Tuesday, September 18th, 2012 at 11:00 am  |  176 responses

The Los Angeles Lakers’ Tax Bill Could Reach $94.5 Million in 2014


by Marcel Mutoni@marcel_mutoni

It takes quite a bit for an NBA franchise to remain on top and contend for titles on a regular basis – front-office smarts, good trades, solid draft picks, etc. – but above all, it takes money. Lots of it.

The Los Angeles Lakers generate more revenue than most (if not all) of their rivals, but their operation is getting more costly to run than ever before. Thanks to the newly agreed upon Collective Bargaining Agreement, the Lakers could end up facing a tax bill of some $95 million after this season if they want to keep their core of players together.

In other words, to keep the team intact, the Lakers could be looking at a payroll of nearly $200 million.

Per the LA Times:

“My feeling is that we’ll continue to pursue the top players in the league,” Lakers General Manager Mitch Kupchak said. “There will always be an emphasis on having the franchise be able to survive and prosper.”

This is the last season the Lakers will pay a dollar-for-dollar penalty for exceeding the luxury-tax threshold, meaning that their league-high payroll of $99.2 million will cost them an additional $28.9 million in taxes, because that’s how far they are above the $70.3-million tax level. The tax will raise the tab for their player costs to $128 million. Starting next season, the tax burden gets significantly heavier. NBA teams must pay a $1.50-to-$1 ratio for the first $4.99 million they are over the luxury-tax threshold, a $1.75-to-$1 ratio for being $5 million to $9.99 million above the threshold, a $2.50 ratio for $10 million to $14.99 million over, and a $3.25 ratio for $15 million to $19.99 million beyond the threshold. Teams that are $20 million or more over the tax level accrue additional penalties, increasing by 50 cents per dollar for every $5 million. Those extra pennies can add up to millions, particularly for teams with multiple all-stars.

The Lakers already have $79.6 million committed to eight players for the 2013-14 season. Assuming they re-sign [Dwight] Howard next summer to a maximum contract that calls for him to make $20.5 million in the first year, that bumps the Lakers payroll over $100 million. If their final payroll was $105 million, that would put them $32 million over the league’s projected tax threshold of $73 million, triggering a tax of $94.5 million and putting the team on the hook for a staggering total of $199.5 million — a 55.9% increase over the total for this season with essentially the same group of core players.

There’s no need to feel sorry for the Lakers, of course. They’re certainly not lacking in funds.

The question going forward becomes, Will they be willing to bite the bullet and continue hoarding some of the NBA’s best talent?

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • PippenAintEasy

    The Lakers are a worldwide popular team. Only the Bulls have matched them worldwide, mainly due to MJ.

  • floe

    watch them not win a championship with this team and coach.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    the thing that’s not being mentioned here, is that the Salary Cap will increase every year. And the NBA is signing a new TV deal soon, which could vault the Salary Cap higher than anyone expects. Not to say LA won’t be paying an assload of money in luxury taxes, but they won’t be paying as much as it seems.

  • MUBWAR

    goood, now maybe my raptors can stand a chance against these mega spenders in LA Mia and Boston.

  • M Cho

    I didn’t know that the cap is increasing too. Rich mf’ers always find a loophole to keep on staying rich.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    the Salary Cap has increased every year since it was implemented except for this past season. With league growth comes financial growth within each organization. The more money the Lakers make, the more money the league makes, and thus, the players are allowed to make.

  • Shifty

    This is rediculous. Can picture Buss going for a coffee and asking one of his staff “you got this?”

  • Drig

    As long as we get 200 million per year from that ridiculous TV deal for the next 20 odd years, you sure as hell are gonna see the Lakers cough up the cash to get the guy they want. Hell, even with all that tax, atleast half of next year’s season tix sales are gonna be surplus for them! That sort of profit is something that 29 other teams can only dream of lol.

  • Yusaf

    This laker team I worry. Very big egos on this team. Also, very much expect. This Mike Brown coach, he seems weak to manage such. I must go now.

  • retloc

    And it doesn’t even matter. The illusion of money will always be on their side at the end of the day. If we understand that the wholle concept of money was invented in order to place people in a caste, we know that their tax bill is irrelevant. Classissism at its finest in a convoluted fashion. The have and have nots; a micro version of the macro-universe.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    if only we weren’t just talking about financial obligations of an NBA basketball team…..that would have been relevant.

  • retloc

    I can’t see how its not relevant. The lakers have and always will have enough to pay their bills, no matter how outlandish they become. It may have been a roundabout way of saying that, but that’s the point. They need not worry about tax burdens.

