Friday, January 27th, 2012 at 4:10 pm  |  16 responses

The Plight of Larry Johnson

A look back at an important NBA figure.

by Josh Hernandez and Christian Wise

“The fundamental dialectical law of all revolutionary struggle—that progress never takes place in a straight line.” —James and Grace Lee Boggs, Revolution and Evolution in the 20th Century

Today’s youth, although accessing unprecedented realms of technology, drastically lack historical perspective. Without knowledge of history, we are doomed to repeat past mistakes and make new, worse missteps that will halt our progression. Why introduce these abstract brush strokes in a perspective on an NBA player? Because Larry Johnson was a revolutionary; unfortunately, he stood alone in his battle for freedom.

To accurately and respectfully tell an athlete’s story, a writer needs to gain an understanding of who this human being actually is, apart from their field of play. To the contrary, the commercial sporting machine, wherein the media plays a tremendous role, tends to dehumanize and decontextualize these players, creating commoditized cogs for our mass consumption. The NBA is overwhelmingly populated by people of color, and in most cases these men hail from underprivileged and underrepresented communities. With options for social mobility severely limited, many NBA players dedicated their lives to the game in order to rise up.

Larry Johnson was no exception. Raised in Dixon Circle, an infamous Dallas jungle, by a single mother, sports saved Larry from a sordid street life. Immortalized on the inaugural SLAM cover, Andy Serwer described him as a “young warrior in a war zone.” Johnson grew to become a hulking power forward balancing force and finesse, developing into a front line general. Internalized pain of his gritty Texas childhood constantly added fuel to Johnson’s fire. Succeeding in basketball was not a goal; it was his only option to save the Johnson family from another generation of impoverishment.

Young men are sacrificing their lives for the fat chance of becoming a basketball millionaire. Beginning progressively earlier, amateurs are developed for sale on the conveyor belt, a term coined by Bill Rhoden. The conveyor belt refers to the youth sports feeder system, where young athletes are exploited for their talent and the select few are finally rewarded with a professional contract. As the NBA’s profitability increased, deals became inexplicably bloated; team owners were seeking bailout packages during the lockout for some of their egregious signings.

Briefly, the players held solid ground against their owners, seemingly understanding the magnitude of this power struggle. However, the union consistently lost the battle in the media, failing to get their true points across to the public. The most outrageous lockout comments stemmed from outsiders rather than the appropriate power players: Bryant Gumbel and union attorney Jeffrey Kessler both drew justifiable comparisons to slavery. Lacking the history to contextualize their own struggle, NBA players have become individualized, vapid bodies wasting their golden opportunities to create social change in their communities. Consequently, choosing sides in the collective struggle for freedom is not necessarily their decision to make; Michael Jordan aligned with Nike to become a commercial robot, devoid of feelings outside of sneakers and basketball. In exchange for inordinate sums of money, players willingly sell their souls for corporate gain.

For a time, Larry Johnson found himself caught in this elaborate scheme: he was the highest-paid player in League history and paraded around in drag by Converse to sell his signature sneakers. An older, wiser Johnson emphatically declared that “no one man can rise above the condition of the masses of his people.” Johnson made the conscious decision to be truthful in the sports media, with the same evolutionary spirit that inspired Ali’s refusal to fight in the Vietnam War. After refusing to speak to the media for months, the League fined Johnson $35,000 for continuing this silence into the 1999 Playoffs.

Within this context, as Commissioner Stern reached into his pockets as punishment, we can gain an understanding of why Larry Johnson declared his Knicks teammates “rebellious slaves.” NBA personalities are mere performers in David Stern’s minstrel show. Misbehavior is not tolerated and personal expression is harshly restricted. The power paradigm in the NBA is based on a system of indentured servitude. Athletes are used for their incomparable talent and tossed aside when the League has had its fill.

In order for a successful revolution to occur in the sports-industrial complex, players and fans alike must take a new approach to the sporting media. Its treatment of athletes is often blatantly disrespectful, as mindless motifs are constructed to shape our viewpoints of these athletes. The media focuses on players and stories in accordance with their agenda of mass consumption (ex: the anointing of Tim Tebow, the demise of Stephon Marbury, the redemption of Kobe Bryant). When Larry Johnson revolted before the watching sports world, firmly discharging himself from the conveyor belt, the hegemonic media swiftly filtered his comments through a lens of ignorance.

He spoke out and was shutout. They crafted the story of Johnson, the sulking, ungrateful antagonist, when in reality, he was the heroic figure. Larry Johnson planted seeds of doubt within the system by politicizing the game, which we hope to consume separate from any social, political or economic truths. Johnson will always be remembered for his contributions to the game of basketball, but we must appreciate his rebellion as a step forward in the struggle for freedom:

“Here’s the NBA, full of blacks, great opportunities, they made beautiful strides. But what’s the sense of that…when I go back to my neighborhood and see the same thing? Everybody ended up dead, in jail, on drugs, selling drugs…I can’t deny the fact of what has happened to us over years and years and years and we’re still at the bottom of the totem pole.”

