan gotta valid point…..

  • Ben Posted: Apr.23 at 7:03 pm
    I think Jukai got everything pretty much right. Don’t forget Wilt was scoring mostly on fadeways not dunks, he was a skilled player. Saying he only stayed under the basket shows you don’t know how he played. Also, players in Wilt’s era didn’t have access to comfortable transportation and the medical staff players have nowadays. But that didn’t stop Wilt from averaging 48.5 minutes a game for a season.

  • Yesse Posted: Apr.23 at 7:06 pm
    Well im glad he didnt start comparing Dwight or any other of his players to MJ. I bet he is just trying to make MJ to go to the court with Bobcats.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.23 at 9:41 pm
    Co-sign Ben two times! And not to mention the 78 triple doubles Wilt amassed during his playing career, fourth most all time only to Jason Kidd, Magic Johnson, and Oscar Robertson… That’s right, more than Michael Jordan or even JOHN STOCKTON (who, to be fair, leads the league all time in point/assist double-doubles).

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.23 at 9:42 pm
    JoeScribe, the 90s was the worst era of basketball? Are you kidding me? Wow…

  • Baller Posted: Apr.23 at 10:21 pm
    They have simulators for everything now why cant they make one that attempts to take into account generational differences to come up with an answer.

  • Chi-Town Stand up! Posted: Apr.23 at 10:55 pm
    If any of u think any player is better than MJ then u clearly don’t know a lick about a dominant winner! While it is True that Wilt scored 100 points in a game and averaged 20 something rebounds, soooo what! Can someone tell me who has the highest scoring average in league history without ever having scored 70 points in a game? Oh thats right..The answer is Jordan!..Who has the highest postseason scoring average? Jordan.. Who has the most 40 point games in playoff history?..Jordan! Who is the only player in Everyone’s top 5, who has at least 6 rings and 0 losses in the final?..Jordan! Who holds the record for most consecutive seasons winning the scoring title?.. Jordan!..I haven’t even talked about how great Jordan’s defense was! It’s very disrespectful 2 put player’s like Magic, The Big O, Wilt, and Jerry West in the same conversation with MJ, and this is y…Magic lost 2 MJ in the finals, so that automatically eliminates him cause MJ never lost, and he took a ring from Magic! As great as The Big O was, he only has 1 ring 2 show for it! U need at least 6 to be in the same discussion! Same goes for Wilt! He was the only 7 footer in the league back then, and he played like it. He always towered over everyone, but he could never dominate against Russell because he was not that skilled! As far as The logo goes…It’s not even close! I don’t care that he didn’t play with the 3 point line, the fact is he played in 10 NBA finals and has 1 ring! 1 ring is definitely not gonna get it done. Jerry West is the biggest loser in NBA history IMO because who loses 9 championships? He’s not even in my top 10 cause that’s a huge stain on his resume! Bill Russell doesn’t even belong in this discussion because he was never a dominant force, and definitely not as clutch as an MJ, Magic, Bird, or even Jerry West for that matter. I respect his 11 rings, but how many hall of famers di he play with again? Cousy and Havlicek were just as important on offense as Russell was on defense! No one can say they accomplished as much as Jordan did on the court or off the court! Only The G.O.A.T. could truly become the first owner of an NBA franchise! Kobe won’t ever be better cause he has already lost twice in the finals, and ditto for Lebron as well! Not only did he lose, but he got swept in the finals! I could never imagine MJ losing in the finals, and I on’t care who he would’ve had 2 play against! Lets not forget that all of MJ’s rings came against Hall of fame caliber players! 1.)Magic..2.)Drexler..3.)Barkley..4..)Payton..5.)Malone and Stockton..6.)Malone and Stockton! Seriously how is he not the G.O.A.T.? Let’s not forget that everytime he went 2 the finals he was always the best player on the court! 6 finals MVP’s and 5 regular season MVP awards!

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.23 at 11:33 pm
    Was Jordan the King of the NBA right out of high school? No he wasn’t.

  • Coney Islander Posted: Apr.23 at 11:34 pm
    MJ would be the best player on the court no matter what era he was put in, point blank period.

  • Sam Z Posted: Apr.23 at 11:37 pm
    i might give him oscar but definitely not wilt dominating in a slow and unathletic league u put kenyon martin right now in that league and he gets 50 a game no doubt. wilt was great and he was an innovator definitely dominant im just saying that with respect to the competition he had i really think jordan bests him there. plus rings wilt was just obssessed with stats and wasnt a great team player

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.23 at 11:50 pm
    You guys might as well argue now, because if LeBron ever wins the title, END OF DISCUSSION!

