Thursday, October 14th, 2010 at 3:21 pm  |  231 responses

Michael Jordan: If I Played Today, I Could Have Scored 100

USA Today had a chance to ask Mike a few questions about NBA 2K11, which allows gamers to play as Michael Jordan in the ‘Jordan Challenges’ mode. Greatness commented on how he thinks the hand checking rule has made it easier for guards to score: “It’s less physical and the rules have changed, obviously. Based on these rules, if I had to play with my style of play, I’m pretty sure I would have fouled out or I would have been at the free throw line pretty often and I could have scored 100 points.”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , ,

  • http://www.nbaballhog.wordpress.com God in Basketball Shoes

    Jukai – out of interest, when did you start watching basketball and actually understand it, not just a kid watching with his dad or something?

    Also, Kobe scored his 81 when he had the physical gifts and the maturity to truly understand the nuances of the game. When was Jordan at this phase of his career? When he was playing baseball. We either have young athletic jordan, or mature Jordan posting up on the wings. It’s a shame we didn’t get to see more of the inbetween Jordan, circa ’93

  • http://Slamonline.com Nbk

    Michael Jordan did spend entire stretches of games driving to the basket. Intact here’s a quote from Tim Grover “with the way refs call games now and all the padding these guys wear Michael would average 40 or 50 a night if he wanted.” Grover trained Kobe before he went out and averaged 36 he trains LeBron. Michael was physically far superior to kobe bryant and was a much more dangerous offensive threat. Jukai are you crazy? Look at jordans numbers he averaged more points on a higher % shooting in every comparable year but the 36ppg season except Michael had a more impressive 37ppg year. Against tougher defenses with less rules enabling the offense to get wherever the expletive they want.

  • starky larky

    I think he can even drop 120, with Dwyane Wade on him. O.O

    look, I’m a kid from the 90s and I know my basketball well. This guy gets his ass beat up by teams every single night, but still finds a way to win.

    72-10 anyone?
    5 time MVP?
    6 NBA Championships?
    6 Finals MVPs?
    for a 6-6 guard?
    this guy was basketball itself in my youth!

  • jmat

    this is demented. mike has no idea what the hell he’s talking about. of course he can score 100 in a game, but only if that was a preseason game against 5 wnba players.

    yeah the games are much less physical now coz of the hand check and bump rules. but he couldn’t make it to 100 for 3 reasons:
    1. teams nowadays have a much much slower pace (except the suns, warriors)
    2. defensive schemes today are much more effective. ever wonder why teams today rarely make it to 120pts, unlike the 80′s and early 90′s?
    3. MJ can’t make more than 7 threes in a game

    MJ, you talkin silly

  • arjae828

    wait…people on here actually think the rest of the League has caught up to MJ?! Even in this era he’d be a top 5 athlete (if he were in his prime). Kobe’s not close ! Wade is close but a few inches too short. As gifted as LeBron is, he doesn’t move nearly as fluidly as MJ did. Yall need to go back at watch some MJ clips. Check the game where he dropped 60+ on the Celtics. The play where MJ is on the left baseline, Goes between his leg about four times then pulls up for a wet jumper right in Bird’s grill. LeBron could only dream of moving that fluidly. LeBron could def get 100 at some point in an 82 game season. The clips speak for themselves.

  • arjae828

    i didn’t even mention how they let you carry and travel now !!! MJ would be unstoppable !

  • http://safjdklf.com Jukai

    Wow.
    I had a small thesis response to nbk and God in Basketball Shoes and my browser crashed. Jesus.
    I’m sorry guys, you wont get a proper response. No way I’m retyping that. Sorry.
    The only thing I’ll retype is that I laugh at someone questioning my basketball knowledge when they say a 7’2, 275-315 pound man would be ‘undersized’ in today’s league (I’m laughing at you God in Basketball Shoes, incase you don’t know).
    Also, stop mentioning Jordan’s 69 points against the Cavs and his 63 points against the Celtics. Those were overtime and double overtime victories.
    Jordan’s highest output was 61 points in a non-overtime game. Man, I had such a freaking genius take on it, comparing Jordan’s 61 point game to Kobe’s 81 point game, and comparing three point potential for each player and how they operate and how fatigue takes things into effect… christ, it was genius. Sigh, alas, never meant to be.
    I’ll reiterate that I’ll be the first one to state that Jordan is WAY better than Kobe. But I think Jordan’s superiority rests in his far superior passing, his superior rebounding, and his better defense.
    I’ll again reiterate: do people really believe Jordan is 19 points better offensively than Kobe? That’s an honest question.

