Friday, July 29th, 2011 at 12:57 pm  |  104 responses

Legend of the Ball

Larry Bird is one of the greatest to ever play the game.

Originally published in SLAM 118

by Alan Paul

The Legend of Larry Bird is so great that it’s easy to lose sight of the basketball player who helped revitalize the NBA while starring for the Celtics from 1979 to ’92. The NBA was at a low point, a distinctly minor major sport, when Bird and his doppelganger Magic Johnson came to the League after squaring off for the NCAA title in a hugely hyped and widely watched game. Bird and Magic immediately brightened the fortunes of professional hoops, revitalizing two of the NBA’s most storied franchises. In the years to come, Bird’s Celtics won three titles (’81, ’84, ’86) while Magic’s Lakers won five, in a gripping decade-long rivalry that captivated millions of old and new fans.

As a white man playing in the whitest of major American cities and starring in a game increasingly dominated by black men, Bird became a great white hope. Some thought he could do no wrong; others were sure that he could do no right. Many saw a symbol instead of a man and they viewed him on the court through this prism. And that is a shame, because it obscures the cold, hard facts of how great Bird was and how much fun it was to watch him play.

The remarkable numbers begin to tell the story: three consecutive MVPs, two-time Finals MVP, nine straight All-NBA first teams, career averages of 24.3 ppg, 10 rpg and 6.3 apg. But they are just the outline. Bird played with supreme confidence and his own kind of definitive, endless grace. He could control a game in every possible way—scoring, passing, rebounding or defending. Bird could score inside or out, break your will with a rebound in traffic, a thread-the-needle pass or an eyes-closed three pointer. And he played with a manic intensity and endless hustle. You couldn’t take your eyes off him.

Teamed in Boston with Kevin McHale and Robert Parish, Bird helped form one of the best frontlines ever. They peaked in ’85-86, going 67-15, including a 40-1 home record. They rampaged through the Playoffs that spring, going 15-3. Bird bagged a triple-double (29 points, 11 rebounds, 12 assists) in the Game 6 clincher against the Houston Rockets to win his third NBA Championship.

Bird was just 30 but he had a lot of mileage. He never won a fourth ring, but he was far from done. He averaged a career-high 29.9 points in ’87-88, and became the first Celtic to record a 40-20 game, with a 42-point, 20-rebound performance. The next year he had surgery to remove bone spurs in both heels and only played six games. He returned for 1989-90, averaging 24.3 ppg, but then his back began giving him problems. He played just 60 games in ’90-91 and 40 the following season after an operation failed to stop the pain from a swollen disc.

As co-captain of the original Dream Team in ’92, Bird helped the US win gold in Barcelona. A few weeks later, he retired. Having coached the Indiana Pacers to the NBA Finals in 2000, the 51-year-old Bird is now the team president. But when we got him on the phone, the convo stuck to the glory days.

SLAM: When did it first strike you that you had an opportunity to be really good at basketball?

BIRD: Not until I got to the pros.

SLAM:  That’s hard to believe.

BIRD: I really didn’t. I have always been confident in my skills and once the game got going I knew I was probably the best player on the floor most of the time whether it was junior high, high school or college. I knew I had control of the game. But I still didn’t know what it meant because I went to such a small high school and college.

SLAM: You started school at Indiana under Bob Knight and left in less than a month. Did you have a problem adjusting socially, academically or basketball-wise?

BIRD: It was all money. My parents couldn’t afford it. I had a free ride scholarship but I had no money for anything else, nothing to live on. My folks couldn’t give me any money at all, so I left after three or four weeks. It was tough. I went back to French Lick. I worked at a company that built motor homes and worked at a boys club and then for the town. I did that for a year and then went to Indiana State.

SLAM:  You won three rings in the NBA—was any one of them more memorable than the others?

BIRD: They all were memorable. Our ’86 team was probably the best and we knew it could be that from training camp on. But I don’t really remember the wins. I remember the losses. That’s what I carry with me. I always expected to win. I can remember ’87, when we lost to the Lakers in six after McHale got hurt. If he stayed healthy, maybe we win. We got beat in ’85 by them when we lost a home game we should have won. Them games stick out more than any of the wins. They stick in the gut.

