Tuesday, May 22nd, 2012 at 10:30 am  |  151 responses

Kobe Bryant: Lakers Are ‘Not Going Anywhere’


by Marcel Mutoni / @marcel_mutoni

The inevitable took place last night in Oklahoma City, as the Thunder unceremoniously ushered Kobe Bryant and his Los Angeles Lakers out of the Playoffs.

The young, frighteningly talented Thunder simply outclassed the older, slower, and bickering Lakers.

Kobe Bryant, ever the optimist, boldly claimed that it wouldn’t be long until Los Angeles would be back on top of the NBA again. He also vehemently denied that he was nearing his own basketball mortality.

From NBA.com and Yahoo! Sports:

“It’s kind of unfamiliar territory,” Bryant said after midnight and after the Thunder beat the Lakers 106-90 on Monday night at Chesapeake Energy Arena and 4-1 in the series. “I’m really not used to it. It’s pretty odd for me. I’m not the most patient of people and the organization’s not extremely patient either. We want to win and win now. I’m sure we’ll figure it out. We always have and I’m sure we will again.” Pressed about being a veteran team that had just been knocked out of the playoffs by the youthful Thunder, Bryant said: “I’m not fading into the shadows, if that’s what you’re asking. I’m not going anywhere.” “The entire team…” a reporter began the follow-up question. “We’re not going anywhere,” Bryant interrupted. “It’s not one of those things where the Bulls beat the Pistons and the Pistons disappeared forever. I’m not going for that (stuff).”

And yet Bryant is willing to gamble considerable stakes against any critic who suggests the Lakers’ championship window has closed. “Put your house on it,” Bryant said. “I would put my house on it. I ain’t going nowhere. They can put their house on it, but I don’t think they want to bet that because they’re not stupid. They’re foolish, but they are not stupid.”

Bryant, smartly, wouldn’t speculate on what changes the Laker front-office needs to make this offseason, but it would seem obvious that a major shake-up is needed. Kobe netted 42 points last night, and except for Pau Gasol (who he’d publicly shamed into being more aggressive), he was seemingly all alone out there.

After a tense and highly competitive first half, the OKC Thunder made quick work of the Lakers in the second half, sending them into an offseason of great uncertainty. And despite Kobe Bryant’s assurances, there are no quick and easy answers for his Lakers going forward.

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    So a team’s best frontcout player and a cat that made the all-star team “has to prove he deserves more touches”? What kind of twisted way of thinking is that?

  • http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/3183/tex-winter-compares-kobe-bryant-and-michael-jordan Allenp

    I thought Ty Lawson was the clear difference maker for his team in that series. They lost the final game on the road, but he was amazing and the Lakers had no answer for him during the series. He changed the game for the Nuggets and he didn’t take anything off the table. For the Lakers in that series, the bigs were the difference makers.
    Blake is more questionable. I would say the work he put in against the Grizz Bigs and some of the stuff he did against Duncan was impressive, but the flaws in his game were clearly exposed this year.
    Then again, the flaws in Kobe’s game were on full display and contributed MIGHTILY to the Lakers’ losses.
    It’s all a perspective thing. If you believe that Kobe’s points outweighed all the other stuff he did wrong, then you think this is crazy. I’m sure many people feel that way. I think that if you’re touted as one of the greatest basketball players of all time your team shouldn’t lose because you refuse to make adjustments to your game. That’s just terrible in my mind.

  • http://www.nba.com Red

    Kobe is done, Laker fans are holding on for dear life. It’s over now, maybe in 2, 3 years Kobe can contend again but not for the next year or so.

  • Ken

    Oh my…………….OBVIOUS Kobe haters make me cringe. James harden, Parker, Westbrook, Duncan, KD, etc. better in the playoffs……….hahahahahahahahahah James harden lol. Shot like 31 percent against Kobe

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Blake I don’t think is even debatable. He is a PF and averaged 6.9 RBS. Ty Lawson on the other hand I see what your saying, in terms of what he did for his team, but still can’t figure how someone would say he had a better playoffs than Kobe, but you see what you see.
    So it sounds like you really, truly, believe that the Lakers lost mainly because of Kobe Allen?
    Taylor… Honestly don’t even know where to start with you.
    You really think that Bynum deserved more touches after that series? Did you not see the facts. He shot a worse percentage than Kobe… He’s the L’s 2nd best center (imo) I don’t think anyone should have been passing the ball to Bynum more. He proved he cannot handle the spot light in a major contributing role right now. That seems way more twisted to me. “Give the ball to a guy because he made an all star team…” HMMM..

