Monday, August 30th, 2010 at 9:00 am  |  106 responses

Brandon Jennings Against ‘Super Teams’

by Marcel Mutoni / @marcel_mutoni

The last few years, NBA teams have realized that the key to winning rings is to put together virtual All-Star squads. Boston did it, L.A. did the same thing, and now, Miami is the latest to hop on the bandwagon.

Players and teams who aren’t part of this trend are understandably unhappy with it, but not everyone speaks out. Brandon Jennings, however, is not one of those who doesn’t say what’s on his mind.

Taking a break from dancing to Lady Gaga, Jennings caught up with TMZ, and explained why he’s not a fan of these so-called “super teams”:

“Everybody’s trying to team up now to try to beat Kobe.” And after calling out Miami and Boston, dude continued, “So I guess me and Tyreke Evans and Stephen Curry should all call each other in the next two years and try to hook up and play on the same team.”

Jennings doesn’t think all the teaming up is good for the NBA — adding, “You lose all the competition.”

He may be against it now — or at least he says he is — but should the opportunity come along for Young Money to form or join a stacked team, does anyone truly believe he’d turn it down for the sake of “competition”? Riiiiiight.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    Uhm….dummy, you, Tyreke and Steph aren’t even in the same breath as LA’s, Miami’s or Boston’s top three guys. Keeping your Ga Ga roll going and gain some weight. Sometime’s it’s better not to say anything.

  • http://www.bluefont.com Hisham

    smh @ the gaga webcam dance.. sent shivers down my back

  • lupe

    Looks like BJ got a little sugar in his tank

  • larrylegend

    curry, reke and jennings on the same team…mhn, nellie should come back from forced retirement!

  • Overtime

    kid’s got a point

  • DDB

    Just a little sugar?

  • tavoris

    so what he’s a lil sweet. HE. IS. RIGHT. These superteams mark the beginning of the end of parity. It also makes the regular season that much more uninteresting.

  • http://slamonline.com Kap

    Dude has a lip ring…nuff said. @ Eboy Reke avg 20 5 5 only rook to do it since Bron. So he is somewhat in same breath as Mia and let me not bring up Jennings dropping 50+. Bc of the video lets not refer to the kid as BJ please…

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    tavoris, haven’t you been around here long enough to remember the conversations which were all about the old days of the NBA? The 60′s entirely consisted of Boston Celtic Finals appearances, in the 80′s, when only the Celtics and Lakers would wind up in the Finals year after year……how about the 90′s when the Bulls were in 6 of 10 finals….not good enough? How about the 2000′s…the Lakers in 5 finals, the Spurs in 4? Yeah, this is such a NEW circumstance. Parity has NEVER been associated with the NBA.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    Kap…..you’re not even allowed in this conversation after that silly comment. Stop yourself.

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    Eboy – what about regular season dominance though? And this is different to those Laker teams of the 80′s.
    Magic was drafted by L.A. He didnt make a choice in Free Agency to join a team and ‘stack it’. Same with Bird and the Celtics. Sure good role players signed with both, but they werent all-nba calibre guys like Garnett or James. This is different.
    Oh, and Shaq left the Magic but it wasnt like L.A was a powerhouse squad when he signed. Bryant was drafted/traded for by the Lakers, but again wasnt an established star (duh).
    The problem with all-nba guys leaving their respective teams is that it front loads the League. Cleveland will suck this year. Miami was a middle of the pack team last year, the Cavs were great. Now one is super great, the other sucks more than Shyla Styles (kids, dont google her).

  • http://slamonline.com Kap

    @Eboy…Lakers have represented the West 7 times this decade if 09-10 is still this decade. Spurs 3 times. That bit of info should allow me bk in the convo huh?

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    I’m kinda on the fence about it personally but thats just the argument.
    I’m also aware that Garnett was a sign and trade- but at least the Wolves got something back. K.G also chose the team he was traded to. The Cavs get.. Cap space?
    Ray Allen was a draft day trade and even then, the Celtics werent expected to make it through the 2nd round.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    Hursty, one of your examples has a gaping hole in it. Magic would NOT have come out of college if he didn’t know for sure he was going to get drafted by the Lakers to play with Kareem instead of being drafted by the Bulls and their group of nothing talents at the time(A couple of weeks ago there was a link up to the article that told the story from ESPN.com by way of an old LA Times article). Magic was the forerunner of this type of behavior in the NBA. Look for the article. It was around the time of the start of the ’91 NBA Finals.

