Monday, November 5th, 2012 at 11:05 am  |  250 responses

OKC Thunder Not Worried About Team Chemistry Without James Harden


Perhaps the OKC Thunder are still stunned by the James Harden trade to Houston, as they’ve gotten off to a slow start this season. But, to a man, the Thunder think they will be fine going forward. Despite the major shakeup, team chemistry isn’t and won’t be an issue in OKC, according to the Thunder. Per CBS Sports: “The Thunder made the decision not just to look toward the long-term plan when they traded Harden, but also to place that future in the hands of Russell Westbrook and Kevin Durant. General manager Sam Presti not only believes in his vision, but in his two young superstars as well. The core of the Thunder might be shaken, it might be rattled, but the mission remains unchanged. And the battery that powers this powerful Thunder team still runs strong. There was a certain tightness, an incredible closeness between the Thunder’s young core and losing a key piece like Harden should obviously disturb some of that togetherness and chemistry. The hole left by Harden’s departure might be unfilled — Kevin Martin’s locker is well away from Harden’s old digs — but Scott Brooks has no choice but to move his team forward and focus on the goal. ‘James [Harden] was a good player,” Brooks said. ‘Don’t get me wrong. But he wasn’t Dr. James. He wasn’t helping the group stick together. All the guys do. Russell, Kevin, down the line, Perk, Nick. All the guys. That’s what makes good teams … I’ve never once went into a practice or a game thinking ‘Oh my gosh, I’m really worried about our chemistry tonight,’ Brooks said. ‘[Chemistry] was never a question. It really wasn’t. I think when you talk about chemistry with our group and if you question it, I don’t think you’ve been around our group as long as I have.’ Martin summarized his view of fitting in with the Thunder simply after his first practice: ‘Talent isn’t the problem, it’s just going to be chemistry.’ […] ‘You can’t duplicate it,’ Westbrook said of chemistry, ‘but we have a group of guys that have been here for a while. We’re switching the team up a little bit but every year we’ve had a different team and we’ve found a way to incorporate guys and make sure everybody knows what it takes for us to win. So I don’t think that’s going to be a problem.’”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , ,

  • Datkid

    oh that’s what your beef is? that they’re not getting to the finals? bc if so I absolutely agree. What they have now is not good enough to get them to the finals. and while you’re right that Westbrook’s instincts gotta get better, I’m not sure even that will make the thunder potent enough. NBK has a point when he says that the thunder’s basic strategy was to RUN at you for a full unrelenting 48. and they can still do that but the drop off between a 29 year old Kevin Martin and a 23 year old James Harden is significant enough where the Lakers can take them… unless PJ3 and Jeremy Lamb turn out to be monsters. which they might be. we’ll see.

  • Datkid

    oh that’s what your beef is? that they’re not getting to the finals? bc if so I absolutely agree. What they have now is not good enough to get them to the finals. and while you’re right that Westbrook’s instincts gotta get better, I’m not sure even that will make the thunder potent enough. NBK has a point when he says that the thunder’s basic strategy was to RUN at you for a full unrelenting 48. and they can still do that but the drop off between a 29 year old Kevin Martin and a 23 year old James Harden is significant enough where the Lakers can take them… unless PJ3 and Jeremy Lamb turn out to be monsters. which they might be. we’ll see.

  • Datkid

    oh that’s what your beef is? that they’re not getting to the finals? bc if so I absolutely agree. What they have now is not good enough to get them to the finals. and while you’re right that Westbrook’s instincts gotta get better, I’m not sure even that will make the thunder potent enough. NBK has a point when he says that the thunder’s basic strategy was to RUN at you for a full unrelenting 48. and they can still do that but the drop off between a 29 year old Kevin Martin and a 23 year old James Harden is significant enough where the Lakers can take them… unless PJ3 and Jeremy Lamb turn out to be monsters. which they might be. we’ll see.

  • Datkid

    oh that’s what your beef is? that they’re not getting to the finals? bc if so I absolutely agree. What they have now is not good enough to get them to the finals. and while you’re right that Westbrook’s instincts gotta get better, I’m not sure even that will make the thunder potent enough. NBK has a point when he says that the thunder’s basic strategy was to RUN at you for a full unrelenting 48. and they can still do that but the drop off between a 29 year old Kevin Martin and a 23 year old James Harden is significant enough where the Lakers can take them… unless PJ3 and Jeremy Lamb turn out to be monsters. which they might be. we’ll see.

