Wednesday, May 12th, 2010 at 2:01 pm  |  104 responses

Throwing Rocks At The Throne

It’s time to ask yourself a serious question. What really matters to LeBron James?

by Bryan Crawford / @_BryanCrawford

We’ve seen this from LeBron James and the Cleveland Cavaliers before.

After the Cavs ran through the regular season like a run-away freight train and became everybody’s favorite to win it all last year, in June, I wrote a blog post about the way LeBron handled himself after the Cavs meltdown which led to them being eliminated by the Orlando Magic in six games.

NBA/In it, I was very critical of the Cavs and their arrogant sense of entitlement; the feeling that people were supposed to lie down because of who they were and what they accomplished during the season. I was also specifically critical of LeBron for not shaking hands and being congratulatory to the Magic considering he was named the MVP of the League. I felt that at the very least, he could’ve extended his hand to Dwight Howard with whom he’d just won a gold medal with the summer before.

Most people felt the incident wasn’t a big deal, other’s felt he behaved like a spoiled brat, but regardless of which side of the fence you were on, Bron got absolutely killed in the media for it. Deservingly so, I thought.

I’ve seen Michael Jordan shake hands with the Pistons in defeat. I’ve seen Magic Johnson congratulate the Pistons when Detroit beat them for the title, and I even saw LeBron congratulating Tim Duncan when the Spurs won their fourth title against the Cavs in ’07. So there was no excuse for what he did. But that was last year, and my hope then was that after the beating he took online and in print that he would grow from it and allow it to not only make him a better man, but also a better basketball player.

Fast forward to this year.

Once again, the Cleveland Cavaliers destroyed all comers during the regular season. Once again LeBron James was named MVP and had all of his teammates come up on stage with him during the ceremony (even though last year he bought them all Flipcams). And once again, we’ve seen the regular season champion and their most valuable player, stumble when it matters the most.

It’s like Groundhog Day.

When drawing comparisons between LeBron and the aforementioned current and future HOFers, a group that LeBron will one day find himself “officially” in the company of, I’ve never seen any of those guys not show up in a big game like his pitiful performance in Game 5. He’s said that his elbow is fine and that it isn’t bothering him, so there was no excuse for such a bad outing; especially not with so much on the line. And I’m not just talking about for the Cavaliers as a franchise, or the City of Cleveland, I’m talking about for LeBron James himself.

Remember, this was supposed to be his year. Especially according to the bandwagoners who only see what’s in front of them and seemingly have no recollection of the not-so-distant past. This was supposed to be the year that LeBron James won his first championship, making his launch into “super-ultra-megastar” status, official, or at least somewhat justifiable. One ring is better than no rings, right?

This was supposed to be an “I told you so” for people like myself who never bought into the whole “King James” movement in the first place. This was supposed to be the season that shut people like me up. I know this series is far from over, but it’s becoming more and more apparent that it’s a matter of when and not if, the Cavs get bounced from the post-season. And it looks as if we’re about to see more of the same from the King…of the regular season.

During last night’s press conference, I was sort of perplexed (and also a bit miffed) that after his team gets thumped by 32 points in a crucial Playoff game, at home no less, he would have the balls to point out, by his own count, that he’s only had “three bad games in seven years.” As ridiculous as that sounds (because it is), whether he counted last night’s debacle as bad game number three or four, it was the worst possible time for him to put up a performance like that and then just Kanye shrug it off like it was nothing.

Bill Russell, Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant, Tim Duncan, and even Shaquille O’Neal, his current teammate, would have never said or done something like that. Ever. Those guys would’ve been pissed and there would’ve been no doubt in anyone’s mind about how they felt about their own individual performance, but also with the outcome of the game. You would’ve walked away feeling confident that in the next game, somebody was going to be in trouble.

You didn’t get that from LeBron in his presser last night. If anything, you should’ve been left with more questions than answers. I know I was.

The way he hung his head and the attitude he showed should make people–even his bandwagoners–wonder exactly what it is that LeBron James cares about. Is being the best basketball player in the world and winning more championships than anybody else important to him? Or is being a billionaire, global icon and corporate pitchman higher on his Bucket List? While there’s nothing wrong with desiring either, what LeBron James doesn’t quite seem to understand is that the latter will be so much easier for him to achieve, if he just completes the former.