SLAM: You once called the late Dennis Johnson your greatest teammate. Why did you like playing with him so much?

BIRD: I called him one of my greatest teammates, and it was because DJ was just special, a two guard who could get the ball up the court, hit a shot or find an open man and defend anyone. But what really elevated him was the fact that in big games, he was always the guy who had the ball in his hand while also guarding their best player. During the regular season he always did well but in the Playoffs he stepped it up and the bigger the game, the more ready he was to go. I really respected that. Me and DJ had a bond. I sort of knew what he was thinking and I just loved playing with him from the moment he arrived in Boston [in ’83].

SLAM: One of the great examples of your chemistry was when you broke the hearts of every Pistons fan and Celtics hater in the world, stealing the ball from Isiah Thomas and passing to DJ for the winning layup in Game 5 of the ’87 Eastern Finals, just when you seemed about to pass the torch to Detroit.

BIRD: [Laughs] It was just a reaction play. Them things happen so fast that you don’t have time to think it out. I was getting ready to go foul Laimbeer because they had the ball and were up by one with five seconds left. When I took off over there, I was heading for Laimbeer and the ball was floating in the air and I just went for it and I knew DJ would be coming for it. I didn’t even look for him. I was always a reaction player. When I made passes to get out of the double team, it was gone before I thought about it. Tip passes off of rebounds, hitting the lane for a steal—things like that just happen. You don’t see it and think, “I need to do this.”

SLAM: You had tremendous rivalries with the Sixers, Lakers and Pistons, and each team had continuity from year to year, with the same core players. Do you gain a lot by keeping a core together for a long time?

BIRD: There’s no question about it. You build a commitment to each other and an understanding and new guys coming in to fill roles pick up on it and find their places more easily. Also, the more you win, the better you’re gonna get. It grows on itself. We played together really well and had great ball movement and that’s the kind of stuff that gets easier and easier with familiarity. I played with McHale and Parish for 11-12 years, DJ for 6-7. Our core group was very stable for a long time. We were pretty close in the sense of really knowing each other on the court and having close basketball relationships.

SLAM: Did that transfer off the court?

BIRD: As far as being professional, yeah, but going out to eat all the time, no. It wasn’t like that and it doesn’t have to be for a team to be close. That’s a misunderstanding. I remember one time Robert saying, “When my career’s over, I don’t want to see any of you guys ever again.” We spent a full nine months together pretty intensely every year.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , ,

  • http://philosopher.view@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    Bird was so stoic.
    Cryptic looking. Look into his eyes…
    Anyways, more and more I see and hear people. What they say about Joe Bird. They don’t know.
    Yes, there are all kinds of videos, footage, etc.
    One would have had to see Bird night in and night out to truly discern and understand the greatness that was Larry Bird.
    THE VERY first of his kind. An original. A genius with the basketball. One of the most cerebral players to ever lace up some sneakers.
    Underrated as an athlete. Just look at the picture. Do not take my word for it.
    Anyways, it is a toss – up, for Larry Bird can be considered the greatest player who’s ever played in the NBA. I said that for Kareem on the legendary Schneezy’s video. But Bird…
    Although I am biased towards Earvin for obvious reasons.
    1. Magic
    2. Bird
    3. Kareem
    My bad, SLAM.

  • Tom

    Larry Legend!! I think my fav. story about him came from that book “when the game was ours”. It was Boston playing in LA but magic had to sit out for whatever reason, when Bird got there and saw Magic not suited up he goes “oh you got front row seats? well then I’m gonna put on a show for you then” and then he went on and dropped some ridiculous line like 40pts, double digit boards and a gang of assists….I miss the old rivalries.

  • DieselMechanic

    The best thing about Bird was his trash talking and the way he backed it up. Calling his shots and things. Watch “Bird’s 50 greatest moments” if you haven’t seen it already.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    By far the baddest white boy to step on any court.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.l.brewer3 BlackPhantom

    ….And this is one of the reasons I find it nearly insulting that SLAM ranked Tim Duncan ahead of him on the Top 10. Tim is great, but skillfully he can barely even hold a candle to Larry Legend.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    ^on offense, maybe. On defense, he makes Larry look like a toddler.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    BPhantom, I could see why though. TD’s the better defender, won more chips while carrying lesser talented squads than Bird’s celtics. I mean if you were starting a team from scratch and had to choose between a dominant 3 or a dominant 4/5, I think most people would pick the dominant big.

