Thursday, April 14th, 2011 at 11:08 am  |  48 responses

Stephen A. Smith on the Playoffs, MVP Race

The ESPN Radio host talks Knicks, Heat, Derrick Rose and more.

SLAM: What do you think of the Spurs in the Playoffs?

SAS: They are to be respected. Anytime you got Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, Tony Parker with the other guys they have and the way Gregg Popovich has had them playing this year, which is nothing short of phenomenal, you can’t ignore them. You can’t dismiss them. I just think that at the end of the day their size really, really hurts them against the Los Angeles Lakers. I think they’ve got enough to beat Oklahoma City. I think they have enough to beat Dallas. But I think Dallas always gives them a hard way to go. I think Oklahoma City as well, but I know there’s no way on Earth they would beat the Lakers. I do not believe that for one second.

SLAM: All right, let’s talk about the MVP. Is Derrick Rose your MVP this year?

SAS: Yes he is, without question.

SLAM: What argument do you make for him over Dwight Howard or LeBron or anybody else?

SAS: I would put him over Howard. I think Howard deserves strong consideration because Orlando wouldn’t be much without him. And I know what he has to deal with but at the same time, they’ve been a 4-seed all year long. They spent some time at the 3 and the 2, but they’ve been a 4-seed. I think that ultimately Derrick Rose, and what he was able to do with Joakim Noah out, with Carlos Boozer out, with a rookie head coach and without a shooting guard, speaks to his greatness. And I just think right now he’s just dynamic. He’s a sensational athlete. He’s just big-time and there’s no question in my mind he, hands down, should be League MVP.

I think LeBron James, as great as he is, I think he’s down to third or fourth simply because that four- or five-game stretch when the ball was put in his hands in the closing moments, and he couldn’t get it done game after game after game, shows what he lacks. He’s a man child, he’s a superstar, we all know this. But he’s not a closer. That’s not what he is. That’s Dwyane Wade’s job. Which makes this, at the end of the day, still Dwyane Wade’s team. And I just think that because of that, on this particular team, he shouldn’t be considered League MVP because he doesn’t have to do for the Miami Heat what he had to do for the Cleveland Cavaliers those two times he walked away with League MVP honors.

SLAM: In regards to end-of-season voting for the MVP and other awards, do you feel that many of the folks who get to vote for it are making informed decisions and aren’t just going off of stats and any other information they have?

SAS: Well, first of all, I don’t really critique my colleagues that way. As a guy that’s been in this business. See, I understand that you have editors to answer to. They have editors and producers and bosses to answer to. And I’m very, very sensitive to that because there are so many occasions where things happen inside an office where the bureaucracy takes over and the politics dominate, and the person whose name is on the byline or whose name is the headliner for a radio show or whose name is plastered over the television screen, they have a minimal amount of power. But they’re the ones in front. So, I’m constantly guarded about my colleagues because of that. I’m sensitive to the fact that sometimes we got to take heat that we may not necessarily deserve because somebody else has made that decision. And that’s just the way it goes. I don’t critique my colleagues in that regard. If they say that’s what they believe, and they have a valid reason for why that is, they’re entitled to their opinion and I’m entitled to agree or disagree based on whatever opinion they express.

SLAM: I respect that. Let me put it this way. Should voting be transparent?

SAS: Absolutely, I definitely think it should be transparent. I definitely think we should know who voted for whom. For example, I found out this year I don’t have a vote. I’ve been voting all of these years but it turns out I had a vote because I was a beat writer and an NBA columnist in Philadelphia and then after that I was on all of the ESPN shows. But since I’m just doing radio right now, according to each city, each city is designated to have three people to vote on League MVP voting. You’re talking to a guy who’s been a national NBA insider and has covered the NBA for 14 years and suddenly I don’t have a vote. I mean, I was shocked by that and that’s the way it goes. I respect their policy. But I will tell you that it does need to be transparent because people are influenced by these votes. People are impacted by it because certain things come your way that are incredibly beneficial to your career and to you as an individual. And I think if people are going to sit there and say, “Well, I didn’t do X, Y and Z” we should know who they are and we should know why.

SLAM: I’ll leave you with this. LeBron James is constantly mentioned year after year as an MVP candidate. This went for Shaq and for Michael—some people felt as though they could’ve won the MVP every year because of how valuable they were. Do you agree with that sentiment?

