Friday, June 17th, 2011 at 3:53 pm  |  10 responses

NBA’s Evolving Relationship With Journalism

How our athletes are now celebrities.

This piece was part of a dissertation on Celebrity and the Changing Nature of Sports Journalism. Anyone with academic interest in the synergy between basketball players and the media will want to give his report a read.—Ed.

by Brandon Robinson / @ScoopB

Now more than ever before, sports stars are looked at as celebrities.

Adena Andrews, ESPN-W contributor, believes that athletes are celebrities because they are celebrated for what they do. “It doesn’t matter if you’re on stage on Broadway or on the court at Madison Square Garden, if you’re celebrated for what you do, you are a celebrity,” said Andrews.

With 24-hour news coverage and sites like Deadspin, TMZ and social media sites like Twitter and Facebook, being an athlete is a full time job that extends beyond the playing field.

“It makes it more of an uncomfortable reality of being a famous athlete in today’s modern media era where that stuff is more newsworthy than it used to be,” said AJ Daulerio, Deadspin’s editor-in-chief. “We live in a more public world and there seem to be mistakes that people make time and time again, especially in not being clear on who they’re texting with.”

Athletes attain celebrity status with endorsements, commercials and television guest appearances.

NBA Hall of Famer Charles Barkley’s 1990s Nike commercial embodied the notion that he was not a role model when he stated, “I’m not a role model… just because I dunk a basketball doesn’t mean I should raise your kids.”

This may sum up the thinking of many athletes today who simply want to do their jobs and go home. The tension associated with being both an athlete and a public figure or celebrity can be difficult.

In November 2009, one of Charles Barkley’s good friends, Tiger Woods backed his Cadillac Escalade SUV out of his suburban Orlando home and crashed into a fire hydrant. It was alleged that his wife ran outside with a golf club to break the passenger window to rescue Woods. After the accident, rumors surfaced on TMZ that Woods had been unfaithful to his wife and had multiple sexual partners.

“If Tiger Woods has a minor car accident at his house, he is immediately in a worldwide spotlight that crosses from the sports arena (ESPN, etc.) to the entertainment arena (TMZ) and on to the more mainstream news locations (CNN, The Today Show, etc.),” says Director of Media Relations of the Utah Jazz, Jonathan Rinehart.

People are fascinated with athletes as they are celebrities and this is reflected in the media coverage they receive. Joe DiMaggio married Marilyn Monroe but this did not, at the time, have the same “celebrity making” impact it might have in the modern media environment. This is why the synergy between Khloe Kardashian and Los Angeles Lakers forward Lamar Odom is worth examining.

Does celebrity overshadow sport and does it affect it? The answer is that they both mirror one another and some handle it better than others.

According to HW Wilson’s Celebrity Culture in the United States, “Many people fascinated by the rich and famous these days love scandal and gossip. The trashier it is, the better.”

“I think the constant media attention, cell phone pictures, etc. adds another layer of anxiety for athletes,” says former WNBC sports anchor Len Berman.

This fascination with getting the news first has turned into the sports version of Access Hollywood. It makes athletes nervous about public perception and how they carry themselves.

“Everyone has this perception of you already and you have to live up to it or you’ll get judged very fast,” says former Memphis Grizzlies guard Marcus Williams. “It’s hard to joke or say certain things without being looked at in the wrong way,” Williams added. “Kids look up to you so you have to watch the things you say, the way you act and even the things you wear—it’s all influential.”

What role do bloggers play in the changing media landscape of celebrity sports journalism?

At the end of the Cleveland Cavaliers’ season last year, rumors circulated on a blog that LeBron James’ mother, Gloria, had an inappropriate relationship with James’ former Cavalier teammate Delonte West. This blog post was given instant credibility as truth and was a hushed topic around the sports world.

“Things have definitely changed in the way athletes are covered and the amount of coverage they receive,” says Rinehart. “Obviously with the advent of the internet, ESPN, fantasy sports, and the 24-hour news cycles, there is much more focus on every minute detail of the lives and performance of every player on every team.”

It appears that traditional journalists in print and local TV have a certain journalistic integrity and filter, compared to some of the websites, sports radio hosts and new media.

“There are rags out there, some tabloids that just get the information whether it’s right or wrong and want to be the first to report it,” said WCBS sports anchor Otis Livingston. “You want to make sure that you’re not putting your station in danger and getting sued because you’ve said certain things and gone with the wrong information without backing it up with sources.”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • MikeC.