  • http://safjdklf.com Jukai

    MJ may hit 85, 90 in today’s age… the only way MJ would hit 100 points is if he shot 30% and lost the game. And people were fouling the other team to stop the clock.

  • D.Stokes

    Against the Nets or Clippers of today… Dr.J could score 100 next week. Come on lets not be stupid for the sake of being dumb.

  • JoeMaMa

    NBA Offense: Then and Now

    1984-85 2003-04 Change

    Points per game 110.8 93.4 -17.4
    Possessions/game 104.8 92.0 -12.8
    Points/possession 1.05 1.01 -.04
    Field-goal pct. 49.1 43.9 -5.2
    Free-throw pct. 76.4 75.2 -1.2
    3-point pct. 28.1 34.7 +6.6
    Off. Rebound pct. 32.9 28.7 -4.2
    FTA/FGA .330 .303 -.207
    Turnovers/possession .169 .154 -.015

  • http://www.redraidersports.com Nicolas Fleming

    If you don’t think that refs favored Jordan and let him get away with travels and carries, you are stupid. Remember the carry rule was caused by The Answer not the GOAT.

  • JoeMaMa

    hmmm. that formatting came out wrong. It said: NBA average scoring in 84/85 was 110.8 ppg/game. In 2003/04, 93.4. People talk about the physicality of the league in the 80s and 90s, but up until the early 90s, the league average for ppg was much higher than it is now. MJ was getting many of his points in the mid and late 80s, though he also got points when the defense of the 90s slowed things down. Basically, the league slowed down more in the early/mid 90s in terms of scoring, despite the belief that handchecking would open the game up. Handchecking was prominently used in the 80s during the high scoring years…showing that only the very best at handchecking were able to make a difference with it (Derek Harper, for one). Kobe came into the league when scoring was low, not high. Anyone who actually has seen 80s games knows how wide open they were. Jordan’s best chance to get 100 came at a time when league scoring was way higher, and during a time when he, personally, was all about scoring. He scored 37ppg when the league scoring average was 110ppg. He had his chance.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Once again Jukai, Jordan was a better more efficient SCORER then Kobe in a stricter, rougher, looser era in basketball. And everyone the pace of the game is not directly related to an individuals output. Like I showed before, personal scoring highs since michael retired have only gone up. David Robinson and his teammates purposefully got him 71 points on the last game of the regular season for him to win the scoring title. You don’t think in a game against the opening night goldenstate warriors 1992-93 mike could score 100 points if he had one of his dominant nights? I’m not saying he would, or without a doubt would have if he played in this generation and i don’t think anyone is crazy enough to guarantee something like that. But COULD he have done it? IMO if he was “feeling it” against the right team, and his teammates recognized the moment then yes without a doubt he COULD have scored 100.

  • JoeMaMa

    @nbk: there were enough nights against brutal teams that allowed 110+ppg. MJ wanted to get records like anyone else, and never let his foot off the gas pedal. There were nights when he demanded the ball everytime down the court. There WERE nights when he was feeling it against the right team, and his teammates DID get him the ball….but apparently not to the tune of 100, 90, 80, or 70. I’m stating facts. I love MJ, but he had about 5 years of his prime scoring years in the ridiculously high scoring, run n gun 80s when he could’ve, and didn’t. Case closed.

  • TP

    Forget all of the stupid Kobe/Jordan arguments.
    Just think about this. Really think about it:

    Mike averaged 37 points per game for 82 games one season (87-88, I think). 100 points is just a little over 2 and half times his average that year.

    Could a guy who average 15 points/game against 80s-90s defense go off for 40 points just once in a game today? It’s possible.

    Could a guy who average 25 points/game against 80s-90s defense go off for 65 points just once in a game today? It’s not impossible.

    Could a 25 year-old Michael Jordan (who average 37 points/game against 80s-90s defense) go off for 100 points just once in a game today?

    Sure.

    Seriously, this is a guy who scored 35 points in the first half of game 1 of the Finals in 1992…and he sat out something like 7 minutes in the 2nd quarter.

    In that half alone, he averaged something like 2 points/min. 48 minute game? 2 points/min? Do the math. It’s 96 points.

    If there is anyone in the history of the game not named Chamberlain who could do it again, it would be a 25 year-old hungry Jordan in the 2010 NBA.

