Thursday, July 26th, 2012 at 10:05 am  |  103 responses

Nate Robinson Escaped Gunfire at Rucker Park Unhurt


Golden State Warriors point guard Nate Robinson was much luckier than the five people who were shot last night, at the legendary Rucker Park in New York City. Reports the NY Daily News: “Gunfire erupted around 10 p.m. at the Holcombe Rucker Park court on Frederick Douglass Boulevard near W. 155th St. after a dispute during a game for the Entertainers Basketball Classic, witnesses said. ‘They started arguing, about a bad call or something like that,’ said Rodney Harris, 47. ‘The guy was standing no more than five feet away from me. He pulled a gun out of his pocket and shot once. He then shot one more time. Everyone started running. He was real close to me,’ Harris said. ‘I thought I got shot.’ Nate Robinson, a former point guard for the Knicks, was at the game but escaped unscathed, witnesses said. ‘He was watching the game,’ Harris said. ‘After the shooting, he was okay. He wasn’t hurt…he left like everyone else.’ The five shooting victims were taken to area hospitals and all expected to survive, police said. One other person also was injured in the incident. The shooter started running amongst the crowd but then walked calmly across the street toward the Fine Fare supermarket and fired a few more rounds, Harris said. ‘Then he just walked away. He didn’t even run. My friend, a basketball player, got shot in the ankle,’ he said. ‘It could have been worse.’”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , ,

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    All short barrelled shotguns are not illegal. It depends on the length of the barrel. You can reduce the length somewhat, just not to much.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    James Holmes was a perfectly legal gun owners. As were the kids at Columbine’s parents. As was George Sodini.
    The reality is that just because something is legal doesn’t mean people will use it correctly.
    In some cases, that means we regulate it more, in other cases, we make the penalty for having that thing even more strict. The choice depends on a lot of factors, but the main factor is “What do white people want to do?”
    Exhibit A: Prohibition versus the Drug War.

  • http://slamonline.com LakeShow

    That’s silly logic right there AP…^^^
    “the assault rifle thing is ridiculous. You don’t need that for hunting. That is for killing humans.”
    Umm… What?
    A sniper rifle featuring a round so large (not even 20mm, say .223) that it could put a tangerine size hole through a bear is legal and fine to you because that is “not for killing humans”, but a Assault Rifle because it looks intimidating and holds in general (but not necessarily) a larger clip is for killing humans…
    I don’t go for that. Guns are for whatever use one dictates they are for.
    What we in America need to do, is make sure that people who have honorable or strictly recreational purposes, and with full knowledge of the power the weapon in their hands has are the ones with the guns.
    Once again my brothers(incredibly strong minded, good people) own Assault rifles. AR15′s, M4′s, and Ak-47′s are routinely modified into hunting weapons. They are not made with a sole purpose of human destruction.

Advertisement