Wednesday, January 23rd, 2013 at 10:55 am  |  63 responses

Lakers Management Blames the Players Not Head Coach Mike D’Antoni


As the Los Angeles Lakers’ hellish season trudges forward, the vast majority of the blame for their troubles has fallen on the shoulders of head coach Mike D’Antoni. Fans and the media see him as the main culprit for this ongoing disaster. As for the only voices that truly matter — those belonging to the Laker front-office and ownership group — they seem to think the players (and their perceived lack of effort) are at fault. Per ESPN: “Without a doubt, we have utmost confidence in Mike (D’Antoni) as a coach,’ GM Mitch Kupchak said. ‘I think if you spoke to him, his vision on Day 1 was dramatically different than it is today. It’s the coach’s job to adjust and to make changes. Sometimes a player is just not going to fit. Sometimes a coach has to make changes and compromise in the way he’s done things and I think that’s what Mike is going through right now is just the process. The Lakers have hit the midway point of the season riding a three-game losing skid as some of the promises made in D’Antoni’s introductory news conference in November are starting to ring hollow. D’Antoni claimed the team should “easily” average 110-115 points per game under his guidance. They’ve crossed the 110-point threshold just eight times in the 31 games since he took over, going 5-3. At the time of D’Antoni’s hiring, Kupchak said the new coach’s system was “more suited to the talent” on the Lakers than Phil Jackson’s Triangle offense, and yet several players have had a difficult time fitting in — Dwight Howard has sniped publicly about his lack of post-up and shot attempts, Pau Gasol has balked at accepting his role off the bench and free agent acquisitions Antawn Jamison and Jodie Meeks have both had to endure strings of DNP-CDs (Did Not Play — Coaching Decision) under D’Antoni. Yet, Kupchak said D’Antoni’s shuffling of the roster is evidence that the coach is willing to change and try new things in order to try to start winning. ‘It’s not like he started a week or two ago trying to figure this thing out,’ Kupchak said. ‘He’s been searching for combinations now for probably six to eight weeks. Understandably, I think the longer the season goes the more is at stake and the bigger hole you dig, the more dramatic your adjustments or your take on coaching has to become. I think that’s what he’s doing. He’s grabbing every rabbit out of the hat trying to look for something that works.’ [...] ‘You don’t want to get too emotional one way or the other, but, we’re halfway through now,’ Kupchak said. ‘Quite frankly, we’ve dug a hole and I think it’s frustrating for everybody. It’s certainly not what anybody or everybody expected halfway through the season.’ Kupchak singled out the Lakers’ effort, or lack thereof, as the most frustrating part to see. ‘I’m a little bit concerned about our effort,” Kupchak said. “I’d like to see better effort on the court. When the ball is not bouncing your way, when shots aren’t going in, you just can’t seem to get a break, the one thing you can control on the court is your effort and loose balls and running the floor, defending, offensive rebounding. I think back to the Miami game and I have that vision of LeBron (James) diving on that ball at midcourt. That’s effort. It’s natural when things get tough to hesitate and be unsure, lose confidence. That’s one thing that we can’t let happen. We have to maintain our confidence and our effort more than anything has to be at an all-time (high) to get through this period.’”

  • Add a Comment
  • Share
  • RSS

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

  • MasterSplinter

    Cosign LakeShow…. That’s the most ignorant statement i’ve read this week…. Oh by the way…Kobe is shooting 47% which isn’t horrible. Kobe wants to win… period. You saying Kobe wouldn’t be happy averaging 21 points with a 10-game win streak should let everyone on this site know to not take your posts seriously. He only averages 8 more points than that. You don’t think he would average 4 less baskets a game for 10 wins in a row?…..smh

  • MasterSplinter

    The San Antonio Spurs are pretty loyal, they don’t move their core players very much, or their coaches. They have had the same core for almost a decade. Which is why their franchise is always in the mix, they all trust each other, and don’t play with the same dramatic issues as other teams.

  • Raz

    Dantoni, is not changing his strategy at all, just shuffling the lineups. He is not adaptable. I think Einstein said the definition of insanity was to keep trying the same thing and expect a different result

  • pposse

    i do recall the Miami Heat going to the finals in their first year that they were put together. They didn’t have a bench nor did they have a Center, still made it to the finals. This LA Laker team has ZERO excuses. You don’t trade for Dwight Howard, bring in Nash with Kobe and Pau and not expect championship is absurd.

  • pposse

    child please..they don’t move the core cause the core players constantly take pay cuts so that they can play with each other. If anything SA management is up front with their players, and say “hey this needs to go down, or this will happen” wherein Duncan and Ginobli graciously take pay cuts for the “better of the team” – that has nothing to do with management and more to do with the players and their business savvy (or lack thereof, however you want to look at it)

  • Redd

    Yeah thanks can’t believe I didn’t mention them, lol.