SAS: Not always. There are times when it applies. I thought one year that Steve Nash got it, it clearly should have gone to Shaquille O’Neal. I mean, he was just that dominant. But a lot of times his talent and his dominance was taken for granted. So, there are times when that argument is applicable. There are other times when it’s just the easy way out, and that’s not necessarily the case. I’ll use Derrick Rose as the example. You look at Derrick Rose and Colin Cowherd was interviewing me earlier today, and he was talking about how Derrick Rose was shooting in the low 40 percent range at certain junctures during the season. And my point was that Dwight Howard is dunking on everybody. He’s bigger, he has muscles coming out of his ear lobes, he’s five feet away from the basket half the time—I would hope that he’s shooting near 60 percent most of the time. That’s not to take anything away from him. But clearly his size and his God-given girth has benefited him tremendously.

Derrick Rose has a different argument. He’s 6-2. His athleticism is off the charts. But his maturation, the maturation that has taken place with his game, speaks to itself. The fact that he’s playing under a rookie coach speaks to that. Then when you combine that and figure out that he’s without a shooting guard and—you have Carlos Boozer as a legitimate front line scorer—not to take away, but if you’re a point guard and you don’t have a shooting guard. And Joakim Noah and those boys are not necessarily scorers. But they play together, they play within themselves and when it’s all said and done they lean on Derrick Rose. I mean, to me, when you look at that, plus the injuries, and they’re not only in the Playoffs but in the aftermath of the celebration and the coronation before they even played a game in Miami, with Boston loading up with Shaq and Jermaine O’Neal and all of these other guys, they see all of this stuff happen. Yet Chicago quietly ascends to the number one seed in the Eastern Conference and quite possibly the entire the postseason and it’s all about Derrick Rose. We all know it. How can you deny him the League MVP honors?

SLAM: You make a good point. Is there anything else you want to add?

SAS: The one thing that I do want to say is this. I’m not being critical—please emphasize this—I’m not being critical of Chris Bosh in any way. He is what he is—a finesse player. And he’s very, very good. He’s a great player, but I got to tell you, if Carlos Boozer was in Miami instead of Chicago, all of these discussions would be meaningless. The Miami Heat would be en route to the Finals. New York wouldn’t stand a chance against them, Boston wouldn’t beat them, nobody would be able to mess with them. They don’t have a man child in the post to throw the ball to. And as a result, that makes life difficult for DWade and LeBron. And that is the reason why we have question marks about the Miami Heat. And that’s the one thing I wanted to say.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://pickandroll.tumblr.com/ airs

    3 pages of stephen a. smith is 2 and half pages too much.

  • R3tRO

    Honestly, this is how ifeel . Franchises are built off either Ceters or PointGuards . The 1 and the 5 spot . Which is exactly the positions Miami is lackin in, simple . Unless we can bring in a legit Point or Center well never have that oh-so-important ball distribution or defense for the other teams 1 (In a league where the ball is dominated at the 1 & 2)[Not hatin' on my dawg Bibby at all] and that low post presense well need in the playoffs to grind out those long games w/ easy points in the paint. Something that Bosh & Erick ‘Damp behind the ears’ will never get us.

  • http://www.double-technical.blogspot.com Zee!

    The truth has set Stephen A free. Everything he said in this interview was spot on.

  • IAMORANGE4EVER

    I don’t agree with SAS making Boozer that much better than Bosh. Get real.

  • IAMORANGE4EVER

    I don’t agree with SAS making Boozer that much better than Bosh. Get real.

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics lights out

    “But you cannot convince me to believe in a team that has the audacity to start Erick Dampier. I just won’t do it.” haha love it.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    They don’t start Dampier anymore.

  • ab40

    *insert useless extremely loud talking trying to look smart here*

  • MLK4Life

    The Heat are a three man team, period. LeBron and DWade will have to average 30 a piece just for them to have a chance to win. Not going to happen against the Bulls or Celtics. The rest of the players are subpar at best. The Bulls are much more balanced. Tougher as well. As are the Celtics.

  • http://pickandroll.tumblr.com/ airs

    ^haha, you forgot the condescending furrowed eyebrow

  • http://pickandroll.tumblr.com/ airs

    that was @ab40

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics lights out

    mlk4life makes a good point about the heat needing the players who aren’t the big three to step up. the bulls and the celtics will do everything they can to put the onus on the role players and not let the stars beat them (and they’ll be operating under the same defensive system that’s historically very good at doing this).