  • retloc

    I guess I have a hard time not seeing everything as connected, so get off point pretty easy, I do get a kick out of you keeping me headed in the right direction though. Focus focus focus this is only a basketball website, not real life.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    The Lakers have had to address issues with finances before. They are just a very well run business, so they don’t make decisions that will lose them money in the end. I wasn’t trying to be a dick or anything, just that your comment applies to the normal world, not really the basketball one. If LA doesn’t win a title, or their players don’t mesh, they won’t waste their money paying for something that won’t happen.
    - After the 04 season for Example, the Lakers had to resign Kobe & Shaq within a year of one another. After each player was extended the Lakers would be playing just those 2 players 45(ish) million dollars – taking up the vast majority of the Salary Cap. Which is the MAIN reason Shaq was traded. Despite the story the media peddled off.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Gilbert/100001749589586 Mike Gilbert

    who gets the money that a team pays when they are over the cap?

  • zogs19994

    ITS ALL OBAMAS FAULT!!!!

  • zogs19994

    ^^btw this is a joke, so dont reply with your view on politics.

  • retloc

    I understand that aspect of it, but the lakers, or more specifically the busses are in a universe where the rich stay rich. Have you ever heard of someone securing a 200 million dollar personal loan? That is the world they live in. And the lakers are definitey in the elite ruling class of the nba. That’s the point I was makking. No matter how smart of decisions the bobcats make they will never attain that level of success. I was merely alluding to the fact that the nba is our society, or the entire world on a smaller scale. The financial end is the exact same there as it is in the rest of the world. Haves and have nots, only broken down into three classes (sound familiar?)ruling(multiple champs), middle (first round exits) low (lottery). Just now many teams have won it all again? And how many have won a grip?

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    the league. it’s part of the revenue sharing program.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    i am not arguing that the richest teams don’t have the most success. I am just saying, them being the richest team isn’t why they are the richest team. They are only “the Lakers” or “the Yankees of the NBA” because of their Location. Not because Jerry Buss is their owner, or because the rich get richer.
    .
    In the NBA, it’s, location, location, location. That’s the difference between the NBA and the real world.

  • retloc

    How is that not the exact same as in the real world? I live in montana and can’t make a liveable wage so im sitting in camp in bumfuck alaska-where the money is.

  • retloc

    If you have a job where the pay doesn’t vary depending on where you are at you’re the only one in the world bud. Price of living varies not only state to state, but town to town, and yes also country to country. This is why I’ve usually refrained from commenting even though I’ve been reading slamonline for three years or so. I can’t help go go on nonsensical rants trying to connect the entire universe, because to me it is. One organism trying to survive by killing itself.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    dude, there is a higher % of people below the poverty line in LA then there are in Montana. Get it?

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Pay varies based on cost of living. It doesn’t vary based on location. You don’t get paid more as a landscaper in LA than you would as a landscaper in Montana, compared to the cost of living.

  • retloc

    And yet when I work for the same company in pennsylvania doing the same job I get paid less, and they don’t provide my food. In alaska they pay me more to do actually less work. The cost for me to live in pennsylvania is higher but my wage is less for the exact same job, so im going to have to respectfully disagree. Montanas average salary off the top of my head is in the 17-20 thou a year range. We do have less poverty, because our economy is more sustainable. We still produce actual consumable goods, which la, because of its size cannot do.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    You are in Alaska. If they don’t pay you more, you won’t live there. I mean, you using Alaska to defend your point that better markets = more money is killing your argument, you realize that right? My point was and has been, in the NBA, the better your location the more money you make, unlike the real world. And you are giving a glaring example of that.

  • retloc

    There are more people that have become disillusioned in la. If I lived in a box in a box id be even heavier into the self loathing as I already am. Well, my waves just waved goodbye to manic so imma get some rest and hope depressed isn’t on the plate for the rest of the day. Knowing everything emanating from my being is a futile attempt to connect and heal the organism takes its toll. I don’t understand how to numb it. Have a good day nbk, I quite enjoyed having a somewhat stimulating conversation to go along with my bukowski in bed this morning. I have a rather fatalistic perception of life{the multi-verse} so I love getting someone ellses view. I can’t help but see the end result. The middle has never existed.

  • Redd

    Romney is the one who is for big business!

  • Redd

    And Jordan’s Chicago Bulls have been the greatest team ever and still will be!

  • hyperactive
  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    people are disillusioned everywhere. you just gotta accept that everyone is on a different path to the same place. once you do that, everything will be easier. Roll with the punches, because they are inevitable. Life is easier once you just accept that you can’t even hope to control it. Good luck, and have a good one bruh.

  • LakeShow

    No.

  • LakeShow

    Bye bye.

  • Dagger

    Obviously the basketball “world” is also part of the economics of capitalism, aka the “normal world” . . . .

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    oh ok, thank you for clarifying. did you really need to write this? Like anyone actually thinks the NBA is in a different reality? The way the economics work is different. Which is also obvious. Unless you really need someone to explain to you the difference between the NBA salary structure and traditional capitalism. (max contracts, revenue sharing, etc.)

  • retloc

    I don’t pay a dime to I’ve in alaska housing and food are provided by the company, as well as the flights here, in pennsylvania I get ess money and have to provide my own food, so how exactly is that a glaring example? I live in montana. I know people are disillusioned everywhere, I was trying to say that its easier to give up when you look around and everything is man made nonsense. Creating jobs with no purpose except to make people feell like they are worthwhile members of society. There is no urban blight in montana, los angeles population alone is like ten times greater than the whole state. Plus in montana rather than live in poverty we kill ourselllves. I know for me personallly the only thing that gets me through some days is nature, not having that around to remind you that there’s more to life than the rent to me at least would make it easier to disconnect.

