Wednesday, August 31st, 2011 at 9:25 am  |  131 responses

Pau Gasol Feels He Has Nothing to Prove After Playoff Meltdown


Pau Gasol briefly addressed his (and the Lakers’) shortcomings in the 2011 NBA Playoffs, and feels that it was just one of those years when everything went wrong. But there’s no reason to freak out. From the LA Times: “In the playoffs last spring Gasol and the Lakers were run ragged by Nowitzki’s Dallas Mavericks. The Lakers power forward was also besieged by unsubstantiated rumors of a rift with his girlfriend, and was the subject of finger-pointing by fans disappointed with his play, and a jab to the chest by coach Phil Jackson during the Western Conference semifinal sweep. ‘I do not think there’s anything to prove on my side,’ Gasol said via email when asked if he was eager to put the Lakers’ postseason behind him. ‘Last season we didn’t perform during the playoffs as we were supposed to. . . . You cannot win every year; there are a lot of very good teams in the league.’”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: ,

  • http://www.slamonline.com UNFROZEN CAVEMAN LAWYER

    NOTHING HERE. …

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Why do laker fans hate the bigs that had a hand in 16 chips? They hate Kareem, they hate Shaq and now they hate Gasol, they do know that without those guys, the franchise wouldn’t be known as the greatest franchise in NBA history (along with Bos).

  • marc

    @jtaylor21 that isnt true. I am a lakers fan and i hate none of the players you just stated. I just feel Gasol had a bad series he’s going to be ok. The person i don’t like is bynum just because of his attitude but he is a decent big man that is needed.

  • http://www.slamonline.com UNFROZEN CAVEMAN LAWYER

    ITS OBVIOUS TAYLOR, AT LEAST WITH SHAQ AND GASOL, DOWNPLAYING THOSE GUYS, ESPECIALLY SHAQ, PROPS UP KOBE. AT LEAST, IN THEIR EYES. ITS ALL A PART OF THEIR DISTORTED VIEW. ACCORDING TO THEM, SHAQ WAS JUST A FAT GOOF OFF WHO DIDNT HAVE NEARLY AS MUCH TO DO WITH A THREEPEAT AS KOBE.

  • letsrun

    @JTaylor21 who here in L.A. hates Kareem. The dude has a street named after him that leads into The Forum. Everyone loves him, just not his surly old man attitude. Los Angeles is a BASKETBALL city forever and ever.

  • MikeC.

    The Lakers organization hasn’t shown Kareem the proper respect for what he contributed. Kareem should have had a statue before Magic. Sure, Magic was more of a cultural icon than Kareem, but Kareem won the same amount of rings as Magic and piled up more career accolades. That should matter more. To all fans.

  • MikeC.

    There’s a legit argument to be made that Kareem isn’t just the greatest Laker, but the greatest player in NBA history.

  • http://aol QGallday

    weak statment he gotts2b pissed…u got swept and dallas never put the broom down until they got a title….kb24 gonna get at him for havn no fire…hahahaaa!!!

  • http://slamonline.com Tae

    We goin all tha way this year. If theres a season

  • Chip

    “There’s a legit argument to be made that Kareem isn’t just the greatest Laker, but the greatest player in NBA history”

    I’ve hated the Lakers, because they’ve always stood in the way of my Blazers.I’ve hated them because they are usually so damn good.

    I’ve been a fan of KAJ since he was Lew Alcindor. The greatest scoring center of all time. He belongs in any argument as the Greatest of All Time. IMHO

  • Purple Regin

    @ JTaylor21 you seriously need to quit talking out your ass before posting on threads here. Shaq & Kareem are both disliked but not HATED by most Laker fans. Also they both did things during their time with the Lakers that caused Laker fans not to like them. Shaq the way he left LA and went on a rant in Miami for 2 years tossing everyone from Kobe, The Buss family, and the city of LA. Kareem it was known that off the court he was not friendly with the local media and the fans. For years Kareem was known for being a jerk in public who refused to give autographs for fans. That’s the main reason why Kareem now is having such a hard time getting a job as an assitant coach or head coaching job today. Nobody in the NBA wants to hire him because of his attitude. But with that said the Lakers still will give Kareem a statue outside of Staples Center and Shaq will get his jersey retired eventually. And no Shaq does not and will not get his own statue outside of Staples Center.