To whom much is given, even more is expected. That’s the place LeBron finds himself in now. He was given almost one-hundred million dollars before he even signed his first NBA contract. Russell, MJ, Kobe, Shaq, and Timmy all have60418245 more rings and they certainly aren’t dead, yet the people of Cleveland and the entire basketball world it seems, crowned him King before he’d done anything to even be considered basketball royalty, or to be placed on pedestal higher than the people I just named. He’s been given so much and even more has been put into him that now–rightfully so–people want a return on their investment.

Instead, it looks like LeBron is about to default on the loan again.

The only difference is this time, he’s going to find himself with bad credit and he’s going to have to do what most people with bad credit have to do when they want something of value.

He’s going to have to work for it.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , ,

  • Bruno

    that’s about time someone write things the way it is

  • Trout

    You have some very valid points but I would have written his obituary after he’s dead. You even say yourself that there are two games potentially to redeem himself so let’s see. Oh and I would like to point out that LeBron almost never writes stories about his greatness himself so he never annoited himself king … but he might just believe it.

  • bitmatt

    Pile on LeBron day marches on. Fair enough. But I hadn’t heard the infamous “five-game sweep” reference for those six games of the 2009 ECF before.

  • http://www.twitter.com/dfrance21 dfrance21

    Every time I get riled up about an underachieving athlete I have to step back and ask my self, “why do I care so much?” At the end of the day, what we think or say has no bearing on what they do. It really is JUST a game. Not a critique on your piece, it was well written. I’m just saying.

  • Trey

    Future HOFers not showing up? Uh…Kobe Bryant, Game 7, ’07 first round vs. Phx. 3 shots in the second half. It’s amazing how many people casually forget that

  • shazeh

    in response to trout:

    Lebron actually has “Chosen One” tattooed across his back!

  • Luke Wilson

    Didn’t the Cavs/Magic series last year go six games? How could that be a “Five-Game Sweep”?

  • underdog

    First of all co-sign Trout. “I know this series is far from over”. Well, you right. It isn’t. I’m rooting to the Celtics, because of none other than Sheed, but you can never write off LeBron. I’m almost sure he’ll have a monster game. And I’m not just not a fan of James, he is one of the few players I dislike in this league, but writing “now –rightfully so– people want a return on their investment” is a bit too much. You’re right LeBron become a superstar before made it to the NBA, but I’ve never heard him asking for the Nike and the other (max) contracts. Nike took a risk, the Cavaliers took a risk. So f*ck the “investors”, I think they all made a lot of money on LeBron. And saying that (I’m paraphrasing) LeBron didn’t work for his share is straight out nonsense. Correct me I’ve something misunderstood.

  • underdog

    Ooops, I’ve missed an ‘if’ in my last sentence.

  • peter

    Trey, no ones forgetting that…its actually been brought up in every single comments section regarding this topic. That was weird too, but it was a game 7, lakers were 7th seed who were supposed to be swept by the suns and shouldn’t have even been there, and they were down about 20 points at the half when he shut it down. It was almost a form of protest from Kobe. Even if they beat the Suns they had no chance at the title. Now why would Lebron choose arguably the most important game of this series to mail it in, when the Cavs are supposed to be the favourites to win the title this year? My opinion is, he just hasn’t found a way to play through bad games, so the whole team adopts his energy.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    My bad on the “Five-game sweep” reference. I misspoke. Fixed now. Thanks for pointing that out, guys.

  • Fat Lever

    “To whom much is given, even more is expected.” Awesome, awesome line Bryan and so true. I’m not going to criticize him just yet, this is the same guy that scored like 25 straight on the Pistons, when they were the best defensive team, to beat them(in that game, and effectively the series later on). But like the Large Professor said, “It’s about that time”.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @Underdog… Yes, you misunderstood. I wasn’t talking about actual money being invested. Yeah, everybody who’s put money in his pocket has got that back more than ten times over. No, I meant people investing their time and energy trying to convince others, as well as themselves, of how great he is. What kind of return have they gotten? A few highlights on Sportscenter, NBA TV, and YouTube?

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    That’s Luke 12:48 (the King James Version…lol)

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    Keep in mind people, I know that the Cavs can still get it together and win the whole thing. They’re certainly talent-laden and capable. But does anybody still think that they will?

  • LA Huey

    So are the same people who hate the “King” moniker (which was given due to his dominance in high school) share the same disdain for “Skip to My Lou” as a nickname for Rafer during his career in the L?

  • Kendrick is God

    a guy has one bad game and people start writing like this, god i love the US media!