  • malcolm Posted: Apr.24 at 12:27 am
    I agree with Stan. The truth is that everyone just says that mike is the best because they are scared to disagree with their friends. If someone differs from that opinion they’re seen as idiots when realistically we can only judge the best in regards to eras. Fifty years from now many players will posses the athleticism and skill mike had. If you don’t believe me look at tapes of Oscar in his prime and tell me how many players in todays game are better.

  • Bassbesteckk Posted: Apr.24 at 12:57 am
    @chi-town stand up: you know, i still have my michael jordan poster from 1996 on the door of my old room in my mom’s house, still wear his jersey when playing ball, stilling putting on my XIVs even though they’re size 7 and i now have 9…
    And I’m pretty sure Jordan is the G.O.A.T.
    But not because of the reason’s you bring up. And not because the other guys couldn’t compete with him. they could… it’s not about the championships or anything, it is, that mj just could take over the roles of all those other greats, he was much more versatile than most of those mentioned here. (except for magic imho, and he is propably the only one truly legitimate to challenge mj, and to my regrets, I never saw magic play in his prime, just know him from tapeings, you know, time’s not on my side in this matter)
    He was a beast on the defense end, and come on, when it come’s to an arsenal of offensive moves, he was a killer, no matter if he needed to be clutch or not. That’s not to say, he was better than one of those others mentioned here in EVERY aspect of the game, but he was able to play them all. (Still when it comes to rings, despite of being the G.O.A.T., he wouldn’t have one without scottie, player’s don’t win championships, teams do) Again, I never saw Wilt or Oscar play live, but I know my history, watched some tapes etc. And Jordan’s ability to score, to create plays and room was incredible and unique. And I do think even today he would be a dominant force (not with his now nearly 50 years, but in his prime). Long Story’s short: he is the G.O.A.T. because of all he did, not because of certain aspects of his game. Just think of what Larry said about him after the 63 vs. Boston in 86. Larry knew all the others that came up here (damn it he’s even one of them)

  • 3233569658 Posted: Apr.24 at 1:25 am
    I agree with van gundy you can’t compare players in differnt eras or when one player was in his prime and one was finishing his legacy. Lebron better than Kobe… NO. Stats favor Lebron but he started Kobe didn’t fir three years. The only only thing lebron beats Kobe in is his Dunks Kobe is a way better scorer hands down and more creative when he was in his prime dunking

  • 3233569658 Posted: Apr.24 at 1:25 am
    I agree with van gundy you can’t compare players in differnt eras or when one player was in his prime and one was finishing his legacy. Lebron better than Kobe… NO. Stats favor Lebron but he started Kobe didn’t fir three years. The only only thing lebron beats Kobe in is his Dunks Kobe is a way better scorer hands down and more creative when he was in his prime dunking

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.24 at 3:08 am
    @Ben: Well, most of Chamberlain’s points were dunks and layups, so that’s a bit of an exaggeration.. but yeah, he also had a finger roll, a fadeaway, he could fast break to the basket to score, etc. etc.
    What’s crazy is, MOST players in the 60s/70s had legit fades. I was watching a Bullets/Knicks game circa 1973, and EVERYONE was hitting insane fadeaways… Frazier, Debuascherre, Lucas, Monroe, damn even Elvin Hayes had a legit fade! We think Jordan/Kobe’s fades are amazing but from what I’ve seen, it was far more common place back in the day.
    @Chi-Town Stand up!: You’re the biggest hypocrite on this website. Wilt can’t be in the discussion cause he didn’t WIN more than MJ… Russell can’t be in the discussion because he didn’t dominate like MJ… it’s one or the other man! Enough with your awful arguments. Yes, MJ is probably the greatest because of his combination of wins AND domination, but you’re making it seem like it’s sacrilegious to compare them. How about we talk about Jordan’s absolute HORRID lack of playoff success before his six rings? Huh? At least Jerry West ALWAYS got there.
    @Everyone: I know the L got more athletic… but the rules have sped up the pace a lot. Oscar Robertson wasn’t athletic? Dude had to deal with people smacking his arm (no foul calls), centers clogging the lane (no three seconds), less spacing (no benefit to taking farther shots, so defense was less spread), hand checking (HUGE different), and a lot less screens (A lot more posting up because of the afformentioned rule, so screens were set less). This cuts down the speed of a player drastically. Athletics, because of training methods, travel methods, shoes, medical knowledge etc. etc. are clearly better, but people make it seem like Oscar playing in today’s league would be like picking up a dude from Burger King and putting him in the NBA. Not true. Do your homework, peeps.