  • alebaba

    As a Lakers fan, I can say that Kareem is a top 10 all time player. He was dominant, innovative, and pivotal in Lakers success for several championships. That said, he was disliked because of his attitude. He was a selfish person, a know-it-all, and at times a bad teammate. This is why the Lakers were able to acquire him in the first place. No one just trades away Kareem because they think they are getting a better player, it’s because the bucks knew that he was holding the rest of their team back. Pat Riley has commented plenty on Kareem and Magic and it is clear why everyone loved Magic. First off, Magic is clearly the best Laker of all time without dispute. He was great on the court, versatile and also charismatic off the court. That’s a terrible reason to not give a guy a well deserved statue, but sometimes that’s the way it is. I don’t know any Laker fans that dislike our bigs. I’ve heard things about Shaq, but that is because many of us saw 4-5 championships go down the drain when he left. Right now we have two really good centers. Yes, I called Gasol a center. In reality the Lakers still have amazing depth and options with our bigs. Lamar and Pau are great at the 4, but Gasol can also slide to the 5 and allow us to spread the floor without Bynums big body clogging the lane. Likewise, if we want to go big we can have LO at 3. Pau is underrated as a center because everyone concentrates on his deficiencies as he gets bodied up by guys who have 50lbs on him. He’s not going to be a dominate center but he can provide options in our rotation and by reducing Bynums minutes to around 20 a game, and limiting his wear and tear and chance for injury. My hat goes off to that Dallas team because I knew they had a championship caliber squad but I, like most people (including NBA teams), just slept on them.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    ^He was holding back the team he won a championship with? And was a contender with the next year except for injuries? That is some revisionist history right there.

  • Hed Furst

    Marc… what does his attitude or anything he does outside of play basketball matter to you or anyone matter… do you think it would be cool if people got to see you at work and said yeah hes a decent (enter occupation here) but his jokes arent funny or he is a square… whatever the case may be it doesnt pertain to your work at all… is that cool…?!?!?

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Kobe Bryant would have 3 rings without Pau Gasol, and none without elite big-men. (that should get um goin – and it’s true)

  • http://slamonline.com AllBall

    Of course its true. How many rings would Mike have with out Scottie?
    Magic without Kareem/Worthy? Larry without Mchale/Dennis Johnson/Chief?

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Kobe Bryant should have 1 finals MVP.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    I wasn’t saying it like Kobe was the top dog, I was saying it like Kobe wouldn’t have rings without those guys like Manu Ginobili wouldn’t have a ring without Tim Duncan.

  • http://slamonline.com AllBall

    Thats just your opinion, I thought Kobe should have won it both times. Going back to the article a minute, Pau did play terrible this post season, so he can be criticised and doubted just like all the other stars are if they play bad, despite what their previous accomplishments may be.

  • http://slamonline.com AllBall

    But Kobe is the top dog in comparison to Gasol. Gasol is Kobe’s Ginobilli. Or at least he has been the past 3 years.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Shaq would have 1 Ring with out Kobe, Pau Gasol woud have ZERO Rings with out Kobe. I like this game.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Gasol and Bynum are what made the Lakers title contenders. Not Kobe – Bynum goes down the Lakers lose. Pau isn’t on the team the Lakers can’t make it out of the first round. (I’m hella bored at work, I started this on purpose)

  • http://slamonline.com AllBall

    But with out Kobe Pau and Bynum aren’t winning any thing. I know, I start stuff like that some times too. It isn’t worth it unless you mention Kobe/Bron or Rose, with out those guys you won’t get enough replies to pass the time.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Shaq would have ringSS without Kobe. Shaq would have won rings if he never left Orlando. Shaq shouldn’t be part of this conversation, he’s the best player (“most effective/dominant”) since Michael Jordan retired.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    I’d take Pau and Bynum over Kobe everyday of every week.