  • underdog

    @Bryan Crawford ok, now it’s clear. Thanks for your answer. One more question if I may: What kind of return have the Stockton & Malone & Barkley & Mullin & etc. fans ever gotten? I mean, if somebody hop on the hype train, whose fault is the disappointment? Can we say, LeBron James is not trying hard enough? (I can’t believe I’m actually try ‘defend’ LeBron here…)

  • http://www.anwilson.blogspot.com rainman10

    And to think if the Cavaliers come back and win this series, they still have to get past the Magic and presumably the Lakers to get the ring. It’s still a long ways off.

  • LA Huey

    @Bryan, I understand the need for a basketball publication to comment on last night’s epic disappointment in both performance and conduct. However, the overall tone of the article seemed like a rushed indictment. To spit that kind of venom, I feel you at least have to let the series finish (less than a week’s wait). Unless, its the bitter/proud Bulls fan within that wrote the article. In which case, I retract this comment. =)

  • http://www.anwilson.blogspot.com rainman10

    To add to that, The Cavaliers have so far gone 6-4 in the playoffs. Assuming the opposition gets better as the playoffs progress, and it will for the winner of this series, are the Cavaliers capable of winning 10 of the next 16 possible games to win a championship?

  • http://www.yahoo.com christian wells

    i count myself as 1 of the biggest Lebron fans,i believe he’s the 2nd best player of all time behind MJ.(i base greatness on indiviual talent/ability)last nights performance was baffling all season and especially after game3 i’m thinking there’s no way boston can beat the cavs if lebron brings it like this every game of the series.his teammates feed off and thrive and are capable of beating better teams when he plays superb/mvp basketball…my reasonings on lastnites performance something off court was on his mind,or(conspiracy theory ALERT)the league is behind two bad performances from lebron and the cavs more money as long as the biggest name in the game is on tv(it’s even deeper than that 4now though i’ll leave it alone)

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @Underdog… You’re comparing apples to oranges now. Nobody has had as much “invested” in them as LeBron has. Nobody walked around predicting that John Stockton, Karl Malone, Charles Barkley, or guys like that would be the “greatest” anything. So that’s a little different. And as far as LeBron James not trying hard enough, well that just underscores my original point.

  • LA Huey

    @rainman10, you might want to ask the 2008 Celtics how their 8-6 record (0-6 on the road) through two rounds worked out.

  • riggs

    Either lebron goes off on friday, or the refs give him the game.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @LA Huey… I never said it was over and there’s a lot of basketball left to be played in the postseason. The Cavs knocking off the Bulls had nothing to do with it. I’m way past that and I’m not that kind of guy anyway. At the same time though, I’ve never bought into the Cavs and I want to be shut up and proved wrong. The last thing I am is a groupie. I’m not hopping on somebody’s bandwagon because everybody else is doing it. You have to show me something and until you do–keeping with the whole “King James” tone–consider me an unbeliever.

  • T-Money

    On the handshake thing: you’re basically lying. I’ve see Kobe and Dwyane Wade walk out after being eliminated without shaking hands. Magic and Larry Bird were quoted as saying that they didn’t see anything wrong with Bron not shaking hands. Look it up, do the research. / LeBron didn’t stumble when it mattered most last year, he actually played his best series ever vs Orlando. It’s incorrect to say ‘once again’. / Kobe has shrugged off terrible performances in the playoffs. Again, look it up. / The fact that Bryan is writing this article before the series is actually over leads me to believe he has an agenda. I’ve exchanged with him in the comments section after game 3 vs Bulls and he was already saying that Chicago would beat Cleveland. In short, he’s been waiting for this. Seriously, at this point I just want Bron to give two big eff you games to pseudo-journalists with already-written pieces. Since when is it cool for journalists to actually have biases like that instead of reporting what is actually happening? You can have a favorite team or a favorite player but just straight up hating on dudes? Where was Bryan’s article after LeBron’s superb game 3? Nowhere. He was waiting for a bad game. Did you have a draft of this article saved up on your hard drive already with tired non-issues like the handshake gate? I hope you’ll look stupid by the end of week.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @T-Money… I NEVER said the Bulls would beat Cleveland. I said they wouldn’t be swept. Now, you go and look that up and then get back to me. BTW, I WANT to look stupid. I WANT to be wrong. I’m not hating on LeBron, I’m just calling spades. There is no bias. As an athlete, I actually like the dude, but it’s bandwagon riding people like you that speak from an invisible reference point which then annoys me and causes me to point out certain things that people like you refuse to see. For example, what exactly do you have to draw upon which gives you confidence that LeBron and the Cavs will pull this thing out and go all the way to a championship? That’s right. You don’t. You’re just hoping it happens so people like myself can “look stupid by the end of the week.” Well guess what? I’m hoping it happens too. But I have a much more “real” frame of reference to draw from when I say that I doubt that it will. But as always, thanks for reading and chiming in. Your comments, while worthless, are always appreciated here.