  • MLK4Life

    Stephen A is right on with his comments about LeBron too.

  • http://nobulljive.com Enigmatic

    I actually agree with his assessment of the Bulls, and have been saying the same thing here as well.
    I think the Bulls will go deep in the playoffs, but their lack of a solid 2-guard stops me short of predicting a title for them this year.
    Of course, I hope I’m wrong though!

  • http://pickandroll.tumblr.com/ airs

    this is why i don’t like Stephen A. – he usually states the obvious or what has been the popular opinion for most of the year and never says anything profound or different. cmon matic, we knew the bulls need a 2 guard, everybody does. but we’re just not yelling it and giving the crazy eyes while we say it.
    also, i didn’t read ALL of it cuz i already don’t like him, hehhh

  • http://slamonline.com/ Ryne Nelson

    No mention of Luol, though… He’s quite possibly put in his best season the L.

  • LeBron de Con

    My momma (and e-but-boy) say knock you out.

  • JTaylor21

    Of course he doesn’t mention Deng. He’s part of the masses that think DRose is the only reason the bulls are so good.

  • Flight

    I cannot believe I actually agree with Stephan A. Smith for most of his answers. Minus Boozer being that much better that Bosh. I really don’t think Boozer is much less of a finesse player than Bosh is.

  • T-Money

    Stephen A. makes a lot of good points but misses on some others. 1- Carlos Boozer LOOKS tougher than CB (and perception is very important it seems) but he actually isn’t. He’s a much worse defender, he rarely sacrifices his body and he doesn’t post up more often than Bosh does. He yells though. A lot. And he grunts too. 2- Derrick Rose’s height influencing his MVP pick is sad and laughable. Until short gards get 2.5 points for made lay ups this is completely irrelevant.

  • http://www.nba.com/celtics lights out

    i’m with you, t-money, especially on that last point. d-rose gets mvp over dwight because he’s smaller, therefore it’s tougher for him? i think d-rose gets mvp–to me, the fact that the bulls will have home court throughout the playoffs clinches it for him–but to say he deserves it because of his size is a joke.

  • JTaylor21

    I’m sorry bout 27ppg with 46% shooting doesn’t equate into being unstoppable on offense.
    ’86 MJ was unstoppable, ’71 Kareem was unstoppable, ’61/’62 Wilt was unstoppable, ’11 KD far from unstoppable.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    SA gets somethings right, and somethings are just weird. You take physical size into MVP consideration? wtf? Its about how productive you are on the court, not how much bigger you are then everyone else. And I tend to agree about Chicago, although I don’t think they re a SG away from “multiple” championships. If anything, this is their shot, cuz Miami is gonna be terrifying after this year. And Chicago is stretched out talent wise, they still got people to pay, and a drastically smaller CBA to deal with. So idk, I don’t feel as good about Chicago’s future as seemingly everyone else does.

  • http://twitter.com/BeezKneezy LA Huey

    Damn, I aint seen this much rational commenting in awhile here. I guess all it takes is an SAS post.
    @nbk, I agree with your comment about the Bulls. I think they’ll contend for the next few years but I don’t think they have much room to improve unless they get a Spurs-like steal in the draft for an SG.

  • Bruno

    carlos boozer dissapears in the playoffs just go and watch LA-Utah playoff series from last year and you’ll understand, watch Millsap and see he was the one battling Pau, Bynum and Lamar

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    I was nodding along, right up until the last part about Boozer.
    WTH, Stephen A.
    WTH

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    yeah I have no idea how you can say something like that about a guy who struggles against any playoff team with a defensive big over 6’9. And Bosh has been better every year of his career but 2, production/efficiency wise, if i’m not mistaken. So yeah, that made no sense to me either.

  • http://www.kylestack.com Kyle Stack

    Love the comments, everybody. But for the folks who say physical size doesn’t or shouldn’t factor into an MVP vote, I present you Steve Nash, back-to-back League MVP.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    his size had nothing to do with him getting MVP. Just like Shaq’s had nothing to do with him getting it, and LeBron, and MJ, and Tim Duncan, bill russel, karl malone, allen iverson, kobe bryant, wilt chamberlain, magic johnson, larry bird, moses malone and every MVP in league history. Size doesn’t play a role, it shouldn’t play a role, and its ridiculous to insinuate it does. Its about what you produce on the court, how much your team wins, and how important you are to that winning. (be it as a teammate (Nash), Scorer (Jordan), force (wilt) anything that encourages or aides winning)

  • T-Money

    kyle: there’s some of that, there was a lot of other factors as well. people that have been commenting on slam for a while know exactly what i’m talking about.