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Garnett – James – Durant – Westbrook – Rondo – Parker – Duncan
    .
    are the only players that I think have been better than Bryant this post season. So I have him at #8

  • http://www.nba.com Red

    I’m with nbk that makes good sense to me. But Kobe killed his team with not trying to set guys up. Anyone catch Kobe shaking hands with everyone except Fisher? PRICELESS lol.

  • http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/3183/tex-winter-compares-kobe-bryant-and-michael-jordan Allenp

    I feel like they lost because they played horribly as a team. And I feel like the main culprit in that horrible play was Kobe and the decisions he made.
    Bynum pouted like a child, Gasol played soft and the rest of the Lakers were the rest of the Lakers.
    But, that could have been massaged away, and was BEING massaged away in three of the first four games. And on two occasions the Lakers lost because Kobe decided he couldn’t abide by that state of affairs.
    That is what I saw as a fact. I saw that fact, and I saw Kobe decide in possibly the final game of playoffs that he wasn’t interested in keeping is petulant immature big man involved (The same big man you touted as awesome a few weeks ago) because he’d rather take the shots he wanted to take. He made a lot of them, but that was never going to be enough. 0 assists is damning.

  • http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/3183/tex-winter-compares-kobe-bryant-and-michael-jordan Allenp

    Basically, Kobe had the power to make or break the Lakers with his attitude and decision making because he is still the undisputed ALPHA dog.
    He chose unwisely, in my opinion. If you disagree, fine, but I consider that choice a huge blemish on his playoff performance this year.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Completely agree with you on Durant, LbJ, Rondo. I think Kobe played as well or arguably as well as Westbrook, Parker, Garnett, and Duncan.
    It’s apples and oranges though. There’s no way to compare them and what they “truly” did for their team, but I do think it’s ludicrous to not call Kobe a top 10 player in these Playoffs. It’s just such an unnecessary slight. You just expect to much out of Kobe if your going to downgrade his performance in these playoffs that much. He wasn’t legendary or prolific, but neither has anyone else.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Before Game5, Kobe was shooting a stellar 39% from the field. I never heard you once say that “kobe needs to prove he deserves all those touches”. I know you will hit me with the but “kobe is an all-time great” line and I agree with you but this season he was basically a 6-6 Allen Iverson.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Lakeshow, there is just no way I can put Kobe over guys who have not only had more success than Kobe, but do more on both ends of the court, and haven’t cost their teams a single post season game. You could put the onus on Kobe for at least 2 Lakers losses because he wasn’t willing to put the team above him self at the end of games or because he just played terribly. You can’t say that about any of the other guys on my little list.

  • Sergio

    Allenp, I agree that Kobe lost game 2 for the Lakers. But I wouldnt blame him for Games 4 and 5 defeats. In those games, Bynum simply could not get a good position in the post against Perkins. And when he got the ball, he didnt have much success most of the time. Gasol, like you said, was terribly soft and looking to pass every single damn time he got the ball. What happened to the 2009/2010 Gasol?
    So, most of the time Kobe had to do something by himself, simple and plain. It was heartbreaking to see him doing it all yesterday and playing an amazing game (despite the 0 assists) while his teammates weren’t givin a sh!t.

  • Eazy

    all these goin fishin and there on vacation jokes are stupid. 29 teams will be fishing 2 by the end of the year idiots

  • Backboard

    Lakeshow is making good points but will forever be picked apart by the know-it-alls on here. its like pi$$ing in the wind – pointless. I didnt look at the numbers but i am not sure that Parker had so far played better than Bryant. One more thing – PLEASE: leave that sorry grumpy old man Eboy alone. He is just… i dont even know what to say, but it amazes me that he would come back on here to bash Kobe when – after all the trash he was talking in the playoffs last season – he straight up dissapeared when the Heat lost in the Finals. That guy is something else….

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Oh and please please please, explain to me how Kobe has been as good as Garnett and Duncan this post season? Those two are playing ridiculous basketball.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    I won’t argue with feeling like Kobe has been better than Parker. That belief, if you have it, is obviously only based on statistics.
    .
    Westbrook is similar, although you’d need an explanation (imo).
    .
    Duncan and Garnett though? Not even close.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Is it Bynum’s fault that his teammates don’t understand how to pass to the post when defenses are fronting? That is basic basketball skill that is taught at a very young age.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Garnett is averaging 19 and 10 on 52% shooting. And his defensive rating is a 92
    .
    Duncan is averaging 17 and 9 (in 32 minutes) on 54% shooting. His defensive rating is also, a 92.
    .
    Kobe is putting up a 30 4 4 (40 minutes) on 43% shooting. His defensive rating is 112 (which is good for a net negative impact defensively. Yeah.)
    .
    Not even remotely close.

