Thursday, September 23rd, 2010 at 11:00 am  |  130 responses

Power Players

SLAMOnline’s newest blogger, AllenP, ranks the 90′s best power forwards.

by Allen Powell

What makes a power forward special? Is it outstanding rebounding numbers or an insane scoring touch? How much weight should be given to players who make their name as defenders, or glue guys? Can you really be one of the dominant players in a decade if you only play for three, four or five years?

Some of the greatest power forwards of all-time either made their marks, or their debuts, in the 90’s. In addition to the names we all know and love, there are some other players whose stars shone brightly, if briefly. Take a gander at who got the job done.

Karl Malone

With all due respect, Charles Barkley sounds stupid whenever tries to leapfrog Karl Malone in the best power forward of all-time discussion.

Barkley had the shoes, commercials and video games, but it was Malone who was killing the game softly like Roberta Flack.

The statistics are mind-blowing. After averaging 31 and 11 at the start of the decade, Malone would never average fewer than 23 points for the next ten seasons, while typically supplying 10 boards and 3-4 assists. Before he retired, Malone had a legit shot to catch Kareem Abdul-Jabbar for the all-time scoring title.

But, to really appreciate Malone’s dominance it’s important to consider the weaknesses scouts initially saw in his game.

There were questions about his jump shot. Malone became the most dependable pick and pop player in the league. People wondered if he had the physical tools to thrive. Malone built himself into arguably the most impressive physical specimen in NBA history. Throughout his career, people wondered whether Malone was smart enough, polished enough or savvy enough to succeed. They forgot that the Mailman always delivers.

Charles Barkley

Before he became the butt of every fat joke on TNT, Charles Barkley was That Guy.

The guy who spit on little girls. The guy who ended bar fights with free trips through plate glass windows. The guy who had no problem reminding Americans that they needed to raise their kids, not him. And, the guy who gobbled rebounds and big men like they were Krispy Kreme donuts fresh out of the oven.

Barkley was the face of big men in the 90s, and he sent shockwaves through tcbarkleyhe League with every rim-rattling “Gorilla Dunk” or outlandish antic.

The Chuck Wagon’s really ridiculous numbers came in the 1980s when he was a wild man trying to fit in with the staid Sixers’ vets, but he was no slouch in the 90s. Regularly topping 23 points a game with 11 boards, Barkley’s only flaws were an indifference to defense, conditioning and decorum. On the 1992 Dream Team, Barkley was described by observers as a “force of nature.”

Call him Hurricane Chuck. Aye Bay, Bay.

Chris Webber

Chris Webber is underrated.

Think about it for a minute. Webber’s legacy, in many eyes, is one of failure. The infamous timeout as a Wolverine, the multiple choke jobs in Sacramento and the limping jump shot heavy debacles in Philadelphia, Detroit and Golden State. Some NBA fans have “heard” that Webber was once amazing, but many of them don’t really believe it.

Well run tell this: Chris Webber was the third best power forward in the 90’s, and honestly it wasn’t even close.

The numbers are stellar. Webber made it his business to average 20 points and 10 boards most years, but he also dished out 4.5 assists, 1.5 steals and 1.5 blocks. Yeah, the free throw shooting was ugly, but anybody who saw Webber hitting a cutting Vlade Divac with a behind-the-back pass from the post knows that was the only ugly part of Webber’s game.

Before his knees betrayed him, Webber had jump shots, baby hooks and pretty dimes in spades. And I’m not talking about Tyra Banks. Sure, he bumped heads with Don Nelson (Who hasn’t?) and disappointed fans in D.C. (Marijuana is a helluva drug), but there can be no question he was a dominant force in the 90s and into the 2000s.

Everybody hates who?

Dennis Rodman

This was the toughest spot to rank.

Shawn Kemp’s ridiculous alley-oops and crotch-grabbing antics are permanently ingrained in every 80’s baby’s brain. The tale of Derrick Coleman’s squandered potential is part of NBA lore.

But, it had to be The Worm.