  • http://safjdklf.com Jukai

    nbk: No.
    Jordan scored primarily on drives, he functioned closer to the basket. He also took smarter shots, he’d pass instead of taking shots double teamed.
    The former involves tougher, more exhausting shots: when you play pickup games and get tired, do you drive more or shoot more? Kobe is more of a jump shooter which uses up less energy, letting him play at a higher level for a longer period of time.
    The latter means Jordan shot at a higher clip cause he was able to win more games with his passing, which in my opinion is much better than Kobe’s. This will not increase Jordan’s scoring average.
    And people should stop saying “this is the guy who went for 35 points in the first half of a Finals game.” To my knowledge, that’s 70 points total… which is 30 points off the mark… and to my knowledge, the Blazers were probably the weakest defensive team of the five teams Jordan saw in the finals (maybe the Suns were weaker?).

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Once again for the 3rd time, as weird as it sounds defense was the reason for the faster pace. Shots were takin early in the clock, offenses were less complex, it was a take what you get type of game. Mike shot a lot granted but he didn’t shoot as much as everyone makes it seem, he shot right around or over 50% most his career. Look at Kobe. Plus now you have stretch fours (virtually absent from 80′s basketball) which would spread the court even more. Add in the rule changes that have been mentioned countlessly, and the quote from their trainer Tim Grover it’s pretty easy to come to a conclusion that Mike would have a legitimate shot on any established scoring record outside of kareems (due to longevity and big man effectiveness sans athleticism)

  • Kadavour

    ok, did some quick math and research. These #s are rough estimates though, but they paint the picture well enough.
    In the post-handchecking era of basketball there have been 9 60+ single player scoring output games. Those players averaged roughly
    FG: 23/39
    3pt: 7/14
    FT: 17/19
    Handchecking era averages are:
    FG: 28/45
    3pt: 1.5/3
    FT: 16/18
    As you can see, there isn’t much of a disparity in terms of getting to the line, and the shot attempts can be accounted for with possessions per game. the biggest difference is 3pt production with 7 3′s being the average amount needed to reach 60.
    Now Golden State led the league with possessions per games around 103. So assuming MJ played against GS’s atrocious defense, his team able to match GS’ possessions AND they got off a shot on EVERY possession, AND MJ got 60% of the attempts, AND he shoots 50%, AND gets to the line 25 times shooting 100% from there, that gets him abt 85pts.
    If it isn’t obvious, the zone regulations are exactly why we see such a spike in 3pt production in this era vs the handchecking era. While players are afforded the less restrictive perimeter guarding regulations, it is now legal to zone off areas so that penetrators are often faced with a second(oftentimes 3rd)defender who is designed to force pull up and perimeter shots. Simply stated, given the current trend of possessions per game, one would be hard pressed achieving 60+ without using the 3pt line. And given MJ’s 3pt shooting ability and the clip required to score 60+, it really is unfathomable to think that Money could score much more than 60 in today’s game given his style of play. 100 without a solid trey-game is just silly.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Jukai find proof ever that Jordan plays worse the more tired he gets or minutes he plays. There is no logic in your argument, Jordan dominated the defensive juggernaut celtics for essentially 5 quarters after sitting out most of the previous 8 months. He beat Utah with a 103 degree temperature. Once again his and loves trainer Tim Grover said Jordan is in a whole different league then Kobe physically. It’s a joke that your saying he couldn’t have done it, nobody is romanticizing or overexaggerating what he was. Your just taking raw unfiltered statistics that have no barring on individual numbers. And Kobe got his 81 by going to the line he didn’t do it relying on his jumpshot. And mike was streaky if you don’t know your history, just like Kobe. Except when mike was in his scoring prime he was sacrificing individual statistics for te triangle and championships. Because defense was too tough on an individual (Detroit) that said individual had to include his teammates.

  • Kadavour

    I mean, if MJ exploited today’s game to attack the hole there’s no way he scores 100. If he doesn’t, he never had the chops to score from outside and beyond the 3 as would be necessary to produce those gaudy numbers. It’s just not happening.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    And kadavour obviously Jordan would have had to have the best game of his career. He did have the ability to shoot – 6 threes in one half vs Portland. That performance against a championship caliber team is proof enough too me that in a different situation circa 992-1995 he could have had a 100 pt game in his own era.