  • http://slamonline.com Dave.

    > Dude has a lip ring…nuff said
    THESE DAMN KIDS THESE DAYS WITH THEIR DAMN JEWELRY!
    LOOK AT THOSE SIDEBURNS, HE LOOKS LIKE A WOMAN!

  • http://www.boogiewilliams.com Boing Dynasty

    “LOOK AT THOSE SIDEBURNS, HE LOOKS LIKE A WOMAN” – I dont even want to think about the type of women you associate with.

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    eboy – I’ll take your word for it since its late here and I dont really have any ‘point’ to prove haha. I think that pick actually belonged to Utah at one stage yeah? Not sure how ‘concrete’ the Lakers were on getting the no.1 pick though. Magic would have come out after that reason anyways, regardless of whoever drafted him I think.
    Do you disagree with any of my other points though?
    Ps-how different is what Magic did to what Kobe and Steve Francis eventally did? Making sure they went to/at least avoided playing for certain teams. And subsequently playing their rookie years on better squads than their original team. (the Hornets were decent though at that time though I think. Zo, Larry Johnson, Eddie Jones? My dates might be slightly off).

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    I’m assuming the Pause Police hasn’t been alerted to this video yet…

  • Fat Lever

    Boing, ahahahahah, that comment made me spit up some of my coffee. Well played.

  • http://www.slamonline.com J

    hursty.. Lebron would sign to miami anyway even if we didnt accept the offer.. and that cap will be very important because of the upcoming CBA. we also have miami’s draft picks which is high first round..

  • vtrobot

    del has/had a lip ring and he’s one of the greatest rappers of all time. that brandon/evans/curry team might need a little size too.

  • http://www.slamonline.com J

    also miami is now Lebron’s team. believe me. Just like 80′S lakers. Cap is Cap but that is Magic’s team.

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    J – I dont think I understand your point. Can you clarify please?

  • http://hibachi20.blogspot.com Moose

    Hursty/Eboy are the smartest posters here.

  • http://thosefishtacosarethetits.blogspot.com Boston_Blogg3r

    Wait… So the Celtics put together their current squad because they wanted to beat Kobe? I thought the Lakers became contenders months AFTER the Celtics started their run towards Banner 17.

  • http://www.hibachi20.blogspot.com Hursty

    Moose
    I always like to read AllenP’s comments. Jukai’s too. Especially how they structurally break dowm arguments to emphasise points. And occasionally (sp) annihilate other commenters with not just facts/strong opinion but with wit too. Thanks though. I’m also thinking you may have just meant this thread lol.

  • Mr. Robinson

    Philosopher is the real deal

  • http://www.slamonline.com J

    hursty that was a reply to your 9:48 comment.

  • http://www.slamonline.com J

    hursty that was a reply to your 9:48 comment. the cap space part.

  • drosefan

    The ring was fake. He lost a bet so he did it. People get so caught up in calling someone gay, it’s ridiculous. Brandon’s right though. It does do away with some of the competition and everyone is doing whatever they can to beat Kobe and the Lakers..too bad it still won’t work for at least one or two more seasons because the Lakers are still the best team.

  • http://www.slamonline.com J

    hursty its a reply to your 9:48 comment. the cap space part.

  • drosefan

    And the Heat are D-Wade’s team. LeBron had his team and he didn’t want it anymore, that’s part of the reason why he left. He doesn’t want the pressure of being the hands down number one guy. D-Wade has proven that he can be that guy. Fact.

  • tavoris

    Eboy-true, but the NBA was dying (as a brand) until Magic, Bird, and Michael saved it. The 60′s and 70′s were chock full of teams dissolving and moving from small markets, as they were unable to attract big players-or make money. We are headed right back down that road. to celebrate the lack of parity would also be to welcome the end of franchises like New Orleans, Memphis, Charlotte, Indiana, Denver, Minnesota, Milwaukee, etc.