  • shaolin23

    Pau/Bynum without Kobe is still one of the more dominating big men tandems in the league is it not? Odom/Pau/Bynum could make up the scoring deficit on a Kobe-less Lakers team.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    If Pau and Bynum are so good and so dominant and have such an imposing front line then why are the Lakes not contenders ever again? Hmm?

  • Heals

    Whoa, we’re going with “meltdown” for his performance. When I think meltdown I think Bobby Knight tossing chairs, not Pau or KG having relatively poor performances against quality competition…

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Bynum went down the Lakers won. Bynum stayled healthy Lakers lost. So confusing logic there nbk. Also, Kobe would have RingSS with out Pau and Shaq…

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    No they probably couldn’t make up the scoring. But without them there is no way in hell Kobe could make up for what they do defensively, and on the boards. The only way I see a team winning a title with their best player shooting 45% from the field and not being dominant in anything else is if they have big-men who control the boards and protect the basket (which Kobe has had in every season he has ever won a title, compared to guys like Michael Jordan who won titles without elite bigmen you can see that efficiency is the difference)

    -For instance

    *Dominique Wilkins (never played with an Elite Big) Zero Championships, 7 All-NBA Selections – career numbers 24.6PPG 6.7RPG 2.5APG 1.3SPG .6BPG.
    *Kobe Bryant (Most his career with an Elite Big) 5 Championships, 13 All-NBA Selections, 9 All Defense Selections – Career Numbers 25.3PPG 5.3APG 4.1RPG 1.5SPG .5BPG

    (Now I’m not saying Dominique is as good as Kobe or even in the same section of all-time greats, but Kobe’s “greatness” is over exaggeratted to the fullest.)

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Lakeshow the whole concept of players getting older is completely lost on you isn’t it? Bynum and Pau can be better then Kobe and the Lakers still not have a chance at a title. Just like Marcin Gortat is better then Robin Lopez but the Suns won’t make the playoffs. Just like LeBron James, Chris Bosh, & Dwyane Wade are the best group of 3 players in the league and they still didn’t win a title. Just like Manu, TP, and TD being together and not having a shot at a title, even though they have won 3 together in the past.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    and Bynum played in both championship runs, and didn’t play in the finals the year they lost. you can put this together, an idiot can put this together.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Well duh dude. Kobe’s not a F/C, he’s not going to protect the paint. He still rebounds better than 90% of guards though. No it’s not over exaggeratted, The reason Pau and Shaq were able to be so effective is because of Kobe. They had/have one of the best shooting, slashing, playmaking, scorers in history. Pau and Shaq get space on the post because you have to make sure Kobe isn’t open cause he’ll kill you. Everyone likes to act like Shaq and Pau make up for all of Kobe’s down falls. No. They work together well. Kobe works well with a big body to move people for him and to swing the ball to on pick and roll. Where is Pau with out Kobe buddy tell me? In memphis stacking chips? common please man. Teams with Kobe on them don’t win despite KB being on the team, they win because he’s on the team. Quit acting like Kobe is a negative, cause you sound foolish.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Define, “Played” lol. Bynum may have been there, but 10 mins from a hobbling center isn’t why they won. Common a nin-com-poop could put that together ;)

  • http://slamonline.com Neitel

    excuses! excuses! THE LAKERS SHOULD HAVE SWEPT THE MAVS. PERIOD.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Pau has been the same player since he entered the league. infact his best individual seasons were in Memphis. And Shaq made the finals before Kobe, and won a title after Kobe. IDK WTH your talking about “the reason Pau and Shaq were able to be so effective” – he didn’t help or change anything.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Bynum played 18.8MPG against Orlando – and 25MPG against Boston in their championship seasons. More then half the game in one instance, and the Orlando series was Kobe’s series.

