Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010 at 12:40 pm  |  16 responses

Point Guard Central

Why Chicago is arguably the nation’s top PG hotbed.

Tim Hardaway, Mo Cheeks & Tim Hardaway

by Peter A. Coclanis

Although several cities can make more or less plausible claims for being the point guard capital of the universe—New York, Baltimore-DC, Oakland and L.A. come immediately to mind—the case for Chicago seems pretty iron-clad, especially over the past 40 years or so. I’m not the only one feels this way either: In recent years sports writers ranging from Michael Cunningham to Mark Potash have argued similarly. Every year, it seems, a new cadre of points guards (and quasi point guards) haling from Chicagoland places well on the NBA Draft boards–this year we have Evan Turner, Sherron Collins, Jerome Randall and John Scheyer–and NBA rosters are sprinkled with playmakers from the Second City. This current list starts with Derrick Rose, of course, but also includes Will Bynum, Jannero Pargo and Shannon Brown. Then there is a guy down in Miami named Dwyane Wade, who also plays the point at times.

And the above list is only a start. Since the ‘70s some of the greatest point guards in the game have haled from the Chicago metro area. Think about it for a minute. There’s the pantheon of Chi guys: In temporal order, Mo Cheeks, Isiah Thomas and Tim Hardaway. But there’s a second level of quality PGs from the Windy City, too, ballers such as Quinn Buckner, Rickey Green—good enough to keep John Stockton on the bench at Utah for a couple of years–Doc Rivers and Kevin Porter, the last of whom, many forget, led the NBA in assists in ‘74-75, ‘77-78, ‘78-79 and ‘80-81.

To be sure, over the course of the same period, New York has produced some fine points as well, most notably, Nate Archibald, Mark Jackson, Kenny Smith (whom I once taught in a history class), Kenny Anderson, Rod Strickland and Stephon Marbury. That said, most knowledgeable students of basketball would agree that the top five or six PGs from Chicago—for the sake of argument, let’s say Isiah, Mo Cheeks, Tim Hardaway, Derrick Rose, Buckner and Porter—trump the group from Gotham. Easily. And New York’s reputation as a producer of top-flight point guards is sullied by overhyped busts such as Pearl Washington, Omar Cook and (likely) Sebastian Telfair.

DC has produced its share of points over the years—Dave Bing (now Mayor of Detroit), Johnny Dawkins, Sherman Douglas and Moochie Norris–and Baltimore has had its premium home boys, too: Muggsy Bogues, Sam Cassell, Juan Dixon (kind of) and, if we stretch Baltimore a bit to include Tacoma Park, Stevie Francis. Oakland has produced two terrific points—Gary Payton and Jason Kidd—and in recent years, we’ve seen a resurgence of the extended L.A. region as a progenitor of PGs: Baron Davis, Russell Westbrook (Long Beach) and, assuming a definition of L.A. broad enough to include Rancho Cucamonga, Darren Collison. At the end of the day, though, no matter how you cut it, Chicago rules.

But why? A number of analysts have suggested that it’s because PGs are by definition tough, and there is no place–and I mean no place—tougher than Chi-Town. I wrote this piece over the weekend of June 19-20 and the Chicago Tribune reported on June 21 that 38 Chicagoans had been shot that weekend. OK, gruesome enough, but there may be something else at work here, too. Chicago has always been a hierarchical, semi-authoritarian kind of place, a place where neither the factories that dominated the city’s economy for a century nor the Machine that ruled its political system for a similar period nor the mega-gangs that controlled the streets in much of the city brooked any criticism, much less disobedience. A place in other words where foremen, gangbangers, ward bosses and at times even precinct captains called the shots. Do as I say, in other words. Semi-authoritarian social orders such as this are tailor-made for leaders –or at least controllers–including those of the point-guard variety. Can anyone think of a better leader in college b-ball than Quinn Buckner? Better point guards, yes, but not a better leader. If you don’t believe me, ask the winningest coach in college- basketball history, Bob Knight, aka, The General. Indeed, as much as I like Derrick Rose—an amazing hoopster who has been my favorite player in the world since he was a sophomore at Simeon—I wish that he’d show a little more “Chicago” in his leadership style. Both the Bulls and the NBA would be the better for it.

