Wednesday, May 30th, 2012 at 9:22 am  |  71 responses

Post Up: Spurs Win, Again

Tony Parker’s 34 points help San Antonio to a 2-0 lead in the Western Conference Finals.

Spurs 120, Thunder 111 (SAS leads 2-0)

Over the past decade or so, a “business-like” victory for the San Antonio Spurs wasn’t all that aesthetically pleasing. It was slow, plodding and absent of much pace or flow. However, the system and its pieces worked really well. It worked to the tune of four titles over a nine-year span. Today, the faces do seem to all look the same.

But, my how things have changed.

Game 2 of the Western Conference Finals was the epitome of what a business meeting with the Spurs looks like now. The Spurs were surgical, hitting shots early, seizing a double-digit lead midway through the first-quarter and never laying off the gas. The team’s 20th straight victory was a 120-111 clinic that now gives the team with the best regular season record a 2-0 advantage as the series shifts to Oklahoma City.

While the critics love to heap, well, criticism on the offensive shot selection and young decision makers on the Thunder, it was their collective inability to slow Tony Parker that was their ultimate undoing. Simply put, Parker finished with one of the most efficient point guard performances from this entire postseason. His brilliant 17-point first half was almost outdone, as he hit 16 of 21 total shots en route to 34 points. The Frenchmen was also more than willing to share. He doled out 8 assists, having his hand in 50 total points.

When Parker wasn’t throwing a pebble into his visual ocean, the team’s sets and crispness of execution positioned his teammates to find more than enough space for open shots. Wide open shots. After an abysmal defensive fourth quarter on Sunday in Game 1, the Thunder weren’t much better for 48 minutes on Tuesday. They were flatfooted, uncommunicative and had that perpetual lost look of a team unable to offer up much resistance. The Spurs hit seemingly dozens of threes; all of them wide open. They hit their first five long-range shots of the second half, which was key to the lead swelling from 11 at half to an overwhelming 22-point spread midway through the third.

To their credit, the megawatt trio of Russell Westbrook, James Harden and Kevin Durant did their part in the box score. Durant scored 31 points on just 17 shots and the guard tandem almost equally combined for 57 points, 14 rebounds, 12 assists and zero turnovers. But it wasn’t enough. Things got to within a couple possessions in the fourth, but not close enough to catch the Spurs.

The Thunder failed to get the offensive support they received from their role players in Game 1. Derek Fisher, Nick Collison and Thabo Sefolosha gave the team a huge lift on Sunday night, going 11-18 for 25 points, but were only able to muster a combined 12 points on just one less shot attempt in Game 2. The interior presence was pretty much transparent for OKC, as well.

The Spurs got 20 points and some key late-game buckets from Manu Ginobili and double-doubles each from Tim Duncan and Kawhi Leonard, who played the best playoff ball of his young career.

Thunder head coach Scott Brooks took his share of criticism himself after some of his small lineups were abused in Game 1 fourth quarter. On this evening, Coach Brooks did not have roster issues, but he never was able to slow down the Spurs. His team was consistently a step behind all night.

Rest assured, though, the next two games are sure to spark the Thunder, getting back to the friendly confines of the Chesapeake Energy Arena. But for the fans of the team now down 0-2, the next two games need to have a specific emphasis.

Take care of business. —Cub Buenning (@cubbuenning)

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • http://slamonline.com Datkid

    I hope ya’ll are right about the spurs weaknesses against miami. I agree with ya’ll about them not being as defensive. and about playing fast which will help miami….but man… those 3′s… they bring back nightmares about last years finals against dallas smh. I don’t really feel like the spurs have anyone that can guard LBJ and Wade either. and if the heat go small and stifle the spurs P&R forcing Timmy to beat them in the post (which the thunder did for stretches) then I think they have a shot. and things only get better if bosh comes back. The spurs have trouble guarding that pick and pop…homie would be KEY in this series. but a wade/lebron pick and pop when the heat go small would work too.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Datkid, I don’t know why you think that the Spurs don’t have anyone to guard LBJ and Wade.
    S-Jack
    Kawhi Leonard
    Danny Green
    Gary Neal
    Manu Ginobili
    Those guys are all above average, to excellent defenders and they are all decent size. No one can stop LBJ and Wade, but they are as likely to defend them well as any other team.

  • http://www.slamonline.com Nick Tha Quick

    @ Lake I don’t know about Gary Neal defending Wade though. If Ray is no match for Wade…

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Ray’s body said adios amigo a few months back. Gary is relatively young, but none the less.
    S-Jack
    KL
    DG
    MG
    All these dudes are capable.

  • http://slamonline.com Datkid

    No they are not. nNne of those people has a prayer of staying in front of either Wade or a motivated Lebron, and if you put ginobli on either one of them he’ll be too tired to euro step his way into the lane. Those people are all decent defenders but other teams have far better personnel to use against them. Chicago had keith brogans and luol deng. The mavericks had shawn marion. etc etc.

  • http://slamonline.com Datkid

    *none. and if popavich is crazy enough to put gary neal on wade then, dwayne will automatically become 2006 finals mvp flash. which would suck for the spurs.