Josh Hernandez and Christian Wise are members of the Black Market Collective, an urban think tank for social change. Read more about their work as a part of Sneakers for Success, an educational non-profit.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , ,

  • Josh

    What a load of BS. I can only assume the writers of this piece have never held a job besides writing. In the real world you can’t go around saying whatever you want at work, you’ll get fired. Same for athletes, they just have longer hours (ie 24/7 for super stars) but the wages they get surely make up for this loss.

    And if it doesn’t? Stop playing basketball and get a job with us bums. You won’t be able to say what you want and keep your job, but…?

    Not sounding as good now does it?

  • http://jungywungy.com jungywungy

    good read, but if we work for anyone (the “man”) we are all mere indentured servants who will be tossed aside (laid off/fired) when they are done using us for our talents….

  • http://www.facebook.com/GetWiseNYC Christian Wise

    JW,

    Thanks + you’re right. Entrepreneurship is the way to go if ultimate freedom is desired.

  • http://bedotwater.bandcamp.com BE.water

    Yo Josh. you can say what you want, Its the way you say it. I will never let an employer walk all over me, or talk to me the way they feel like. Never have. I’ve Gotten fired for it, gotten respect for it. You assert your will. You are your own man, and you allow others to treat you how they do.

  • Mega

    hey BE water you cant say what u want in the real world, professionalism is professionalism, deal with it

  • http://bedotwater.bandcamp.com BE.water

    Bro. I live in the real world. How are you supposed to tell me what I can and cant do? Im not trying to follow all these lemmings.

  • JJ

    So, I’m not entirely sure what this article is about….

  • Darrin

    LJ is no revolutionary. He is just another useful idiot who repeated the same tired liberal rant about the “man” while cashing huge game checks. He is the problem.

    LJ made a concious decision throughout his career, conversion to Islam, etc to do and be who he wanted to be and now finds himself on the outside looking in. If anything, the young players and youth in general need to be taught historical perspective and given a good dose of realism.

  • Madterps

    This article makes it sound like the authors never worked a real job in their lives, too much of this slavery misconception BS. Guess what? If you work a job, you gotta toe the company line whether you like it or not. You can’t say or do certain things or there will be consequences in your job. It’s the same even when you open your own company, you gotta be responsible to your employees, shareholders, etc.

  • http://anyoldthing Ugh

    @Josh – “The Real World” is a tired, reactionary cliche. Why not use ‘occupations and lifestyles vulnerable to market forces’ instead? Maybe because then you’d realise that all professions exist in the ‘Real World’. If you actually knew one single writer by profession you’d know they’re as vulnerable to saying what won’t upset their employer/boss/overseer as every other profession, and in some cases more than the average. About the only people who can say whatever they want, no matter how uninformed or ignorant, are anonymous people on website comments sections. That lack of accountability and lack of solidarity among workers and their communities is, I’m pretty sure, the point of the article.

  • http://anyoldthing Ugh

    @Darrin – LJ’s ‘rant’ isn’t liberal, it’s an appeal against liberalism. If you don’t know what liberalism is I suggest going back to school, or maybe just spending some time on Wikipedia.

  • http://anyoldthing Ugh

    @Madterps – What’s a “Real Job”? Do you have to do manual labour to be ‘real’? Count out teachers. Is it waged work rather than salaried, freelanced or piecework? Count out tradespeople who own their own business. Does it have to produce an actualy, physical product? Count out the programmers who wrote the software you’re using right now. Seriously, what does that evern mean, dude?

  • jimmythesaint

    LJ’s point and the writers (see their credentials& involvement above) is entirely relevant .. the lack of Social Change in the environments where the vast majority of NBA ‘stars’ came from (..apart from Bryant, K) clear evidence that NBA Cares etc is window dressing at best. It’s The Product TM (Minstrel Show) that’s to be protected.. love the line about MJ and his anti-societal stance with all that power pfffft..
    Props to Ugh for pointing out anonymous hypocrisies

  • Dan

    the best article i ever read by a sports journalist

  • Ken

    Larry Johnson went from being an NBA star to being associated with a penny stock scam. Look up Hall of Fame Beverages, which is a proven pump/dump penny stock scam.

  • Greg

    Ok, if LJ is so heroic why attack his teammates? Would you want to play with this guy if he called you a “rebellious slave”? Why has he been so quiet and not spoken his mind since? Where is the book/radio show/podcast explaining his point? He gets props for at least having an opinion and Stern needs to seriously chill out with nanny state stuff and let the players (& coaches) express themselves (Stern all but neutered Stan Van Gundy) recently.

    Also, LJ fell off harder than Eddie Murphy when he got to the Knicks…Pippen used to torch him (admittedly Pippen used to torch everyone but Mase (oh wait, the guy LJ was traded for!) Hmmmmmm…..

Advertisement