  • Heals

    My bad if already posted – Seton’s Stat of the Day (DP Show): Kobe has 4 assists in the Lakers’ last 5 elimination games. Let that sink in Beanbags…

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    There’s the difference Taylor. You think that Kobe deserves similar respect and consideration as a 1 time All Star… I view Mr. Bean a little differently than you. Bynum was shooting the same percentage as a SG. I’ll side with Bryant over Bynum. If you think that 40% from a big man is just as good as 40% from a guard then that’s on you brotha.
    .
    Allen, very well said and articulated, not that you need to hear that. I see what your saying and agree on some points and not so much on others.
    Things I know:
    1. Kobe can’t make Pau Gasol and Andrew Bynum play up to their ability. That is on them. They did not play up to their ability.
    2. Kobe CAN help them feel more confident and get them easier buckets. He did not do that through out the playoffs. He did it for the majority of games and then vanquished that when it was “winning” time. That’s where he lost games for the Lakers.
    3. You need good coaching and PG play to do well in the playoffs. They had neither.
    4. You need a good bench in the playoffs if your starters aren’t able to get it done. They have the worse bench and their starter couldn’t always get it done.
    5. Basketball is a team sport. BUT, there are superstars in this team sport. Superstars deserve more credit, and more blame, depending on the direction their team goes.
    Kobe did not have a great playoff’s by his standards. He had moments that were damning of him as a player. Whether it was a blown defensive assignment or a missed shot, he had his fair share of bad plays. But Kobe’s standard is much higher than anyone elses. Rightfully so. While he did have his bad moments let us realize some things. He has had Phil Jackson for every successful post season run of his career. Props to both Phil and Kobe for that. Mike Brown is some what notorious around hoops heads for being a bit of an offensive… umm… Whats the right word? Let’s just say, “Not very good offensively speaking.” So Kobe went from the greatest coach of all time to a defensive first, defense second coach. I like Brown. The guy. He is a solid dude from all accounts, players like him, media likes him, but he isn’t a very good head coach. I think he’d be a great assistant and defensive coordinator, but he just isn’t a very good head coach IMO. Kobe also went from having a post player in Pau that was world class at passing and with his skill-set, to the Pau we see today… A borderline All-Star who is more likely to give you 10 points and 5 boards than 20 and 10. While Bynum had a career year it was more of Lamar leaving and himself staying healthy than him improving. (Also, I know what Bynum’s limitations are and what his main issues are. You can act like i’m wrong or hyping him up by saying he is the 2nd best center in the L, i’m not, he just is….)
    No Lamar Odom (6th man of the year, PF/PG extraordinaire), a weak, non-AllStar, Pau Gasol. Bynum limited on what he can do on a nightly basis, new coach that is not exactly a genius on the offensive end along with a swap at PG that is a big deal due to who and what Fisher brought to the table in addition to the worse bench the Lakers have had in a fresh minute = To me an understandably bad post season by Kobe/Laker standards.
    I know where Bryant deserves blame(Leadership, accountability, shot selection, team involvement, post passing, smarter defense) I also see what else is on the table. ALLOT of SH*T is on this teams plate. Kobe deserves as much blame as anyone else, but I will not put more blame on Bean when his team and his coach failed just as bad and in general worse.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Lake, no one is saying that Bynum deserves the same respect/touches as Kobe does but Kobe doesn’t deserve 33 shots while the 2nd best player on the team barely gets 15. If you think the lakers are coming close to competiting for a championship in the near future with Kobe taking that many shots, I overrated your basketball knowledge.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    If you think the Lakers can improve without making a miraculous trade i question your basketball knowledge.
    .
    Wanna See Kobe Bryant’s Salary the next 2 years???
    .
    - $27,849,000 (2012-13)
    - $30,453,000 (2013-14)
    .
    Wanna See The (estimated) Salary Cap the next 2 years???
    .
    - $60,000,000
    - $62,000,000
    .
    UH-OH SPAGHETTI-O’S, that’s just a hair below 50% to one player.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    I see you Taylor. That’s not what i’m saying. I’m saying if Bynum was 6 for 10 shooting then yes he deserved more touches, but dude wasn’t being forceful or nearly aggressive enough for me to say, “Get that dude some more touches!” You see me. In a perfect world (as you know because I’ve said this before) I would have Bryant with below 22 FGA, Pau and Bynum both at 15-17. It’s not perfect, and sometimes Pau and Bynum cannot get their own shots, and sometimes they can’t complete the easy ones. I can’t be upset with Kobe making 55% of his shots. While Pau and Bynum are both sitting below 40% and just say “Kobe should have gotten them more involved.” He just plainly was not the most glaring problem to me. Bynum’s lack of concern and aggression with poor PG play with bad coaching mixed with Bryants HERO ball are all the attributing factors for the Lakers demise.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Lake, I had no problem with Kobe’s play last night (apart from the 0 assists) because he shot a great percentage and did it within the confines of the offense (well if we could call what MBron runs an offense) but I have a problem with his play and refusal to get bynum involved during the 4th qtrs of Gm2 and Gm4 losses.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Then you and I are on the same page. I just wish Bynum made it easier for Kobe to want to give him the ball… Same with Pau. It’s partially KB’s fault for them being so scarred to fail that they can’t play with exuberance and joy, but it’s also just on them as MEN that have a job they get payed well to do and they just need to play up to their ability independently.