Dennis Rodman is easily the most controversial player in NBA history, and that’s without discussing his wedding dress, tattoos and piercings. His game is enough to spark intense debates about what’s truly valuable, and how much weight should be given to “specialists.”

Rodman didn’t really score, only cracking double figures once. By the 90s he had bulked up, and even the pretense of caring about buckets was abandoned. But, Rodman’s elite rebounding and defense, along with his ability to ignite his team and provoke opposing players into horrible mistakes was astounding.

Most people remember Jordan stripping Malone before his iconic final shot. But what they don’t remember is Malone flopping horribly after the strip because Rodman had taken up residence in the Mailman’s mind and had him whining to the refs. Rodman never tantalized fans with superstar scoring potential, but he did force viewers to appreciate that there are other ways to dominate a game.

Now somebody get this man into the Hall of Fame.

Shawn Kemp

Was there a more beautiful sight in the 1990’s than watching Shawn Kemp take flight to cram through another off-target alley-oop from Gary Payton? Who didn’t marvel as Kemp trademarked the phrase “nuts on the nostrils” while emasculating plodding earthbound suckers trying to contain him?

Outside of the high wire act occurring nightly in Chicago, nothing compared.

Kemp made it rain when Weezy was still in magnet school. Before Allen Iverson hit the scene, Kemp and his classic Southside Houston bald fade embodied the hip-hop aesthetic on the hardwood. A prep-to-pro star before the elaborate support systems, Kemp’s game always maintained a rawness that made it even more appealing.

But, sometimes the memory can play tricks. Even with his descent into cocaine and obesity, Kemp has a stellar rep among fans, yet he only averaged 20 points for one season in his career. True, 19 points and 10 boards is still impressive, and Kemp was a terror facing up opposing power forwards and giving them his loosey-goosey crossover, but there is a clear separation between his game and the game of the true dominant players of his decade.

Turns out some things really are better on You Tube.

Derrick Coleman

Derrick Coleman had Game, and the capital “G” is intentional.

Handles, post moves, jumpers, rebounding and defense were all part of Coleman’s package, with a nasty streak for good measure. Most NBA analysts agree that there have been few more players talented than Coleman, and for once, they’re right.

So, what happened?

Life happened, or more accurately, the NBA life happened. Coleman exploded in his first five seasons in the League posting a silky smooth 20 and 10 most years, and even garnering an invite to embarrass foreigners in the 1994 World Championships.

But, Coleman’s game would steadily erode over the remainder of his career as the temptations and a foul attitude conspired to prevent him from joining the all-time greats. He began to rely far too much on jumpers, as evidenced by his plummeting shooting percentage, and spend way too much time at bars and steakhouses.

Coleman had all the tools to join the pantheon, he just didn’t seem that keen on using them.

Larry Johnson

Nobody made dunking in a dress and granny glasses look cooler than Larry Johnson.

Then again, who else tried it?

Grandmamma, as LJ was once known, had a game as exuberant as his gap-toothed smile, and if chronic back problems hadn’t robbed him of his explosiveness he could have easily been higher on this list.

Johnson was introduced to the public via a brash UNLV squad that was almost as racially divisive as O.J. Simpson, but when he got to the NBA all that angst disappeared. Johnson’s fun-loving attitude and ferocious game quickly made him a fan favorite and a nightmare for opposing coaches. Although undersized, Johnson would earn Rookie-of-the Year by punishing players on the block thanks to broad shoulders and a wide base. Plus, once he faced up on most big men, it was curtains thanks to an insane first step.

By the time he left Charlotte for New York, Johnson’s burst was gone, but thanks to an underrated understanding of the game and impeccable work ethic he was still a key cog in the last relevant Knicks teams. Remember Johnson hitting that ridiculous three pointer against Indiana that sent the Knicks to the 1999 Finals? The foul call was bogus, but the shot was still wet.

L.J.’s game was no fairy tale.

Juwan Howard

Biggie said “Mo’ money, mo’ problems” and Juwan Howard would probably agree.

After taking a year to prove that the Fab Five wasn’t all about Chris Webber, Howard was reunited with his former partner-in-shine when the Wizards picked him fifth in the 1994 Draft.