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.24 at 3:10 am
    And one final note, Stan Van Chumdy should keep his mouth shut. Love the conversation, hate the coach.

  • Hursty Posted: Apr.24 at 3:36 am
    Co-sign Jukai on pretty much everything. Scratch that, 100%.

  • matt Posted: Apr.24 at 3:48 am
    Jukai, not saying you’re full of sh** but supply us with the quote Red Auerbach made about Wilt being the better player.

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.24 at 5:01 am
    Matt: “Wilt is better than Russell” — Red Auerbach
    Nah, just playing. I remember reading a quote from Red, saying Wilt was a better talent but he was happy to have Russell cause he needed a leader that Wilt wasn’t. From a five minute google search, I can’t find it, so I’ll try again later today (much later)
    but I did find this gem:
    “Wilt is playing better than I used to — passing off, coming out to set up screens, picking up guys outside, and sacrificing himself for team play.”
    – Bill Russell, Great Moments in Pro Basketball, (by Sam Goldaper) p.24
    And this:
    “If [the referee] is calling [the game] loose then everyone gets away with more. So, you have to handle your own man accordingly, unless it’s Wilt Chamberlain. Him, you just don’t handle. He’s too strong. The best you can do is make him work hard.”
    – Bill Russell, Go up For Glory p.100

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.24 at 5:07 am
    haha, I love this one:
    “I had a habit of getting a running start toward the boards on every shot. Wilt used to zone it up and he’d be standing under the basket on most possessions. After I had run up his back a couple of times on made shots, Wilt gave me an ultimatum with that deep, deep voice.
    ‘Tamjanovich, don’t come in here anymore.’
    ‘Wilt, I’ve got to do my job,’ I responded.
    Let me just say that I didn’t make that statement with a lot of conviction. After all, I happened to be talking to one of the strongest men in the world. Late in the game, I went barreling in to grab a loose ball. Wilt grabbed my arm and was called for a foul. As I was starting downcourt, Wilt wouldn’t let my arm go. He spun me around and said, ‘I told you not to come in here anymore.’
    At that tenuous juncture, I threw a finger up into Wilt’s face and he let me go. When I got back to the bench, everybody was saying how great it was that I had stood up to Wilt.
    But what I was really saying–and I never told my teammates this–was, “Please give me one more chance.”
    –Rudy Tomjanovich, A Rocket at Heart, p. 77

  • JoeMaMa Posted: Apr.24 at 7:28 am
    I just can’t get over this. No one has dominated like Wilt. Stats don’t lie. No one. You can say whatever you want, but at the end of the day, no one has dominated like Wilt. You can make situations like “if her were playing today…”….”if Jordan played in the 60s…”…”Wilt was just bigger than anyone…” But that’s not reality.
    Wilt – Most dominating ever. As for greatest, I love MJ as much as the next, but his legacy has been bumped up on account of Nike and globalisation of basketball. 6 rings, yes…I agree. I squealed like a little girl for all his moments. But Wilt…the best.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.24 at 12:46 pm
    Kareem is the greatest center who’s ever lived.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.24 at 12:50 pm
    Not to discount Michael, but as everyone on these threads knows, Michael didnt’t win until certain Hall of Famers got old. This is fact.

  • Jackie Moon Posted: Apr.24 at 2:00 pm
    Thank you Stan Van Gundy. I now transfer Paul Pierce’s nickname to you. You are “The Truth”.

  • zeekthefreak Posted: Apr.24 at 2:10 pm
    if you think about the team aspect and how the game is played like that. John Stockton. To me no matter what you say Stockton is the best ever. On and off the court. He is what the logo should really be, what the face should be. Everything about MJ was about him. Stockton made everyone else notice the team, what basketball WAS really about.

  • matt Posted: Apr.24 at 3:14 pm
    stockton, the greatest ever? you’ve gotta be shi**ing me.

  • Clark Kent Posted: Apr.24 at 3:44 pm
    Stan may have a point. MJ was no doubt awesome, but he really was not that much better than guys like Bird, Magic and etc. I don’t care enough to have an opinion one way or the other, but it’s not clear cut that MJ was the greatest ever, regardless of what is universally accepted.