  • rand33p

    PEOPLE talking about touches for Gasol and Bynum are ridiculous.. Gasol WAS looking to pass almost throughout the playoffs and Bynum had horrendous positioning to receive the ball in end game situations (Pau and Bynum surely should have run the high-low more often) BUT that is the reason Kobe had to iso throughout the fourth quarter.. too big a load for the Mamba who is still freakin insane good

  • shutup

    Whatever happened to great players making the players around them better. Honestly you don’t think Kobe pouting when someone else misses a shot has an impact on their confidence? if anyone is responsible for Pau turtling up its Kobe. You think Pau is worried about Mike Brown chewing him out? NO, its that look Kobe will give him. Think about this you think Kobe didn’t say something to Blake after that missed shot? You don’t think Pau had thoughts of that at the end of the game and thats why he forced that pass? Because we all know if he would have missed that shot he probably would have got the look from Kobe and death threats from the fairweather fans of LA. Lastly you don’t think Pau knows hes gonna be gone next year? he help the Lakers go from early playoff exits to 3 finals appearances and 2 chips. Yet most Laker fans were calling for him to be traded like he didn’t do sh!t for this team.

  • Mike from Spain

    Let’s see… I pick a dude and I say ‘his primary role is as scorer’. Now, he has the league’s 25th best guards’ FG%. Question: do you give him the best salary in the league? He’s not even top 10 in his role in his position. So, what should he be making?

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    No, Shutup. In life one of the first things you learn is A.) Life is not fair. B.) Man up and make it better yourself and don’t rely on other people to motivate you.
    Pau Gasol would not have made it to the NBA if he had banked on people getting him where he is. He is a MAN. He doesn’t need Kobe to motivate him or make him feel special to do well. He can do that on his own.
    When Michael Jordan gave team mates a look of disapproval after a poor choice it was considered good leadership, and good no nonsense style. When KB does it he’s being a bad team mate…
    LeBron is one of the best team mates ever and he chides Mario Chalmers all the time. I have seen Bron chew out a few different guys on occasion. IMO that’s good. If you think that’s bad leadership, then many, many, greats were bad leaders. Charles Barkley, Oscar, MJ, Wilt, Shaq, Bird. Nahh, I think that respect is the best indication of leadership quality and that is something that Kobe gets no matter where he goes.
    If you don’t understand why Pau Gasol is not liked much in LA these days after the last 2 playoff performances, that is once again, on you.
    We respect Pau for what he use to be able to do, but it is obvious that he is past his prime and he appears to be emotionally distraught. Those are not qualities you want in your 2nd best player…

  • http://slamonline.com Bryan Crawford

    I’m glad I missed this convo. And AQWORD is an idiot (what else is new) if he really thinks I made those earlier comments.

  • shutup

    So now we should act like disapproval from the alpha-dog doesn’t have a negative impact on other players. You think someone with Kobe’s success would understand the team dynamic. There is no one way to deal with people and clearly Kobe doesn’t understand what is needed from him to have team success. Despite putting up high scoring numbers his game has lost a step and usually as the greats age they learn how to use their team, this concept has been lost on Kobe. Oh and I understand why Pau isn’t liked in LA I just think its ridiculous to expect someone to flourish when Kobe plays the way he does; and people act like Pau didnt save LA, or do you not remember all the Kobe wants out drama?

