Thursday, November 3rd, 2011 at 10:25 am  |  90 responses

Jerry Stackhouse: Derek Fisher Not Qualified to Represent Players in Lockout


It’s been a rough few last days for Union prez Derek Fisher, and now it appears that some NBA players are beginning to turn on him. Jerry Stackhouse tells ESPN Radio that he doesn’t feel comfortable with Fish representing him and the other players in the battle against team owners. Per EOB: “Not to say anything against Derek Fisher, it’s not that I don’t think he’s a great guy,’ Stackhouse said, ‘But I don’t want him negotiating my contract. I want an agent who knows the lingo negotiating my contract. Derek Fisher, he doesn’t negotiate his own contract. He has an agent. So why would I want him negotiating something even bigger than his contract? This [Collective Bargaining Agreement] is something more important to everybody.’ If that wasn’t clear enough for you, Stackhouse went on to leave no doubt that he feels Fisher is outmatched in the current negotiation. ‘David Stern, he’s made this league what it is,” Stackhouse said. ‘He’s one of the greatest commissioners in sports. He’s got that title, he’s got the NBA at the place where it is because he’s a shrewd businessman and knows how to work his way, play the media, play things up to get what he wants. We don’t do that. Players are emotional. Players get emotional. So no, I don’t necessarily, particularly want Derek Fisher or any of the executive committee negotiating a contract for me.’ While Stackhouse sounded reluctant to outright accuse Fisher of disloyalty to his members, he clearly left the possibility open. ‘I don’t know [if Derek met with the NBA],’ Stackhouse said. ‘I would hope not. I don’t think Derek is that kind of guy from what I’ve seen. But at the same time, he does have aspirations to possibly be a G.M. one day. If he can be the guy to bring the sides together in whatever way, maybe there would be an opportunity for him to be a G.M. I’m not saying that he has an ulterior motive but the possibility lies there.’ If there was a silver lining for Fisher, it was that Stackhouse’s frustration with the NBPA pre-dated Fisher’s tenure as president, which began in 2006. ‘Over the course of my career, the last 16 years, it seems like the executive committee is always making concessions,’ Stackhouse said. ‘More concessions, more concessions in each Collective Bargaining Agreement and this is no different. I don’t think there’s ever been a case where it seems like we have any leverage… We need to have more people who are capable of going toe to toe with David Stern and I just don’t think players who spend most of their time playing basketball and Billy Hunter are geared to do that.’”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , ,

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Jerry Stackhouse mistakenly believes that there is a way for him to gain leverage in a situation where he is paid millions of dollars to play a game.
    He is mistaken.
    Even a strike wouldn’t give players leverage. Because the owners would just wait them out. And they would come back to the money they are addicted to as much as a junkie is addicted to heroin.
    The owners write the checks, the owners have the wealth, and thus, the owners have the leverage.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    Brilliant….I guess he’s a Laker hater too for criticizing Fisher’s horrible representation. *rolls eyes at every 14 year old Kobe slurper* Stack get’s it.

  • MikeC.

    Jerry Stackhouse is still in the players’ union? I’m not a labor expert, but my assumption is that you still have to be employed in a profession to be in that profession’s union.

  • JR

    MikeC said it before I could. This is hilarious.

  • Mburb321

    Fisher is just trying to fix what Hunter screwed up. By not decertifying like the agents wanted the players lost all leverage and will never get higher then 50%. So why not take it and not lose checks?

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Ray Allen negotiated his own deal with the help of a lawyers. Said it didn’t make sense to give an agent all that money when the contracts are mostly boilerplate.
    Players who think they need their “agents” are typically weakminded and lazy.
    Most players could save tons of money by doing their deals on their own and getting a lawyer to be paid by the hour.

  • Mburb321

    Kind of the same thing most agents are lawyers and deal with contract negotiations on a daily basis. They care about the players wallets because it directly affects their own, hunter cares about his ego.

  • MikeC.

    @Allenp – I remember when Ray negotiated that contract. I think there is still a place for player agents. For max-level players, like Ray was at the time, negotiating that contract was easy. Ray just needed a lawyer to go over the contract, but all he really had to do was say “Hey, I’m a max-level player, so give me the max contract.” Done and done. Agents aren’t needed to negotiate contracts for All-Stars. Agents are needed to get Darko $20mil and Luke Walton $30mil. Which is why we have this lockout. What was my point?