  • Chi-Town Stand up! Posted: Apr.24 at 4:56 pm
    @Jukai…U obviously know nothing about the game I coach and study more than u watch! MJ never missed the playoffs in his entire career! Who ever beat MJ when it mattered the most! The answer is no one! I’ll make u a deal…Name me one Superstar other than Jordan who has an undefeated Record in the Finals..other than the greatest power forward ever in Tim Duncan! MJ is definitely better than Magic cause he took a ring from him! Who can boast about being undefeated in the finals?
    @Michael Scorn.. Please stop mentioning Lebron cause like I said he already not only lost in the finals, but he got swept! How is he ever gonna be better? Seriously!!! I argue with facts not opinions! Ya’ll should try the same!

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.24 at 5:11 pm
    @Chi-TownStandUp: GET Them!!!!!! Get them HARD!!!!!! But Magic is still the greatest of all times. I’ll explain to you later.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.24 at 5:22 pm
    Chi-Town: Dwyane Wade and Ray Allen (and Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett) all have undefeated records in the finals this decade. So does Chauncey Billups. Hakeem Olajuwon is also 2/2 all time.

  • letsmotor Posted: Apr.24 at 6:14 pm
    @teddy-the-bear: 6 for 6 is a little different than 2 for 2. I agree with Stan, there’s no clear cut best player ever. The game has been blessed with a lot of great players. Still, if I had to choose, I’d say Jordan. He had all the fundamentals on offense, he was a great defender, and he was a winner who made everyone around him better. I’m not saying he’s definitely the best ever, but of all the names in this conversation, his would generate the least debate among people who know basketball. That probably counts for something?

  • Chi-Town Stand up! Posted: Apr.24 at 6:45 pm
    @Letsmotor thank u for stating what I alredy did in my previous post! Let me simplify it for everyone…MJ 6 for 6, name another superstar that can claim that they have an undefeated record in the finals with at least 6 rings or more! That disqualifies everyone, cause even the Celtics in the 60′s lost twice in the finals!

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.24 at 8:26 pm
    Jordan missed the playoffs in 2002 & 2003.

  • ai come back Posted: Apr.24 at 9:03 pm
    put shaq or hakeem on that 285 pound wilt and guranteed that he’ll be beat i mean for real shaqs HUGE I MEAN HUGE, now i kno wilts faster blah blah blah he can shoot better but in the post can anyone TRULY beat shaq, okay hakeems footwork is magical i mean seriously david robinson wulda been like wilt back then and hakeem, thoroughly schooled him hes just one to name but theres no one besides maybe shaq and ewing aroudnt hat time that was worth mentioning, Jordans scoring titles were better and honsetly , athleticism has changed like crazy since the frickin 60s considering that there was still racism back then even after mlk died…..the majority of the nba, the vast majority was white…..and i kno im stereotyping but black guys are just better…jordan kicked a$$ against magic and larry…i mean who else does taht wilts team had three all time greats and still couldnt beat russel, johnsons team had a.c. green, james worthy, magic,byron scott,etc. thats crazy ok? and to dominate in only 5 games? i mean really russels team was not aht great compared to wilt, rick, thurmond rite there is according to slams very own list numbers 2, 26?, and 39 respectiveley, how they cant beat the celtics is quite pathetic….idc how good russel cousy,and jones etc. were jordan on the other hand had one guy and only one yes hes the ultimate sidekick blah blah blah…but i mean one all star sides frickin horace grant whos obvioulsy nowehre near any of the other pfs that they had …….jordans scoring titles match wilts, his rings match wilts, his dominance, and his team play,van gundys just hatin on everyone……

  • zeekthefreak Posted: Apr.24 at 9:14 pm
    if the game was created as a team sport why is it only about one player? Stockton made it about everybody. Not only that, but he was a genuine guy. Did John ever, EVER boast about himself? He scored when needed and made every player on his team noticed when on the court. This is only in the team aspect, only. If you think of the greatest player who blows himself up in interviews, got HIV from too much sex, boasts about sleeping with too many women, gets traded for money and doesn’t play when he loses, whines to the referees, or all around steals the show to make himself look good because he may have scored 40 but still lost, THEN you have the rest of the players you guys (or girls) talk about.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.24 at 9:29 pm
    Magic defeated all of the greats of that generation. By the time Michael started winning, the last of the TRUE greats were old. Now, in the history of the game, no one has ever seen anything like Magic. We haven’t seen anything like him since him. Nobody in the annals of the League could do what he does at 6’9″. Put Magic on the blocks, he’s proved he’s a Hall of Famer. Put Jordan on the blocks… Jordan would have survived on the blocks????????????

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.24 at 9:38 pm
    There is no player in the history of the NBA who was consistently able to control the tempo and flow of a game from start to finish. We see players all the time who are the “next Michael Jordan”, and what not. We don’t see the “next Magic Johnson”. There will never be the “next Magic Johnson.” Magic was from another planet.