  • shaolin23

    @Lakeshow – if teams win because, “they win because he’s on the team,” then why weren’t those few years under Rudy T. a success? If he’s so deadly creating space for bigs with the pick-n-roll, why is it that in the 06-07 season Kwame Brown/Bynum only averaged less than 6 field goal attempts per game? Isn’t a truly “great” player one who is able to make those around him better? I know Kwame is a laughingstock with no offensive repertoire to speak of, but surely any big playing alongside Kobe would be wide open enough for easy buckets.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Rudy T was there for like half a season, and they had a winning record under him. (I think they went like 24-19 or 25-20 under Tomjanovich)

  • shaolin23

    @nbk – I guess I should have defined success as “Championship seasons.” But yeah, my bad for not doing my research.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Frank Hamblen took over for him and the Lakers only won like 10 games the rest of the season. (Something that Kobe gets overlooked for, especially by those Laker fans that don’t like giving credit to Phil Jackson, namely the morons that like comparing Kobe to Michael, like its not clear that coaching Michael first gave Phil a huge advantage when it came to coaching Kobe to go along with all the other things like on-court production that Michael Jordan dwarfs Kobe in)

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Conversation is over you. You just said Kobe didn’t help or change anything. A blatently stupid statement not meritable with a response. BTW Your favorite all important Laker Bynum’s stats in his pivitol role in the championship runs: PPG:7 RBPG:5 BLKSPG:1…… dam. For a Stats dude i’m surprise how much you love those digits. Should Bynum have been the Finals MVP iyo?

  • Alekesam

    LakeShow: Bynum went down, we lost to the Celtics in 08. Bynum healthy, we beat them in 10.

    To nbk, um Jordan had that Rodman guy who, y’know, was the best rebounder, possibly ever, in the game? He was the smallest big alive. lol. Dude pulled down 15-17 rebounds a game for six straight seasons at 6’6″! Not to mention, how their team was set up, they didn’t really need a dominant center, just a servicable one.

    The truth is, no one wins a ring on their own, not Jordan (definetly not Jordan), not Kobe, not Shaq, not Magic, not Hakeem, not Bird, not Tim Duncan, and not Wade (tho’ since he almost beat the Mavs single-handedly in 06, he damn near came close), not anyone. HOWEVER…had it not been for those guys, the teams they played for would be short quite a few rings because the guys they played with couldn’t get it done without them. Pippen’s success without Jordan? Zero rings (skillz points to him for making it to the east coast finals tho’). Gasol,Bynum and Lamar, as good as they are, don’t make three finals appearances, winning two of them, on their own. Same with Manu/Parker and same with pretty much every other multiple ring winning teams because they are just that…teams, a group of people collected for maximum efficiency. But usually teams are built around one player, even if the second one is close to that players ability, it’s that one player that puts the team over the top.

    And that’s where your Jordans, Kobes, Magics, Hakeems, Tim Duncans of the world come in because they have that drive and extra something to get it done where no one else could.

  • http://www.ballislife.com/profiles/blogs/kobetop10moments nbk

    Use a fact to support your smug arrogance, how has Kobe improved anything in Shaq and Gasol’s career other then being their teammate when they won rings? – and Bynum protects the rim and helps with Pau to force teams into shooting an increased amount of shots away from The rim. But he was not more important then Kobe as an individual I never said that. And Pau should have been finals mvp against boston.

  • http://www.ballislife.com/profiles/blogs/kobetop10moments nbk

    I realize everything about the Bulls and who was on the team and how/why they won. And nobody is saying anyone wins alone. I’m bored so i started a conversation that I knew would get responses.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Alekesam, your a smart guy. Or at least just don’t have hater glasses on. Theres a point of success a person can reach when people start talking about how great they are on the regular, some folks like to start diminish their achievments. They go from not getting enough credit(“Shaq is the only reason Kobe’s concidered great type people”) to getting a little to much credit(“Kobe’s better than Jordan” type people)to people taking away all credit that he earned and deserves.(“Kobe sucks and brings his teammates down and they all won despite all his negatives” type people.) nbk, admit you were wrong about Kobe having zero effect on the ability of Pau Gasol and Shaq being able to win Championships and we can continue a discussion. I for one think of a finals MVP as the one guy who was consistent through all the series and played the most important role in all the playoffs so if you are talking about The NBA Finals most important player, I would understand Pau Gasol getting the nod. But IMO Finals MVP is Playoffs MVP. If i’m wrong i’m wrong, but I think it’s silly to give an award for 1 series when you wouldn’t be in that series without the other ones.