Derrick Rose, Kevin Porter & Quinn Buckner

Peter A. Coclanis is Albert R. Newsome Distinguished Professor of History and Director of the Global Research Institute at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. He started at point guard at North Park Academy in Chicago in ’68-69, perhaps the principal reason the school ceased operations at the end of that academic year.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , ,

  • slamfan4life

    Hell yeah Chi-town

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Chi Town stand up! I also wish Rose showed more of the Chicago additude in his leadership and playing style. In high school, he had more of that patented Chicago “follow me or get the hell outta my way” style. But I think at Memphis he deffered more to his teammates, and he did the same his rookie year with the Bulls. He started to develop more as a leader his second year, but I really hope this next season coming up he can develop it even more. I don’t even care if we get LeBron, I STILL would want to see Rose say “this is MY team”. Great article, Peter. I just really hope Ronnie Fiels could’ve made that list too.

  • LB

    I still think the LA point guard pool is deeper than Chi Town’s RIGHT NOW. You forgot to mention Young Money, Brandon Jennings! He’s only one of the brightest young talents in the game! Dont forget Jrue Holiday, who is on the come up, and Jordan Farmar, who contributed to two championship teams. You also forgot to mention Dre Miller, a steady, dependable point who’s produced on every team he’s played for. And if you’re gonna count D-Wade as a point, I’m gonna include Gilbert Arenas. You dont even have to stretch to Rancho Cucomonga, whic isnt even in LA to find many great point guards. Chicago’s got the best individual talents in Derrick Rose and D-Wade, but the other point guards you mentioned are marginal players at best (Jon Scheyer? Come on, now!) L.A. has recently produced more star point guards than Chi-Town. And our’s come in all flavors too. We can be young and flashy, or we can be steady and fundamental. We’ve got pure points, and we’ve got combo guards that can stick a double nickle on you. We’ve got Baron Davis, Dre Miller, Gilbert Arenas, Brandon Jennings- guys how produced big numbers and moments for their squads.

  • Tyrone

    d-rose dat dude maynnnneee!!!!!!

  • Peter Coclanis

    LB: I take your point re Jennings. A major oversight on my part. He’s a real talent, and the other young guys you mention have potential. In my defense, I’d say the main point of the essay was the 40-year arc rather than relative PG talent pools in 2010. Peter Coclanis

  • Young C

    What about Philly????????

  • http://www.slamonline.com/online/category/blogs/san-dova-speak-easy/ San Dova

    Great stuff, sir :)

  • http://slamonline.com Chris Deaton

    Great perspective and history, Peter. Thanks for writing this. As an Indiana boy, I know of Quinn Buckner. And you’re right — he was a hard-nosed authority. It says a lot that a modest-scoring point guard was a top-ten pick. But I’m not sure if it’s in Rose’s nature to be that type of player. I’m vividly remembering NBA Draft analyses that called Rose some sort of PG/D-Wade hybrid, and because of that offensive skill set, he doesn’t have to adopt the “Chicago” definition of toughness to be effective. I think improvement in his play may depend upon becoming a better outside threat — if he can prove to be a ~35 percent shooter from three, he’d face some tighter D, making his slashing game and kicking ability all the more dangerous. That would up BOTH his scoring and assist numbers. Because of that, I still think he has a little ways to go to reach the Paul/D-Will/Nash echelon (I consider Rondo to be a different animal altogether) — and I’m not sure being a more assertive floor general will get him there. I think he’s a solid leader as it is. But it’s a good debate — and you raise some great points.

  • http://joeloholic.wordpress.com Joel O’s

    Hey, good piece, Peter. There’s a typo in “haling” (hailing) I think, however. And Rose should be fine, “Chicago-ness” or not, he leads by his actions, and that’s more important – his verbal leadership will only grow with time.

  • Saku 39

    I disagree that Chi is easily better than NYC, but NYC is definitely slipping.

  • Bigg Regg

    This is a good piece. Chicago got the best everything though. Get it right!! (j/k good job on the article)

  • Adrian Zapata

    This has nothing to do with PGs but…
    Chicago isn’t tough at all. I live on the border with Mexico, do you read the news at all? I think within 10 miles of my house there’s been at least 400 murders the last 16 months…. Now THATS tough.

  • Bdub

    Define tough? Does murder counts equal tough or desperate. I never really thought shooting some dude makes you tough. Cold maybe, desperate but not tough.

  • Slick Ric

    I dont know about tough but it makes adrian sound stupid arguing over who killed the most people.hella lame

  • unrel

    slick… i think he was being sarcastic..

  • NY Baller

    Ny Ball rules!!!!! like the the man said, look back in time. What city has repesented with all-stars and hall of famers from the get go? New York. Guys like
    Bob Cousy and Nate “tiny” Archibald, were doing it when Isiah Thomas, and Mo Cheecks were playing hide and seek. It runs very deep in NY. much love to all
    cities who produce greats, but sorry to inform you,
    NY takes the cake for producing PG’s/players in every era. Thank you

Advertisement