Tuesday, May 8th, 2012 at 9:26 am  |  134 responses

Post Up: Clippers In Command

Lob City outlasts Memphis in overtime to go up 3-1 and San Antonio completes the sweep.

Spurs 87, Jazz 81 (SAS wins 4-0)

Get out the brooms, everyone. The San Antonio Spurs got redemption after an early first-round exit last year as a No.1 seed with a sweep of the Utah Jazz, taking Game 4, 87-81.

“We always want to win. You always want to go as far as you can, and of course last year was frustrating. It’s always hard when you go home after the first round,” said Manu Ginobili in comparing each of the first-round series over the past two years. “But like I said many times, last year the Grizzlies played better than us. When that happens, you can’t do much but shake their hands and congratulate them and get ready for the next season. I think we played better this year. We didn’t let them (the Jazz) get in the game. We played very solid basketball. We didn’t play an opponent as good or as sharp as Memphis was last year.”

In a relatively poor offensive night for the San Antonio’s starting lineup, the Spurs’ bench picked up the slack, outscoring Utah’s bench 57-10. Manu Ginobili led the charge with 17 points off the bench. Despite finishing with just a 37 percent field goal percentage, San Antonio continued its hot shooting from behind the arc—shooting 45 percent in the contest.

Utah competed hard throughout the contest, as they cut a 21-point lead to 83-79 with a minute left to play. But the Jazz ran out of gas in the closing seconds. Al Jefferson had a great game, scoring 26 points and grabbing 10 rebounds.

“Looking at it from the beginning of the game I thought that our guys showed a lot of class as they have done all year—just continued to fight, Said Utah coach Tyrone Corbin. “Our backs were up against the wall right from the beginning. If we win, lose or draw, we are going to give everything we have.”

While Utah has a young team that showed a lot of promise for the future, the seasoned vets were just too much for them in this series. San Antonio will get some rest now as they await the winner of the Memphis-L.A Clippers series. —Christian Mordi (@mordi_thecomeup)

Clippers 101, Grizzlies 97 (OT) (LAC leads 3-1)

There’s this big, hazy cloud over last night’s Clippers-Grizzlies game and it’s distracting us from how good Chris Paul is and how we should all be buying his shirts and shoes and jars of sweat for cloning purposes. So let’s address it right away.

Blake Griffin was very gently caressed a couple of times by Memphis’ big men—from Zach Randolph to Marc Gasol to Mike Tyson’s Punchout character Hamed Haddadi—and fouls were called. They weren’t fouls, and Blake pretended like the sun had fallen on him.

It was probably enough to swing the game, to keep Gasol off the floor (he had four fouls and two shot attempts entering the fourth quarter), and to get the Grizzlies out of rhythm and desperate for big men solutions. This set of refs probably coddled Blake a little and fed into his bad flopping habit.

But he also scored 30 points on 10-15 shooting and exhibited real, human post moves for the first time in his NBA postseason life. The fouls had to do with almost none of it. This was enough to keep the Clippers afloat while Vinny Del Negro made bad decisions waiting for Chris Paul to do his end-of-the-game thing.

The Clippers won 101-97 in overtime. Los Angeles is a win away from trying to make the Spurs feel all sad and deflated by their spryness in the West Semis.

Oh, it seems like we jumped right over the overtime part, but it wasn’t much. The Clippers were up 10 with 5:11 left. Memphis snuck back in it in that very Memphis kind of way. (“Wait, they’re down 6?”)

It wasn’t until Mike Conley hit his pull-up 3 with 2:59 left that you saw what kind of day he was having. Dude netted 25 points so quietly you’d need to get NASA involved to remember any of it.

Rudy Gay jumped in and tried to out-Chris Paul Chris Paul. Nobody out-Chris Pauls Chris Paul, obviously, but he pretended not to know this.

Rudy hit an unbeatable contested jumpshot with 35 seconds left. It tied the game. It was only unbeatable for nine seconds, though. CP skipped the breaking of Tony Allen’s ankles and just cut them off altogether at the free throw line.

He got a free layup with 27 seconds left in a tied playoff game. The guy would like you to pay attention to how painfully good he is.

Zach Randolph tied it with free throws on the other end. There was an overtime, but it was just a series of sequences that ended in Chris Paul getting more points. He had eight in overtime. Almost all on contested jumpshots.

Blake contributed four more. He showed off a couple of post moves. It wasn’t much, but it was effective when he wanted it to be. It was something. And something is scary.