  • tavoris

    I don’t know how long the Heat’s window will be, considering Wade is awfully close to hitting 30. also, if they don’t win this season, then how will they attract players in the era of the next CBA?

  • http://www.threadsandkicks.com.au Eduardo

    More super teams makes the NBA weaker and actually does a bad thing for the fans in the end, because if you’re a fan you’d rather wait for a super team to come to town now rather than watch a games with a couple of good players in different teams.

  • james

    he did that video cuz he lost a bet. and the lip ring is fake. you guys are dumb

  • Mo

    Drosefan:

    You can’t be serious right? “LeBron didn’t want the pressure of being handsdown the #1 guy?” C’mon son, it aint that dam hard to figure out. He left because he knew he’d never be surrounded with enough talent to win a championship in Cleveland. Has absolutely nothing to do with not wanting to be the #1 guy. So does that mean Wade doesn’t want to be the #1 guy either? Because he went and recruited LBJ to come to Miami. No, that’s silly. He chose Miami because that was the best basketball situation for all three of them. People kill me talking like Bron scared and sh*t. LA dam near got an allstar team over there, and Boston has the Rondo and the Big 3. Hell, let LeBron play with (dependable) talent for a change, every other contender is. Where he doesn’t have to make every single dam play just to win.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    I actually hope the lack of parity leads to contraction.
    Fewer teams means fewer roster spots, which means that fewer wack players get to play prominent roles, which means better product for me to watch. I like that.

  • tavoris

    @james-the presence or absence of sweetness in Jennings is unimportant to me.

  • http://slamonline.com Kap

    I’m just going by what I see and not what I hear.

  • Dagger

    Yeah, because super teams really ruined the league in the 80s and 90s . . . .

  • tavoris

    Allenp-I get the feeling you’re playing devil’s advocate for kicks and giggles.

  • tavoris

    @Dagger-the 80′s and 90′s were the beginning of an era of somewhat-parity in the NBA. It’s not like any team won 8 titles in a row anymore.

  • Ali

    B-Jenn mis me with the Vid kid! Let your skills do your talking young fella. Nuff said….

  • Uk

    They would be better off teaming up with the kings cuz they gave Demarcus cousins and they would atleast have a big man unlike the heat

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Tavoris
    Nah. I want competition. I would have preferred if Lebron went to Chicago, like I’ve said. But, if an offshoot of the super team movement is contraction, which I’ve long supported, then something good will have come from Lebron’s self-serving decision.
    I think we have too many teams in the league, and too often the basketball we get reflects the problems associated with a dilution of talent. Too many owners are just using their teams as status symbols or profit making ventures. They don’t care about actually developing talent or making good decisions. I say get rid of the teams that can’t survive, and let us have a better overall product to watch.
    Why don’t you like that prospect? I don’t really care if one team manages to dominate, but I want the regular season and playoffs to have a more similar level of play.

  • monkeyball

    I disagree that “super teams” necessarily destroy parity. The Celtics signed two HOF players a couple of years ago, but those guys all had to find ways to fit into their new situation. Lot of talent means lots of ego and more opportunities for bad chemistry. Remember the Hakeem-Barkley-Pippen Rockets of the late 90′s? Didn’t win a thing. Further, if Miami implodes, the East is wide open with the aging C’s and the shaky Magic.

  • tavoris

    @Allenp-I prefer competition, but I also enjoy watching basketball at all levels..good & bad.
    Right now, I can drive 3 hours and see the Knicks, Nets, Sixers, and Wizards. Contraction could mean the demise of the latter two franchises.

    Plus, the Clippers would still survive-and still suck. Plus, the Knicks are gonna suck as long as Dolan is around to keep trying to rehire Isiah Thomas.

  • The Philosopher

    Shout out @all of the money to be made this coming season!

  • LA Huey

    History says “super teams” are good for the league. I think its partly because if a team is even good enough to make the playoffs, there won’t be any lames in a key rotation (Farmar/Brown) and we won’t see sidekicks masquerading as 1st options (re: Joe Johnson). I wouldn’t be mad if the league contracted by about 4 teams. But I’m from Seattle so…

Advertisement