Sunday, November 25th, 2012 at 3:17 pm  |  251 responses

Kobe Bryant: ‘I’ll Be Scoring a Lot More When [Steve] Nash Gets Back’


Kobe’s scoring numbers aren’t way down this season—he’s averaging 26.9 points per game, just one point per game less than last year. But he does expect that number to go up when point guard Steve Nash returns, allowing Kobe the chance to do less distributing and more, well, shooting. Via the OC Register: “Bryant understands how it looks. When he sets up teammates for buckets, the Lakers have been winning. When he doesn’t, they haven’t. Bryant’s pick-and-roll plays are “by far” the best attack the team has, D’Antoni said, while Steve Nash remains out because of a leg fracture. No. 2 point guard Steve Blake might be back from his abdominal strain Tuesday against Indiana, but Bryant had four assists and no turnovers in the Lakers’ hot first quarter against the Mavericks. To Bryant, though, when he sets up teammates and they don’t make shots, then he has no choice but to shoot more to try to rally. ’I've been doing this my whole career, and some nights my teammates hit more shots and that adds up to more assists for me,’ Bryant said. ‘The games we win are when the whole team is making shots. Now, if our shots aren’t going in, then I have to take more of the offensive load.’ Bryant is looking forward to Nash’s return, for sure. Nash will be re-evaluated next week. ’I'll be scoring a lot more when Nash gets back,’ Bryant said. ‘I won’t have to facilitate as much, and it will allow me to do what I do best — and that’s put the ball in the hole.’”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: ,

  • ByAnyMeansNecessary

    Wait, you think Kobe is equal to Jordan in overall skill? Seriously? And you think he matches Magic Johnson too? The walking double-double compared to the pure scorer? I don’t need to look up game highlights on YouTube. That is outright silly to say or think that Kobe and Jordan are equal in “all-encompassing skill”. Absolutely ridiculous. And that is why these type of Kobe fans make themselves look foolish. So many people have talked about Jordan being the prototype for a basketball player. His body along with his skill level. Barkley called him the strongest guard he’s ever played against. His hands were huge. Everyone knows about his athleticism with his jumping ability and his control in the air. I’d also say that LeBron came into the league more naturally talented than Kobe. He came in as a better passer, rebounder and more athletic. His improvement with adding more muscle along with his jumpshot and his defense puts him past Kobe. Man vs. man, player vs. player, Jordan and LeBron trump Kobe. The summer Kobe bulked up and came back looking like a beast in 2002-2003, he had his best overall season. Him at his best compared to what LeBron did last season which was LeBron’s best season? I’m taking LeBron from last season. He averaged 31 points in his 3rd season with an inconsistent jumpshot and no post moves. Pop can say what he wants about Kobe, I highly doubt that he would take Kobe over Duncan. The Spurs built a dynasty around Duncan. 4 titles in 8 seasons. The Lakers dynasty ended early partly because of Kobe. You talk about game highlights as if they mean more than stats…are you aware that the stats actually come from those games?

  • ByAnyMeansNecessary

    I’m taking Wilt, Bird, Shaq, Robertson, Duncan, and LeBron over Olaujuwon and I wouldn’t think about it too much at all. If Kobe and Shaq were able to get along better, they could have run off 5 or 6 in a row with Shaq leading them. That’s not a shot at The Dream. That’s just how special Wilt, Bird, Shaq, Oscar, Duncan and LeBron were/are. Hakeem was one of the most skilled big men in the history of basketball. But you don’t dismiss the physical dominance of Wilt and Shaq or even LeBron’s physical dominance.

  • Caboose

    Haha

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509819249 Gaurav P.

    I know about Magic’s rookie performance. I also know that the Lakers were Kareem’s team and he had been the best player in those Finals prior to his injury. He had 33 and 14 in two games, 38 in one game, and 40 points and 15 rebounds that he got injured. It was a remarkable performance by Magic, and one of the best in NBA history, but let’s not act as if Kareem wouldn’t have sealed that championship/MVP had it not been for his injury.