  • JoeMaMa

    People have a misconception about NBA defenses of the 80s/early 90s. The 80s were a golden age of scoring, as I’ve shown. The Early 90s got tougher and scoring went down, but this has been over emphasized because it was being compared to the earlier era. Defense actually stayed at the same level throughout the 90s. In 2000/01, for example, NBA scoring was at 94 ppg. Subsequent seasons were at 95ppg, 95, 93, 97, 97, 98, 100, 100, and 100. Jordan would now be playing in a league with fewer possessions and points. It would be tougher for him to maintain his averages he had in the 80s, even in his prime, though I don’t doubt he could do it. But this cannot be emphasized enough: Jordan played during a time when scoring was HIGH, not low. HIGHER than now. MORE possessions. HIGHER FG%. (2-3 points higher). Does that sound like defenses were BETTER, or WORSE? Know your history. I’m a student of the game. But I also like to teach.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    His and kobes* trainer

  • Armando

    @Eboy.. can’t say I agree with your top 10 list. You’re omitting Frazier, Monroe, Kidd, Cousy and Wade from consideration at least (since yours is a SG AND PG list). How about: 1. Jordan 2. Johnson 3a. Robertson 3b. Bryant 5. West 6. Thomas 7. Stockton 8. Gervin 9. Wade 10. Frazier. HM: Drexler, Iverson, Kidd, Cousy, Nash, Monroe, Miller. Missing the cut: Allen, Richmond, Maravich, Dumars.

  • Armando

    Sorry, forgot Tiny Archibald!

  • Kadavour

    Mitch Richmond? wtf? He isn’t better than prime TMac

  • http://kb24.com Bigi

    I don’t think so. Maybe if he really really tried. The rules don’t make it that much easier, if what the old school players are saying were true then Kobe would be like a role player in the 70s. Teams are scoring less today than when Mike was still playing, cause the pace has slowed down. I think they are exaggerating about how it’s easy to score today, especially when people talk about Wilt. I don’t think he could score 20 ppg today. It’s still very tough scoring, they don’t play so fast anymore and not as much free throws. MJ could maybe score a 100 if he had the same kind of night Kobe had when he got 81 and if his only goal was to get a 100 points.

  • Anthony

    Why try to score 100 when you have Luc Longley on your team ?

  • scjustice

    MJ never faced a DOMINANT CENTER in his 6 CHAMPIONSHIP runs in the FINALS.

    Would he beat the ROCKETS with a PRIME HAKEEM OLAJUWON?

  • Anthony
  • KROD

    If Mike played against the Bobcats he could definitely score a 100pts…maybe 200!

  • KB8toSG8

    Missed the entire thread. Damn, I was too late. Anyways, for all the guys who think MJ can get 100…..3pt shooting. Before the 3pt-line was brought closer by 2 feet (to put it in context, Ron-Ron would’ve had the best 3pt shooting percentage :P ) was a terrible 28%. That’ll never bring you 100pts MJ. Never. Keep playing your videogames in which you can score easily even from 3pt land (My biggest gripe with 2k11…Jordan=God)

  • lazaruz

    so damn arrogant. dont understand why the media all over his d. wow. he is an a hole and had his teammates give up facets of ther game so he could do his thing………

  • smooth

    i dont think mj would score a 100 points in a game but i think he would average close to the fourties and be the best player in nba. but if lbj would quit acting like a bad ass shooter and atack the rim more often then he lbj would have alot of 60 point games when he played for cavs.

  • http://www.threadsandkicks.com.au/ Eduardo

    yeah he could have done it with todays style of play… this was a guy that averaged 37.1 points per game in a season.

  • smooth

    i dont know i just dont think he can do it even though the dfence was alot tougher back then but 100 points doesnt seem believable in this time

  • JoeMaMa

    Good lord, people, read my comments again. Scoring was up to 15ppg higher as a league average in the 80s and early 90s. Think about that. Jordan’s best scoring years came in this period of wide open, running basketball.

  • http://stapledesign.com Spaceship Jay

    Personally, I think it’s hilarious when jtaylor rants and beefs about the 80′s… Yet he wasn’t alive in the 80′s to experience anything first hand. Your credibility on anything prior to 2005 is sh+t kid, put the keyboard away. With the ref’s in Mike’s pocket and the increased sensitivity of what a foul is considered to be, Mike could have scored 100 easy in my opinion. Please don’t comment if you weren’t around for it though, it gets too silly around here.

  • http://www.twitter.com/Boston_Blogger Boston_Blogg3r

    Y’all realized he dropped 50 at 40, right?

  • http://www.twitter.com/Boston_Blogger Boston_Blogg3r

    Jordan in ’87 could have dropped 100 on 2006 defenses. That’s a really theoretical and conditional statement, but it’s also a very true one. Dude averaged over 37 points per, against tough and physical defenses. And to counter-argue the “3-point shot” point: MJ would LIVE at the free-throw line, because he played a game closer to the basket. He also had moves and knew how to finish after a foul.