  • giogolo Posted: Apr.24 at 10:19 pm
    Y’ALL STFU.

  • Marco Posted: Apr.24 at 11:03 pm
    Big Shot Bob is 7-7

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.25 at 1:44 am
    Thank you Marco, forgot about that. I guess Robert Horry is the GOAT?

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.25 at 1:46 am
    @ zeekthefreak: Sorry, but we’re talking about game’s best player, not best person. If being a nice, modest, and charitable world citizen made you a better basketball player, Dikembe Mutombo would be the GOAT.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.25 at 1:49 am
    Although on the court Deke was crazy.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.25 at 1:58 am
    Bill Russell is without a doubt the best rebounder (along with Wilt) and defensive player ever. He is also the best player-coach ever.. lol.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.25 at 8:04 am
    @gigolo: I was wondering where you were at. Good to see you on these threads.

  • Justin Posted: Apr.25 at 8:07 am
    @Jukai: Pre first title win, you think anyone is winning titles with names like Dave Corzine or Orlando Woolridge on your team?
    Magic isn’t in the argument for one reason and one reason only. He took HIMSELF out of the running. Read his autobiography and you’ll see it yourself. Magic honestly believed he was in the same league as Michael until the ’92 Olympics but it was after one practice where he said he now knew who was the best, and it wasn’t even close. Larry Bird also called Michael the best…just not every night, which is a great way to put it.
    Ask yourselves this question. Looking back at those Bulls teams, if you replace MJ with any of the players you’re talking about, do they still win those 6 titles? Do they still win 72 games in one season? I think the answer is pretty clear that they do not.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.25 at 8:19 am
    Jordan didn’t win until Magic, Isiah, and Bird got old. Magic did say Jordan was the best, but Magic is an all time class guy. It’s good for business if he says that. He always knew how to make the money.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.25 at 8:21 am
    And during the Olympics, Jordan did say that Magic was at least the better leader. This is fact also.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.25 at 8:25 am
    Magic couldn’t publicly concede that he was better than Michael. Jordan was/is the most popular player in history. Bad business move TO THIS DAY if Magic were to finally admit he was better than Jordan.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.25 at 8:28 am
    And, Magic is so classy, if one were to ask if Barkley was better than Magic, Magic probably would respond with a “no comment”.

  • Justin Posted: Apr.25 at 9:13 am
    No he wouldn’t because that question would never be asked. It wasn’t just that those guys got old (I hardly call being 32 old), it’s that Michael and the Bulls got better. Also, they were better coached with a better system once Phil got there. It has nothing to do with business either. You don’t think Magic would have sold more books if it got out he had written he was better? People would want to see what else he had written.

  • Justin Posted: Apr.25 at 9:52 am
    And by the way, why do you use the “only won when people got old” when MJ was still winning at 36? Sorry, that excuse doesn’t hold water. And Hakeem only won because MJ was “retired”. Does anyone really think those Houston teams beat MJ? Doubtful

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.25 at 12:02 pm
    In 1995 Houston didn’t have to beat Jordan because Orlando already did. Houston swept Orlando, so that means they would have beat Jordan too.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.25 at 12:36 pm
    @Justin: in the NBA 32 years of age IS old. And as far Magic selling books, this is why he threw Isiah under the bus, because it’s better for business. He can’t “throw Michael under the bus”. He’s too much of an icon.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.25 at 12:41 pm
    @Justin: You are right about Jordan winning at age 36. But by then, there was no one in the League worth mentioning in the same breath as Michael Jordan. He had no choice BUT to win. If he didn’t win, he would have been the most overhyped player of all time.

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.25 at 3:05 pm
    Justin is right.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.25 at 4:14 pm
    Co-sign Michael 12:02. But I’m not sure when he’s not being sarcastic anymore.

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.25 at 5:49 pm
    @Teddy- I like to mix it up a little bit. I also love the fact that Jordan supporters act like 1995, 2002, & 2003 never happened.

  • ai come back Posted: Apr.25 at 9:46 pm
    @The Philosopher no he can throw isiah under cuz in all recent memories isiah was crap….mj himself if gonna tell u obviously taht he aint the best but thats just not the case….and if kareem won at the age of 40………@ michael scorn……no shi# everyones got bad years but u can give excuses for those years just like everyone else if u come up to me with an athlete who never messed up then hes eitehr cheating or outta this world and i mean litereally…if hakeem can beat the magic, and magic can beat the bulls, then the rockets can beat the bulls? so if seattle beats the rockets and the bulls beat the sonics…..then the bulls can beat the rockets………

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.25 at 10:40 pm
    @ai come back: Magic and Isiah, do you know their history? They practically grew up together. And, he STILL threw him under the bus. It HAD to be a business move. AND we all know Bird didn’t like Isiah, either. You feel me?