  • http://www.ballislife.com/profiles/blogs/kobetop10moments nbk

    Lakeshow i like what you said “finals MVP is playoff MVP” i wish that were true. But Dwyane Wade, & Tony Parker prove that otherwise

  • Lakersfan143

    Pau didn’t even “play” in the playoffs. He was on the court, but, he did NOT give any effort or give it 100%. Did anyone watch him? It doesn’t seem like anyone plays basketball with all these off-subject comments. He was very slow and did not look interested at all. He hurt the Lakers this past playoffs. He didn’t play any defense on Dirk and let everyone out-hustle and out-rebound against him. He didn’t want to defend the basket either. He didn’t contest lay-ups or short-range jumpers near the paint. He was a big disgrace to the Lakers organization. You could easily tell that his body language For him to say that they were better teams out there is just a cop out to give your very best.

  • Alekesam

    The hell? Smug arrogance? My points must be getting to you if you’re going there. But anyways, talking basketball…I didn’t say Bynum and Gasol was useless (in fact I defended both Bynum and Gasol and gave credit where credit was due in my post previous to this one) but I did say that Kobe puts the team over the top and it’s true. You honestly think with no Kobe, LO/Bynum/Gasol makes three finals and wins two of them? As constructed during the playoffs? And no adding anyone else to the roster because “well if they didn’t have Kobe they’d have another player”. Yeah, I didn’t think so. LO didn’t win when he was in Miami with Wade and Pau didn’t win one back with the Grizzlies, tho’ that’s slightly more understandable. But as I said before, it’s dumb to get into this line of thinking because every great needs help because they don’t do it by themselves. BUT, those greats is the one that drives the bus to victory.

    Oh wait, I just re-read your post. One more thing I need to address. Bynum protects the rim, not Pau. Pau doesn’t play defense except when he’s pushed to. Pau literally thinks he doesn’t need to play D, which was unfortunately reinforced by the coaching staff by designating Gasol be more offensive minded and Bynum be more defensive minded, despite the fact that Bynum could go off on people who are guarding him but the staff tells him no, which is bad advice. You have an advantage, exploit it. Meanwhile, Gasol (who doesn’t make D a priority, gets even lazier on D because they’re not pushing him to do so–except of course when it’s too late and bad habits have set in while they’re getting swept by the Mavs, hence the vitriol Phil was spitting at him in those games). People started wising up to the fact that Gasol wasn’t good on D and attacked the rim whenever Bynum wasn’t in the game.

    And finally, Gasol saying he has nothing to prove just reinforces that we need to ship his butt out of here. I mean, I thank him for helping get the rings but if he’s going to be a wet noodle for the rest of his career, then he needs to go. Because as bad as he got it last year, he’s only going to get more of the same this year and I’d rather ship while we can still get something for him than keep him and see him tank another season with more excuses.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    shaolin23: kinda hard for me to take you serious when your tellin me Kobe shoulda made Kwame Brown, Smush Parker, Luke Walton, and Brian Cook better. They had their best seasons with Kobe for the most part. And they were all garbage. Absolute garbage. Like, makes Mo Gotti, Andy V, Big Z, and antawn Jamison look like an Super-All Star Squad typa garbage. nbk, correct they are, but Kobe scored 200 points in the Finals. 70 more than any other player. He also had 15 steals by far the most of any player. He had the 2nd most rebounds out of everyone in the series. Thats right he had more than NBA, FHOF, one of its best rebounders Kevin Garnett. He had 17 more rebounds than KG in the series. He did all that in less mins than Pau. I know he had some bad stats to, but i’m presenting a side that maybe you don’t see. Was his FG% bad? Yes, Awful. Was everything else Elite? Yes. So basically you are holding FG% against Kobe and ignoring all the other positives.

Advertisement