  • retloc

    Also tell someone in detroit location doesn’t matter in the real world. Or san salvador. I mean are you seriously saying that location doesn’t affect income? The better the location the better the income is a universal truth my man. That’s why there are slums and there are ritzy neighborhoods. You can’t go to the ghetto in la and get a badass high paying job, but you can go to the nice areas and get one-follow? In any case at the end of the day I feel none of it makes a difference, if you join society and get a job you enslave yourself I happen to work in the
    Gas and oil industry so I feel I help enslave the rest of the world as well, but that’s a different rant entirely.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    are you high? the conversation is about economics and the difference between the NBA and normal life. You get more benefits to live in a remote place like Alaska in real life, while in the NBA you get more benefits to do a job in a bigger market. I am not discussing which place is more depressing to live (which should, logically, only depend on the person, The Suicide Rate is irrelevant, considering the vast difference in locale & culture). You keep just reiterating what i’m saying by pointing out it is more beneficial for you do the same job and live in Alaska which is a “worse market” than to do that same job and live in Pennsylvania. Which is the exact opposite of how it works in the NBA.

  • retloc

    That’s kind of whta I was trying to get at, I wish I lived in a world where some things are real and some aren’t. I guess I get it in my head that my time in these camps aren’t “real” my life at home is though. Even though im here more than there ha. For some reason I feel like I create my reality more here than at home and control peoples perception of me more. Which is baseless im the same onlly I embrace different aspects of myself to get through the day here. Mostly the manic side,whereas at home I tend to let the depressed win the battle. Basketball is llife,as is everything else.

  • retloc

    Llaws against monopolies welfare etc {in case you didn’t make the leap yourself} salary cap and revenue sharing. Paying taxes is sharing revenue

  • retloc

    Also sorry my l and k don’t work right if a word looks funny its prob either missing one of those or has too many

  • retloc

    Oh yeah and that’s working for the clippers how? Location plays a role, but don’t overlook the caste system

  • shutup

    Oh, I see were the disconnect happened, for a second seemed like you guys were arguing the same point, but Retloc is arguing location does determine wage but NBK is arguing bigger cities= more team money. Although a lawyer in NY at the top of his profession will make more than a lawyer at the top of his profession in lets say Montana. Location will always play a major factor in wages, but the factor the location playes differs, Alaska has harsher climates and more danger but it also has more natural resources, most sports team need a large fan base of a major city to stay above the curve, but there are small market examples that buck that trend, Greenbay of the NFL is the first one that comes to mind.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    you don’t get it. I am not talking about the difference in job opportunities. Ofcourse there are better jobs in bigger cities, that’s obvious. Those jobs also include higher competition (meaning you get paid less than you would somewhere where they don’t have 85 people lined up to do the job). You can’t just walk to LA and get a nice job and buy a nice house. If you have a very unique skillset, sure LA is definitely going to earn you a better lifestyle, a more expensive one too. For the average person, it is more beneficial for them to live in a place that NEEDS their Skills then it is for them to live in a place that has multiple people trying to get a job. Hence, you having more benefits in Alaska than in Pennsylvania. Just read what i’m saying.

  • retloc

    I did specifically say it cost me more to be in pa too, glossing over that fact definitely enhances your arguement.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    you are obviously ignorant. The Clippers are, and have been, one of the top 5 most profitable franchises in the NBA since their expansion season. Despite the losing. If winning isn’t a priority, the Clippers is one of the best organizations to play for in the whole NBA. Why they don’t win, is directly linked to Donald Sterling. You need to do some semblance research, this is elementary basketball information.

  • shutup

    Don’t know if I helped at all but, the idea that Alaska is a worse market than Pennsylvania for gas and oil production is the reason you guys arent seeing eye to eye.

  • retloc

    I prefer being in alaska though so how does that factor in? How is it a worse market when my job is the exact same, and my life is the exact same? And did this really need to come down to questioning my mindstate? I could ask you if you are mentally retarded, does that somehow make my arguement more valid? I do the exact same thing whether im in pa or ak I stay in the same environments. Either way im away from my wife and kid, also you saying me being paid more to stay in a worse market is making my point, notyours, I was the one arguing that pay varies depending on location in the real world too.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    it cost you more to live in PA because they pay for everything for you in Alaska. It is definitely more expensive to live the same life in Alaska as you would in PA. I know this for a fact. As I have friends who are from Alaska, and have friends who moved to (and since moved back). All of which complain about the cost of living (in terms of their normal luxuries) in Alaska, compared to in the states. Which makes sense, considering truck routes, and other overhead costs that involve getting goods and services in such a remote location.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    this guy doesn’t understand the difference between a “good market” and “bad market” – the disconnect here is common sense.

Advertisement