  • Datkid

    oh that’s what your beef is? that they’re not getting to the finals? bc if so I absolutely agree. What they have now is not good enough to get them to the finals. and while you’re right that Westbrook’s instincts gotta get better, I’m not sure even that will make the thunder potent enough. NBK has a point when he says that the thunder’s basic strategy was to RUN at you for a full unrelenting 48. and they can still do that but the drop off between a 29 year old Kevin Martin and a 23 year old James Harden is significant enough where the Lakers can take them… unless PJ3 and Jeremy Lamb turn out to be monsters. which they might be. we’ll see.

  • Datkid

    oh that’s what your beef is? that they’re not getting to the finals? bc if so I absolutely agree. What they have now is not good enough to get them to the finals. and while you’re right that Westbrook’s instincts gotta get better, I’m not sure even that will make the thunder potent enough. NBK has a point when he says that the thunder’s basic strategy was to RUN at you for a full unrelenting 48. and they can still do that but the drop off between a 29 year old Kevin Martin and a 23 year old James Harden is significant enough where the Lakers can take them… unless PJ3 and Jeremy Lamb turn out to be monsters. which they might be. we’ll see.

  • YaMama

    Why, thank you sir.

  • YaMama

    Why, thank you sir.

  • YaMama

    Why, thank you sir.

  • YaMama

    Why, thank you sir.

  • YaMama

    Why, thank you sir.

  • YaMama

    Why, thank you sir.

  • YaMama

    Why, thank you sir.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    They absolutely do need Westbrook. I just think someone else would be better. Swap him with Rondo and they improve. But about getting it together, definitely, theyll be up there. But they aint winning the chip. That’s coming down to Bron and Kobe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    They absolutely do need Westbrook. I just think someone else would be better. Swap him with Rondo and they improve. But about getting it together, definitely, theyll be up there. But they aint winning the chip. That’s coming down to Bron and Kobe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    They absolutely do need Westbrook. I just think someone else would be better. Swap him with Rondo and they improve. But about getting it together, definitely, theyll be up there. But they aint winning the chip. That’s coming down to Bron and Kobe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    They absolutely do need Westbrook. I just think someone else would be better. Swap him with Rondo and they improve. But about getting it together, definitely, theyll be up there. But they aint winning the chip. That’s coming down to Bron and Kobe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    They absolutely do need Westbrook. I just think someone else would be better. Swap him with Rondo and they improve. But about getting it together, definitely, theyll be up there. But they aint winning the chip. That’s coming down to Bron and Kobe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    They absolutely do need Westbrook. I just think someone else would be better. Swap him with Rondo and they improve. But about getting it together, definitely, theyll be up there. But they aint winning the chip. That’s coming down to Bron and Kobe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    They absolutely do need Westbrook. I just think someone else would be better. Swap him with Rondo and they improve. But about getting it together, definitely, theyll be up there. But they aint winning the chip. That’s coming down to Bron and Kobe.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    Philly is going to suck. ATL will be better than Brooklyn and maybe Chicago and Indiana.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    Philly is going to suck. ATL will be better than Brooklyn and maybe Chicago and Indiana.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    Philly is going to suck. ATL will be better than Brooklyn and maybe Chicago and Indiana.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    Philly is going to suck. ATL will be better than Brooklyn and maybe Chicago and Indiana.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    Philly is going to suck. ATL will be better than Brooklyn and maybe Chicago and Indiana.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    Philly is going to suck. ATL will be better than Brooklyn and maybe Chicago and Indiana.

  • http://www.facebook.com/evan.boland Evan Boland

    Philly is going to suck. ATL will be better than Brooklyn and maybe Chicago and Indiana.