  • bakers’-dozen

    David Thompson scored 79 as a 6’4″ guard with the Nuggets when the league was it’s MOST physical. The 70′s were harsh. If HE played today with those rules, he probably woudl have dropped 100 as well.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    NBK
    I’m going to leave the 100 debate alone. Just wanted to note this.
    Jordan shot a lot. Look at his shot attempts. They dwarf Kobe’s. I think Mike has like two seasons with over 2,000 shots attempted. That’s an astronomical amount of shots.

  • KB8toSG8

    @Boston Blogger

    43 Points in 18-30 From the Field shooting at 60% FG in 43 minutes at Age 40, 10 Rebounds, 3 Assists, 4 Steals, 1 Block 7-8 FT shooting at 87% FT

    Hmmmm…..he played for 43 min and shot 60% from the field. He played for 43 minutes!!! Do you honestly think that the old MJ could actually almost triple his productivity in the same time?!?! You my friend, need to think clearly.

    Same argument I made at dime mag.

  • http://ijustwantmynametolookbig.com Chukaz

    jordan’s feelin himself too much. He’s da lebron of his generation. 2guards were da size of pg durin his best days. think about it. jordan was a beast physically n he was 6’6 210. now a days that ain’t shit. baron davis is 4 inches shorter than that n he’s 30 lbs heavier. every sg in da league is mike’s size. in todays league he couldn’t averege 25 a game.

  • yaboy316

    bs

  • smooth

    david who yeah go back in that time and find how many 6’4 players there were not much even though the L didnt have 3 point line the d was weak all you had to do was run through there and lay it up

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Allen for his career yes he shot a boatload more shots then Kobe, but per game as the focal point of the offense they were right about even. FE in Kobe’s 35.4ppg season he shot 27 shot attempts a game. Michael averaged 37 on the same number of attempts. The best shooting % of Kobe Bryants career is 46.8%, that’s lower then michaels average career shooting % (49.7) by 2.9%. MJ and Kobe are not really comparable, Jordan’s career scoring average is higher then Kobe’s 3rd best season, and Michael played 2 seasons at the age of 38 and 39 after taking 3+ years off. The chances of mj scoring 100 in this day and age are very very low, but was it possible?

  • http://sdjfklf.com Jukai

    NBK: if you believe that driving to the basket isn’t more physically exhausting than taking jump shots, we’re done with this conversation.
    Kobe scored 81 mostly on jump shots and three pointers. Jordan has a more driving based oriented game. And yeah, Jordan scored 63 points on one of the toughest defenses in the history of the NBA, but it took him 2 extra quarters to get there.
    One again, Jordan’s highest scoring output was 61 in regulation, and he shot worse than Kobe and missed every single three pointer he took. Kobe and Jordan also took the same amount of free throws.
    So, really, it’s just not possible.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Jukai jordan dropped 35 in one half against portland, hit 6 threes. Its not impossible. And I was saying that Jordan could and did spend entire games driving to the basket. Not that it isn’t more exhausting. The fact that your saying it’s impossible is stupid. Dejuan Wagner scored 100 points in less than a full game in HS, if Jordan was feeling it and his team actively got him shots and helped get him open, in todays nba 100 is not IMPOSSIBLE. saying it is, is stupid – to say a player would definately have a 100 point game, or saying they could get 100 without actively pursuing it makes perfect sense, but to say its impossible just because Jordan didn’t have monster scoring games after 1990. If Kobe never scored 81 or 62 against dallas he wouldn’t even be in this conversation, and ya’ll would be saying him outscoring Jordan’s 69 or Robinsons 71 would be impossible. what’a joke, coming to a definitive answer on a hypothetical situation.

  • Justin

    JoeMaMa…there’s a flaw in your thinking though about how MJ had his chance in the scorer’s era of the 80′s. He only came into the league in ’83, missed most of ’84 and didn’t come into his physical prime until the late 80′s, early 90′s when the league WAS slowing down and becoming a LOT more physcial. You take ’89-92 Jordan, who took a pounding every night and still scored over 30 a night, in a system where Phil was preaching team play THROUGH Jordan and put that guy in a system like Phoenix and tell me he can’t go off for 100? Really? I also think people are underestimating how much the handcheck rule would have effected this. Nobody could guard him while handchecking. What makes you think they could guard him without that extra little help?
    @Jukai…In his prime, when did you ever see Michael tire? He didn’t. That was another thing that amazed his opponents, that no matter how much he was shooting or minutes played, the man did not get tired. He willed himself to keep going. And it’s not just that he played offense too, because he was determined to shut down his guy too which he did a lot more often than not.
    Whoever said Michael, when compared to Kobe’s 81 pt. game, couldn’t ever hit 7 3′s in a game apparently never saw the 6 in a half against Portland. He barely played the second half or you could have booked a bunch more that night

Advertisement