Sadly, the two big men would see their reunion marred by injuries, holdouts and arrests. Despite that, Howard’s first two seasons were stellar, particularly year two when he averaged 22 points and eight boards and was third team All-NBA.

However, that offseason the Bullets and Heat engaged in a bidding war for Howard’s services, with the Wizards ultimately making him the NBA’s first $100 million man. That contract, and circus surrounding his signing, would dog Howard for the rest of his career as he could never live up to the demands of being paid like “The Man.” Howard posted solid averages of about 18 and 8 for the next few years, but his career would be defined by his quiet intelligence more than a dominating game.

Kevin Willis

The man affectionately dubbed “T-Rex” because of his stubby and ridiculously cut arms is kind of a forgotten player.

Younger fans likely remember him solely as an old guy with a bad haircut on the Raptors and Spurs, but in his heyday Willis was a bonafide beast for the Atlanta Hawks banging alongside high-flyer Dominique Wilkins.

Willis bounced between the forward and center positions, but by the 90’s he had cemented himself as a terror on the glass averaging 15.5 boards in 1991, while managing to score 18 points a game. The only reason Willis isn’t ranked higher is because by the middle of the decade he had settled into the role of solid journeyman after a decade putting in work.

A lottery pick in the famed 1984 draft, Willis built his reputation on being in peak physical condition, which allowed him to contend with younger players into his 40s. Although he struggled with injuries at times, Willis was known as a rugged defender and locker room leader until he retired.

Clifford Robinson

Was Clifford Robinson a power forward? The incomparable Red Auerbach said it’s ridiculous to classify forwards as “small” or “power.” Mr. Celtic said the only important measure is if a player gets the job done.

Who can argue with Red?

Robinson doesn’t have the rebounding numbers of a power forward, nor does he have the shooting percentage. He’s known more for his three point shooting than his post moves, even though Robinson attempted fewer than 150 three pointers in his first five seasons combined. With his height, soft touch and lack of handle, Robinson was more Bob McAdoo than Grant Hill.

But, it would be idiotic to focus on what Uncle Cliffy couldn’t do, when there is so much he did well, starting with winning. Robinson only missed the playoffs once in his 18 year career, and he was a key cog off the bench for a Portland Trailblazer team that was a constant contender in the West. Robinson topped 20 points per game multiple times in his career, and is the oldest player to ever score 50 points.

Positions are overrated.

Kevin Garnett

Yes, Kevin Garnett was drafted in 1995. Yes, he came fresh out of high school and only averaged 10 points and 4 boards his rookie year.

So what? kg-twolves-pic

After a one-year to get his mind right, Garnett was putting up 17 and 8 on 50 percent shooting and by the end of the 90s he was a certified 23 and 12 with five assists, a block and a steal. There is a reason the Minnesota Timberwolves exploded the NBA salary structure to keep Da Kid around…

Including Garnett on this list meant a worthy power forward like Tom Gugliotta, Christian Laettner, Horace Grant, Antonio McDyess and Danny Manning couldn’t make the cut, but Garnett’s impact and numbers would not be denied. Three years removed from the prom he was among the best at his position, within five years he was arguably the best. His unique combination of size, speed, athleticism and heart have made him one of the most popular and wealthy NBA players ever. Even with the general douchery associated with Boston sports, Garnett maintains a certain level of respect.

The Big Ticket is worth the price of admission.

Allen Powell II is a reporter at the Times Picayune in New Orleans, La. A graduate of Howard University and the University of Maryland-College Park, he’s maintain an abiding love for basketball and SLAM Magazine since taping a picture of Tim Duncan sitting on a throne of basketballs to his bedroom wall. In fact, SLAM was the first magazine he ever subcribed to. “Highlights” doesn’t count since his parents paid for the subscription.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • Hussman25

    Flip flop CB 34/4 w/ Karl Malone and were good, otherwise another good post Allen! (My own personal bias)

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Hussman
    If you don’t mind, explain why you think Barkley was better. I used to be on that team, but now I’m not so I’d like to hear why you think Charles is the man.