Here’s why: This game went to overtime and it never felt like it was in danger the entire second half. Not once. Whatever the Memphis did, it felt like CP would do the same thing by himself, plus two.

Thing is, a lot of people knew he was going to be the best player in the West in these Playoffs. And this is still making us all look stupid and unprepared.

The closest analogy is Dirk Nowitzki last year. The next closest analogy is Michael Jordan. I’m not getting carried away. —Ben Collins

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , ,

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    @ Lakeshow: Come at me bro.

  • http://slamonline.com Datkid

    lakeshow… fam.. everybody get’s old. someday soon russell westbrook will be better than D.wade and at some point John Wall/Derrick Rose or Kyrie Irving will be better than cp3. Even Jordan got old at some point and Kobe became better. nobody’s knocking KB24. and d.wade and cp3 are arguably better than 99.9% of the league, the fact that he can still sort of stay with them is incredibly impressive IMO. but no he’s not better than them.

  • http://idunkonthem.blogspot.com albie1kenobi

    regarding to the greatest career, kobe is in the lead right now, and I don’t see duncan ever catching him with individual accomplishments. Lebron’s not trailing behind by a major distance, and unless he gets 5 rings with at least 3 Finals MVP, it’s still going to be Kobe.

  • http://Roosterteeth.com Caboose

    Unfortunately JT, I also think that’s what’s gonna happen. And datkid, well put.

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    whatever happened to Enigmatic? I miss that dude, he was one of the coolest commenters on here. Where you at, Rigo?! #thatawkardmomentwhenyoumisspeopleontheinternet.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    He can’t really comment from Alaska for whatever reason.
    .
    imo, Tim Duncan is still ahead of Kobe all-time. I don’t see why more people don’t feel that way. Just because the guy has one more ring doesn’t mean he’s been a better player throughout his career.

  • http://Roosterteeth.com Caboose

    Cosign nbk. Duncan has ALWAYS been ridiculously and consistently stellar. I remember a couple years back, SLAM ran an article on him (Adult Swim, it was titled, I think). They compared his stats from his rookie year, current year, and career, and there was never more than like a 5% difference in anything. That’s crazy.

  • http://slamonline.com nbk

    Tim Duncan has been the best player on his team his entire career save the last 2 years. And he has the best winning % in all of professional sports in that time. How does that get over-looked? If Tim Duncan played next to Shaq instead of Kobe he would have like 8 rings, have any of you considered that? The Championship was either won by Shaq or Duncan every single year but 1 from 1999 to 2007.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Teddy: I’ve already come! Ehh, eww, never mind, don’t like the sound of that.
    Dat: I will put money on D-Wade still being able to out play Westbrook when he is 33 and Russ is 25 or whatever their age difference is. Yes players lose certain things. Like athleticism, energy, physical things. What they lose in their physical gifts the good players make up for in intelligent play and all around smarter ball. D-Wade has won it all. Kobe whas won it all. They know what it takes. So I see you. I feel that position, but I am on the side of the vets on this one.
    Co-Sign Teddy on Enig.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    People do know that when they say “Kobe accomplished more individually than TD”, that they are wrong? TD has more Final MVP trophies, more RS MVPs, higher MVP award win-shares, higher PER, more win-shares (defensively and offensively) and more all-nba defensive team selections. Just putting that out there.

  • http://Roosterteeth.com Caboose

    But JT! Win shares don’t mean anything!!!!! (Mostly because Kobe’s have been declining, but I will ignore that). And Kobe has 5 rings! See that’s one more than Duncan! DUHHHHH. (sarcasm)
    —–
    Lake, by that logic then, Jason Kidd is a better player than Derrick Rose. I mean, Kidd may have lost most of his physical gifts, but dude is as savvy as any veteran and he “knows what it takes,” I mean, he won a ring last year. But Rose, pfft, what does he have?

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    Yeah, I was running out of bro sentences too… These exchanges can sound homoerotic real fast. Not that there’s anything wrong with that (Seinfeld voice). Later bro.