  • http://www.kb24.com The Seed

    People blaming Kobe for playing hard and wanting to win at any cost, need to relook at the performances of Bynum and Pau. Kobe does what he does and if Bynum and Pau do not want to come to the party, then Kobe will play without them. Pau is playing soft and always had and Bynum thinks he is a 10 time all star now. Bynum is overrated and Pau is very tradable. I take my chances with Kobe. People were killing Kobe before he won two rings with Pau-who is a borderline HoFamer. Kobe is the only player in History to win two straight rings without another HoFamer on the team. Its not a guarantee that Pau will make it. Especially if Pau gets traded and does nothing later in his career. Kobe gets blamed for nonsense, but its easier to blame Kobe, BUT MJ did the same thing in his playing career. People act like MJ won a ring every year he played.

  • http://www.kb24.com The Seed

    @shutup
    Stop acting like Bird, Magic and MJ didn’t have great players. MJ never won without Pippen. Bird without all of his HoFamers and Magic never won without Kareem. Cut out the Pau talk, because Kobe needed a big man and you act like Pau is Kareem or Shaq. Pau is a good big man that has skill. Pau is not great, he dissapears some nights then have great games. Pau is very inconsistent. What greats are you talking about, check what greats won rings later on in there careers like Kobe, you would be surprised. Also if Kobe was not a team player you think he would have 5 rings. You just don’t like Kobe, because MJ was way worst as a teammate or about the same. Rodman has stated they never talked, Pippen wanted out of chi at times, Grant left and MJ punched his teammates in practice and even Phil stated MJ was to hard on his teammates. I bet you won’t blast MJ. BOOK IT!!

  • Hobbes

    Lakers will never win another championship with Kobe Bryant as the main ball hog. End.

  • shutup

    Why does every convo about Kobe revert back to MJ? You wanna discuss MJ’s lack of leadership why not wait until a MJ thread pops up, I never understand why people insist on calling on MJ to defend Kobe. Kareem deferred to Magic and Duncan differed to Tony Parker, Shaq differed to Wade Kidd deferred to Dirk history is full of great players that age well. You think Bird had a problem giving the ball to McHale? Winning is all that matters but surely you cant equate Kobe’s performances with wanting to win. You know who is responsible for Kobe’s 5 chips? Phil Jackson, the Zen Master kept his team playing well despite Kobe’s selfish antics. Young Jordan played like Kobe has his whole career, then he matired and realized he had to rely on his team more, thats when he went from being a great scorer to being imo the greatest of all time. Book That, BeanBag( sorry had to use it Heals)

  • shutup

    *matured

  • http://www.kb24.com The Seed

    ^^^ You straight dumb, you are actually going against what you posted earlier. Phil Jackson won Kobe his rings with Shaq and after Shaq. MJ wasn’t selfish later in his career. You need to read more, its a reason MJ stated Kobe can be compared to him. Go read some articles and learn the reason why. It will open you eyes.

  • Tierra kelly

    kobe all day everyday

  • shutup

    I dont think I mentioned Shaq in this thread at all. But yes the first 3 were Shaq’s teams, the Finals MVPs show that. But if you don’t think Phil was the glue that held that team together despite clashing egos than you have a very short memory. I was pointing out that Kobe’s lack of leadership didn’t really matter because Phil was a master at managing personalities, so despite Kobe chucking the team still played at a high level. Like I said Laker fans act like Pau didn’t turn the franchise around and was the main reason that they went from early exits to 2 time champions.

  • shutup

    When you typed “You straight dumb” did you have one hand on your hip while snapping your fingers on the other hand while your neck went side to side?

  • Bruce

    Dear Mitch:
    As everyone knows I do what I do. I have formulated a five year plan for the remainder of my Laker career. As you have probably learned by now,big people annoy me,they usually get upset if they don’t get 10 shots a game. As a favor to you and the organization I have scoured the NBA for players whose games are compatible and complementary with what i do when I do what I do. Here is a complete list of those players. In order to comply with my demand,trade or sell all 11 players who cost me a title this year. In return here are the players whose game is compatible with mine:
    1. Chris Paul
    2. Jason Kidd
    3.Steve Nash
    4.Rajon Rondo
    5. Derek Fisher

    Our starting lineup will be Paul,Nash,Kidd,Rondo and me. Derek Fisher will be our sixth man and my ambassador to the other four players.We won’t need any more players since I can’t any more whose games are compatible with mine. Goals for the five year plan include:

    1. Pass Michael in career scoring.
    2. Surpass Wilt’s 50.4 points per game scoring average for one season.
    3. Pass Karl Malone in career scoring.
    4. Pass Kareem in career scoring.
    Sincerely,
    K.B.B.