  • http://philosopher.view@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    Bird’s underrated defensively.
    Very few players in the History of the Game are better than Bird when it comes to help defense.
    He was always in the right place at the perfect time.
    Just ask Lord Thomas III…

  • http://www.slamonline.com Alan Paul

    Thanks for posting Slam. Love seeing my Old Schools up here.

  • http://nba.com GP23

    One of the greatest passers of the ball may i add.

  • DieselMechanic

    @Philosopher: and what a knack for the ball. He seemed to have a real sense for steals and deflections if the ball came near him.

  • larrylegend

    :-)
    @AllenP: Man, come on! when they played the Lakers, and LB took a shoot or anyone else and it clanked, the LA fastbreak rolled at it best. The 1st player back was always Mr. Bird. Also, he was the Man for the C’s, so no need to pick up dump fouls. And what about his rebounding!?

  • Armando

    I agree. Way too many players get labeled “superstar” nowadays. Each decade seems to have around 3-4. Now it seams to be one on every team. I sadly doubt we’ll ever see a rivalry like Bird-Magic ever (the top two players going at each other in that manner).

  • http://www.slamonline.com Wayno

    I think people forget how good TD was in his prime…especially in the playoffs.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Larry Bird was not a bad defender. He wasn’t great or anything, but he was above average. Defense is about effort. Knowing that, I think it would be impossible to say Larry Bird wasn’t good defensively.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    No one’s saying that Larry was a bad defender but he looks like KLove when compared to TD’s D.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Wayno

    Cosign JTaylor. Bird was a pretty good defender…Duncan is/was a GREAT defender…dominant in fact. He could change the game with his D as much as he could with his offense.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    Larry Bird was one of the greatest defenders ever, he has a defensive rating higher than Jordan, Magic, Lebron, Kobe and Pippen. He is also 24th all time in steals per game. Larry Bird led the league in Defensive Win Shares 4 times in his career: 1980, 81, 84 & 86. He is also 25th All Time in Defensive Win Shares. (That’s the description from the YouTube Video connected to my name, which highlights how good Bird was Defensively. – Certainly was no “Kevin Love”)

  • http://dsjfklf.com Jukai

    NOTE: -OPINIONS BELOW- -NOT FACTS-
    Yeah, Duncan’s passing is sizably better than Birds… Duncan is one of the best defensive fours in league history… but I think the gap between Bird & Duncan’s offense (both scoring wise and passing wise) is pretty sizable too.
    In my opinion, when you look at everything, Bird is the better option over Duncan… but it is easier to build a team around a big man, especially a big who can play the four and five totally seemlessly (something that Duncan actually doesn’t get enough credit for). So I can understand people who would take Duncan over Bird, you’re taking the slightly worse player who you can build a team around slightly easier. It’s all about options. I honestly might take Duncan over Bird if I was a GM.
    I don’t really understand Tim Duncan being ranked higher than Larry Bird.
    If we’re looking at the players, Bird is better. Bird scored more on a more variety of shots, was certainly better than Duncan at passing… Duncan was a superior defender but the rebounding is the issue and I’m just not sure Duncan was the dominant rebounder. Better yes, but also simply had a role on the team closer to the basket. So, I’d cast my vote to Bird.
    Expanding to their careers as ball players, Duncan has that one extra chip but Bird has the greater number of MVPs, greater number of Finals appearences, and far greater impact on the NBA. In their current careers, they’ve played just as long so longevity isn’t a factor… I don’t see how one can say Duncan had a better career.
    But I love debates like this.

  • sean b

    Nice interview. Even though I’m a Lakers fan til the day I die, how can you not like Larry Bird?

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    @Jtatlor, Michael Jordan: The baddest black dude to step foot on the court.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    No one’s saying that Bird’s just as bad a defender as KLove, never that. All I’m saying is that the gap between TD’s defensive ability and Bird’s is so huge that it makes Bird look like Love when compared to TD. Bird was a decent man to man defender/very good help defender but Duncan’s an all-time great defender right up there with Hakeem, Rodman, Pippen and GP.