  • bike

    The players, collectively, are simply amateurs at this kind of thing. They call owners ‘owners’ for a reason. Like it or not, in a sense the players are owned. The owners want control, they want their power restored. When the big three was formed in MIA, the owners perceived that as a loss of control and figured now is the time to rein the boys in a bit. It’s crazy, probably unfair, but that’s the way it is.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Bike
    I agree.
    Mburb
    Most agents are not lawyers. That is a misconception. Agents are people who file the paperwork to become agents.
    Mike C
    Honestly, I don’t think agents go and get people great deals. Rashard Lewis said Orlando just called his agent and offered the max. They didn’t push for it at all.
    I think agents help keep track of finances, responsibilities and set up certain outside deals. But, since most NBA players don’t have those, they really hire these cats so they don’t have to concentrate on things they don’t want to think about. It’s a convenience thing more than a need thing.

  • DieselMechanic

    cosign Stack

  • LA Huey

    Yeah, Shuttlesworth know what’s up.
    Also, if I’m not mistaken, it’s not just Stern, Silver, Fisher, and Hunter in a room by themselves. They’re all flanked by lawyers.

  • Patrick

    This is a great point imo. This is the first time I’ve ever heard this. But it makes complete sense. Players don’t even negotiate their own contracts..why they be negotiating the massive CBA.

  • Mburb321

    @Allenp I have to disagree with you on that one buddy. Most agents and especially the ones that influence these negotiations def are lawyers or have their law degree. Almost all well known agents have their degree: Leon Rose, Rob Pelinka, Arn Tellem, Dan Fegan, Mark Steinberg, Drew Rosenhaus etc maybe some new or smaller agents don’t but its away of earning credibility.

  • Jlc171

    You have to have a player on the committee for player perspective. If they didn’t, players would complain that there are no players on the committee! Fisher has alway come off as an honest hard working guy. Keep up the good work Derek.

  • http://bedotwater.bandcamp.com BE.water

    Eboy, arent you a grown a$$ man? lol You act like a child sometimes. How about not b*tching about “Lakers Slurpers” til we actually see one? And arent you a Heat “slurper”??? Whats the difference?

  • Visionary38

    If Jerry Stackhouse has an issue with the proceedings..why hasn’t he attended the meetings himself, stated his case and had some real imput, instead of tearing down the Union President that he voted on and appointed?!
    Billy Hunter is the person going head to head with David Stern……Fisher is there to voice the opinions of the players and make sure that Hunter is negotiating in GOOD FAITH in respect to the players!
    Stackhouse has never been known to show any kind of real intellect…..so I wonder why he is all of a sudden trying to speak intellectually………?!

  • Riggs

    one didnt get swept by the mavs?

  • robb

    Derek is very smart and he’s a good guy, probably that’s the problem. Stackhouse is right about that, the players need a cunning, cold blooded son of a b*tch representing the players so he can go toe to toe with someone like Stern.

  • http://www.michaelcho.com M Cho

    @AllenP: Mburb321 is right, from my experience most agents are lawyers or retain the council of one in their agency. The big value of an agent is in negotiating a contract, and you definitely need a lawyer to keep on top of that legalese – especially at that level of money.

  • robb

    or someone like Hunter

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Most agents are not lawyers, what? Then why am I thinking about going to law school in the hopes of becoming an agent?

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    I stand corrected then MBurb and MCho. I remember reading that many agents are not lawyers, and I remember talking to an agent who said the same thing years ago. Maybe that has changed.
    And it doesn’t matter who is arguing for hte players, the only threat they really have is the possibility that a federal court with buck all judicial precedent and decide that the lockout is illegal. That is it. That’s a weak hand no matter who is playing it.

  • B

    Last time I checked Jerry Stackhouse does not have an NBA contract which means he doesn’t play for team which also means HE HAS NO CONTRACT to negotiate. What Stackhouse should have said was he feels an agent should represent the players and not another player because players can’t understand the lingo the way an agent would. It seems as if Fisher is doing all he can. The reason the lock-out has continued is because the PLAYERS refused the 50/50 BRI by the owners.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    BE.Water, The best way to utilize Eboy’s 7 year old girl like remarks is to think about how you have already made strides as a human being to not act like a bratty little b*tch. BUT, when your team looks like a similar group of adolescents that is upset at mommy and daddy for not getting a championship then you follow in that trait I suppose. It should be especially embarrassing when your well over 50 years of age. BUT, that’s why they have coined the phrase “MAN CHILD.”