  • http://www.sportsgrid.com/media/shaq-kobe-highlights/ shutup

    ^lmao so you havent been watching Ginobili guarding Harden? Although the Spurs aren’t the defensive powerhouse of yesteryear they still play very solid controlled defense. Miami relies on turnovers and long kickouts to get in transition, which the Spurs can control with low turnovers and dumping it down to Duncan to keep the D honest, it’s the same formula they are using to slow the very potent offense of the Thunder; Durant, Westbrook and Harden are the best running trio in the NBA. Although Miami has improved their halfcourt offense they still get stagnant and predictable in their attack. Spo is outmatched just like Scott Brooks is right now. One last point for Datkid, its a lot easier for a defender to stay in front of someone when they give a cushion to shoot, Lebron isn’t killing anyone if he settles for jumpshots 18 feet and out, oh and btw if Jackson can cause problems for Durant, I’m sure he has a prayer of making it tougher for Lebron.

  • http://www.yahoo.com The Fury

    Go get ‘em Shutup….

  • http://www.sportsgrid.com/media/shaq-kobe-highlights/ shutup

    Even if LBJ and Wade both score 35 points each per game thats only 70 points the Spurs are avg around 100+ points per game in these playoffs where is Miami going to come up with another 30 points?

  • Ronald

    Doesn’t OKC have the best trio of young, atheltic wings in the league?

  • K.a.

    This heat team is no different from last year. This spurs team is better than last years mav. Pretty obvious to me where this is going.

  • everything

    @shutup i dont think mia will just allow the spurs to reach 100. this heat team is a big improvement from last year k.a. no bibby, no big z, no dampier, no eddie house. plus the time spent together by the core is a big plus. so far the spurs havent faced a top 10 defense in the playoffs. Jazz -23rd
    Clippers 13th
    Okc – 17th

    Heat? 4th and they are currently up against the second best defense in the L behind chicago. think about that.

  • Ronald

    @everything: The Heat are 28th in the league in defending 3 pointers. Spurs are 1st in the league at 3 pt%. Think about that.

  • jimmer

    The Spurs are playing as well right now as the 2001 Lakers at the end of their season, and the 1996 Bulls during the middle of theirs. I say this having watched all three. Based purely on matchups, Miami don’t stand a chance. Ginobli can basically keep pace with Wade, or close enough to it to negate any dominant advantage. The heat have nobody to handle Duncan in the paint or Parker on point. The Spurs have an unsightly amount of depth and genuine talent across every position, which Miami don’t. All Miami have is a guy called Lebron James. On his own, he will have to beat a Spurs team with untouchable depth, balance, experience and skill, and that’s before you get into the efficiency of the Spurs in the half court. Lebron is either going to have to be some sort of Wilt Chamberlain/Oscar Robertson statistical hybrid who owns the entire spurs team and the series, or just go home. Again. Seeing as we don’t live in a fairy tale, I know which one I’d put my money on.

  • L

    The Thunder should go small most of the time with that line-up : Russ, JHard, Thebo, KD, Ibaka. That’s the only linup with they can defend the pick and roll with their lenght, speed and overall athletism.L

  • http://slamonline.com Datkid

    lmao just because ginnobli is doing well against harden… does not mean he’d do well against wade. lmao. if the heat can figure out how to stiff that P&R like the thunder did and force the spurs to make duncan and diaw beat them… they have a chance.

  • http://slamonline.com Datkid

    also… this has all depends on Bosh coming back.. without him.. they don’t have enough firepower.

  • http://www.sportsgrid.com/media/shaq-kobe-highlights/ shutup

    @KID So now Duncan and Diaw beat the Thunder? are we even watching the same sport? Ginobili was the key in game one and Parker the key in game two. Also the pick and roll ran rampant over the Thunder, even when the Spurs struggled in game one the p&r was the only bright spot of the offense, seeing as the threes really werent dropping. Harden and Wade aren’t that much different both good jumpshooters and great slashers the main difference is Harden tends to lead the break more than Wade and Wade get’s more Iso plays called for him in the halfcourt set. Wade gets more shots thus more points on avg. I can’t think of any discernible differences between the two but I am open to your opinion and insight.

  • http://www.sportsgrid.com/media/shaq-kobe-highlights/ shutup

    2012 playoff stats
    Harden 6-5 220
    PPG 18.4
    RPG 5.3
    APG 3.0
    SPG 2.0
    BPG 0.2
    FG% 0.455
    FT% 0.881
    3P% 0.372
    MPG 30.7
    Harden total fgm/fga 56/123
    Wade 6-4 220
    PPG 23.6
    RPG 4.5
    APG 3.9
    SPG 1.8
    BPG 1.4
    FG% 0.496
    FT% 0.680
    3P% 0.278
    MPG 37.6
    FGM/FGA 117/236

    not so much different DATKID although for almost twice the shot attempts Wade only has about an extra 100 points on Harden during these playoffs because Harden shoots 3′s at a higher %

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    Wade is not Flash no more Kid.

  • http://www.sportsgrid.com/media/shaq-kobe-highlights/ shutup

    Antone who didnt know a game like this was coming hasn’t been a Spurs fan that long. The Thunder’s energy was off the charts, was hoping the Spurs would right the ship but it didnt happen. Westbrook has played his best game of the series 10/15 shooting great decision making, thats what the Thunder need out of him. Wasn’t really a fan of the Harden stare-down, sometimes its best to let sleeping dragons lie. Game four will be very interesting.

Advertisement