Thursday, August 9th, 2012 at 10:43 pm  |  475 responses

Dwight Howard Reportedly Headed to Lakers in Four-Way Trade


It’s over! Dwight Howard is officially a Laker—or at least will be after a call is made to the league office Friday morning. As part of the deal, Andrew Bynum is headed to Philadelphia, with multiple pieces from the Lakers, Magic, 76ers and Nuggets moving around. More details, via ESPN: “A four-team trade that would send Dwight Howard to the Los Angeles Lakers is complete, multiple sources told ESPN on Thursday night. A source with direct knowledge of the talks told ESPN.com’s Marc Stein the Lakers will receive Howard, the Denver Nuggets will acquire Andre Iguodala, the 76ers will receive Andrew Bynumand Jason Richardson, and the Magic will get Arron Afflalo, Al Harrington, Nikola Vucevic and one protected future first-round pick from each of the other three teams. In addition, the Magic will be getting other pieces, including 76ers No. 1 draft pick Moe Harkless, a source told Stein. Sources close to the process told Stein and ESPNLosAngeles.com’s Ramona Shelburne that a trade call with the league office has been scheduled for Friday to secure the necessary NBA approval to make the deal official. Lakers forward Pau Gasol had been in and out of talks, sources told Shelburne. Earlier Thursday, Yahoo! Sports, citing sources, reported that talks of a four-team trade involving Howard have taken place this week and have ‘grown serious.’”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , ,

  • http://slamonline.com The Philosopher

    Kareem is the greatest center who’s ever lived.
    And arguably, the greatest player of all time.

  • dev0

    Just watched the intro press conference. He’s so happy. Good for him, and the Lakers. Would’ve liked to see what Nash could do for Bynum, but this is a clear upgrade. The Nash-Amaré style pick-and-roll of the mid-decade could be brought back and would be deadly with Howard flying in. Pau will be rejuvenated, and Metta will keep an edge. And Kobe?
    that’s the best part.

  • philly4rmAfrika

    the clippers cannot get a break… Lol…

  • http://www.slamonline.com flea

    Caboose. On paper yes. Only in terms of “best” Big names list, but not head to head when age and number of players in thier prime is factored in. I would take that 86-87 lakers team over any team past or present, including the 12’13′ Lakers even with old @ss Kareem. That was basketball perfection. The celtics team they beat that year imo is 1B in tearms of “best” teams ever. Also people always leave out the “bad boys” pick a year between 87′-90 they were sick…87’88 Zeke/Dumars/AD/ Mahorn/Laimbeer/ plus Microwave,Rodman and Salley? That said anything short of a chip will be a failure for the 12’13 Lakers. The heat had a buffer since thier best player had yet to win a chip’ but with kobe holding 5 and already losing twice in the finals, there is no buffer. plus Nash and D12 have no more excuses, at this point in thier careers (especially Nash) surrounded by that much talent it’s time to put up or shut up. But on the real all the Kobe critcs and stans are funny. Back in 00′ it was Shaq’s team. If Jordan was on that team it would have been Shaqs team. He was the most dominant player in the game. That said, Shaq doesn’t lead the Lakers past the stacked Blazers or Pacers to win the chip if Kobe didn’t do then what he’s done more than any other player since Shaq in the playoffs and finals. Win games. Pippen never carried that torch from michael, in that sence you could say he rode on Mike’s coatails. I don’t think you can really make that statement in refrence to Kobe, yeah it was obviously Shaqs team, He was greater than Kobe, or any other player in the L at the time.. Duncan,KG,Iverson,Vc,Tmac, but by 01′ kobe was in the convo with those guys already proving to be a superstar in his own right while playing with Shaq. #34 and #8 were arguably the greatest tandem in NBA history.
    As farr as Kobe’s legacy goes, we’ll just have to see..Like Huey said ridiculous is the norm in the NBA not sure if the CBA will prevent this sort of thing in the future, but at least for now the current generation of players are defining thier legacies by teaming up with other great players to win.