  • Michael Scorn Posted: Apr.25 at 10:57 pm
    @ai come back- someone here said Jordan never missed the playoffs, which is false. He missed in 2002 & 2003. I take 1995 back, that wasn’t his fault.

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.25 at 11:09 pm
    Chi-Town Stand up: Where do you coach buddy? Kindergardeners? Yer so clueless that this isn’t really worth my time, but if you ‘know the game’ so much, you know basketball is a team sport. jordan would get EMBARRASSED in the playoffs every year until he got a good coach and a good second fiddle in Pippen. No Phil and no Pippen? No championship. Would Jordan still be the best? I’d say. But one man can’t take on a team of twelve. Jordan’s accomplishments, albeit incredibly depressive, was still because of his TEAM.
    I’m calling BS. You’ve never played or coached basketball.
    Also, Russell never lost in the finals. The Celtics in the 60s never lost in the finals. And, incase you want to get ‘technical’ with me and say you didn’t mean the finals, you meant the playoffs, I’ll just remind you that the Celtics won 9 out of 10 times in the 60s.
    For someone who has ‘studied’ the game as much as yourself, you seem pretty damn clueless on BASIC BASKETBALL HISTORY.
    Thanks, have a good day.

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.25 at 11:23 pm
    @ai come back: I agree with you, I’d take Jordan over Wilt. Now, lemme correct your misconceptions:
    -Wilt, Barry, and Thurmond never played together. Good LORD that team would have been mint– although Chamberlain and Barry absolutely hated each other, so maybe not.
    -Chamberlain came into the league at 285. He was well over 300 during the height of his career. So, Shaq was only about ten, fifteen pounds heavier. Add Chamberlain’s ability to jump higher, better timing on blocking shots, and his superior speed, and I’d say Chamberlain was more of a match for Shaq in the post. Hakeem I think could school Chamberlain with some of his moves. On the other hand, not sure if Hakeem could really stop Wilt. All three, along with Abdul-Jabbar are on a similar plane to me.
    -Scottie Pippen was 27 on SLAM’s list. Just saying.
    @Justin: I think there is an ARGUMENT that Magic is better. Personally, I’d choose Jordan seven days a week and twice on Sunday. But I think there is an ‘argument.’ That argument, in my mind, is wrong. I don’t think there is really anyone else you can argue who is better than Jordan.
    But saying no one is on Jordan’s plane is ridiculous.

  • Lazarus Posted: Apr.26 at 1:07 am
    id take kareem or magic over mj anyday.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.26 at 1:51 am
    Magic averaged very nearly a tripple double during the greatest era in basketball history.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.26 at 2:40 am
    I still say Wilt is the best player to ever play the game. You can say stats are skewed from one era to the next, but when you average 50 ppg and 20 something rebounds in a season, score 100 points, and amass 78 triple doubles throughout your career, the numbers don’t lie.
    The only knock on Wilt’s legacy is that he “only” won 2 championships, like 2 chips aren’t a great enough accomplishment. Some people act like those two championships mean nothing.

  • Teddy-the-Bear Posted: Apr.26 at 2:41 am
    Also, I think you’re being too harsh on Chi-Town Stand up, Juks. No need to insult anyone here.

  • kevin armenta Posted: Apr.26 at 3:00 am
    Jordan changed his position forever.He changed basketball for ever.The game hasn’t been the same since.He made the whole world want to play basketball.All im hearing is Wilt,Kareem,Russell.There 6’10 and up.There are suppose to be dominant,there the biggest on the court.Mike was 6’6.He’s not even supposed to be mention in the same sentence as these cats.That just shows his GREATNESS.This is or should I say this was a big mans game until MICAEL JORDAN.The best player in the league is a gaurd or point forward whatever.He changed the way the game is played and influenced the whole world.