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    I’m sorry but your just as likely to hate on Eboy at this point as he is to hate the Lakers. And you look more petty and sensitive then he looks childish. Considering he hates a basketball team and it’s illogical fans (nobody named you, don’t get defensive) and you hate him, a person, for his dislike of your team.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Thanks hall monitor nbk.

  • bike

    Stack isn’t helping the players out at all by criticizing Fisher. He should keep his mouth shut. This is yet another example of how amateurish the players are in this dispute. At this stage of the game, they want to keep their losses at a minimum and the best way to accomplish that is to provide a united front. Public displays of within-player divisions are adding more blood in the water. There is nothing that would put a bigger smile on Stern’s face right now than the players turning on Hunter and Fisher.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Your welcome sensitive little guy

  • http://theurbangriot.com The Nupe

    Only a part of an agents job is to negotiate the NBA contract. Most of the time is spent getting side/endorsement deals, setting up trust/foundations, oranizing public appearances and providing ‘guidance’ on how to best create/protect the players brand. Player contracts are somewhat ‘easy’ as market value is somewhat defined (not that the sides can’t disagree), contract length is a snagging point as well, but nothilng that can’t be worked out.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    This sensitive little guy will be the bigger man on this one, Peace.

  • Jeff

    Jerry Stackhouse not qualified to play in the NBA.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Haha that sure is what the bigger “man” would have said.

  • Chukaz

    I agree with stack. Sure fisher is good at taking charges and misfiring from 3, but that doesn’t qualify him to do sh*t. For starters, if the players were to decided to sit out the season and wait for a court ruling they would gain mad leverage (everyone knows that they’re gonna win in court and the owners would lose several billion dollars if this were to happen)

  • http://www.slamonline.com Nick Tha Quick

    @ Eboy’s comments. It is no secret here you find particular joy in any anti-Laker and anti-Kobe article/game outcome/negative press. You’re usually one of the very first to comment on such posts. That is the highlight of your day. Anyone who disagrees with you is ALWAYS a ‘teenage slurper’, however reasonable and concise they make their arguments. Doesn’t the energy you spend unconditionally defending LBJ/Wade/Heat equally make you a 52 year old slurper?
    The past five NBAPA presidents: Buck Williams, Patrick Ewing, Michael Curry,Antonio Davis and DFish. President has to be a current player. What makes all these dudes more (or less) qualified than DFish? Last time I checked Stack wasn’t on any team roster. He has his opinion like everyone here. Doesn’t mean he’s right. I’m sure you think your Heat dudes Jamal Magloire or Joel Anthony would make better presidents than DFish.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Read what was posted by Whitlock this morning regarding Fisher as NBPA President. He talks about why players like Fisher (and Michael Curry before him)are not suited for that job. He makes it pretty simple to understand.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Nick Tha Quick

    And on the same note, since DFish is apparently unqualified to be the pres, name any other active player who is more qualified than DFish and why?

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Veterans that have made enough money too not have to think about their job opportunities after basketball. (Derek Fisher wants to be a GM, or Coach after he’s done playing. It would be hard to get hired as such by an owner if you are hardlined against what they are seeking, look at what happened with Michael Curry after he negotiated the last CBA and then retired and was on the fast track to NBA front offices, he received an ill-deserved head coaching Job in Detroit that netted him $7.5M) Steve Nash, Elton Brand, Grant Hill would all be better candidates to get a fair deal representing the players then Derek Fisher.

  • http://www.bulls.com Enigmatic

    I’ll never read anything by Whitlock ever again.
    FTP.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Why do you have to use common sense and reason Nick? Seriously man, can’t you just try and start drama and be a secret Heat fan like certain other people on here. On a final note, your a teenage slurper for using your brain instead of giving brain.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    I dont give Whitlock time on the toilet to read his articles for the most part. But what he said about Fisher being a questionable at best leader for the union made sense too me. I don’t see any reason that Stern would portray that the lockout is just about over (like he did last week) unless he thought he had a deal coming. What reason would he have to act that way? Can someone logically explain that aspect of all of this? When has Stern ever made it seem like they are close to a deal when really they are no closer then they were a month ago? Unless he thought he had something worked out….. it’s not like Stern to look so wrong regarding negotiations, he is usually non-commital about any optimistic or pessimistic outlook regarding the lockout, except for last week.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Nick Tha Quick