  • bike

    Stealing the inbounds pass from Isiah Thomas and passing to DJ for the winning layup–that play alone makes Larry a great defensive player. Period.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    Kevin Love is horrible. — Saying Bird is like Kevin Love compared to Duncan is like saying Duncan is Bruce Bowen on offense compared to Larry Bird….it just isn’t true. I get what your trying to say, but your exaggerating

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    I think several people are overrating Bird’s defense. Yes, he was a great help defender. But I wouldn’t even say “average” isolation defender. He was mediocre on a good day. He just had a backcourt of Maxwel, McHale, Parish and Walton to always keep slashers honest, which allowed Bird to do what he did best: abuse the passing lanes, weakside block, help on cutters and deep post players and lead people into the guys who could actually stop you.
    If Larry Bird had been on a lousy defensive team, no one would remember him for what he did defensively cause he would not have been able to do it.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    “IF” Larry Bird was on a different team he wouldn’t have played Small Forward, and wouldn’t have been guarding guys way more athletic then him like he had too do in Boston. But IF, IF, IF, Duncan got drafted by the Clippers and was surrounded by Ricky Davis and Darius Miles we wouldn’t be having this conversation….

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Alright, I’ll take that back. Bird looks like Dirk when compared to Duncan on defense.
    Also you have to take into account the defensive abilities of the players around TD and Bird. Bird for the majority of his career played with two of the greatest defenders of all-time (McHale and DJ) while TD played with a past his prime DRob for a few years and a very good but not great defender in Bowen. TD had to be the anchor year after year for a spurs squad that depended on his supreme ability to defend the rim while at the same time being able to shutdown his man. Bird on the other hand could gamble and play the passing lanes a little bit more because he had guys like McHale/Parish back there and DJ on the perimeter to handle quicker cats.

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    NBK: Overreaction much? Next time I wont use examples because you’ll get angry and just say “he was not a good isolation defender, can’t elaborate cause NBK will get angry”

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    That’s fine, I don’t know why I really even care, it’s just your opinion..I just didn’t want someone to read this conversation and then go on to all their little friends born Post Jordan Retirement I about how Bird was not a good defender and gets all his credit because of his offensive exploits. I don’t want Larry Bird to look like the White Amar’e Stoudemire to the kids. lol

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    And I don’t know why you’re so sure Larry would have been a PF, but if he had been guarding fours, he would be more in the post and wouldn’t be able to help out as much. Just throwing that out.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    lol are you butthurt or something? How did I overreact? You think I’m upset because I said IF three times in a row Jukai? Or because I took your argument/opinion and responded?

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    He was 6’9″ 220. Its not like Bird was small, he would have been a big small forward in todays NBA, he was a huge one back then. Its part of what made Boston so hard to deal with, they had 3 guys on the court that were 6’10″ or smaller, all could help around the basket, all were good defenders. — And basically I am “so sure” he would have been a four because of how many more issues he would create as a four without a super team around him then he would have as a three. And I realize its my opinion, I just think its right, so I present it as such.

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    You either overreacted or misunderstood. I’d explain, but I don’t want you throwing a hissy fit again so you’ll have to take my word for it.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    6’9″ or taller* haha my bad.

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    Look, I’m not gonna get into the three/four debate because it’s dumb, I’m going to end it with this logic bomb: Larry Bird liked playing the three because it gave him the ability to spread the floor or go into the post, a perfect middle ground for him. So are you, as a coach or a GM, going to get a lot of wings on your team or a lot of post guys on your team if one of the top-5 players of all time wants to be a three?

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Hysterical!
    Now that we have gotten that surge of aggression out of the way, who’s the better defender, Bird or Magic? I leaning towards bird but it’s closer than people think. Bird was a better help defender but not by much and both guys were average man to man defenders.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    I understood and meant what I said. Bird’s defensive problems were from isolation situations (the isolation era hadn’t even started by then anyway) when he was guarding a player he otherwise would not have been guarding on any other team during the 80′s. He was a good defender, much better then he get’s credit for (even though he may have been overrated at somepoint, not anymore), especially if the perception was he’s Kevin Love compared to all time defenders.