  • http://slamonline.com Ben Osborne

    Yes sir, Allenp is officially in the building! We’re very glad to have him…should have a “Musings by the Mississippi” banner logo up by next week…

  • shaolin23

    the mail man always delivers…except on sunday (just ask scottie)

  • http://slamonline.com Maurice Bobb

    Nice work Allenp. Welcome aboard the SLAM train…

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    So it’s official, Tim Duncan is a C. And if not, he probably should’ve (definitely could’ve) replaced Cliff Robinson on this list. Also, I might be inclined to to move KG all the way up behind Chris Webber.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    Outside of that though, another solid list/rankings. Looking forward to some Hornets coverage too with the return of CP3 this season.

  • http://thephotoriot.com davidR

    congrats allen. great writing that makes for a great read.
    on a sidenote, man how crazy would it be to play fantasy bball in the 90s..

  • http://stapledesign.com Spaceship Jay

    Tim Duncan in his prime would destroy (did destroy?) half these dudes. Put him before or after Karl and your good; great article

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    I initially planned to put Duncan and KG on the list, but really couldn’t justify it with Duncan after only three years. KG was a stretch at four years.
    If I let three years count, then I would have had to take another look at McDyess, and Brad Daugherty.
    The biggest challenge with this list was deciding how to deal with injuries and people only playing a few years in the decade. After the top five, it was really difficult. Kinda of like the list for centers of the 90s.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Spaceship
    Wouldn’t you say Duncan’s prime was the 2000s?
    This list was solely about the 90s.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    Brad Daugherty was a center though. McDyess, I get. You probably could’ve gone Danny Manning (2x All-Star, 6th Man of the Year) to a degree, but like you said, that plays into the injury thing.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    I had Danny Manning on the list. Wrote the blurb and everything. Daughterty played some forward as well, though and before the back problems he was nice.
    I really wanted to put Gugs on the list though.
    I’m surprised more people aren’t upset about Rodman.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    This may be a perfect list.

  • http://Slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    That’s because Joakim’s not involved…

  • http://thephotoriot.com davidR

    allen,
    as good as rodman was in the 90s, it’s hard to place him above karl charles and chris. he had the numbers throughout the decade (although he finished the decade on a sour note), but he arguably didn’t get faulted into elite status until those 3 seasons with the bulls.

  • Hussman25

    @AllenP: I would love to, but my fingers and employer would not appreciate my time being taken away from my work (lol), but again it was just a personal choice, nothing to do w/ statistics or overall play. One point I will make Y i think CB was better was for part of the 90′s (90 to 92) Chuck did it all on his on in Philly, leading an overachieving sixers into the playoffs in 89-90 (the bump and thump era). In 92 Charles finally broke thru physically and w/ his game (If he wasnt traded I still believe he would have won MVP that season; physically and basketball wise he was @ his peak). From 92-95 in the Desert he finally had the team he always wanted. Now after his trade to Houston in 96 (i believe) he was still as dominant, but a steady does of women, alchohol and anger problems steadily broke chuck down (thus the Quad rupture in 99 & the reason Malone may have moved ahead of him as his Jazz closed out the decade in the Finals 2x and Malone winning an MVP and cheated of another). While this may push the debate to Malone’s favor, personally as a fan of Charles Wade Barkley, I can never call Karl the greatest PF of that era… Myself and Barkley share a common trate… Stubornness! (Again great write up Allen… I like this series. Will enjoy your SG list if and when complete.)

  • Hussman25

    *excuse the typo’s… Supervisor was on my @zz! LOL!

  • http://thephotoriot.com davidR

    plus, dennis was more a complimentary piece compared to the 3 that you ranked ahead of him who were all focal points (stars) of their teams

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    David
    I thought people would be pissed he’s ranked as high as he is, not that that would think he should be higher.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    Outside of KG, Dennis is the only one on this list with a championship, and he has several. It’s hard to argue against his spot.

  • MikeC.