  • http://www.facebook.com/shooting.guard.319 Shooting Guard

    talk about living in denial, and doing it casualy

  • http://www.facebook.com/shooting.guard.319 Shooting Guard

    talk about living in denial, and doing it casualy

  • http://www.facebook.com/shooting.guard.319 Shooting Guard

    talk about living in denial, and doing it casualy

  • http://www.facebook.com/shooting.guard.319 Shooting Guard

    talk about living in denial, and doing it casualy

  • http://www.facebook.com/shooting.guard.319 Shooting Guard

    talk about living in denial, and doing it casualy

  • http://www.facebook.com/shooting.guard.319 Shooting Guard

    talk about living in denial, and doing it casualy

  • http://www.facebook.com/shooting.guard.319 Shooting Guard

    talk about living in denial, and doing it casualy

  • danpowers

    yes, he does. that is his flaw. but he also makes good things like pressuring opposing defenses non stop wich also helps the thunder win games as durant and brooks say. he aint perfect but he plays with fire. we saw in the finals what he is cabable of doing. i wouldnt underestimate that

  • danpowers

    yes, he does. that is his flaw. but he also makes good things like pressuring opposing defenses non stop wich also helps the thunder win games as durant and brooks say. he aint perfect but he plays with fire. we saw in the finals what he is cabable of doing. i wouldnt underestimate that

  • danpowers

    yes, he does. that is his flaw. but he also makes good things like pressuring opposing defenses non stop wich also helps the thunder win games as durant and brooks say. he aint perfect but he plays with fire. we saw in the finals what he is cabable of doing. i wouldnt underestimate that

  • danpowers

    yes, he does. that is his flaw. but he also makes good things like pressuring opposing defenses non stop wich also helps the thunder win games as durant and brooks say. he aint perfect but he plays with fire. we saw in the finals what he is cabable of doing. i wouldnt underestimate that

  • danpowers

    yes, he does. that is his flaw. but he also makes good things like pressuring opposing defenses non stop wich also helps the thunder win games as durant and brooks say. he aint perfect but he plays with fire. we saw in the finals what he is cabable of doing. i wouldnt underestimate that

  • danpowers

    yes, he does. that is his flaw. but he also makes good things like pressuring opposing defenses non stop wich also helps the thunder win games as durant and brooks say. he aint perfect but he plays with fire. we saw in the finals what he is cabable of doing. i wouldnt underestimate that

  • danpowers

    yes, he does. that is his flaw. but he also makes good things like pressuring opposing defenses non stop wich also helps the thunder win games as durant and brooks say. he aint perfect but he plays with fire. we saw in the finals what he is cabable of doing. i wouldnt underestimate that

  • biggieman

    Yeah Redd, we all must have been born dumb because you seem to be the only one who agrees with you. I really like DRose also, but there is no way you can deny that they play very similar. Rose has never gotten to play with a great player, but if he did he would struggle the same way Westbrook does with decision making. When you are that talented, it is tough to not take the ball yourself, Rose does that whenever he wants and jacks up shots because there is no one else on his level in Chicago. Westbrook does the same thing but is ridiculed because he plays with Durant. That is the difference between the love and the hate. This is my last response Redd… so keep hating on Westbrook as he climbs the ranks of the best in the league and has a better career than Rose.

  • Redd

    …A better career? Rose has an MVP, Westbrook is the moron screwing it up for OKC. LOL, I don’t think I’ll be losing any sleep over OKC losing cause of him. Rose is NOT Westbrook, Westbrook is a SG, Rose is a PG. Westbrook is a bad decision maker & the guy holding KD back. Rose is the guy who can control the urge to shoot & does what needs to be done.

  • Redd

    Did you watch the Spurs game? He drove in, wide open lay ups which he missed consistently. Yeah he’s got speed & penetration but never realizes when he’s cold.

  • http://twitter.com/Jzakoni Verified Account

    yes mam

  • http://twitter.com/Jzakoni Verified Account

    i gotta agree with @Red7252:disqus westbrooks decisions boogle my mind sometimes

  • http://twitter.com/Jzakoni Verified Account

    agreed

  • hardenoverratedoverpaid

    good in regular season, sucks in playoffs when it counts. when the lanes to the rim close off, and the defense gets up close and personal, he is too small to do his thing in the association. good in regular season, big zero in the playoffs. good move by thunder long term and short term.

  • danpowers

    thats really annoying at times. but when he gets hot or has an average game he is better or as good as anyone out there

  • danpowers

    mine too. its just that this is not the only thing that defines his game

Advertisement