    How were Magic’s championships won that make them more significant than what Kobe won? Magic was more of a leader and team player than MJ as well – does that make him a better player?

  • Caboose

    Lol, Durant. Ok.

    1. Kobe’s first 3 years were lame.
    2. He’s touted as a great scorer but he has only 2 scoring titles.
    3. He has only one MVP (debatable at that).
    4. He has only 2 Finals MVP’s (also debatable).
    5. He has only 2 rings as the best player on his team.
    6. Poor team performance after the departure of Shaq.
    7. Poor shooting percentages in clutch situations.
    8. Kobe is 4th on the All-Time Missed Shot List (not huge, but his FG% doesn’t justify it).
    9. Middling PER.
    10. Middling shooting percentages.
    11. Lower FG% in Playoffs. Even worse in Finals.
    12. A plethora of advanced stats that I know you’ll discount.

  • Caboose

    Do you know what illogical means?

  • Bored

    i was poking fun at optimistic Laker fan. sorry i didnt think people would take the ever part so seriously.

  • Bored

    ok, why?

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    Well just look at it. There is a pretty great (and small) stretch for New York. You’ll notice the same thing if you look up Raymond Felton’s career. Or if you paid any attention last season, I’m sure you witnessed the 3 weeks of Jeremy Lin? That is, if you really need proof of D’Antoni’s ability to get the most out of true point guards.

  • rkirby

    Kobe smells a 138 point game. #kobesystem

  • Bored

    why do Kobe fans not understand this?

  • Bored

    yeah i understand that. you are right, he will be able to something with the offense. i just think that if they are trying to compete for title, maybe they dont have all the pieces yet.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    They are close. Idk if they could beat Miami in a series, but they are about as close as it gets to having the potential to do it

  • ByAnyMeansNecessary

    In 3 out of 5 of his championships, Kobe had great moments with Shaq, but those were Shaq’s teams much like Scottie having great moments with MJ, but those were MJ’s teams. In the last 2, they were his teams so on only 2 out 5, he’s been the most dominant guy on his team. Magic was mostly responsible for 4 out of 5 and the only one where he wasn’t the most dominant player for the entire Finals series was his rookie season. And he gave a performance in the game where his guy Kareem was out that was an all-time great performance. There’s no way anyone can think that Magic’s 5 and Kobe’s 5 are the same. For anyone to think that Kobe can match or move past Magic as the greatest Laker of all time is wild given that he’s now playing with Dwight Howard, Pau Gasol and Steve Nash. He has more help than he’s ever had. More help than Jordan ever had. More help than Magic ever had.

  • Bored

    yeah thats another player who is hard to compare.

  • Bored

    its like the Moneyball scene, when the old guys dont want to except that there might be another way to understand the game. we all want to believe that we can automatically understand whats good and bad with a player purely based on all the basketball we have seen through our lives but it just isnt the case. we see a dunk and all the analysis goes out the window.

  • Bored

    better than Magic? they all said that he is better than Magic?

  • Bored

    he had a better on court impact than Kobe. how can you say otherwise?

  • Bored

    so are you saying they 2nd in line at the moment on paper? or just 1st in the west? i cant really see it because of their bench but if you can explain why they pip teams like Spurs, Grizzlies and Clips, i would love to know.

  • Bored

    this is why BAMN and others seem like haters because they have to respond to comments like this. can you honestly say that Kobe is better than Oscar or Magic or even Shaq. where is your reasons?

  • Bored

    what are you saying. you cant just say players names and say these guys are better and i take him over him. no one will take you seriously if you keep saying ish like that. you are the definition of illogical.

  • Bored

    ill never figure out how Kobe fans call this hating.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509819249 Gaurav P.

    …I was right up with you until you said Kobe has more help around him now than Magic ever had. Really?!?! Really?!?!?!? You honestly believe that having James Worthy, Kareem Abdul Jabbar, Byron Scott, Michael Cooper is comparable to a 38 year old Nash and a past-his-prime Gasol? Dwight is a great player, but even on his best day, he is not 75% of the player Kareem was.