  • Jono

    @nbk Of course size counts, even if it’s extremely little. How could Shaq at his peak only deserve 1 MVP? I’m not saying Dwight should be this years MVP, DRose is hands down. That being said, people took Shaqs early dominance for granted and was something they continually expected. This will defintely apply to Dwight in the future. Even if he leads his team to a number one seed, if some media darling does almost as well and he’s a guard, that guy will have a fair shot too. It’s rubbish but big Arnold-built dudes will always be at a small disadvantage for the MVP unless they tear the rim down every night.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    People expected great things from great players. Not big players. Michael Jordan ONLY has 6 MVPs, and I say only because he was clearly the best player in the league for atleast 10 years. Kobe only has 1. Shaq literally only got jipped out of 1 MVP, and he came in 2nd in the voting, its not like people just passed him off. Size has no barring whatsoever, consistent dominance does. Like LeBron who will surely get overlooked a few times in his career, if he hasn’t been already. The MVP race is as much about the story as it is the perfomance, which is really why Nash got his 1st MVP, which is coincidentally the same year shaq got jipped. And it was about Phoenix’s record, not Steve Nash’s height.

  • http://nobulljive.com Enigmatic

    Actually, MJ had 5 MVPs.
    WTF…

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    my bad matic lol even further illustrates my point.

  • balher

    About this MVP business it goes to Derrick Rose period.
    Lets put the whole size thing out of the equation:

    1.
    Chicago had 20+ more wins than the previous season plus 1st seed (Magic 7 less wins and 4th seed from last years 2nd).

    2. D12′s offensive game relies on Magic three point shooting which more often than not.Yes he definitely effects the defensive end but his FT % makes him a liability.His post game is improving but he ain’t Hakeem or Shaq.
    D-Rose on the other hand basically has to beat the defense from up top.(While remaining out of foul trouble or baiting referees to give him technical fouls).

  • balher

    And if you had to build a team around either of these 2 which one would you choose?

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Dwight Howard, every day of every year. You win in the NBA with bigmen, you sell tickets with guards. (unless you have Michael Jordan, then you do both)

  • http://yahoo.com rudy

    Jeez, can that guy talk. It must have taken at least 3 or 4 hours to transcribe that interview.

  • http://www.kylestack.com Kyle Stack

    @rudy About two hours, almost straight-through. From the start of Lakers/Kings last night up to the start of overtime.

  • http://www.kylestack.com Kyle Stack

    @rudy Yes. About two hours, basically the entire regulation of the Lakers/Kings game last night.

  • http://yahoo.com rudy

    wow. I bet your recorder wants to kill it self now hahaha. hide all the sharp objects and liquid based substances.

  • http://Www.fiba.com Darksaber

    Jesus, so many words. As usual with SAS, some hits, some misses. Par for the course with blabbermouths like him. Nothing profound here.
    As for Nenad Krstic being soft: tell him that to his face, Stephen.
    He’s got a chair with your name on it. :-)

  • http://hoopistani.blogspot.com hoopistani

    This was a really good interview – and for the first time, I find myself agreeing with almost everything SAS said, from the Dampier criticism, to Wade being the Heat’s closer, to Boozer instead of Bosh in Miami

  • B

    To continue with Quite Frankly’s what-if comment about Boozer in Miami instead of Bosh–if Cleveland had kept Boozer in Lebron’s rookie year, LeBron would have never left and they would have a ring right now.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Dark
    Good point. Nenad is finesse, but not soft. That knee injury really messed up a promising career. I mean, dude wasn’t going to be a superstar, but I think he might have made an all-star game or two before the knee injury. He used to go the rim hard, but now he’s so slow all he can do is hit that jumper.

  • Riggs

    Allow me to pontificate.

  • r2j

    I agree with what Stephen Smith says but to an exstent. Luol Deng has been the forgotten hero in for the Bulls.

  • rayrae

    @airs :

    franchises built on 1 / 5?
    tell me how that applied to jordan’s bulls
    bird’s celtics
    duncan’s spurs

Advertisement