    @ NBK My simple point is that you shouldn’t base your opinion on what Stack says or what Whitlock writes. Make your own independent opinion. I also think that if players didn’t like/want DFish as their prez then they wouldn’t have elected/re-elected him. That simple. The guys you named above. If they are head and shoulders above DFish, don’t you think their fellow players would see this and would fight to have them as the prez instead? Instead we base all this on Stack’s comments and possibly Stern’s clever use of the media machine.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    My opinion is not based off of what Whitlock or Stack says. What they say just plays into my line of thinking and sums it up better then I have the ability too. Plus Whitlock’s views are extreme, its like he knows there is a BBQ in the neighborhood, but he doesn’t know where, or how much food there is. (just a sh*tty analogy to show that a dog can smell something and still not really know that much about it) – about the President of the Union question, I don’t know the specifics of how a player is elected, but I would assume they have to want the position in the first place. And judging by the Suns & 76ers Union representatives (Dudley & Childress) (Kapono, Hawes), those types of responsibilities are not something Brand, Nash & Hill are interested in. But that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t make better union presidents. Basically I think any player that doesn’t have a “down the road” financial concern or aspiration to work in an NBA front office and is a visible member of the NBA community (a player with a degree of fame) and is well educated would make a better president then a guy like Fisher, who plans to work for the very people he is up against in the very near future.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Nick Tha Quick

    So in essence, you’re saying that Brand, Nash and Hill who appear to be well educated, very much involved in their communities and are widely respected, veteran leaders with no future NBA management/coaching aspirations and who want nothing to do with player representation would make a better prez than DFish? You’re basically saying that guys who meet your criteria of qualification but have never shown any interest would be better at an equally qualified guy who’s had 5 years experience at that position. I just don’t get it. I’m not saying that DFish is the greatest player prez of all times but he’s done nothing wrong( that we know about) so why are we so ready to tear him down?

  • http://www.slamonline.com Eboy

    Stop crying.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Because he’s leading a movement of concessions. Not a negotiation – it’s more like ultimatums. In Order for the players to get anything more then a 50/50 (which isnt reAlly 50/50) split after this next CBA the players will have to Strike, you realize that? During the 99 negotiation the Owners had too lock out the players just to get 43%. If you ask me, Fisher has done nothing but fail as the NBPA President. Just like Billy Hunter has failed to adulate the public about the real meaning of these negotiations and BRI split. I don’t at all think allthe blame should be on Fisher, I just feel the president should have some form of leverage with either the owners or the public. And Fisher has neither.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Nick Tha Quick

    Please explain what exactly DFish has failed at as President. The players don’t really have any leverage with the owners. Fish or any other player cannot manufacture leverage out of thin air and expect the owners to cave. I see your point that Fish could have handled the public/press considerably more to the players advantage. Other than that, I fail to see exactly where he’s failed miserably. [Side note, you also live in Phx?]

  • Mburb321

    Guys Stephen A already explained it on 750.In the beginning D.Fish and Kobe were two of the most hardcore supporters of 54%, but once the union missed its opportunity to decertify (because of HUNTER)they pretty much lost ALL LEVERAGE.Think about how things have changed Kobe and KG walked into sterns office and said 54 or no deal to then talking about setting up a fund for players to now all of a sudden being ok with 50/50, just because Fish is trying to get a job? NO its because its only going to go lower then 50% from here on. The rank and file guys cannot afford to miss checks and Fish knows it, thats why hes trying to settle for 50/50 no other reasons. The owners called their bluff and they were right.

  • http://aol QGallday

    man….i gotta headache….nba was my aspirin…i need my prescriptioNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!NOW

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Yeah I live in Phoenix, does that matter? – maybe “failed” when talkin about fisher is the wrong word, but there are ways to get leverage. The Public controls the perception, if the NBPA got the public to realize the split at 57, 43 was already basically 50/50 – and that in most similar industries (Entertainment industry for example) the talent takes home a much larger cut then 50% don’t you think the players would have leverage with the most important group in this whole thing? The fans… (only the “die-hard” fans have even an idea about the specifics of the lockout.). Fisher is at the en of his career, and aspired for a front office job. Even if there was leverage too have, what makes you think Fisher would use it in the public against his future employers? Because he wrote a “letter to the players” (which didn’t even make it too the majority of players, even though Fisher said it was sent to every one of them, most of them read it in the media). Or because he threatened to sue Whitlock? I know a lot of people who get caught doin something shady try and flip their actions on their accuser to absolve themselves of suspicion, what makes everyone think Fisher isn’t just coverig his ass? It’s not like an owner is going to come out and snitch on Fisher or confirm Whitlocks “sources” that would be detrimental too the whole league, Fisher has free reign to deny and make idol threats, there is no leverage in disputing fisher or any party, players or owners.

Advertisement