  • justin05

    I figured your first reply was just a joke because Nash will come back more motivated than ever. He and D’Antoni have a great chance to compete again and now they have teamates in Howard, Gasol, Bryant, Artest, Jamison? These players are towards the end of their careers now but that gives them an edge come playoff time. I’ll take defense, poise, experience, and Kobe in the last 5 minutes over athleticism, youth, and potential. I see the Lakers as 3rd-4th best in the West despite their record but they will only continue to play stronger if healthy.

  • justin05

    I understand you just don’t like Kobe as a person. It’s hard for me to defend him because of how he talks but he was my favorite player growing up so I’m not going to let ppl bash on him when it has nothing to do with the article. 30 points a game is a great goal for him.

  • justin05

    Isn’t that how you win a game? Whichever team scores the most points? I thought you were intelligent Caboose..

  • justin05

    Kobe could be top 5 if he wins another ring or two. When i said 5-10 I meant somewhere between them

  • justin05

    Yup, I was saying the same thing Drig’r. Lakeshow and Conor have been defending as well but Caboose and bamn just see things differently. It isn’t their fault I suppose..we’re all just people with our own opinions. At least we all share a pasiion for this game.

  • justin05

    You already lost your argument awhile ago but when I said 5-10 all-time I meant in between. If he finishes his career w/ 7 rings then I would consider him a top 5 player all-time. At the end of the day these “all-time” lists are all a matter of opinion though. Bryant is already a top 5 scorer btw pal, I say he finishes #4 at the end of his career (he’ll pass Jordan but I can’t say Kobe was a better scorer than Mike). There is a clear line on this basketball website and it started a while back w/ the Wade vs. Kobe debate. I just can’t stand it when I read an article (a good one at that) about my favorite NBA player and then read continuous negative comments about the guy when he said nothing wrong. SHOW MORE RESPECT. You stat guys care so much about numbers but do you realize how difficult it is to win a championship?

  • justin05

    LOL quit making Caboose look bad. These guys are smart but they just don’t see the game the same way as we do. They call it a Laker fan thing so we might as well just call them stat nerds. I don’t even know why we waste our time on a guy who has Halo as his picture. Play more ball and less video games bro..

  • justin05

    You said it perfectly man. These guys should show more respect for one of the greats.

  • ByAnyMeansNecessary

    You can’t compare Dwight to Kareem in that way. A better way to do it would be to compare Kareem’s place in the league during that time period compared to Dwight’s place in today’s game. In today’s game, Dwight is the best big man in basketball. Which means that if Kobe wins, it would be his 4th championship playing with the best center in basketball. Steve Nash is one of the best, if not the best, passers in basketball and one of the best free throw shooters ever. Gasol, while he may not be the player he was when he first got to LA, is still one of the most skilled big men in basketball. Michael Cooper was a great defender, but he’s not a Hall of Famer. Which means that Magic played with only one Hall of Famer in Kareem. Kobe is now playing with one guy in Nash who will easily get in, one in Gasol who should get in being the best Spanish player to ever play, and one in Dwight who, if he wins 1 or 2 championships or gets a few more Defensive Player of the Year awards, will also be in. That’s Kobe playing with 3 Hall of Famers compared to Magic playing with 1.

  • Caboose

    I’ve got nothing against the man himself. It’s his irrational supporters I can’t stand. Do I attack Kobe personally? No. Do I speculate about his relationship with teammates? No. What do I do that makes you so against me? I can tell you why I’m against you. It’s quite simple: I have facts and stats. You do not. You argue from subjectivity. I argue from objectivity. In the academic world, that makes you wrong. I guess in online-basketball-land, subjective viewing is worth more than actual data. If that’s true, then you’re right, and I’ve been wrong all along.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=509819249 Gaurav P.

