Wednesday, May 11th, 2011 at 2:40 pm  |  7 responses

Too Cool For School

These draft prospects should have decided they were too cool for school.

by Jeff Fox / @HoopsManifesto

Should they stay or should they go? That is the question tons of NCAA underclassman had to answer this past Sunday, which was the deadline for early entry candidates to withdraw their names from consideration for this June’s NBA Draft. And with the date being pushed ahead earlier and earlier every year, these players had limited time to make an educated decision on whether to leave their hat in the ring or to pick it up and return to school. So who made the right decision? First up, the players who should have decided that they were too cool for school.

Too Cool For School

(Players who didn’t enter the Draft but should have.)

Jared SullingerOhio State

Jared Sullinger is definitely too cool for school. After a dominant freshman season for the Buckeyes, the 6-8 power forward had a shot at going first overall this June (he probably wouldn’t have, but he would have been close to the top of the Draft). Instead he chose to return to Columbus for his sophomore season. While this is good news for college basketball fans (Buckeye fans in particular), it won’t do much to improve Sulinger’s stock, unless he plans on growing a couple of inches and becoming more athletic this season. Returning to school isn’t the best decision, in a basketball or business sense, for a player like Sullinger whose game is already mature beyond his years.

Perry JonesBaylor

While Perry Jones had a bit of an inconsistent freshman year with the Bears, he was another player who had a shot at being the first name out of David Stern’s mouth next month due to his immense potential. While there’s a good chance he will blossom his sophomore season and actually improve his draft standing, it’s a dangerous move to pass up on going in the top five and pocketing around $16 million over his first four years.

Harrison BarnesNorth Carolina

Yes, Harrison Barnes had a disappointing freshman season as a Tar Heel and, yes, he lost his projected position as the first overall pick, yet Barnes still should have entered this year’s Draft. Based on talent and potential alone he was assured to be a lottery pick (probably even higher than that) – why not get paid while you are developing your game? Returning to college is a gamble for Barnes — what becomes of his stock if he has another inconsistent season?

Terrence JonesKentucky

Terrence Jones is another player whose game should benefit from an additional year in college; however, he should have entered the Draft. First off, he looked to be a surefire lottery (possibly top-10) pick this year due to this being a weak Draft and Jones’ unique skillset. The other reason he should have decided he was too cool for school was because of the team he plays for — Kentucky. John Calipari plans on his star players only sticking around one year so he recruits and replaces them accordingly. Now Jones will have a uber-talented crop of frontcourt freshmen teammates (Anthony Davis, Michael Gilchrist, Kyle Wiltjer) to fight with for minutes and touches, which could have a real detrimental effect on his draft stock (especially when you consider that Davis and Gilchrist are both projected to go ahead of Jones in the 2012 NBA Draft).

Next Up: School is Cool, Fool — players who entered this year’s Draft who shouldn’t have.

Read more of Jeff Fox at The Hoops Manifesto and The MMA Manifesto.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , ,

  • Rigo Gonzalez Posted: May.11 at 3:05 pm
    I agree that Sullinger should’ve gone.
    Didn’t T. Jones return because his draft stock was falling, though?
    It’ll be really interesting to see what happens with Perry Jones.
    Ultimately, I agree he probably should have gone pro, but he has the chance to really polish his game, and perhaps not be as high a pick but have a better rookie season.
    Or he could fall out of the lottery altogether.

  • Jeff Fox Posted: May.11 at 5:20 pm
    Terrence Jones stock might not have been as high as it was at one point, but he was still in the lottery range. And, as I mentioned in the story, with all the frontcourt talent at Kentucky next year, he could get overshadowed.

  • spit hot fiyah Posted: May.12 at 7:28 am
    harrison barnes-higher than a lottery pick? what’s higher than a lottery pick, the lottery is 1-14 right

  • Joosh Posted: May.12 at 9:13 am
    dude all these players are amazing. but i guess they are encouraging education

  • Jeff Fox Posted: May.12 at 2:48 pm
    By “higher than a lottery pick” I basically just meant top 10 or even top 5. But, like you said, that is still considered a lottery pick.

  • Patrick Nolan Posted: May.14 at 8:52 pm
    Jeff I can’t disagree with you more when it comes to the Jones. If you think he could get over shadowed next year at UK then what do you think would happen if he went to the league. Grant it, I am biased and I bleed blue. Unpolished players heading to the league hurts both the NBA and college basketball. For example Hasheem Thabeet. If was up to me college hoops should be modeled like college baseball. If you think you can go pro out of high school then do it, but if you go to college you stay 3 years.

  • Dgib Posted: Jun.5 at 12:44 am
    I think yall are underestimating how much the possible upcoming lockout has effected these guys decisions. They don’t want to leave school and still be broke. Draft stock doesn’t matter with no contract

Comments




The comments section is a place to further discuss the topics in this post. Commenters who seek to accomplish any of the following may be banned: - Personally attack other commenters. - Make derogatory comments regarding race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexual orientation or religion. - Troll, or comment with the intention of creating problems. Trolling includes, but isn't limited to, baiting people to flame at you, encouraging people to leave the site, spamming and using alternate IDs.