  • http://thetroyblog.com Teddy-the-Bear

    Or should I say, #laterbro.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Caboose as long as you understand that Kevin Love is the 5th most winning-est player in basketball, I too will share your win/share enthusiasm.
    Go James Harden, best Thunder player according to win/share!! Ya!
    Naw, your going off the deep end there final train car… Kidd hasn’t proved to be able to run with these young cats on both ends like KB has (lead L in scoring for 90% of season, Scored 40 plus points numerous times, still leading his team in the playoffs, All Star MVP). Kidd has shown ability to play great defense per his age and the ability to still be able to run a team well while still hitting 3 pointers at a high rate, but he is not in the category of “still able to outplay young guns.”
    Here let me see if I can try and break through here… Would anyone here think that Duncan or Garnett could outplay Love in a playoff series? There you go… Now ya get it don’t ya??!!
    At least that’s what ESPN tells me.
    LMAO @ Ted the Bear

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Obviously Lakeshow just doesn’t understand what win shares are…

  • http://Roosterteeth.com Caboose

    It sounds like you’re arguing against just win shares and general perception. Ok, that’s 2 things. How about ALL THOSE OTHER STATS I gave? Or are those overlooked because Kobe is Kobe and stats can’t be applied to his game?

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    You can’t spend the year talking about Kevin Love as the best PF in the L an ten use his Win Share total as proof of how in-reliable the stat is. That’s hypocrisy.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Well nbk, if a player makes his team win the most…. That would be the teams best player would it not?
    I understand that under the right context win/shares can illuminate light on a subject that is hard to reveal without such a equation.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    2 cheers for autospell.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Find one time I ever said that K-Love was the L’s best PF nbk.
    Once.
    WTF are you talking about.
    You little lying sack.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Lakeshow, come on now. You spent the entire season running your “Love is the best PF” propaganda after every good-great game Love had. Don’t bracktrack now.

  • http://Slamonline.com nbk

    Oh sorry, undisputed top 3. Or best this season or whatever you were saying.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Man you guys are more stupid than I thought.
    If you don’t know what the difference is between a top 3 at a position and being undisputed number 1 then this convo was over before it started. Like that, and i’m out.
    Straight stupid.

  • http://Roosterteeth.com Caboose

    LakeShow arguing pattern:
    1. Make claim, give nothing to back up.
    2. Act stunned when claim is challenged, demand explanation.
    3. Disregard any stats given and give unrelated subjective observation.
    4. Reassert point in formal style followed by sarcasm ad hominem.
    5. Insult person(s) arguing after being pressed further and finding self in corner.
    6. Leave, thinking argument has been won.
    Repeat.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Co-Sign Caboose.

  • http://idunkonthem.blogspot.com albie1kenobi

    @LakeShow: nice one! i like it! (no sarcasm)

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Shout out to the guy who lived in a small dwelling on the edge of the Jundland Wastes on the desert planet of Tatooine.

  • http://Roosterteeth.com Caboose

    Lol, nice Lake.

  • http://www.soundcloud.com/tray-5 T-Ray

    I leave for 2 classes and come back to what may I ask?

  • Ryan

    I can’t stand Flop City I hope they drop three straight to Memphis. Charles Barkley is exactly right about Blake Griffin the way he’s flopping around guys are going to actually hit him and people like me will stand up and cheer when he goes down hard. I want to like the kid since he’s got game and seems like a nice guy but then I watch him flop and I want to vomit.

  • Mike From Spain

    I like Chris Paul, Blake Griffin is exciting to watch, but his stare-downs and flopping have me liking this Clipper team less than I thought I would. @teddy-the-bear -> it really hurts me to see the Gasols getting abused, and I never understand why Marc never takes more than 6-8 FGAs even though he’s a strong 7 footer with good post fundamentals… well, I think I begin to see what happens, the guy is soft, much as I hate to admit. Pau… well, Pau is on the decline. Let’s see what can he do with the OKC

  • Justin G.

    Griffin and his flopping are driving me crazy. Paul is easily the best PG in the game right now. It really is incredible to watch him play. And while I agree that right now Wade and CP3 may have the upper hand on Kobe overall, the gap is not as wide as you regulars make it seem. Kobe is better than them on a lot of nights too. It’s like when Larry Bird, Magic Johnson, and Michael Jordan sat around playing cards late into the night at the Olympics and Ahmad Rashaad asked them who’s the best. After some discussion they decided that Michael was the best but not every night. I think the same thing goes here. And you guys have got to realize there is more to a player than some of these ridiculous, obscure stats. You guys get way too stat oriented when trying to prove your point as well as way too condescending when people disagree with you

  • http://www.alllooksame.com Tarzan Cooper

    Lakeshow is a dingus

  • toinefan88

    i remember chauncey biwwups undressing paul in the playoffs a couple years ago. let’s not get ahead of ourselves (mj?). he still has to beat westbrook and the thunder. we’ll see how that goes lol

Advertisement