    I think you’re forgetting that James Worthy was a HOF player and a NBA Finals MVP with Magic on his team. Kobe is on a team with a past his prime Nash and Gasol (admittedly, Kobe is past his prime as well), and a Dwight in his prime. Yes, Nash and potentially Gasol are hall of famers, but to say that this team is any way comparable to the Laker teams of the 80s is laughable. This team in 2006? Sure. Not so much in 2012.

  • Caboose

    Ok, I’m done with the Kobe argument. Do I give a sh*t if I can’t convince you that Kobe isn’t top 5 all time? No. I’ve learned that while some people can listen to reason and not rely solely on what they’ve learned from the media or their own subjective eyes, most cannot. You included. The arguments I’ve heard are never based on anything objective; they need to be justified by something that is unquantifiable. I’ll share this here: I’m also an atheist for the same reason. The existence of a god cannot be proven rationally; it is solely based on subjective, biased observation. I believe in logic and facts and they say, there is no god. The same thing applies here. I don’t “believe” in the greatness of Kobe just because it’s the thing that we’re all told to think. I question. I look. I find the real facts behind players’ careers and it’s quite simple: stats do not support Kobe. I don’t think highly enough of my own observation to make an informed judgment about a player’s legacy, especially since I’ve never seen many of the past players live. Neither have most people here. So, I don’t just rely on what my eyes tell me. They can lie, because of biases. Instead, I look to what can be quantified, what removes any subjective bias. If you or any others prefer to reject what the logical world tells you and instead rely on popular opinion and your own beliefs, fine. But don’t expect me to respect such an obviously weak, unjustifiable, unprovable, personal, and utterly unscientific viewpoint.

  • Datkid

    yeah but it’s more than that and again I’m no kobe stan but I also figured that as skilled and knowledgeable as he is, if he wasn’t such an egomaniac he could be crazy efficient. like It’d be kinda cool if after all these years of being a chucking jerk, at the end of his career he turns in a super efficient 50-40-90 season w/ great passing #’s.

  • Datkid

    you are a jackass sir.

  • Datkid

    I hear you… but I’d take a fully healthy nash,pau,and dwight over an ancient kareem and james worthy. I’m with BAMN on this one.

  • Caboose

    By that logic, Wilt is the GOAT.

  • Bored

    i think this might be the first time i agree with you. no offense, just differing opinions. well except that Jamison part.

  • Bored

    do you mean top scorer in actual points accumulated? not a subjective rating of the top 5 scorers? do you mean he will move pass MJ because he has more total points? because i shouldnt be having to tell you that there is a HUGE games difference.

  • Conor

    @disqus_oxoGJMLagc:disqus, too:

    You, and those who think like you, will never be swayed because you cannot muster enough debating nobility to look past your dislike of the man. If you honestly think that your opinions are worth more on the matter than those who have coached & played with Bryant: think again.

    I could just as easily argue that Jordan & his Bulls were especially dominant during an expansion era that saw the old guard, the golden guard of the NBA replaced with a lesser roster of players… I could say that it’s precisely because LeBron James has an inconsistent jump shot or that Shaquille O’Neal couldn’t score from outside of five feet & both benefited from rulebook exceptions (travels & charges, respectively) while being inferior defensively – in every facet of the discipline – to Kobe that makes the latter the best of the three… That Jordan himself said that Kobe is his only logical comparison, man-to-man… I could say all these things, support it with the opinions of professional players and coaches, video recordings, and the like, but I know that you cannot be swayed. No matter what people other than John Hollinger, Henry Abbott, and that little voice at the back of your head that makes you dislike the man say to you… no, prove to you – with logic, with evidence – you will never change your minds because you are incapable of seeing reason and proof which is not your own.