  • Justin Posted: Apr.26 at 4:12 am
    There are so many funny arguments here. Wilt was not the BEST. He was one of the most DOMINANT. There is a difference people. Who was the best offensive player at his position? Michael. Who was the best defensive player at his position? Michael. You guys are all taking one stat and making the argument for that person but overall skills, the intangibles, everything, there is no question that the best was Michael Jordan.
    @Jukai…You say Michael never wins with Scottie or Phil. Does Magic win without Kareem or James Worthy, or Pat Riley? Those types of arguments make no sense. Nobody wins without other great players on their team. Christ, the 60′s Celtics were stocked with Hall of Famers. They’d BETTER win with the lineup they had.
    As for Orlando beating Chicago in ’95…really? Are we really comparing an MJ who had 17 regular season games under his belt after a year and a half off to a “normal” MJ? Please. What was the difference between the team that Orlando beat and the team that got swept HANDILY the next year by the Bulls? Michael having a full season and the addition of Dennis Rodman instead of Pete Myers on the team. ‘Nuff said

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.26 at 4:42 am
    Teddy: The glove was thrown when he said he coached and studied more basketball than I’ve watched. If he’s gonna try and condescend like that, he better damn well get his history right.

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.26 at 4:45 am
    Justin: I only said Michael never won without Scottie or Phil to prove a point dude, the point you just flat out said in your rebuttal towards me. Nobody wins alone, success depends a lot on the talent around you. Jordan took that talent, made it better, and dominated. Had Jordan played with his crap 88 squad his entire life, is he any worse of a player?

  • kevin armenta Posted: Apr.26 at 4:53 am
    thank you justin!!! 23 GOAT

  • Justin Posted: Apr.26 at 7:27 am
    Philosopher, Magic and Isaiah’s friendship was pretty much done (at least in Magic’s eyes) when Isaiah made the comments he did about Magic’s HIV. Threw him under the bus? I’d say Isaiah lay down and pulled the bus on top of himself. Now there was an overrated player, especially in his eyes. I used to laugh so hard when he was commentating for NBC and he’d be putting himself on the same level as Michael, Magic, and Larry. Please! I also wouldn’t say that Michael had no choice but to win simply because of the players he played against. You’re calling the 80′s the best era because it has all these Hall of Famers. Well, part of it is because the players from the mid 90′s/early 2000′s are only now becoming eligible. I’m not arguing which era is better, by the way, as I do agree the 80′s was such great fundamental basketball and the 90′s was a clutch and grab fest. In my mind, it almost shows how great Michael was as he could adjust to any defense or style thrown at him. Look at Kobe right now. He’s had so many lapses in games where he doesn’t seem to care, he just can’t seem to head to that next level like Michael could when his shot wasn’t working. In the playoffs, you never saw Michael have 10 or 12 points, even in the early rounds. Against the Knicks he had one 3-18 game but he got to the line 12 times and got a triple double. Next night? Double nickel

  • Dacre Posted: Apr.26 at 8:23 am
    When ever i hear the name Michael Jordan…I just think straight to, Steve Nash.

  • Justin Posted: Apr.26 at 8:47 am
    Hahahahaha! One of the funniest commercials ever

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.26 at 9:55 am
    @Justin: Would Magic have referred Zeke to the Dolans in New York if they weren’t friends? You are right about Isiah’s reported questioning of certain things. But we are talking about childhood friends, here. For all we know, Isiah was showing genuine concern for his friend. Maybe not. At the end of the day, Magic Johnson has turned out to become a shrewd, hustling businessman. And, Isiah does throw himself under plenty of busses. But this one is different.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.26 at 10:05 am
    @Justin: And to touch on Isiah being overrated, it depends on to me, how one rates. He probably was overrated in his own eyes. But in reality, Isiah was the greatest “little” guard to ever play. He is one of two players in history to record over 1000 assists in one season. The great Michael Jordan had to go through Zeke. And it took him quite a while to beat Isiah.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.26 at 10:11 am
    @Justin: Jordan was great enough to adjust to the changing eras. You are right about that, too. But we must understand that guys weren’t even allowed to guard Michael Jordan. The League had to keep it’s golden goose the golden goose. I’m sure we all are aware of the “Jordan Rules”.

  • Come to New York, Carmelo! Posted: Apr.26 at 10:29 am
    MJ is the best basketball player the game has ever known. He is the one who nearly everyone repeats as being the G.O.A.T. Stan Van Gundy can’t even dunk the ball.

  • nbk Posted: Apr.26 at 1:29 pm
    @jukai – yes, much worse. (atleast he wouldn’t be the clear cut G.O.A.T.) He actually would be “worse” then Kobe in a lot of Laker Lovers minds, and we would have to listen to that BS all day everyday

  • onlyclipsfanonslam Posted: Apr.26 at 3:44 pm
    @philospopher you might be a little confused on what the Jordan rules actually are.. @everyone replying to this thread: most of you never saw Wilt, Russell, etc. play. I also bet most of you didn’t even get to see Magic or Bird in their primes. I am sure almost everyone saw Jordan in his prime. You can probably see what I’m getting at.