  • http://www.twitter.com/dfrance21 DFrance21

    @LA I don’t see how you can compare the nickname “The King” to “Skip”. But I agree with you, let the series end before sticking a fork in the Cavs because in a months time the story can become “Remember when Lebron stunk that game up on his way to the title?”

  • T-Money

    Bryan, you are a joke of a writer. You didn’t do the research before writing this article. And that seems to be a common theme judging from what you’ve posted on this website. Everyone that disagrees with you on Bron is considered a bandwagon fan. That’s how you argue, I’ve seen it. Like Don Quixote, you’re on a crusade against windmills against the ones who proclaim Bron to be the greatest ever. Only problem is those people don’t exist. Nobody said that his career, body of work was comparable to the all-time greats. What most rational analysts are saying is that he is the best player in the league right now. You tried to weasel your way out of that argument by making ridiculous distinctions between being the best player and the best basketball player. Hilarity ensued. / To say that Bron stunk up the joint yesterday is absolutely correct. To say that it defines his playoff career disregarding the superb series he has had against Orlando last year, Boston the year before, and Detroit the year before that is just dishonest. / I respect writers like Lang who give credit when credit is due and don’t always throw everything together (i.e., saying that bron is the best player while the lakers, to him, are still the best team). You will not write a positive article on Bron even if he wins the next two games. However, you’ll prolly write a follow up if he loses tomorrow. You’re a pseudo-journalist who writes like a fan. Unfortunately, that market has been cornered by Simmons already.

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    T-Money just facef’cked Bryan Crawford, I’ll sit back and wait for the gag-reflex. Crawford you are as ignorant to facts as you are arrogant towards the commentators. I hope SLAM cuts you lose sooner rather than later. You are simply not worthy.

    Best Regards,

    Lz – Cphfinest3 (long-time commentator / longer time reader)

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @T-Money… A joke of a writer? A pseudo-journalist? It’s all good. I’ll beedat. But I think I must be doing something right considering my writing does appear on this website and people like you come here and read my work. And if you think that people who proclaim LeBron James as the greatest ever don’t exist, I’ve got news for you dude. They do and they’re very REAL. I think you’re one of them, but if you really want proof, sign up for Twitter. You’ll find plenty of like-minded people to talk to. Also, am I not allowed to say that LeBron James is the best “player” and that the Lakers are the best “team”? What part of that is irrational and doesn’t make sense? I do give LeBron credit for being an amazing athlete and I will gladly write an article eating every venom-filled word I’ve written about LeBron James if and when he ever does win a title. But until then, I’m standing on mine and you can call me whatever you want. Just remember to spell my name right.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @Lz – Cphfindkhaksdkhasd-or-whatever-3… I’m not arrogant towards all commenters. Just ignorant ones. Nice to meet you. Come back soon. I’m here all the time.

  • LA Huey

    @DFrance21, my point about the nickname is that it was given due to his high school dominance. And it carried over into the league. LBJ-Haters all jump to the same conclusion of “King” should equal “dominating his world (read: the NBA)”.

  • T-Money

    Point of clarification: 1- I was applauding Lang for being able to make a distinction between individual and collective praises. 2- I have never EVER said that Bron is the greatest ever. What I say is that he is the best right now. That’s a baseless claim you’re making (I see a pattern here). 3- So you’re doing this for the 9-year olds on twitter saying Bron is the GOAT? That’s completely pointless. Like the ones saying that Bron is all muscle, no skills. 4- You lose, that article is basura.