    Ultimately, you’ll tell me that a man who forced his franchise to fire its coach is a more commendable understudy than another who allowed his to leave by his own accord. You’ll tell me that a man who once punched his point guard in the face was a greater teammate because he called him to apologize about assaulting him later that day. You will give me numbers written by like-minded zealots that have already been discredited by a series of comments by @disqus_j65FuvcSML:disqus. You will do all of this, and I will laugh and continue to disprove your eternal, boring theories with logic at its most basic because, in the end, it’s hilarious to get you to repeat the same thing for the 5000th time with the same, unmolested certainty of the 1st. In the end, I’m right.

    Have a good day.

  • Drig’r

    Isn’t this another stat which factors in FG% indirectly instead of TS% or eFG%????

    Help me out here and explain how there’s such a huge disparity in the WS of Kobe, Jordan and Scottie…….

  • Drig’r

    GOAT list is subjective.

    All time scorers : Kobe 6th? WTF?? Dude’s the best scorer in L history. He has a more complete game than Jordan esp. from range and just as efficient if allowed to play his game ( like he’s doing now ).

    How the hell have 4 guys come between Kobe and Jordan?? Their TS% and eFG% are virtually identical.

  • ByAnyMeansNecessary

    The best way to compare them would be to compare them to the teams in the league at that time. At this time, the Lakers have the best starting 5 in basketball. Kobe is playing with easily the most talented team he’s ever played on. That’s not really up for discussion.

  • ByAnyMeansNecessary

    …What evidence has anyone given besides Kobe scores a lot and he has 5 championships? lol. People can’t even talk truthfully about how he’s won them or why he’s won them without his fanatics losing their minds. @LakeShow has never said anything about Kobe that proves anything besides cheering for others like you. Rarely has he said anything original. No one has given any evidence here on Kobe being equal to Jordan in anything or being a top 5 player of all-time. Nothing. All anyone has said is that he has 5 rings and he is a great scorer. That’s it. If you think that those arguments have somehow proven what they were meant to prove, you’re out of your mind. Plenty of people have presented evidence showing that Jordan was superior, LeBron is superior, D-Wade has been superior for the past few seasons, Oscar Robertson and Larry Bird were definitely superior, and all Kobe fans have said amounts to “No, you’re wrong. I like Kobe. He has 5 rings. He has scored a lot of points. You’re a hater.” A 4 year old could come up with arguments like that. In what world is any of that proof for anything at all? That is precisely why his fans on here are a complete joke. I hope he has better fans than you all because you’re all pitiful when you try to stick up for him here.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    no it isn’t another stat that indirectly factors FG% instead of TS% or eFG%. I just explained in the comment you responded to how you come up with the statistic.
    .
    and frankly, i would have argued Pau had a greater effect on LA winning than Kobe did. The thing that the stat doesn’t higlight by itself, is that Pau’s effect is only greater than Kobe’s because he was playing with Andrew Bynum (and vice versa for Bynum). As individuals it would be stupid to say either were more important than Bryant. But as a pair? Yes, they were more important.

  • http://twitter.com/sooperfadeaway nbk

    ok so, as you know, or at least as i’ve said on here numerous times, PER is a basic stat that gives a great idea of a player’s OFFENSIVE production. — it does factor in some defensive statistics, but really, the offense is what matters. And the stat totally over values defensive rebounds. I mean completely and utterly. Which is why you always see Kevin Love at the top of the PER rankings, despite him being a horrid defender, and routinely ineffective in terms of changing his teams fortunes.

    .

    with that being said, Jefferson has been a starter since his 2nd year, his career averages of 16 points and 9 rebounds on 50% shooting are just flat out valued more than Nash’s 14 points and 8.6 assists.

    .

    But if you look at their stats since each became a starter Nash’s PER is 21.2 while Jefferson’s is 21.1

  • justin05

    Jamison seems to be washed up but he came to LA to win a ring so maybe he’s waiting for the playoffs.

  • justin05

    Your brain thinks up some funny sh*t. I’ll take ppg over almost any other stat because that is how you win a basketball game, scoring more points than the opponent. Everything is an argument for you but I’m not trying to debate. I’m telling you how it is young blood.

Advertisement