  • Omar

    Hilarious because I blame Lakers managament!

  • Vince

    Yes but the Miami Heat had something the Lakers didn’t – chemistry and talent. Lebron and Bosh both wanted to go to South Beach, they had played together already a few times in the All-Star games, they were good friends, etc. There was already an underlying friendship that meant they were comfortable with each other.

    Talent wise, you can’t compare the Heat to the Lakers, Kobe is, well Kobe. Howard has just come back from back surgery, Nash is 38, Pau is soft, Blake is washed up and Artest is… MWP. The Heat have the Big Three, who play hard, are efficient, are high volume scorers, can fill out an entire stat sheet and are team players, they also have Haslem who although undersized is a banger in the post and Mario Chalmers who is a 3-point threat and decent ball distributor.

    Heat > Lakers

    The Lakers’ problem is they thought that bringing those three together will instantly bring them a championship. They have that ‘entitled’ attitude where they think that whatever roster move they do will lead them to the Second Round at least. No. Management screwed this up.

  • pposse

    the players may have an entitled attitude, but thats up to the coach to fix.

    Last year the whole world was saying that Dwight Howard was a better center than Bynum, everyone not named Shaquille O’neil that is. I’m feeling like you are pulling some revisionist history right now. The management just traded for the best C in the league, retained the combo of Kobe and Pau (2X championship duo) and upgraded from Ramon Sessions at pg to a former 2 time MVP while having a formidable veteran named Antwan Jamison come off the bench. That team on paper is stacked. If I am the owner of the Lakers, in July i am shaking my GM’s hands and buying him a bottle of Luis the XIII and a freshly rolled cubans. They don’t perform cause of the coaching imo.

    The only mismanagement that occurred was not firing mike brown earlier and hiring d’antoni instead.

  • Vince

    Well I guess thats where we disagree. Anyone who thinks Dwight was/is the best C in the L was/is misguided.

    1. He was coming out of a very tense and very public spat with Orlando

    2. He’s a great player but very weak mentally

    3. He was going to have major surgery on his back during the offseason

    If those aren’t red flags I don’t know what is. Bynum was coming out of arguably his best season as a pro, he is stronger mentally, better offensively than Dwight, although not as athletic, and IMO on the same level defensively as Howard. Trading him away was very poor decision making.

    Now, onto the already incumbent Lakers F Pau Gasol, personally I never liked him, he’s too soft in my eyes, although I can see what he brings to the table. If anything, he should’ve been the one to be traded.

    Now if you’re trying to sell me that anyone thought Antwan Jamison had anything left in the tank coming into the season, I ain’t buying. He had a very uninspiring season in Cleveland, and was about to turn 36. He was a while away from his prime.

    Lakers should’ve tried to get some younger players to join the squad, the Meeks signing was a good one, and keeping Hill was another. Unfortunately thats it. A bench consisting of Duhon, Meeks, Hill, Jamison, Clarke and other loose pieces won’t and hasn’t achieved much.

    STEVE NASH CAN’T PLAY D AND IS 38. God damn people, how hard is that to understand, they should’ve kept Sessions!

    Coaching wise, I’m neutral on Brown and D’Antoni, given the right situation they’ll thrive, LA was not that situation. I think Brown did alright in his first season, and I would’ve rather seen the Zen Master signed than D’Antoni. If management wanted to support D’Antoni and give him the best shot to do well and get into the playoffs they would’ve shipped Gasol out of town for a 4 who can stretch the floor (and somehow get their hands on even some mediocre talent for their bench).

    Management screwed up.

  • MasterSplinter

    pposse you just prove my point…. players wouldn’t do that without loyalty both ways. I’ve seen your posts….you argue to argue. Bring some valid points. What’s your argument…..that the Spurs aren’t loyal? Go wake your gf or bf up and argue about stuff that makes no sense…

  • pposse

    the only thing spurs management is loyal to is money then winning, just like every other management group out there (thats my thesis). They might put a higher premium on winning than some, but don’t get it twisted and act like this franchise cares extra special about their players than any other one. They found a formula (Pop plus Duncan Parker and Ginobli) that keeps them in the mix for a decade so they stay with it. Tell me tho, has this combination won a championship since Duncan turned 32? But they are good enough to get into deep rounds in the playoffs, which ultimately creates more revenue for the team. Why would anyone want to tweek that?

  • MasterSplinter

    Still arguing just to argue, your funny…. How does any of what you just said prove that the Spurs management aren’t loyal? Your thesis? Lol…..who said anything about winning a championship, we were talking about loyal management. Now you are just trying to argue a point that has no relevance to what we were talking about.

Advertisement