    Cough…Charles Oakley!…cough…

  • http://thephotoriot.com davidR

    ahh, my fault haha. nah, i think we all recognize how important dennis is. i know there are a lot of people who would disagree with making dennis a HOFer, but i think there are more people who believe he should be in.
    i found it interesting that you opted not to point out any of rodman or LJs stats, but point out the avg’s or numbers of all the other PFs on the list

  • Hussman25

    Rodman’s a HOFer too! LJ’s place is abt right… From 91 to 95 he may have been top 3; but then the back went…

  • JTaylor21

    GREAT list AllenP, I cant argue with anything. It’s great that KMalone finally gets his just due because dude has just as much a case as TD and CB34 in the GPFOAT debate. Rings don’t mean SH*T when judging individual players.

  • http://thephotoriot.com davidR

    what craw said. i dont think anyone can argue that any of the players below dennis were better, especially considering dennis won 3 (4?) rings in the 90s, helped shut down #1 on this list, and played a vital part in those championships.

  • http://www.google.com/news BETCATS

    Allenp finally gets his own column. A bit of justice in an unjust world.

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @davidR: I wouldn’t go so far as to say that Dennis shut (or even helped shut) Karl down in the Finals those years. Karl still got his numbers and in some games, Dennis got flat-out torched. But DR didn’t make it easy for Karl, that’s for sure.

  • http://www.michaelcho.com M Cho

    Kudos to you on your new blog column. Looking forward to reading more.

  • http://www.need4sheed.com Tarzan Cooper

    Um wheres sheed? And minus twenty points for the a bay bay ish. Come on allen, youre better than that. SHEED!

  • MikeC.

    @JTaylor – Bosh has some miles to walk before he’s even in the discussion.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    I kind of like that Allen had a subscription to Highlights back in the day!

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    @Mikec: He was talking about Charles Barkley (CB34), not Bosh (CB4).

  • arjae828

    no charles oakley? really?…idk…he pumped fear into a lot of people in those days. Also, Chuck is better than the mailman. sick handles and passing ability (malone never had either) different style on the block (face up & blow by) but just as effective as malone. sure he didn’t wanna pump iron or run laps but once the weight cause him to lose a step he got in the gym and developed the trey ball. never choked in a big game. malone’s calling card (although unwarranted at times). Just based on raw athletic ability you gotta go with chuck. he was 6’4″ !!! he jumped higher than damn near everybody. quicker than some 2 guards. vision of a point –how he ran the break and dished while looking at the ball the entire time is still a mystery to me but damnit if those behind the back passes weren’t on point. Chuck is arguably the best college player of all time and def 1 of 1 as a basketball player. chuck hayes? al horford? ben wallace? … couldn’t see chuck on his worst day..2nd or 3rd best pf ever behind duncan & kg. on another note, why is KG never mentioned in the top 2 or 3? i don’t see how you can make an argument against him.

  • arjae828

    no charles oakley? really?…idk…he pumped fear into a lot of people in those days. Also, Chuck is better than the mailman. sick handles and passing ability (malone never had either) different style on the block (face up & blow by) but just as effective as malone. sure he didn’t wanna pump iron or run laps but once the weight caused him to lose a step he got in the gym and developed the trey ball. never choked in a big game –malone’s calling card (although unwarranted at times). Just based on raw athletic ability you gotta go with chuck. he was 6′4″ !!! he jumped higher than damn near everybody. quicker than some 2 guards. vision of a point –how he ran the break and dished while looking at the ball the entire time is still a mystery to me but damnit if those behind the back passes weren’t on point. Chuck is arguably the best college player of all time and def 1 of 1 as a basketball player. chuck hayes? al horford? ben wallace? … couldn’t see chuck on his worst day..2nd or 3rd best pf ever behind duncan & kg. on another note, why is KG never mentioned in the top 2 or 3? i don’t see how you can make an argument against him.

  • Cool Dude

    Anyone worth their basketball salt knows how valuable Rodman was. He was one of the main components for the Bad Boys defense and the 2nd 3peat.

  • http://thephotoriot.com davidR

    eboy, highlights were the isht!