    Very interesting piece. I used to think that the Knicks’ media policy of not allowing a team member or member of the coaching staff to speak to the media without a PR rep on hand was way too much. I completely understand why that practice is in place now. Some media members are doing their jobs by asking questions related to the game, team and league. Others are just trying to find out who player X is putting his dingdong into, and how they can spin that into a big controversy. I’m going to do my part to slow down the spread of junk reporting like TMZ. Any gossipy crap that does not impact the actual sport will no longer get my “click of approval”. If Lebron farts in public, I don’t care. If Lebron comes back next season without a post move, that’s comment-worthy.

    Suggestion for SLAM: maybe make another section of the site to post the gossip/celebrity lifestyle stuff. There are some people that want to know about that, so it still has its place. Just separate the posts like “Lebron buys a new house” from actual basketball articles like the mock drafts and trade suggestions, etc.

  • http://www.basketballartistry.com Dave White

    I agree with what you’re saying Mike. I like watching the games, reading analysis about the games, teams, players, etc., but it stops there for me. Players should be allowed to live their lives without people sticking their noses into everything.

  • MikeC.

    Nobody else read this article and found it interesting? Wow. That says a lot about the attention span of most of this site’s visitors. Was the article too long? Too many big words?

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.l.brewer3 BlackPhantom

    I really liked the article. I thought it was very interesting.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    Nah, I sat down and read this whole thing and loved the article.
    Just didn’t really know how to comment on it.
    But it was a great read. SLAMOnline needs more epic pieces like this.

  • giogolo

    Interesting piece. The problems discussed in here between players and journalist has been the same all throughout the era’s and the answer has been their conclusion at the end. Everyone has to maintain a certain degree of professionalism. And cuban is right,there has to be a certain limit for media access to protect the players.

    Now tell me that this is gonna be followed? Highly doubt it. But remember, media is to the doctor here as the players are to the patients.they are in charge of reporting facts to a bigger group of people,the masses so they actually influence a lot of reactions and public perception in a major way more than the truth of what players did or not. So it’s you Slam that should be held more accountable into the relevance of your reports and should do a better job as what people have said here on the comments to comparmentalized what you deliver. Players,like patietns, can only be responsible to themselves basically. Media has more of the responsibility of taking care of the players and the information they put out by giving them atleast the respect of informing them what would be off the record during their conversations or any juicy info they get. atleast they have they should have the balls to inform that player beforehand before printing.

  • Quantumphysix

    Should be more basketball journalism on here more often. Love it!!

  • MikeC.

    Players have to be so much savvier than they used to be. It seems like back in the day, the writers had a line and if something a player said or did crossed that line, the writer just treated it as confidential and let the players be human beings. Unless of course the words or act were actually newsworthy and not just some gossipy crap. I’d love for things to be like they were about 15 years ago, when NBA athletes were famous, but not celebrities (if that makes sense). Players were allowed to get their wieners gobbled at strip clubs, testify in corruption trials *cough Patrick Ewing cough* and it was news for a couple days and then it was gone and those guys could go on with their lives. If Dwight Howard was even seen around a strip club, it would be a huge controversy. Let’s let people be people. Forget about gossipy trash and enjoy some boobies!

  • MikeC.

    @giogolo – I don’t necessarily view SLAM as needing to be held more accountable. SLAM is a business and their site drives revenue through advertisements on each story’s page. The more clicks an article gets, the more ad money comes in. We as readers need to speak with our ‘clicks’. Don’t click on gossipy crap articles any more. If they stop getting hits, they’ll stop generating money. If there’s no money to be made, those types of articles will die off. We’re the ones driving those kinds of articles by clicking on them in the first place.

  • giogolo

    @mike
    appreciate the thought MikeC..= ) i only used Slam as an example though who I really meant were the reporters and beat writers..and..those at TMZ. I guess we are all in it for the ride then..= ) It’s impossible not to click on those articles but ur suggestion again was good. Times are indeed changing and every innovation has it’s pros and cons. who wud have a thought a guy like me 3000 miles away cud learn such info even from slam’s comment section about things not included in the articles. decades ago it wuldnt be possible. So I guess it’s fair then, if bball players get to be celebrities and earn crzy amount of money they get to lose thier priv life. So does Media have the right to earn from them and $capitalize$ on their mistakes?

Advertisement