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    ‘@Lz – Cphfindkhaksdkhasd-or-whatever-3… I’m not arrogant towards all commenters. Just ignorant ones. Nice to meet you. Come back soon. I’m here all the time.’ again with the arrogance Bryan. I’m not a ignorant commentator – ask your colleague Jake for instance. I just happen to think you are a mediocore writer not worthy of SLAM who acts out like a spoiled father’s son everytime someone disagrees with you – it’s just my opinions, I respect that you and others don’t share them. Good day to you.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @T-Money… 1- No need for applause, but I do the same thing. 2- I NEVER said that the Bulls would beat Cleveland either. A baseless claim made by you (I see a pattern as well). 3- I don’t do this for the 9-year-olds on Twitter that say that LeBron is the GOAT. I LOVE kids! Besides, there’s some grown people out there that say the same thing too. But if I have offended any 9-year-olds, please give them my apologies. 4. You read. You commented. Therefore, I win.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @Lz – Cphfindkhaksdkhasd-or-whatever-3… By saying you’re not an ignorant commenter, pretty much makes you an ignorant commenter, no? And whether you think I’m mediocre and not worthy of SLAM, doesn’t matter. Actually, that would reflect poorly on SLAM and considering they’ve been around since ’94, one could draw the conclusion that they have a pretty good handle on who’s worthy and who’s not worthy to represent them online and in print. I know I suck, and strictly for YOUR approval, everyday I’m working on getting better. So please, bear with me. Finally, I don’t act like a “spoiled father’s son everytime someone disagrees” with me (whatever that means), I’m very capable of having an intelligent debate back and forth. But when guys like you and T-Money come with insults, well…then I’m not nearly as nice. A good day to you as well, sir.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Oh, it’s on and poppin’ up in here!

  • http:slamonline.com Allenp

    Y’all should all chill on the personal insults.
    And, journalists always have opinions. They’re only supposed to share those opinions in commentaries, which this is, but often their personal biases and opinions leak through in all their work despite the reports to the contrary. It’s human nature.
    Anyway, I’m disappointed, but hopeful that we will see a basketball explosion for the ages in Game 6.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @Enigmatic… Yessir! Who doesn’t like a good party?

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    Allenp, you know me man. You and I have had our agreements as well as our differences. Have I ever made it personal with you? You’ve always been very respectful and your arguments have always been very well thought out. For the most part, we’ve agreed to disagree and maintain that level of respect that should exist between writer & commenter. But on this post I’ve been called a “liar”, a “joke”, a “peudo-journalist”, among other things, and I’ve been “f*ckfaced” with a pending “gag reflex” in the works. All because I wrote 1,000+ words on LeBron James that people (read: bandwagoners) disagreed with?

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    @Bryan – You know how we Ill-state cats do! Hey, commentators gonna have their opinions but for what it’s worth, being over 2,000 miles away from the 312, I enjoy reading your posts. It’s like being back home for real.

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    Bryan; first of all, me saying I’m not ignorant doesn’t necessarily make me ignorant – that’s very simple reasoning. I base that statement on the fact that I try to debate BBall etc. without going into name-calling mode. If people such as yourself disagree, so be it. But you will find few people around these parts that can attest to me throwing out ‘(insert star players name here) sucks’ comments. You are right; my opinion about your writing or worthiness doesn’t matter in the greater scheme of things, but you as well as I do know that if enough people agree (or maybe rather the right people agree) you will in fact be canned + you commenting on it, just goes to show that it do in fact matter, at least to you. SLAM may have a good handle on who is worthy, but all great organizations (like BBall players) make mistakes. So them being around since ´94 (I have been here for the whole ride) doesn’t necesarilly mean that they have never hired a bad writer, again childish reasoning on your part. The points you using sarcasm I’m fully aware of. Nobody is pretending that you need to get better for my approval, but I reckon you agree you need to work to get your readers approval. Sounds good that you are working to get better at writing and that you are capable of having a intelligent discussion, I’ll look forward to one day witnessing it. As for insults; I made a rather graphic methafore about T-Money owning you, and stated my opinions about your writing and manners – no name-calling, no insults – there is a big difference thought they taught you that in writing school. I understand that you take the critism personal since it’s your craft, but really being a blogger you should be more thick-skinned. Reread my posts; you will find no insults just opinions/critism about your writing/behaviour (and admittedly one very unflattering methafore). You can label me an ignorant or consider the points I make, that’s your choice, wont bother me either way.

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    *The points you MAKE using sarcasm I’m fully aware of.

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    If it makes you feel any better I apologize for the ‘gag-reflex’ methafore. It was a rather nasty way of saying that I think T-Money owned you in that arguement. Hope you accept my apology. My mother and BBall coach always said I had a foul mouth.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    ^^ and terrible spelling. It’s “metaphor”, dude. Other than that I ain’t got no beef with you, it was just bothering me is all.

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    If it makes you feel any better I apologize for the methafore. It was indeed a rather nasty way of saying that I thought T-Money owned you in the argument. Hope you except my apology, my mom (and BBall coach) always said I had a foul mouth. Anyways I’m out, have to go mingle with the wonderful São Paulo traffic. But will check in later to read your reply.

  • Lz – Cphfinest3

    Sorry for the double post and the bad spelling. I agree bad spelling is annoying.

  • dar

    *waiting for comment from Michael Scorn*

Advertisement