  • Larry Johnsons Gold Tooth

    In terms of Greatest starting lineups on paper Fellas forgot about

    84/85 sixers……Moses, Barkley , Dr J, Andrew Toney , Mo Cheeks

  • http://www.nba.com/knicks danpowers

    that aint the best starting five of all time because they lack athleticism and speed. they need at least one guy out there who could guard guys like bron, durant, ellis, iggy, etc… or any point guard in the league. without that teams will find a way to kill the lakers with perimeter game even though gasol and howard would wait in the paint

  • eZ

    This laker team can dominate, but can also easily flame out. As often seen when great players team up, part of their game has to be sacrificed for the team. When players fail or refuse to, the experiment will fail. Can kobe give up shots, move without the ball and accept a lesser role in the clutch. For that matter can nash? Can gasol accept being a no4 option on offense and become a glue guy? Can howard dominate defensively and shelve his face of the franchise no1 scoring option and go-to-guy ambitions he has expressed so often? Can Mike Brown manage all these different personalities and get them to think like a team?
    And ofcourse health, how will steve nash’ back hold up without the phoenix super staff? How will Howards back support a guy who is only a star because of his athleticism? How will kobes knees holdup come playoff time?

    Lot’s of valid questions i think and those make me refrain from annointing the lakers just yet.
    But…very exiting yes (Borat voice)

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Man this Lakers squad isn’t better than those prime Lakers and Celtics team. Hell, it might not be better than the championship Lakers of the 2000s. It’s arguable whether the squad is better than the early 90s Magic or Piston Bad Boys teams.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    Yall realize that Nash, Kobe and Artest are all past their prime, right? Even farther past their prime than the Celtics were, right?
    Hell, the Celtics in 2008 might have had a better starting five than this Lakers when you consider where each player was in his development althogh Perkins and Rondo were somewhat weak links.
    If this was 2008, yeah, they could maybe talk about best of all time, but it’s not. The Sixers of 82 were definitely better than this Lakers squad. Not even close.

  • James aka…

    Having read the thread up and down, I have to say what is clear about arguments on this site is a general tendancy to lie by omission. Inconvenient facts get dropped by people on here like merde d’oiseau on a park statue. The false dichotomy of shaq kobe, the catestrophic loses of superstars where they perform well, the idea that a 38 year old steve nash will have no excuse for failure on a team where 3/4 superstars are past their prime. argument requies nuance and some treatement of the counter argument’s best facts, unless you’re a politician campaigning, where sophistry rules supreme. This lakers team looks stupendous on paper, but so did a starting line up that had karl malone at pf, gary payton at pg, kobe at sg and shaq at c. If this team plays well they play well, but reputations and legacies don’t win championships so while the acquisition is exciting, this is no sure thing.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    James
    Right now, without a doubt, the Lakers have the best of second best roster on paper in the West.
    We’ve just been told, when Nash was traded, about how much he still has in the tank and how amazing he was last year with far less talent. So, now he has even better talent than first imagined.
    I don’t understand how Kobe’s legacy is going to take a hit if the team loses, which pretty much everyone agrees about, but Nash is just along for the ride.
    This will be the third time in his career when he’s been surrounded by very good to great talent. If he does not make the Finals at the very least, and preferably win, how could that failure not affect his legacy?
    You can’t argue that dude is a key piece and a difference maker and then say “But if he fails his team was old and so was he.” It’s a built in excuse that is insulting. Kobe is old, and actually has more miles on his body than Nash. Nobody is giving Kobe that pass.

  • http://slamonline.com Allenp

    This team is old, no doubt. But they also have extreme advantages for at least another two year. Kobe can still score very well in isolation against most of the league and his supreme intelligence means he knows how to get to the best spots to get off his shots.
    Nash is still one of the most efficient offensive talents in the League and probably still the best shooter off the bounce or spotting up. And obviously he’s one of the best passers.
    Artest can still play defense, hit the occasional shot and post up smaller players.
    Gasol is still a top five power forward, with elite passing skills, decent jumper and great back to the basket moves when he fights for position.
    Howard is the best center in the League, a defensive juggernaut who averaged 20 points and 14 rebounds despite only getting 13 shots and being horrible from the free throw line. He doesn’t need touches to get buckets and his lack of shots rarely impacts his rebounding or defense.
    The only Laker problem that is not controllable by the players is their age. Nash can play defense if he so desires, it’s not impossible. Kobe can move the ball. Gasol can play with fire and aggression while Artest is capable of having success as a defender and fifth option. Dwight can embrace his role and be special.
    There is no excuse for anyone on the Lakers team, particularly not for the team’s two most decorated members if they don’t challenge themselves to do what it takes to get a ring. If Ray Allen and Paul Pierce could morph into part of one of the greatest defensive units in recent NBA history, Kobe and Nash can address the weaknesses that have contributed to their past failures.
    Or pay the price as far as legacy.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Past lineups better than the current Laker squad.
    1962 Celtics- Sam Jones/Heinsohn/Russell/Havlicek/Cousy/Ramsey/KC- all HOFs. ’66 Sixers- Wilt/Hal Greer/Chet Walker/BCunningham.
    ’72 Knicks- Frazier/Monroe/Reed/Bradley/DeBusschere/Lucas
    ’80 Celtics- Bird/Parish/Archibald/McHale/Cornbread Maxwell
    ’83 Sixers- Erving/Moses/Toney/Cheeks/BJones
    ’84 Lakers- Magic/Kareem/Worthy/BScott/McAdoo/Coop/JWilkes
    ’85 Celtics- Bird/McHale/Parish/DJ/Ainge/Walton
    ’88 Pistons- Isiah/Dumars/Vinnie/Laimbeer/Dantley/Rodman/Aguirre/MaHorn
    There are quite a few teams better than the ’12 Laker team.