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    JTaylor: Bird was a better defender. Done. Next question!

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    Jukai: I’d Assume Larry wants to win, and doesn’t give a sh*t about what position he plays. So I would build the best team possible around him depending on who is available. He’s too versatile too try and pigeon-hole him into one position full-time. I am not arguing against what Boston/Red Aurbech did with Larry Bird, infact it’s exactly what I would have done with that personnel. I just don’t think I would play him as a Small Forward more often then as a Power Forward with the majority of lineups in the league then and now.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Ixy8Uttq0 nbk

    Oh yeah and Bird was a better defender then Magic IMO. Magic was just a great piece cuz he could guard 4 positions against most teams.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Aight, fair enough. Here’s an even better question; why do people rate Bird and Magic as equals and at times claim that Bird’s the better player when those Magic-led Laker squads beat Bird’s Celtics in the 2 out of 3 Finals they met in and won 5 chips to Bird’s 3 in the 80s?
    Bear in mind that I believe that Bird’s a slightly better player than Magic (based on skill set and ability to dominate a game 3 different ways (scoring, passing and rebounding).

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    I always just felt like Magic is a better winner. And as a point guard plays a more important role in winning. Basically they are so even the only reason i have had Magic as better is cuz he was involved in more possessions. But idk who was actually better at basketball.

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    NBK: Remember when Magic was so intent on winning that he said he wanted to be traded if they moved him off the ball? Remember when Jordan was so intent on winning that he threw a big sh*t fit about working in the triangle until Jackson told him he could break it whenever he needed to? Remember how little Elvin Hayes complained about playing center? Remember Chris Webber doing the same?
    Yeah, superstars will do anything to win.
    I believe Bird would play the four if the current team makeup forced him too. I also believe Bird would be more than willing to voice his opinions to the higherups about the need to get more backcourt players so he could slide to the three. You do things to make your star players happy.
    I think in this era he’d 100% be playing the three more than the four, and that’s because this era is chocked full of star fours… in other eras of basketball, you’d have a good argument.

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    JTaylor: In my opinion, Magic was more valuable. He literally could get anyone to play his style, it was contagious. You watch a lot of the 80s all-star games and when Magic gets on the floor, it’s the Showtime Lakers no matter who is on the floor.
    I’d also say Magic’s teams were less injury prone then Bird’s, and Magic was less injury prone than Bird, which really helped the 5-3 scorecard.

  • http://philosopher.view@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    The only thing that held Joe back defensively was his lateral abilities. He had his finest moments defensively AND offensively in the moments of clutch.
    And Larry was intelligent and versatile enough to be able to play all five positions on the floor. Effectively.
    But we’re getting into the “if” games, in which I have been humbled in using that angle…
    In any other generation that Larry Bird plays in other than the one he did play in, he is a big man.
    Can Tim Duncan come out on the perimeter and distract someone with merit and prestige? Can he distract a perimeter player out there, period? Regardless of fame? Not saying that Joe is Derek Harper, but…
    Bruce Bowen is among the premier defenders of his generation.
    Back to Larry;
    I frequently go back to this, but Larry’s day was the Golden Age of NBA basketball. There are only a handful of players today who can even make someone’s bench in those days.
    Some people just don’t know, man.

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    Philo: I wont usually tip my hat to you, but the Duncan point on his inability to go far out is a very good point. Dirk always schools the Spurs because Duncan simply can’t guard him and they have to put someone else on Dirk.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    I have never heard Larry Bird complain about his own situation on the court for any reason. As long as he played heavy minutes and touched the ball i genuinely doubt he cared what position he played. He isnt Michael Jordanhe never showed a sense of entitlement and was a workhorse for indiana, b*tching isnt in his DNA

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    From* indiana.

  • http://dsjklff.com Jukai

    nbk: Agree to disagree. I don’t think Larry Bird felt any less entitled than Magic and Bird.

  • http://philosopher.view@blogspot.com The Philosopher

    Shoutout@ Jukai.

Advertisement