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    ArJae
    Charles Oakley was a great, great role player in the 90s. He wasn’t one of the most dominant fours in the league. I considered him, but he didn’t make the cut.
    For those wondering, unlike with the points I didn’t just depend on my own memory to make this list.
    I thought about all the cats I could remember who played the four in that generation, looked up their stats and then gave them a base ranking based on those stats on a 1-5 system. Then, I went back and thought about their individual games, read some stuff about those I wasn’t as familiar with, and then tried to make a determination based on their impact and dominance.
    I didn’t include Duncan for the same reason Garnett is number 10. If this was the top ten all time, KG might make that cut, but not for the 90s. He only played five years, and he only really, really dominated for some of those years. But, the speed with which he made the leap considering the fact that he came straight from high school was amazing, to me at least. Same thing with Kemp, only Kemp had a whole decade to make his mark and really kind of plateaued at a certain point.
    I can see your argument for Barkley over Malone. Like I told Hussman, I always had Barkley over Malone on my lists, and maybe when you consider what Charles did in the 80s he beats him out careerwise. Maybe. But, in the 90s, Malone was simply better. He really just was.

  • JTaylor21

    Where do buffons get this idea that CB34 was 6-4, dude’s 6-6. Another fable fabricated by the media and fans to hype up 80s and 90s players even more. We know it was a great decade but get over it and stop living in the past.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Congrats to AllenP! I enjoyed this article and can’t wait to read more from you. But I really do think you should’ve put TD in here over KG. Yes, KG played more years in the 90′s but Duncan accomplished so much from 97-00 that his place on this list would be easily justifiable. Rookie of the Year and All-Defensive 2nd team his first year, All-NBA and All-Defensive 1st team and NBA Finals MVP his second year. All-NBA and All-Defensive 1st team again in ’99-00. He was an All-Star each year, and of course he won a championship. I’m saying quality over quantity here.

  • http://www.need4sheed.com Tarzan Cooper

    Cosign enigmatic(hows alaska?) but WHAT ABOUT SHEED?!

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    If you’ve ever seen Charles Barkley in person before, you’d easily and quickly be able to tell that he wasn’t 6-6. Player height in the NBA has been exaggerated for years. 6-4 is Barkley’s actual, real-life height and that’s what makes the things that he did and the way he dominated in the League so impressive. A 6-4 cat beasting dudes 6 to 8 inches taller than him, you don’t see that very often.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    @Tarzan – the days are getting darker and colder…thanks for asking.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Jukai has the picture that shows Barkley in his mugshot and he’s actually 6’7″ if you count the point in his head. Not to mention he had Iverson arms and insane hops.
    Now, 6’7″ is still short, so I dont understand the need to detract the other three inches.
    Tarzan
    I didn’t include Sheed because he diddn’t deserve it for his play in the 90s. His numbers were mediocre, and his game really didn’t blossom until he had a couple of years in Portland. And, while I’ve always been impressed with Sheed’s intelligence on and off the court, I haven’t been impressed with his anemic rebounding, penchant for jumpshots, and ridiculous techs.

  • price

    ho grant? oak?

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    So, 6-6 without the point, and I’m willing to bet he was rocking AF1′s that night because he always is whenever you see him (I’m almost positive they don’t make you remove your shoes for a mugshot) which gives him at least another what, inch, inch-and-a-half? So 6-5, roughly without shoes? Happy medium? I say this because I’ve met the dude before and he’s really not that tall. Defintely not as tall as say Kobe Bryant or LeBron James. And I’m not saying that I’m the only one here who has met him, but I can pretty much eyeball height on sight. And if we can all agree that even though he was undersized in comparison to his contemporaries and was still able to do some pretty amazing things in his career, his true height really doesn’t even matter at all.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Bryan
    It only matters when people give him a bunch of extra points because of it. I don’t like when people take a players deficiency and make that the deciding factor when comparing him to another player. That seems unjust.

  • thegggfunk

    Slam we got 50 “duncan greatest pf of all time” ?

  • larrylegend

    horace grant?

  • larrylegend

    oakley?

Advertisement