  • Alpha-bet Posted: Apr.26 at 3:57 pm
    I dont agree with everything SVG says, but he has a point here. Most of us on this site grew up in the Jordan era at it’s peek, so it’s pretty much hands down that he’s the greatest WE’VE ever seen.
    _
    It’s cats playin in the L now that wasn’t even BORN when Magic won his last title..So this generation of 24 hour promotion, info, internet and social networking that grew up on Jordan is gonna bombard you with MJ being G.O.A.T.
    _
    Not saying Mike dons’t deserve to be, he most likely his the greatest..but I’ve seen and heard from people who’ve played and follow ball pre-Jordan, and they say ‘not so fast’..i.e Bill Russell said Oscar is the greatest he’s ever seen, INCLUDING Jordan. I remember he said that in a interview with BIll Walton..

  • Justin Posted: Apr.27 at 3:40 am
    @Philospher…Wow, where to begin. The Jordan Rules were not about him getting calls. It was the name the Pistons gave for their defensive philosophy in regards to containing Jordan. It’s not that people weren’t allowed to guard him either, it’s that they COULDN’T. I would have loved to see him play in an era where there was no hand checking. It didn’t take Michael awhile to beat Isiah. It took the Bulls awhile to beat the Pistons. There’s a difference as for awhile, the Pistons were just better and Chicago didn’t respond well to the style of play. When they decided they were going to push back, that they weren’t going to be intimidated, that’s when you saw the Bulls crush the Pistons. Calling Isiah the best little guard ever is kind of funny too. Obviously you overrate him as much as Isiah overrated himself. I’ll take Stockton, Iverson, Pete Maravich, and Steve Nash any time before Isiah. @onlyclipsfanonslam…I saw Magic and Bird play in their primes. The choice is easy as they both readily admit.

  • Jukai Posted: Apr.27 at 4:38 am
    Justin: I will take Isiah before any of those guys, no way man!

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.27 at 10:14 am
    @Justin: My bad, I was referencing to the “unwritten Jordan Rules” that Steve Smith and too many other players to name had often spoke about, where a defender was virtually not allowed to touch Michael Jordan. And the only reason the Bulls finally defeated the Pistons was for the same reason every elite team declines. Age.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.27 at 10:22 am
    Justin: Jordan had pretty much the same core for a lot of years, you know? They were younger than the Pistons, not to keep harping on it, but… and you’re right again, the Bulls DID push back eventually. But again, the Pistons were OLD by then. When Isiah finally beat Bird, (my bad for continued usage of single star player comparisons)Bird was old too.

  • onlyclipsfanonslam Posted: Apr.27 at 5:35 pm
    @justin… I saw Bird and Magic play as well, but I never saw Wilt, or Russell, or Baylor, or etc. Don’t be so narrow minded

  • Justin Posted: Apr.28 at 3:13 am
    I don’t buy the age thing for a second. If anything, veteran teams always find more ways to win. Guys like Laimbeer, Isiah, Joe Dumars were no older than Michael, Pippen, and Rodman were. Maybe that is another example of Michael’s greatness, that he could will these teams to a lot of wins, even at 36 and later on at 39 and 40 for the Wizards but Pippen was still a great player at 34, and Rodman as well Jukai…are you crazy? You don’t think Steve Nash will go down in history as a better player than Isiah Thomas? Yes, Isiah won more titles but he had better teams for sure. Championships don’t mean one is individually better than another. Robert Horry and Steve Kerr are great examples of that

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.28 at 11:11 am
    @Justin: Steve Nash won’t go down as a better player than Isiah.

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.28 at 11:15 am
    @Justin: Laimbeer, and Isiah are older than Jordan. By a couple of years. Rodman is older than Jordan, too. Rodman is one year older than Isiah. Joe Dumars is around the same age as Jordan. Pippen and Horace Grant were the youngest out of that core group.

  • Justin Posted: Apr.29 at 5:22 am
    @Philosopher: By how many years were they all older? Not by much. When the Bulls finally got past the Pistons Jordan was 28 years old. Isiah and all those guys are not older by much (haven’t looked it up to know for sure but it sure isn’t by a lot)

  • The Philosopher Posted: Apr.29 at 10:00 am
    @Justin: Jordan, 1963. Isiah, 1961. Rodman, 1961. Dumars, 1963. Laimbeer, 1957. Pippen & Grant, 1965. James Edwards is around the same age is Laimbeer. So, by the time the Bulls got past the Pistons, the Pistons were a post – championship team in their 30′s.

Comments




The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.