  • Mack

    As if nobody commented on this article…

  • JoeMaMa

    Nash sits 10 games during the season, if for no other reason, than to rest. Pau takes nights off, and Kobe…and during the season, they accept that they’ll lose a couple of games for the sake of rest. The issue with the Lakers isn’t age – that’s manageable. The issue is whether they can mesh properly. Nash is a consummate team player, and will help. As good as Kobe is, I’m interested if he’ll keep hoisting tough shots. If he paces himself and picks his spots (which will be created with ease by Nash) then he’ll be 23-25/game while staying relatively fresh. I think a big X factor is the Lakers’ bench. Who do they have now? I guess Barnes, Jamison? They need a defensive spark on the bench to spell big minutes. That’s not Jamison. Not really Barnes.

  • http://Roosterteeth.com Caboose

    Just to be clear, I’m well aware there are better TEAMS than this Lakers squad, I was solely talking starting 5. That’s all.

  • http://cnbc.com JTaylor21

    Caboose, I know. Most of those cats I named were starters except for a few bench players sprinkled in.

  • http://Roosterteeth.com Caboose

    Fair enough. We’ll have to see. On paper, the lineup looks great. When it’s game time, no, I don’t think these 5 surpass the best Lakers or Celtics teams.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.l.brewer3 BlackPhantom

    So, are the Lakers the absolute favorite to win the title? They are to me…but that’s only because I’ve always been a Laker fan….and that starting 5 is freaking scary on paper.

  • NBA Guru

    Damn im good! I said it from the beginning, Lakers should not trade Gasol, it would kill the value of this team. They listened, ofcourse (haha) and now this team is gonna be a wicked good. Im reading some of the posts and some people are mentioning the age difference, and if they will be able to mesh. Neither one will be a problem. Nash is too damn good as PG for this to be a problem. Yea theyll get tired becaue of all the years theyve put in, but look at the Celtics last year. Everyody said they were too old, and they nearly knocked out the Heat. Only real losers in this trade is Orlando! I guess they plan on building for the future, cause they got nothing but lottery picks…The NBA is gonna be hell-a-exciting this year..

  • http://www.reverbnation.com/tray24 T-Ray

    On paper they are the favorites but they are not the team to beat. They haven’t accomplished anything yet. My only worry is that Howard won’t be back until late 2012 or early 2013 so we won’t get a very high seed. We’ll see how it plays out. I personally don’t think chemistry will be a big issue. But cosign whoever it was who mentioned the 08 Celtics. To me they will go down as one of the best teams in history because not only was the starting 5 great but they had great bench production.

  • http://slamonline.com Sergio

    The joys of being a Laker fan! Simply outsmarting everyother team out there! We are the Yankees of Basketball!

  • jinolin

    The general consensus is even if Bean wins another 3 rings he’s still not better then GOAT.

  • http://www.nba.com/knicks danpowers

    bryant wont like to hear that but they should really consider moving gasol for a bruiser who only rebounds the ball and plays d like humphries or a younger reggie evans and maybe get one or two quick swingmen in return. otherwise their small perimeter players will be emberassed by faster squads with slashers and shooters like memphis, golden state, oklahoma, miami, denver, etc

  • http://www.nba.com/knicks danpowers

    not small, i meant slow perimeter players

Advertisement