  • roybot

    42 points, 0 assists. I liked Kobe better when he was a complete basketball player and not just a scorer. He has taken it on himself to shoulder the scoring load while neglecting other parts of the game that are just as important. Kobe became the best player in the world because of his versatility, not just his scoring abilities.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.l.brewer3 BlackPhantom

    Of course Kobe should v’e passed more,Sometimes people act like Bynum always got the deep post position all throughout the playoffs….it really hasn’t been that way. So it’s kind of a hand-in-hand thing to me.

  • http://nyill.wordpress.com Enigmatic

    Meh.

  • Justin G.

    @The Seed, if the MJ was such a terrible leader why do Pippen (him wanting out of Chicago had to do with salary and nothing to do with MJ), and Steve Kerr (the guy who got slapped) call him one of if not the best teammates and leaders they’ve ever had? Dennis Rodman said the same thing and he played with a lot of the great ones. Just because they didn’t talk off the court doesn’t mean you’re not a great teammate on the court. What would the two of them have to talk about anyway? Rodman went out to party and be a freak show. Jordan went home to the family. Horace Grant left because he wanted more money and he was tired of being Phil Jackson’s whipping boy. If you want others to start doing their research, perhaps you should too

  • sheedfan

    If they woulda’ had Sheed, the Lakers season would not be over.

  • Bruce

    I don’t see where Kobe has ever been the best basketball player in the world or that versatile. Before him there was Jordan who excelled him in every aspect of the game,between Kobe and LeBron was Duncan who has always played much better than Kobe in every aspect except scoring(although Duncan was a more efficient scorer) and was a unifying rather than divisive influence with teammates and LeBron came into the league a better all-around player than Kobe in every aspect of the game except raw scoring(though he is far beyond Kobe in efficiency in scoring and enhancing the games of his teammates.
    All things considered,raw scoring is a neutral statistic. It can be a good thing if you lead the team in scoring and you make the highest percentage on the team in fg% or it can be a negative or neutral statistic if you are below the team average and if there are other stars on the team who are higher percentage shooters on the team(which has almost always been the case with Kobe). When this is the case and you are a high volume shooter you are taking shots away from your most effective scorers which is a negative for the team. In every season except about two or three of Kobe’s there have been stars who are more efficient scorers who are deprived of opportunities because of Kobe’s personal need to be “the man”.
    Now,unfortunately for everyone involved,Kobe has become a parody of himself with games like 42 points and 0 assists(it was not long ago when he had a thirty something game with no assists). In the few seasons he played where the team actually needed him to score tons of points and his field goal percentage was actually near the highest on the team,the team went nowhere. They missed the playoffs one year and were eliminated by Phoenix the other two. Kobe had great stats during that time,but the team went nowhere.
    Bottom line on Kobe is that when it comes to individual play Kobe is great offensive player(and an overrated though good one, when he chooses to be, defensive player).
    As far as top ten player of all time,that is ridiculous ,and better than Michael absurd, except for the Kobe worshippers who consider only scoring and hype when determining how good a player was/is.True greatness has to factor in how the player fit in and worked with them for team goals and while Kobe scored a lot of points,his high volume shooting to enhance his own stats has often made things more difficult for team chemistry and team success through the years.
    As for “his” five titles,again irrelevant when you consider who his teammates were over the past 15 years. Consider that using that criteria,if DFish wins a title this year(a very good possibility) he will be greater than Kobe. Not as far fetched as you may think since Fish was an important person in smoothing over the many problems caused by Kobe’s personal contempt for his teammates at times. That stuff is important to a team.

  • PnoyVibe

    Ayo, looks like Kobe and Vanessa are back together.

  • Socrates

    I just love reading all of these arguments. You’re all so cute. You all think you’re right and you all refuse to accept very good arguments from each side.

    I am a Kobe fan, but I am a basketball fan too. So I, unlike almost everyone here, am not so ignorant to the game itself. The stats, reports, and media will all say something at some time to disagree with what you think; your collective biases are why you will all never get along, shut up, and watch the game and appreciate it, before stars like Kobe Bryant are old and retiring and leaving you to watch only the highlights to reminisce on a time when basketball was much different, for better or for worse.

    That being said, continue the naivete; it is entertaining.

Advertisement