Adrian Dantley: ‘George Karl Fired Me’
Differences between head coach George Karl and his assistant Adrian Dantley led to the Denver Nuggets not renewing Dantley’s contract, and things seem to have ended on a rather nasty note. From Denver Stiffs: “Oh, yeah, I’m done,’ Dantley said. ‘(Nuggets coach George Karl) fired me Friday.’ Messages left Sunday for Karl and Nuggets executive vice president of basketball operations Masai Ujiri were not immediately returned. ‘I got fired because I didn’t rotate on the bench,’ said Dantley, who was regarded as Karl’s lead assistant and filled in for Karl for the final 1 ½ months of the 2009-10 season when the head man was battling a form of throat cancer. NBA teams are allowed to have three assistants sit on the bench, with others having to sit behind it. Dantley, who always had sat on the bench, said Karl approached him early last season and requested he rotate along with other assistants either sitting on or behind the bench. Dantley said he sat behind the bench for the final 67 games of the regular season and during the playoffs and wouldn’t rotate to the front of the bench. Nuggets assistants Chad Iske, John Welch and Melvin Hunt sat on the bench for those games. ‘I didn’t rotate,’ said Dantley, an NBA star forward from 1976-2001 who was named in 2008 to the Hall of Fame. ‘I wasn’t going to rotate. If they (other assistants) want the publicity to sit up front, I don’t need the publicity… I got no problem not being seen on TV and sitting at the back of the bench … This had to do with a whole lot of backstabbing,’ Dantley said. ‘I got fired because I wouldn’t rotate. And people felt uncomfortable (about that).’ Dantley went 11-8 in games Karl missed late in the 2009-10 season due to cancer. With Dantley at the helm, the Nuggets were upset 4-2 in the first round of the playoffs to Utah … ‘What upset me is the loyalty you show to someone and you get screwed,’ Dantley said.”
LATEST NEWS & RUMORS
View all »- Ray Allen and Paul Pierce Say They Prefer the Quick Turnaround Between Series
- Report: Thunder and Spurs Executives are Strong Candidates for Magic GM Job
- NBA Fines Erik Spoelstra $25K For Criticizing Officiating
- Report: Hawks Not Talking Extension With Josh Smith
- Knicks Sign Mike Woodson to 3-Year Contract
- SLAM Radio: Epitaphs Out East
- Avery Bradley to Undergo Season-Ending Shoulder Surgery
- Jeff Van Gundy Blasts Orlando Magic for Handling of Stan Van Gundy’s Firing
- JR Smith Arrested in Miami Due to License, Then Released
- View All »

Is this not a little silly?
I’m saying…
As for Dantley’s part, pride only hurts.
It never helps.
If race isn’t a factor in Dantley’s firing, then why is he saying George Karl fired him? Does Karl have that much clout?
Besides, Karl is a known racist, anyway.
It may not be a race issue, and I may be wrong about that.
But given Karl’s history, don’t be surprised either way.
I’m just saying that if Dantley where white, things might have been handled differently.
I just try to read in between the lines.
Again, I could be wrong. And, I probably am wrong.
But…
Checkmate sir.
So what you’re arguing is that Karl would never be employed by the NBA if he was a racist, but Sterling can be a part owner of the NBA and be racist?
So, by your logic, the NBA could have a racist part owner making decisions about the course of the League, but would never actually employ a racist?
Do you realize how stupid you sound? Seriously, you made a horrible point, I let you know how horrible your point was. The smart decision would be to move on, and recognize that working for the NBA does not prevent you from being a racist in any way. That’s just horrible logic that you have ZERO proof to back up.
But, for the record, I am not co-signing Philosopher’s comment because I really don’t know about Karl. I think he’s an a-hole and shady, but I don’t know if he’s racist.
How many players in the NBA that has played for George Karl during their careers have credibility to you?
You didn’t answer my question.
So you’re unaware that Donald Sterling settled a federal housing discrimination suit for discriminating on blacks and Latinos at apartments he owns in Los Angeles?
You’re also unaware of his sordid history of racial comments?
And, as for accusations, the most famous one was by Elgin Baylor, although he lost his suit in that matter.
If you have to ask what proof I have of Donald Sterling being racist that tells leads me to question your grasp on the League’s history and its major players.
Which leads me to believe you’re just typing to see yourself type at this point.
@AllenP- I really was unaware of all those court cases, except for the Elgin Baylor one. My question now is to Sterlings fellow owners, How are you letting this guy remain an owner?
Then, there should be no argument.
Now, my advice to you (I mean no offense) is to partake in research.
I’ll even give you a hint.
Those Milwaukee Bucks teams…
David Aldridge had to put George Karl in his place not too long ago. Although, one can gather a plethora of an opinion on that one.
But, you know.
Do some more.
While doing so, study nbk’s comment @6:10p.m.
With love.
With love. lol
I’m just clowning at this point.
How does nbk’s comment show that he’s racist, he says he was trying to get his black assistant coach a head coaching job.
The reason I pointed out nbk’s comment is because, that was what I was referencing when I mentioned how D. Aldridge had to put G. Karl in his place.
In the meantime, I have to run some errands.
philosopher.view@gmail.com
You are kind of hitting the nail on the head.
Karl wanted HIS “Afro-American” to get the top spot.
Not another guy’s “Afro-American”.
You know, the old slave trading mentality..
But, I’m playing with Bird, right now. You know?
But, the fact that Karl was fighting for his WHITE assistant…
GREAT coach in the NBA. (sarcasm)
6:30p.m. comment was in reference to nbk’s 6:26p.m. comment.
LOL I’m a clown.
That man has some serious f*cking issues…
Just want to correct, that “David Aldridge” article about George Karl was all about how George Karl WASN’T racist, just dumb. So, you know, don’t know why Philo keeps commenting on an article defending George Karl.
Also, NBK, there’s only one definition of racism. If someone’s using it just to show a person that diferentiates black and white, he’s using it wrong.
Philo knows what the word means though, these George Karl rumors have been going around since his Bucks days.
The logic that nobody employed by the NBA could be racist, when it’s obvious that at least one owner in the NBA is a racist is poor logic. Period.
There is no argument there. How can you argue that a business run, in part, by a racist would be opposed to hiring somebody who is a racist? Where is the logically underpinning for that assertion?
I can’t believe y’all missed that point so completely.
I said no one employed by the NBA could be a “known” racist, huge difference.
Donald Sterling is a “known” racist by any fair measure.
He owns at team in the NBA, which makes him a part owner of the league.
So, you’re saying that a League with a “known” racist owner could not have a “known” racist employee.
But, then I’m sure you will quibble about the definition of “known” but oh well. It is what it is.
Comments